Comparison of the efficacy and adverse effects of oral ferrous succinate tablets and intravenous iron sucrose: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinical efficacy and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of iron preparations. METHODS: A total of 374 patients with iron deficiency anaemia admitted to our hospital between 1 January and 31 December 2020 were included in this study. They were divided into 2 groups based on their medication regimens: Group A (n = 187) took oral ferrous succinate tablets, and Group B (n = 187) received intravenous iron sucrose. The remission of major symptoms, laboratory test results, ADRs and other related data were collected after 4 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Compared with the pre-treatment baseline, haemoglobin (Hb), serum iron (SI), serum ferritin (SF) and the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) increased in both groups at 4 weeks of treatment (P < 0.05). After treatment, Group A had lower levels of Hb (108.41 ± 8.39 vs. 122.31 ± 6.04 g/L, t = 6.293, P < 0.001), SI (9.72 ± 4.24 vs. 15.62 ± 5.41 µmol/L, t = 5.482, P < 0.001) and SF (27.1 ± 10.82 vs. 39.82 ± 10.44 ug/L, t = 6.793, P < 0.001) compared with Group B. In contrast, there was no significant difference in the post-treatment level of MCV (P > 0.05). The overall response rate significantly differed between the 2 groups (78.61% vs. 90.91%, χ2 = 10.949, P < 0.001). The incidence of ADRs of both groups were similar, and the difference was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.035, P = 0.851). CONCLUSION: Iron sucrose demonstrates favourable efficacy and safety in treating iron deficiency anaemia.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for preventing acute kidney injury.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is characterised by a rapid decline in kidney function and is caused by a variety of clinical conditions. The incidence of AKI in hospitalised adults is high. In animal studies, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) have been shown to act as a novel nephroprotective agent against ischaemic, toxic, and septic AKI by inhibiting apoptosis, promoting cell proliferation, and inducing antioxidant and anti-inflammatory responses. As a result, ESAs may reduce the incidence of AKI in humans. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted on the efficacy and safety of ESAs, but no prior systematic reviews exist that comprehensively examine ESAs with respect to AKI prevention, although the effectiveness of these agents has been examined for a range of other diseases and clinical situations. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of ESAs for preventing AKI in the context of any health condition. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 30 August 2024 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs and quasi-RCTs (in which allocation to treatment was based on alternate assignment or order of medical records, admission dates, date of birth or other non-random methods) that compared ESAs with placebo or standard care in people at risk of AKI. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias for included studies. We used random-effects model meta-analyses to perform quantitative synthesis of the data. We used the I2 statistic to measure heterogeneity amongst the studies in each analysis. We indicated summary estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with their 95% confidence interval (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for each main outcome using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 20 studies (36 records, 5348 participants) were included. The number of participants ranged from 10 to 1302, and most studies were carried out in single centres (13/20). All the included studies compared ESAs to placebo or usual care. Many of the studies were judged to have unclear or high risk of reporting bias, but were at low risk for other types of bias. ESAs, when compared to control interventions, may make little or no difference to the risk of AKI (18 studies, 5314 participants: RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.10; I² = 19%; moderate-certainty evidence), death (18 studies, 5263 participants: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.06; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence), or the initiation of dialysis (14 studies, 2059 participants: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.51; I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence). Even with standardised measurement of AKI, the studies showed no difference in results between different routes of administration (subcutaneous or intravenous), background diseases (cardiac surgeries, children or neonates, other adults at risk of AKI), or duration or dose of ESA. ESAs may make little or no difference to the risk of thrombosis when compared to control interventions (8 studies, 3484 participants: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.24; I² = 0%). Similarly, there were probably no differences in kidney function measures and adverse events such as myocardial infarction, stroke or hypertension. However, this may be due to the low incidence of these adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In patients at risk of AKI, ESAs probably do not reduce the risk of AKI or death and may not reduce the need for starting dialysis. Similarly, there were probably no differences in kidney function measures and adverse events such as thrombosis, myocardial infarction, stroke or hypertension. There are currently two ongoing studies that have either not been completed or published, and it is unclear whether they will change the results. Caution should be exercised when using ESAs to prevent AKI.

