Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 161
Filtrar
1.
Crit Care Med ; 52(7): 1054-1064, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537225

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Hypophosphatemia occurs frequently. Enteral, rather than IV, phosphate replacement may reduce fluid replacement, cost, and waste. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, parallel group, noninferiority clinical trial. SETTING: Single center, 42-bed state trauma, medical and surgical ICUs, from April 20, 2022, to July 1, 2022. PATIENTS: Patients with serum phosphate concentration between 0.3 and 0.75 mmol/L. INTERVENTIONS: We randomized patients to either enteral or IV phosphate replacement using electronic medical record-embedded program. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Our primary outcome was serum phosphate at 24 hours with a noninferiority margin of 0.2 mmol/L. Secondary outcomes included cost savings and environmental waste reduction and additional IV fluid administered. The modified intention-to-treat cohort comprised 131 patients. Baseline phosphate concentrations were similar between the two groups. At 24 hours, mean ( sd ) serum phosphate concentration were enteral 0.89 mmol/L (0.24 mmol/L) and IV 0.82 mmol/L (0.28 mmol/L). This difference was noninferior at the margin of 0.2 mmol/L (difference, 0.07 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.17 mmol/L). When assigned IV replacement, patients received 408 mL (372 mL) of solvent IV fluid. Compared with IV replacement, the mean cost per patient was ten-fold less with enteral replacement ($3.7 [$4.0] vs. IV: $37.7 [$31.4]; difference = $34.0 [95% CI, $26.3-$41.7]) and weight of waste was less (7.7 g [8.3 g] vs. 217 g [169 g]; difference = 209 g [95% CI, 168-250 g]). C O2 emissions were 60-fold less for comparable phosphate replacement (enteral: 2 g producing 14.2 g and 20 mmol of potassium dihydrogen phosphate producing 843 g of C O2 equivalents). CONCLUSIONS: Enteral phosphate replacement in ICU is noninferior to IV replacement at a margin of 0.2 mmol/L but leads to a substantial reduction in cost and waste.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Hipofosfatemia , Fosfatos , Humanos , Hipofosfatemia/economia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estado Terminal/terapia , Estado Terminal/economia , Fosfatos/sangue , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Nutrição Enteral/economia , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Hidratação/métodos , Hidratação/economia , Adulto , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva
2.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0249638, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33886584

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Oral rehydration therapy (ORT) is an effective and cheap treatment for diarrheal disease; globally, one of the leading causes of death in children under five. The World Health Organization launched a global campaign to improve ORT coverage in 1978, with activities such as educational campaigns, training health workers and the creation of designate programming. Despite these efforts, ORT coverage remains relatively low. The objective of this systematic review is to identify the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of oral rehydration therapy in low and middle-income countries. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy comprised of relevant subject headings and keywords was executed in 5 databases including OVID Medline, OVID Embase, OVID HealthStar, Web of Science and Scopus. Eligible studies underwent quality assessment, and a directed content analysis approach to data extraction was conducted and aligned to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to facilitate narrative synthesis. RESULTS: The search identified 1570 citations and following removal of duplicates as well as screening according to our inclusion/exclusion criteria, 55 articles were eligible for inclusion in the review. Twenty-three countries were represented in this review, with India, Bangladesh, Egypt, Nigeria, and South Africa having the most representation of available studies. Study dates ranged from 1981 to 2020. Overarching thematic areas spanning the barriers and facilitators that were identified included: availability and accessibility, knowledge, partnership engagement, and design and acceptability. CONCLUSION: A systematic review of studies on implementation of ORT in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) highlights key activities that facilitate the development of successful implementation that include: (1) availability and accessibility of ORT, (2) awareness and education among communities, (3) strong partnership engagement strategies, and (4) adaptable design to enhance acceptability. The barriers and facilitators identified under the CIFR domains can be used to build knowledge on how to adapt ORT to national and local settings and contribute to a better understanding on the implementation and use of ORT in LMICs. The prospects for scaling and sustaining ORT (after years of low use) will increase if implementation research informs local applications, and implementers engage appropriate stakeholders and test assumptions around localized theories of change from interventions to expected outcomes. REGISTRATION: A protocol for this systematic review was developed and uploaded onto the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews database (Registration number: CRD420201695).


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Diarreia/economia , Diarreia/terapia , Hidratação/economia , Hidratação/normas , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hidratação/métodos , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/métodos , Humanos
3.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 30(5): 105705, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33711759

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of hydration with or without Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) 130/0.4 on neurological outcomes and medical costs during hospitalisation in patients with a single infarction (SI) in the posterior lenticulostriate artery (LSA) territory. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, single-centre, non-blinded cohort study, SI in the posterior LSA was defined as an ischaemic lesion with a high-signal intensity area ≥20 mm. All patients received basic stroke care within 48 h of symptom onset between April 2015 and January 2019. Patients were divided into the following two groups by clinician's preference: 1) those administered HES 130/0.4 and 2) those receiving other infusion fluid. The relationships between hospital costs and hydration therapy type were examined. RESULTS: Eighteen (31%) of 58 patients received HES 130/0.4. The HES group had a significantly lower total cost than the control group (3.6 vs. 6.4 million yen, p=0.006). Moreover, the HES group had a significantly shorter hospital stay duration (79.5 vs. 141.0 days) and lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on day 7. Multivariate analysis found that HES 130/0.4 administration was an independent factor associated with high costs. CONCLUSIONS: Hydration therapy with HES 130/0.4 significantly decreased the total costs and hospitalisation duration of patients with SI in the posterior LSA territory.


Assuntos
Infarto Encefálico/economia , Infarto Encefálico/terapia , Hidratação/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/economia , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/uso terapêutico , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Substitutos do Plasma/economia , Substitutos do Plasma/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Infarto Encefálico/diagnóstico , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Hidratação/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Substitutos do Plasma/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Aust Crit Care ; 34(1): 23-32, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32828672

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Fluid resuscitation is a ubiquitous intervention in the management of patients treated in the intensive care unit, which has implications for intensive care unit resourcing and budgets. Our objective was to calculate the relative cost of resuscitation fluids in several countries to inform future economic evaluations. METHODS: We collected site-level data regarding the availability and cost of fluids as part of an international survey. We normalised costs to net present values using purchasing power parities and published inflation figures. Costs were also adjusted for equi-effective dosing based on intravascular volume expansion effectiveness and expressed as US dollars (USD) per 100 mL crystalloid equivalent. RESULTS: A total of 187 sites had access to cost data. Between countries, there was an approximate six fold variation in the cost of crystalloids and colloids overall. The average cost for crystalloids overall was less than 1 USD per 100 mL. In contrast, colloid fluids had higher average costs (59 USD per 100 mL). After adjusting for equi-effective dosing, saline was ∼27 times less costly than albumin (saline: 0.6 USD per 100 mL crystalloid equivalent; albumin 4-5%: 16.4 USD; albumin 20-25%: 15.8 USD) and ∼4 times less costly than hydroxyethyl starch solution (saline: 0.6 USD; hydroxyethyl starch solution: 2.5 USD). Buffered salt solutions, such as compound sodium acetate solutions (e.g., Plasmalyte®), had the highest average cost of crystalloid fluids, costing between 3 and 4 USD per 100 mL. CONCLUSION: The cost of fluid varies substantially between fluid types and between countries, although normal (0.9%) saline is consistently less costly than colloid preparations and some buffered salt solutions. These data can be used to inform future economic evaluations of fluid preparations.