UK survey of patient and caregiver perspectives on the impact of chronic kidney disease-associated anaemia.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated anaemia has substantial biopsychosocial impacts. This study explores the impact of CKD-associated anaemia and treatment preferences from the patient perspective. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Anonymised online survey implemented by Ipsos UK on behalf of the National Kidney Federation and GSK from October 2022 to January 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected from UK adults living with CKD (self-reported). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were exploratory and not predefined. The cross-sectional survey was designed to explore the biopsychosocial impact of living with anaemia on individuals with CKD; their unmet needs; the treatment strategies typically implemented and the associated barriers/facilitators to adherence; the healthcare professional-patient relationship with regard to anaemia diagnosis and management. RESULTS: Of 101 participants, 90 (89%) were patients with CKD and 11 (11%) were informal carers. 96 (95%) participants reported symptom(s) relevant to their experience of CKD. 88 (87%) participants reported symptom(s) associated with anaemia and 61 (64%) expressed an impact on daily life including 18 (19%) unable to perform daily activities, 13 (14%) unable to go to work and 9 (9%) reporting poor social life/interactions. 85 (84%) participants reported they have received treatment for anaemia: intravenous iron (n=55, 54%), iron tablets (n=29, 29%), erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) via an autoinjector (n=28, 28%), ESA injections via a syringe (n=24, 24%), ESA injections via a dialysis machine (n=17, 17%), folic acid (n=22, 22%) and blood transfusion (n=17, 17%). Six of seven (86%) participants who received their ESA from a healthcare professional at home preferred injections whereas 13/27 (48%) participants who injected themselves at home preferred oral tablets. CONCLUSIONS: There is not a 'one-size-fits-all' approach to the management of CKD-associated anaemia. A personalised approach incorporating the treatment preferences of the individual should be explored when discussing treatment options.

Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose versus oral ferrous sulphate for the treatment of moderate to severe postpartum anaemia in Nigerian women (IVON-PP): protocol for an open-label randomised controlled type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

INTRODUCTION: Postpartum anaemia is often caused by iron deficiency with onset during the antepartum period and can be exacerbated by excessive blood loss at birth. Its prevalence is estimated as 50-80% in low-income and middle-income countries. It poses adverse consequences on the mother and negatively impacts her ability to care for her newborn. Prompt treatment of postpartum anaemia is thus important. Adherence to oral iron is reportedly low in Nigeria due to its side effects and forgetfulness by the mothers. Intravenous iron such as ferric carboxymaltose, given as a single dose, might help overcome adherence issues, but investigation in a high-quality randomised control trial in Nigeria is first required while evaluation of challenges around its implementation is also warranted. OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical effectiveness, tolerability and safety, of using intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (intervention) vs oral ferrous sulphate (control) for treating moderate to severe iron deficiency anaemia in postpartum women and to evaluate implementation of ferric carboxymaltose in treating postpartum anaemia in Nigeria. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is an open-label randomised controlled trial with a concurrent implementation study. It is a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design conducted in four states across Northern and Southern Nigeria. A total of 1400 eligible and consenting women with postpartum moderate to severe anaemia (haemoglobin concentration <100 g/L) will be randomised to intravenous ferric carboxymaltose; a single dose at 20 mg/kg to a maximum of 1000 mg infusion administered at enrolment (intervention) or oral ferrous sulphate; 200 mg (65 mg elemental iron) two times per day from enrolment until 6 weeks postpartum (control). The primary outcome, proportion of participants who are anaemic (Hb <110 g/L) at 6 weeks postpartum will be analysed by intention-to-treat. Haemoglobin concentration, full blood count, serum iron, serum ferritin, transferrin saturation and total iron binding capacity will be measured at specific intervals. Implementation outcomes such as acceptability and feasibility of using ferric carboxymaltose for postpartum anaemia treatment in Nigeria will be assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the ethics committee of the teaching hospitals, Ministry of Health of the four states as required, National Health Research Ethics Committee and the drug regulatory agency, National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC). Findings of this research will be presented at conferences and will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and shared with stakeholders within and outside Nigeria. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: International standard randomised controlled trial number: ISRCTN51426226.

Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors in Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors are an oral treatment for anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed long-term safety of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized trials comparing HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) or placebo with greater than or equal to 48 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Treatment effects were pooled using random-effects models. RESULTS: Twenty-five trials involving 26,478 participants were included. Of these, 13 trials enrolled 13,230 participants with dialysis-dependent CKD, and 12 trials enrolled 13,248 participants with nondialysis-dependent CKD. There was no evidence that HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA had different effects on MACE in people with dialysis-dependent CKD (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.08) or people with nondialysis-dependent CKD (risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.22). Similarly, there was no evidence that HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and placebo had different effects on MACE (risk ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.27) in people with nondialysis-dependent CKD. The lack of difference between HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA or placebo was observed for individual components of MACE and cardiovascular death. Safety of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors for other outcomes was comparable with ESA in dialysis-dependent CKD. In nondialysis-dependent CKD, dialysis access thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, infections, and hyperkalemia occurred more frequently with HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors in placebo-controlled trials but not in ESA-controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of a difference in the long-term cardiovascular safety profile of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA in adults with dialysis-dependent CKD and adults with nondialysis-dependent CKD. (PROSPERO registration number, CRD42021278011.).

Prevalence, risk factors, and treatment of anemia in hospitalized older patients across geriatric and nephrological settings in Italy.

Anemia is a common but often underdiagnosed and undertreated geriatric syndrome in hospitalized older patients. In this retrospective multicenter study, we aimed at characterizing the prevalence, risk factors, diagnostic and treatment approach to anemia in older patients admitted to acute care hospitals, focusing on differences between nephrology and geriatrics units. Prevalence and risk factors for anemia, diagnostic inertia (lack of iron, vitamin B12, and folate status assessment), replacement inertia (omitted treatment with iron, vitamin B12 or folic acid), and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) inertia were explored. 1963 patients aged 82.7 (6.8) years were included in the study; 66.7% of the study population had anemia; among anemic patients, diagnostic inertia and replacement inertia were common with rates of 22-31% and 50-87%, respectively; omitted treatment with ESA affected 67.2% of patients and was more prevalent in geriatric units. In most cases, patients with ESA inertia were not routinely screened for iron tests. COPD, cancer, eGFR 45-60 ml/min were associated with increased tendency to ESA inertia. In conclusion, anemia had a high prevalence in older patients discharged from acute care units, but it is often underdiagnosed and undertreated.

The clinical efficacy of combined ESA and Roxadustat treatment for renal anemia in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism: A case series.

RATIONALE: Pharmacological mechanism of Roxadustat in the treatment of renal anemia. PATIENT CONCERNS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of combined Roxadustat and erythropoiesis stimulator (ESA) treatment of renal anemia in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. DIAGNOSES: A retrospective analysis was conducted on hemodialysis patients with renal anemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism treated with ESAs alone, who were admitted to our hospital from March 2022 to December 2022. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were treated with Roxadustat combined with ESAs for 3 months, during which oral iron supplementation was given, and the changes in Hb levels and laboratory-related indicators before and after the combined treatment were analyzed. OUTCOMES: The results showed that a total of 13 patients received combination therapy, with a significant increase in Hb compared to ESAs alone (t = -3.955, P = .002). The Hb qualification rate was 38.46%, and the ∆Hb response rate was 76.92%. The parathyroid hormone significantly decreased with a statistically significant difference (Z = -2.062b, P = .039). Hemoglobin (RBC), total iron binding capacity, and serum ferritin (male) were significantly increased compared to ESAs alone. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein were significantly lower than ESAs alone. The differences in the changes in the above indicators were statistically significant (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in changes in other laboratory-related indicators (P > .05). No adverse reactions were observed during the combined treatment of 13 patients. LESSONS SUBSECTIONS: The combination of Roxadustat and ESAs can effectively improve renal anemia in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism, as well as improve indicators of hyperparathyroidism and blood lipid levels with high levels of safety. This combined treatment thus provides a new and safe treatment method for these patients.