Assuntos
Hidratação/economia , Substitutos do Plasma , Soluções para Reidratação , Soluções Cristaloides/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Soluções Isotônicas/economia , Substitutos do Plasma/economia , Substitutos do Plasma/uso terapêutico , Soluções para Reidratação/economia , Ressuscitação
5.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 77(18): 1497-1503, 2020 09 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32779706

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To outline a data-driven analysis involving use of intravenous (i.v.) pump data to identify optimal drug and fluid amounts for various continuous infusions, with the primary goal of minimizing medication waste. This methodology incorporates analysis of vial sizes, infusion rates, number of bag exchanges, and bag volumes to determine optimal concentrations that improve operational efficiencies and decrease drug and fluid waste. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of i.v. infusion pump utilization data for continuous infusions of norepinephrine, phenylephrine, vasopressin, and cisatracurium was performed using data provided by 9 hospitals in North Carolina during January, April, and June of 2015. RESULTS: The recommended medication concentrations and fluid volumes were determined using a novel 4-step analysis, the VERB (Vial, Exchange, Rate, and Bag) analysis, which applied optimal practices for cost reduction, operational efficiency, and patient safety. The application of the VERB analysis to the i.v. infusion pump utilization data resulted in the following recommended medication concentrations: norepinephrine, 4 mg/100 mL (final concentration, 40 µg/mL) and 16 mg/250 mL (final concentration, 64 µg/mL); phenylephrine, 10 mg/100 mL (final concentration, 100 µg/mL); vasopressin, 20 units/100 mL (final concentration, 0.2 unit/mL); and cisatracurium, 200 mg/100 mL (final concentration, 2 mg/mL). It was determined that implementation of the recommended concentrations by the 9 study hospitals would result in significant medication cost savings and fluid volume savings. CONCLUSION: Analysis of i.v. infusion pump data from multiple hospitals using VERB analysis resulted in standardized medication concentrations and bag sizes for continuous infusions that reduce drug and fluid waste and improve operational efficiencies.


Assuntos
Hidratação/métodos , Bombas de Infusão , Preparações Farmacêuticas/administração & dosagem , Redução de Custos , Desenho de Equipamento , Hidratação/economia , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , North Carolina , Preparações Farmacêuticas/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Pediatrics ; 146(1)2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32487592

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Management decisions for patients with gastroenteritis affect resource use within pediatric emergency departments (EDs), and algorithmic care using evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) has become widespread. We aimed to determine if the implementation of a dehydration EBG in a pediatric ED resulted in a reduction in intravenous (IV) fluid administration and the cost of care. METHODS: In a single-center quality improvement initiative between 2010 and 2016, investigators aimed to decrease the percentage of patients with gastroenteritis who were rehydrated with IV fluids. The EBG assigned the patient a dehydration score with subsequent rehydration strategy on the basis of presenting signs and symptoms. The primary outcome was proportion of patients receiving IV fluid, which was analyzed using statistical process control methods. The secondary outcome was cost of the episode of care. Balancing measures included ED length of stay, admission rate, and return visit rate within 72 hours. RESULTS: A total of 7145 patients met inclusion criteria with a median age of 17 months. Use of IV fluid decreased from a mean of 15% to 9% postimplementation. Average episode of care-related health care costs decreased from $599 to $410. For our balancing measures, there were improvements in ED length of stay, rate of admission, and rate of return visits. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an EBG for patients with gastroenteritis led to a decrease in frequency of IV administration, shorter lengths of stay, and lower health care costs.


Assuntos
Desidratação/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Hidratação/economia , Gastroenterite/economia , Recursos em Saúde/tendências , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Algoritmos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Desidratação/etiologia , Desidratação/terapia , Feminino , Hidratação/métodos , Gastroenterite/complicações , Gastroenterite/terapia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
J Trauma Nurs ; 27(3): 141-145, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32371730