A real-world analysis of roxadustat effectiveness and safety in managing renal anemia among patients on maintenance hemodialysis: An observational study.

We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of roxadustat with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, particularly erythropoietin (EPO), in the treatment of maintenance hemodialysis patients with renal anemia. A prospective cohort study was carried out at the Nephrology Department of the Nantong First People's Hospital and Nantong University Affiliated Hospital from December 2020 to December 2021. We compared hemoglobin (Hb) levels, serum ferritin (SF) levels, and adverse cardiovascular events between the roxadustat and EPO groups at 1, 3, and 6 months into the treatment. A total of 209 patients participated in the study, with 112 in the roxadustat group and 97 in the EPO group. At baseline, no statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, weight, dialysis modality and duration, previous EPO dosage, Hb levels, SF levels, transferrin saturation, heart function classification, and blood pressure levels (P > .05). After 1 month, Hb levels in the roxadustat group were significantly higher than those in the EPO group (P < .05). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups at 3 and 6 months (P > .05). Additionally, there were no significant differences in SF levels and the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events between the 2 groups after treatment (P > .05). Roxadustat was superior to EPO in the initial treatment phase, while its cardiovascular safety was comparable to that of EPO.

Comprehensive perioperative blood management in patients undergoing elective bypass cardiac surgery: Benefit effect of health care education and systematic correction of iron deficiency and anemia on red blood cell transfusion.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a two-step patient blood management (PBM) program in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements among patients undergoing elective cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, non-randomized, two-step protocol design. SETTING: Cardiac surgery department of Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France. PATIENTS: 897 patients undergoing for elective CPB surgery. INTERVENTIONS: We conducted a two-steps protocol: PBMe and PBMc. PBMe involved a short quality improvement program for health care workers, while PBMc introduced a systematic approach to pre- and postoperative correction of deficiencies, incorporating iron injections, oral vitamins, and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. MEASUREMENTS: The PBM program's effectiveness was evaluated through comparison with a pre-PBM retrospective cohort after propensity score matching. The primary objective was the proportion of patients requiring RBC transfusions during their hospital stay. Secondary objectives were also analyzed. MAIN RESULTS: After matching, 343 patients were included in each group. Primary outcomes were observed in 35.7% (pre-PBM), 26.7% (PBMe), and 21.1% (PBMc) of patients, resulting in a significant reduction (40.6%) in the overall RBC transfusion rate. Both the PBMe and PBMc groups exhibited significantly lower risks of RBC transfusion compared to the pre-PBM group, with adjusted odds ratios of 0.59 [95% CI 0.44-0.79] and 0.44 [95% CI 0.32-0.60], respectively. Secondary endpoints included reductions in transfusions exceeding 2 units, total RBC units transfused, administration of allogeneic blood products, and total bleeding volume recorded on Day 1. There were no significant differences noted in mortality rates or the duration of hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that health care education and systematic deficiency correction are associated with reduced RBC transfusion rates in elective CPB surgery. However, further randomized, controlled studies are needed to validate these findings and refine their clinical application.

The effect of erythropoiesis­stimulating agents on lung cancer patients: a meta­analysis.