RESUMO

Postoperative patients are susceptible to alterations in electrolyte homeostasis. Although electrolytes are replaced in critically ill patients, stable asymptomatic non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients often receive treatment of abnormal electrolytes. We hypothesize there is no proven benefit in asymptomatic patients. In 2016, using the electronic medical records and pharmacy database at a university academic medical center, we conducted a retrospective cost analysis of the frequency and cost of electrolyte analysis (basic metabolic panel [BMP], ionized calcium [Ca], magnesium [Mg], and phosphorus [P]) and replacement (potassium chloride [KCl], Mg, oral/iv Ca, oral/iv P) in perioperative patients. Patients without an oral diet order, with creatinine more than 1.4, age less than 16 years, admitted to the ICU, or with length of stay of more than 1 week were excluded. Nursing costs were calculated as a fraction of hourly wages per laboratory order or electrolyte replacement. One hundred thirteen patients met our criteria over 11 months. Mean length of stay was 4 days; mean age was 54 years; and creatinine was 0.67 ± 0.3. Electrolyte analysis laboratory orders (n = 1,045) totaled $6,978, and BMP was most frequently ordered accounting for 36% of laboratory costs. In total, 683 doses of electrolytes cost the pharmacy $1,780. Magnesium was most frequently replaced, followed by KCl, P, and Ca. Nursing cost associated with electrolyte analysis/replacement was $7,782. There is little evidence to support electrolyte analysis and replacement in stable asymptomatic noncritically ill patients, but their prevalence and cost ($146/case) in this study were substantial. Basic metabolic panels, pharmacy charges for potassium, and nursing staff costs accounted for the most significant portion of the total cost. Considering these data, further research should determine whether these practices are warranted.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/economia , Eletrólitos/economia , Hidratação/economia , Magnésio/economia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/economia , Potássio/economia , Enfermagem em Ortopedia e Traumatologia/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hidratação/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Enfermagem em Ortopedia e Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos
8.
Pancreas ; 49(3): 375-380, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32132512

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate lactated ringers (LR) versus normal saline (NS) in pediatric acute pancreatitis (AP). METHODS: This retrospective study used Pediatric Health Information System database of primary AP patients, 2013 to 2017. RESULTS: The study included 1581 first time AP patients with exclusive use of a single fluid (111 LR, 1470 NS) for the first 48 hours. The LR cohort had a significantly shorter length of stay (P < 0.001) compared with NS. A multivariable logistic regression analysis suggests use of NS in the first 48 hours (after controlling for total parenteral nutrition, operation, and infection during the admission) had a significantly increased likelihood of requiring a hospitalization for 4 days or more compared with the LR group (odds ratio, 3.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.95-5.62). The overall cost was significantly less in the LR group. There was no statistical difference observed in risk factors for AP, intensive care transfer, organ dysfunction, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This represents the first large data set analysis of LR versus NS in pediatric AP. The use of LR was associated with a shorter length of stay and reduced cost compared with NS. Future randomized trials will help determine the ideal fluid choice for pediatric AP.


Assuntos
Hidratação , Tempo de Internação , Pancreatite/terapia , Lactato de Ringer/administração & dosagem , Solução Salina/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Criança , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Hidratação/efeitos adversos , Hidratação/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Masculino , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Pancreatite/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Lactato de Ringer/efeitos adversos , Lactato de Ringer/economia , Solução Salina/efeitos adversos , Solução Salina/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
9.
Eur Radiol ; 30(7): 4005-4013, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32107605

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines on safe use of iodinated contrast material recommend intravenous prophylactic hydration to prevent post-contrast adverse (renal) effects. Recently, guidelines have been updated and standard prophylaxis is no longer recommended for the majority of patients. The current study aims to evaluate the consequences for clinical practice of the updated guidelines in terms of complications, hospitalisations, and costs. METHODS: The Contrast-Induced Nephropathy After Reduction of the prophylaxis Threshold (CINART) project is a retrospective observational study. All elective procedures with intravascular iodinated contrast administration at Maastricht University Medical Centre (UMC+) in patients aged > 18 years, formerly eligible for prophylaxis (eGFR 30-44 ml/min/1.73 m2 or eGFR 45-59 ml/min/1.73 m2 in combination with diabetes or > 1 predefined risk factor), and currently eligible for prophylaxis (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) were included. Data were used to calculate relative reductions in complications, hospitalisations, and costs associated with standard prophylactic intravenous hydration. CINART is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03227835. RESULTS: Between July 1, 2017, and July 1, 2018, 1992 elective procedures with intravascular iodinated contrast in patients formerly and currently eligible for prophylaxis were identified: 1808 in patients formerly eligible for prophylaxis and 184 in patients currently eligible for prophylaxis. At Maastricht UMC+, guideline updates led to large relative reductions in numbers of complications of prophylaxis (e.g. symptomatic heart failure; - 89%), extra hospitalisations (- 93%), and costs (- 91%). CONCLUSION: Guideline updates have had a demonstrable impact on daily clinical practice benefiting patient, hospital, and health care budgets. Clinical practice varies between institutions and countries; therefore, a local estimation model is provided with which local impact on costs, hospitalisations, and complications can be calculated. KEY POINTS: • Clinical practice guidelines recommend prophylactic intravenous hydration to prevent post-contrast adverse outcomes such as contrast-induced acute kidney injury. • Clinical practice guidelines have recently been updated, and standard prophylaxis is no longer recommended for the majority of patients. • The guideline updates have a large impact on daily clinical practice: relative reductions at Maastricht UMC+ were - 89% prophylaxis complications, - 93% hospitalisations, and - 91% costs, and similar reductions are expected for Dutch and adherent European medical centres.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/administração & dosagem , Radioisótopos do Iodo/efeitos adversos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Administração Intravenosa , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Meios de Contraste/economia , Hidratação/economia , Hidratação/métodos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
10.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 64(6): 781-788, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32037505

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of albumin-based fluid support in patients with septic shock is currently unknown. METHODS: In a simulation study, we compared standard medical practice and systematic 20% albumin infusion. The study population consisted of patients with septic shock admitted to one of the 28 ICUs belonging to the Cub-Réa regional database between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016. Cost estimates were based on French diagnosis-related groups and fixed daily prices. Estimation of mortality reduction relied on ALBIOS trial data documenting a Risk Ratio of 0.87 in a non-preplanned subgroup of patients with septic shock. Life expectancy was estimated with follow up data of 184 patients with septic shock admitted in the year 2000 in the same ICUs. Several sensitivity analyses were performed including a one-way Deterministic Sensitivity Analysis (DSA) and a Probabilistic multivariate Sensitivity Analysis (PSA). RESULTS: About 6406 patients were included. In the base-case scenario, the mean live years gained with albumin was 0.49. The mean extra cost of using albumin was €480 per year. The cost per year gained was €974. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. The probability of albumin being cost-effective was 95% and 97% for a threshold fixed at €20 000 and €30 000 per life-year saved, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the risk reduction observed in the septic shock subgroup analysis of the ALBIOS dataset, the application of the ALBIOS trial results to Cub-Réa data may suggest that albumin infusion is likely cost-effective in septic shock.


Assuntos
Albuminas/economia , Albuminas/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Hidratação/métodos , Choque Séptico/economia , Choque Séptico/terapia , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hidratação/economia , França , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Modelos Econômicos , Proibitinas
11.
J Intensive Care Med ; 35(1): 14-23, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30309279

RESUMO

Static indices, such as the central venous pressure, have proven to be inaccurate predictors of fluid responsiveness. An emerging approach uses dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness (FT-DYN), such as stroke volume variation (SVV) or surrogate dynamic variables, as more accurate measures of volume status. Recent work has demonstrated that goal-directed therapy guided by FT-DYN was associated with reduced intensive care unit (ICU) mortality; however, no study has specifically assessed this in surgical ICU patients. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of employing FT-DYN in the perioperative care of surgical ICU patients on length of stay in the ICU. As secondary objectives, we performed a cost analysis of FT-DYN and assessed the impact of FT-DYN versus standard care on hospital length of stay and mortality. We identified all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL that examined adult patients in the ICU who were randomized to standard care or to FT-DYN from inception to September 2017. Two investigators independently reviewed search results, identified appropriate studies, and extracted data using standardized spreadsheets. A random effect meta-analysis was carried out. Eleven RCTs were included with a total of 1015 patients. The incorporation of FT-DYN through SVV in surgical patients led to shorter ICU length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD], -1.43d; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.09 to -0.78), shorter hospital length of stay (WMD, -1.96d; 95% CI, -2.34 to -1.59), and trended toward improved mortality (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.30-1.03). There was a decrease in daily ICU-related costs per patient for those who received FT-DYN in the perioperative period (WMD, US$ -1619; 95% CI, -2173.68 to -1063.26). Incorporation of FT-DYN through SVV in the perioperative care of surgical ICU patients is associated with decreased ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and ICU costs.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Hidratação/métodos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Ressuscitação/métodos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Hidratação/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Ressuscitação/economia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/economia , Volume Sistólico
12.
Intern Emerg Med ; 15(4): 613-619, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31620978