Previous studies have demonstrated that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) can reduce anemia and improve quality of life in cancer patients, but ESAs may increase mortality. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the effect and risk of ESAs about the prevention or treatment of anemia in cancer patients. Four databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of science and Cochrane Library were searched for published RCTS on ESAs in the treatment of anemia in lung cancer patients from 2000 to 2023. Endpoints including mortality, incidence of thrombotic vascular events, blood transfusion requirement, and incidence of adverse events. Our meta-analysis included 8 studies, with a sample size of 4240 patients, including 2548 patients in the ESAs group and 1692 patients in the control group. The risk of mortality was lower in patients using ESAs than control group (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.99, P = 0.02). But there was no significant difference in the risk of mortality between the patients using ESAs and controls (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92-1.06, P = 0.69) after removing Pere 2020. Subgroup analysis found that patients diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.08, P = 0.16) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.87-1.17, P = 0.13) were no significant difference in mortality rate. The thrombotic vascular events increase in patients using ESAs than control group (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13-1.72, P = 0.002). The blood transfusion requirement of ESAs group was lower than control group (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.72, P < 0.00001). And the subgroups of Darbepoetin alfa (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41-0.79, P = 0.003) and Epoetin alfa (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.99, P = 0.01) had lower transfusion requirements than the control group. In the SCLC subgroup (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.40-0.65, P = 0.34), blood transfusion requirements were lower in the ESAs group, but there was no significant difference between the subgroup of patients with NSCLC (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.36-1.04, P = 0.009). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of adverse reactions (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, P = 0.10). In conclusion, ESAs does not increase the mortality of lung cancer patients or may reduce the risk of death, and can reduce the need for blood transfusion, although ESA can increase the incidence of thrombotic vascular adverse events.Registration PROSPERO CRD42023463582.

Short-term effect of low-dose roxadustat combined with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent treatment for erythropoietin-resistant anemia in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

Background: Erythropoietin resistance is present in some patients with chronic kidney disease, especially in those undergoing hemodialysis, and is often treated using roxadustat rather than iron supplements and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). However, some patients cannot afford full doses of roxadustat. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy of low-dose roxadustat combined with recombinant human erythropoietin (rhuEPO) therapy in 39 patients with erythropoietin-resistant renal anemia undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (3-4 sessions/week). Methods: The ability of the combination of low-dose roxadustat and rhuEPO to increase the hemoglobin concentration over 12 weeks was assessed. Markers of iron metabolism were evaluated. Eligible adults received 50-60% of the recommended dose of roxadustat and higher doses of rhuEPO. Results: The mean hemoglobin level increased from 77.67 ± 11.18 g/dL to 92.0 ± 8.35 g/dL after treatment, and the hemoglobin response rate increased to 72%. The mean hematocrit level significantly increased from 24.26 ± 3.99% to 30.04 ± 3.69%. The soluble transferrin receptor level increased (27.29 ± 13.60 mg/L to 38.09 ± 12.78 mg/L), while the total iron binding capacity (49.22 ± 11.29 mg/L to 43.91 ± 12.88 mg/L) and ferritin level (171.05 ± 54.75 ng/mL to 140.83 ± 42.03 ng/mL) decreased. Conclusion: Therefore, in patients with ESA-resistant anemia who are undergoing hemodialysis, the combination of low-dose roxadustat and rhuEPO effectively improves renal anemia and iron metabolism.

Treatment of Anemia Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease: Plea for Considering Physiological Erythropoiesis.

Traditionally, the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) involves prescribing erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or iron preparations. The effectiveness and safety of ESAs and iron have been established. However, several clinical issues, such as hyporesponsiveness to ESAs or defective iron utilization for erythropoiesis, have been demonstrated. Recently, a new class of therapeutics for renal anemia known as hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)/proline hydroxylase (PH) inhibitors has been developed. Several studies have reported that HIF-PH inhibitors have unique characteristics compared with those of ESAs. In particular, the use of HIF-PH inhibitors may maintain target Hb concentration in patients treated with a high dose of ESAs without increasing the dose. Furthermore, several recent studies have demonstrated that patients with CKD with defective iron utilization for erythropoiesis had a high risk of cardiovascular events or premature death. HIF-PH inhibitors increase iron transport and absorption from the gastrointestinal tract; thus, they may ameliorate defective iron utilization for erythropoiesis in patients with CKD. Conversely, several clinical problems, such as aggravation of thrombotic and embolic complications, diabetic retinal disease, and cancer, have been noted at the time of HIF-PH inhibitor administration. Recently, several pooled analyses of phase III trials have reported the non-inferiority of HIF-PH inhibitors regarding these clinical concerns compared with ESAs. The advantages and issues of anemia treatment by ESAs, iron preparations, and HIF-PH inhibitors must be fully understood. Moreover, patients with anemia and CKD should be treated by providing a physiological erythropoiesis environment that is similar to that of healthy individuals.