RESUMO

Nutritional support is a crucial issue in Acute Pancreatitis (AP) management. Recommendations on nutrition in AP are still not completely translated in the clinical practice. We aimed to compare and evaluate the effects of parenteral nutrition (PN) vs oral/enteral nutrition (EN) on several clinical and economic outcomes in AP. This is a retrospective monocentric study conducted in a tertiary care center for pancreatic diseases. The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS) and associated costs. The secondary outcomes were the use and cost of antibiotics and fluid therapy, and the complication's rates. One hundred seventy-one patients were included from January 2015 to January 2018. Patients were 69 (40.4%) in PN group and 102 (59.6%) in EN group. There was a significant reduction in LOS in EN vs PN group in both mild AP (p < 0.0001), and moderate-severe AP (p < 0.005). There was a significant reduction in the total hospitalization costs in EN group vs PN group in both mild AP (p < 0.0001), and moderate-severe AP (p < 0.005). There was a significant reduction in the total costs of antibiotics and pain therapy in EN vs PN group (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.05, respectively). Finally, a significant reduction in the infected peri-pancreatic fluid collections rate (p = 0.04) was observed in EN vs PN group. The use of EN in AP is associated with substantial clinical and economic benefits. Thus, the application of the standard of care in nutrition and following AP guidelines is the best way to cure patients and improve healthcare system costs.


Assuntos
Nutrição Enteral/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Pancreatite/dietoterapia , Nutrição Parenteral/economia , Antibacterianos/economia , Feminino , Hidratação/economia , Humanos , Itália , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária
13.
Clin Ther ; 41(11): 2297-2307.e2, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31668842

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Albumin-based fluid therapy in septic shock is a matter of debate and criticism. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of albumin therapy in patients with septic shock. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in Imam Khomeini, Sina, and Shariati hospitals on patients with septic shock admitted to intensive care units from March 31, 2016 to September 22, 2017. Data sources were the health information system database and patient medical records. The patients with potential septic shock were identified based on norepinephrine use. Septic shock was confirmed after medical record review based on systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, antibiotic use, and fluid therapy. Patients who received albumin in the fluid therapy were compared with patients treated without albumin. The 28-day mortality, life-year gain, and cost-effectiveness were evaluated. FINDINGS: The addition of albumin had no significant increase in life-year gain (mean difference = 0.67; 95% CI, -2.25 to 3.58). However, the addition of albumin increased the total cost of treatment by US $3846.07 (95% CI, US $2093.46-US $5598.98). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio calculated based on the mean life-years gained was US$5740.40 per a life-year gained. The net monetary benefit was negative (-355.4; 95% CI, -15,387.61 to 14,676.81), and the probability that the addition of albumin will be cost-effective at a gross domestic product per capita was 40.0%. IMPLICATIONS: Albumin-based fluid therapy does not improve the 28-day mortality of patients with septic shock. The addition of albumin in the fluid therapy of patients with septic shock was not cost-effective. Both the observational and retrospective nature of the study was expected to introduce bias. We recommend a cost-effectiveness analysis combined with clinical trials to settle the debate once and for all.


Assuntos
Albuminas/economia , Hidratação/economia , Choque Séptico/economia , Idoso , Albuminas/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Análise de Dados , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque Séptico/tratamento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/mortalidade
14.
J Infect Public Health ; 12(6): 816-821, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31104987

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea causes, annually, approximately 1.7 billion cases and 760,000 deaths worldwide among children under 5 years of age, although these are preventable and treatable. This study aim to assess the cost-effectiveness for the treatment of diarrhea in emergency services in the management of children of acute gastroenteritis with non-severe dehydration. METHODS: A stochastic decision tree model considering the perspective of the Brazilian public health system was used to calculate the cost-effectiveness of the 5 interventions: oral rehydration therapy (ORT) at home, and if it fails supervised ORT; they would receive; ORT at home, and if it fails intravenous rehydration therapy (IVT). ORT at home and if it fails, the half of them will receive supervised ORT, and the other half would receive IVT; Patient receives supervised oral treatment; Patient receives IVT. Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was used to measure the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The strategy of initiating oral rehydration in children younger than 5 is the most efficient practice with a cost of $14.28 and effectiveness of 0.89 QALYs. CONCLUSION: ORT is an underutilized resource for the management of children with non-severe dehydration in emergency services. The overprescribed IVT increases cost without a corresponding significant increase in effectiveness.


Assuntos
Desidratação/terapia , Diarreia/complicações , Hidratação/economia , Hidratação/métodos , Administração Oral , Brasil , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino
15.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 20(4): 357-364, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30950987

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine common practice for fluid management after cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease among pediatric cardiac intensivists. DESIGN: A survey consisting of 17 questions about fluid management practices after pediatric cardiac surgery. Distribution was done by email, social media, World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies website, and World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies newsletter using the electronic survey distribution and collection system Research Electronic Data Capture. SETTING: PICUs around the world. SUBJECTS: Pediatric intensivists managing children after surgery for congenital heart disease. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One-hundred eight responses from 18 countries and six continents were received. The most common prescribed fluids for IV maintenance are isotonic solutions, mainly NaCl 0.9% (42%); followed by hypotonic fluids (33%) and balanced crystalloids solutions (14%). The majority of the respondents limit total fluid intake to 50% during the first 24 hours after cardiac surgery. The most frequently used fluid as first choice for resuscitation is NaCl 0.9% (44%), the second most frequent choice are colloids (27%). Furthermore, 64% of respondents switch to a second fluid for ongoing resuscitation, 76% of these choose a colloid. Albumin 5% is the most commonly used colloid (61%). Almost all respondents (96%) agree there is a need for research on this topic. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey demonstrates great variation in fluid management practices, not only for maintenance fluids but also for volume resuscitation. Despite the lack of evidence, colloids are frequently administered. The results highlight the need for further research and evidence-based guidelines on this topic.


Assuntos
Hidratação/métodos , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Soluções Isotônicas/administração & dosagem , Coloides/administração & dosagem , Soluções Cristaloides/administração & dosagem , Hidratação/economia , Humanos , Soluções Hipotônicas , Soluções Isotônicas/economia , Soluções Isotônicas/provisão & distribuição
16.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 288, 2019 Mar 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30866876

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the 2016-2017 austral summer, unprecedented water scarcity was observed in the south of Mayotte, French island in the Indian Ocean. Therefore, authorities introduced restrictive measures to save the water of this part of the island. The rationing system affected over 65,000 people, for four months. In order to detect a possible deterioration of the health situation, a strengthened epidemiological surveillance system was set up. METHODS: Surveillance focused on intestinal and skin diseases, which are often associated with a lack of hygiene or poor-quality drinking and bathing water. Three pathologies were monitored: acute diarrhoea, acute gastroenteritis and skin diseases and also, proportion of antidiarrhoeal and rehydration solutions sales in pharmacies. Cases of leptospirosis were also under surveillance. The analyses consisted of comparing the collected data according to the areas that were either affected or not affected by the water restrictions. Comparisons with historical data were also made. RESULTS: Although none of the surveillance systems were able to demonstrate any impact on skin diseases, they revealed a very sharp increase in the proportion of consultations for acute diarrhoea and gastro-enteritis in the southern area. This was corroborated by a high increase in the sales of antidiarrhoeals and oral rehydration solutions via the sentinel pharmacists in the south of the island compared with those of the north. Comparison with historical data highlighted the occurrence of an unusual situation. CONCLUSION: These water restrictions caused a real deterioration in the health status of the inhabitants who were deprived of water.