Pure red cell aplasia secondary to erythropoietin therapy.

We report a case series of two patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who developed erythropoietin-induced pure red cell aplasia following a change in erythropoietin preparation. Both patients responded well to immunosuppressive treatments, but unfortunately developed severe infections as a result of being immunosuppressed.

Luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): primary analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The preplanned interim analysis of the COMMANDS trial showed greater efficacy of luspatercept than epoetin alfa for treating anaemia in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-naive patients with transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. In this Article, we report the results of the primary analysis of the trial. METHODS: COMMANDS is a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial conducted at 142 sites in 26 countries. Eligible patients were those aged 18 years or older, with myelodysplastic syndromes of very low risk, low risk, or intermediate risk (as defined by the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System), who were ESA-naive and transfusion dependent, and had a serum erythropoietin concentration of less than 500 U/L. Patients were stratified by baseline red blood cell transfusion burden, serum erythropoietin concentration, and ring sideroblast status, and randomly allocated (1:1) to receive luspatercept (1·0-1·75 mg/kg body weight, subcutaneously, once every 3 weeks) or epoetin alfa (450-1050 IU/kg body weight, subcutaneously, once a week; maximum total dose 80 000 IU) for at least 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was red blood cell transfusion independence lasting at least 12 weeks with a concurrent mean haemoglobin increase of at least 1·5 g/dL (weeks 1-24), evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03682536; active, not recruiting). FINDINGS: Between Jan 2, 2019, and Sept 29, 2022, 363 patients were screened and randomly allocated: 182 (50%) to luspatercept and 181 (50%) to epoetin alfa. Median age was 74 years (IQR 69-80), 162 (45%) patients were female, and 201 (55%) were male. 289 (80%) were White, 44 (12%) were Asian, and two (1%) were Black or African American. 23 (6%) were Hispanic or Latino and 311 (86%) were not Hispanic or Latino. Median follow-up for the primary endpoint was 17·2 months (10·4-27·7) for the luspatercept group and 16·9 months (10·1-26·6) for the epoetin alfa group. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the luspatercept group reached the primary endpoint (110 [60%] vs 63 [35%]; common risk difference on response rate 25·4% [95% CI 15·8-35·0]; p<0·0001). Median follow-up for safety analyses was 21·4 months (IQR 14·2-32·4) for the luspatercept group and 20·3 months (12·7-30·9) for the epoetin alfa group. Common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurring among luspatercept recipients (n=182) were hypertension (19 [10%] patients), anaemia (18 [10%]), pneumonia (ten [5%]), syncope (ten [5%]), neutropenia (nine [5%]), thrombocytopenia (eight [4%]), dyspnoea (eight [4%]), and myelodysplastic syndromes (six [3%]); and among epoetin alfa recipients (n=179) were anaemia (14 [8%]), pneumonia (14 [8%]), neutropenia (11 [6%]), myelodysplastic syndromes (ten [6%]), hypertension (eight [4%]), iron overload (seven [4%]), and COVID-19 pneumonia (six [3%]). The most common serious treatment-emergent adverse events in both groups were pneumonia (nine [5%] luspatercept recipients and 13 [7%] epoetin alfa recipients) and COVID-19 (eight [4%] luspatercept recipients and ten [6%] epoetin alfa recipients). One death (due to acute myeloid leukaemia) considered to be luspatercept-related was reported at the interim analysis. INTERPRETATION: Luspatercept represents a new standard of care for ESA-naive patients with transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Significantly more patients had red blood cell transfusion independence and haematological improvement with luspatercept than with epoetin alfa, with benefits observed across patient subgroups. FUNDING: Celgene and Acceleron Pharma.

A spotlight on using HIF-PH inhibitors in renal anemia.

INTRODUCTION: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) together with iron supplementation had been the standard treatment for anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) for the past decades. Recently, hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) have attracted attention as a novel treatment option. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the effectiveness and the safety of HIF-PHIs based on previous clinical trials and discusses points to consider for their clinical use. EXPERT OPINION: The results from clinical trials demonstrate that HIF-PHIs are non-inferior to ESAs in terms of the efficacy to maintain or improve blood hemoglobin levels. However, concerns about adverse events including cardiovascular outcomes, thrombotic events, and tumor progression have prevented HIF-PHIs from being widely approved for clinical use. Also, long-term safety has not been demonstrated yet. Practically, HIF-PHIs should be used with caution in patients with a history of thrombosis or active malignancy. Patients without them may be preferable for HIF-PHIs if those are bothered with regular injections of ESAs or are hyporesponsive to ESAs without obvious reasons, provided that the drugs were approved in the country. Even so, clinicians must take caution for signs of adverse events such as heart failure after prescribing the drugs.

Asociación de trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos y síndrome de Parsonage-Turner: ¿coincidencia o relación causa-efecto? / Association between hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and Parsonage Turner syndrome: coincidence or cause-effect relationship?

El síndrome de Parsonage-Turner o plexopatía braquial idiopática es una inflamación total o parcial del plexo braquial cuya presentación típica es una omalgia intensa y súbita, seguida de debilidad braquial y amiotrofia precoz. La etiología es desconocida, aunque se propone un mecanismo inmunomediado.El trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos es un tratamiento bien establecido de las neoplasias hematológicas y tiene un papel creciente en el tratamiento de enfermedades autoinmunes. Los efectos adversos neurológicos son probablemente infradiagnosticados.La asociación del síndrome de Parsonage-Turner y el trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos es muy poco conocida. Describimos dos casos clínicos de plexopatía braquial idiopática tras trasplante de células stem (progenitores) hematopoyéticas (TPH).La reconstitución del sistema inmune tras un trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos puede ser un desencadenante de plexopatía braquial, aunque se necesitan más estudios para entender la fisiopatología de esta entidad y establecer su relación causal con el trasplante. (AU)

Parsonage-Turner syndrome or idiopathic brachial neuritis is a total or partial inflammation of the brachial plexus, with a typical presentation as a sudden and very intense pain in the shoulder, followed by weakness and early amyotrophy. The etiology is still unknown, although an immune mediated mechanism is thought to be involved.Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a well-established treatment for hematological malignancies, but with a growing implication in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. The neurological side effects are probably underdiagnosed.The association of the Parsonage-Turner syndrome and the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is scarce. We describe two clinical cases of idiopathic brachial plexopathy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.The reconstruction of the immune system after a transplant may be the trigger of a brachial plexopathy, but more studies are necessary for the etiology of this disease to be understood and to establish a cause-effect relation with the transplant. (AU)

Evaluating the safety and efficacy of vadadustat for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease.

INTRODUCTION: The breakthrough in erythropoietin-stimulating agents in the 1990s improved the prognosis and treatment of complications in chronic kidney disease patients and renal anemia. Discovery of the novel molecular mechanisms for hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) transcription factor under hypoxic conditions has led to the development of oral drugs, HIF-Prolyl Hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs), that constantly activate erythropoietin by inhibiting prolyl hydroxylase. HIF-PHIs have gained rapid approval in Asian countries, including Japan, with six distinct types entering clinical application. AREAS COVERED: This article provides a comprehensive review of the latest literature, with a particular focus on the effectiveness and safety of vadadustat. EXPERT OPINION: A phase 3, randomized, open-label, clinical trial (PRO2TECT) demonstrated that vadadustat had the prespecified non-inferiority for hematologic efficacy as compared with darbepoetin alfa in non-dialysis-dependent patients not previously treated with ESA. However, vadadustat did not show non-inferiority in major adverse cardiovascular events in the non-US/non-Europe patients. It may partly because of imbalances of the baseline eGFR level in those countries. In dialysis-dependent patients, a phase 3 clinical trial (INNO2VATE) showed vadadustat was non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa in cardiovascular safety and maintenance of hemoglobin levels. Adverse events including cancer, retinopathy, thrombosis, and vascular calcification should be evaluated in future clinical studies.