Assuntos
Epidemias , Vigilância da População , Abastecimento de Água/estatística & dados numéricos , Antidiarreicos/economia , Comércio/estatística & dados numéricos , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Diarreia/terapia , Hidratação/economia , França/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/terapia , Humanos , Farmácias/economia , Dermatopatias/epidemiologia
17.
BMJ Open ; 9(3): e024159, 2019 03 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30878979

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare and contrast illustrative examples of the adoption of high value practices and the de-adoption of low value practices. DESIGN: (1) Retrospective, population-based audit of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (high value practice) and albumin for fluid resuscitation (low value practice) and (2) cross-sectional survey of healthcare providers. SETTING: Data were collected from nine adult medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) in two large Canadian cities. Patients are managed in these ICUs by a group of multiprofessional and multidisciplinary healthcare providers. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 6946 ICU admissions and 309 healthcare providers from the same ICUs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) The use of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis (per cent ICU days) and albumin for fluid resuscitation (per cent of patients); and (2) provider knowledge of evidence underpinning these practices, and barriers and facilitators to adopt and de-adopt these practices. RESULTS: LMWH was administered on 38.7% of ICU days, and 20.0% of patients received albumin.Most participants had knowledge of evidence underpinning VTE prophylaxis and fluid resuscitation (59.1% and 84.2%, respectively). Providers perceived these practices to be followed. The most commonly reported barrier to adoption was insufficient knowledge/understanding (32.8%), and to de-adoption was clinical leader preferences (33.2%). On-site education was the most commonly identified facilitator for adoption and de-adoption (67.8% and 68.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite knowledge of and self-reported adherence to best practices, the audit demonstrated opportunity to improve. Provider-reported barriers and facilitators to adoption and de-adoption are broadly similar.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/economia , Hidratação/economia , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/economia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Albumina Sérica Humana/economia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Canadá , Estudos Transversais , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tromboembolia Venosa/economia
18.
Ethiop J Health Sci ; 29(1): 869-876, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30700954

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fluid and antimicrobial therapy are the essential parts of sepsis management. The type of fluid to resuscitate with is an unsettled issue in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of albumin-based resuscitation over crystalloids. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted by extracting data from a database of Sina Hospital, Islamic Republic of Iran. A decision tree was constructed by using Tree Age Pro 2011. The patients were grouped based on the types of fluids used for resuscitation into crystalloid alone or crystalloid + albumin groups at the initial decision node. The patients were followed from the onset of severe sepsis and septic shock upto 28 days. The healthcare payers' perspective was considered in constructing the model. The cost was measured in US dollars and the effectiveness was measured by life years gained. RESULTS: The addition of albumin during resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock has an effectiveness gain of 0.09 life years and cost increment of 495.00 USD. The estimated ICER for this analysis was 5500.00 USD per life year gained. The probability that albumin is cost-effective at one GDP per capita is 49.5%. CONCLUSION: Albumin-based resuscitation is not cost-effective in Iran when a GDP per capita was considered for a life year gain. The cost-effectiveness was insensitive to the cost of standard care. We recomend the caustious use albumin as per the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline.


Assuntos
Albuminas/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Hidratação/métodos , Ressuscitação/métodos , Sepse/terapia , Choque Séptico/terapia , Albuminas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hidratação/economia , Humanos , Irã (Geográfico) , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ressuscitação/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/economia , Choque Séptico/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
PLoS Med ; 16(1): e1002734, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30677019

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Over half a million children die each year of diarrheal illness, although nearly all deaths could be prevented with oral rehydration salts (ORS). The literature on ORS documents both impressive health benefits and persistent underuse. At the same time, little is known about why ORS is underused and what can be done to increase use. We hypothesized that price and inconvenience are important barriers to ORS use and tested whether eliminating financial and access constraints increases ORS coverage. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In July of 2016, we recruited 118 community health workers (CHWs; representing 10,384 households) in Central and Eastern Uganda to participate in the study. Study villages were predominantly peri-urban, and most caretakers had no more than primary school education. In March of 2017, we randomized CHWs to one of four methods of ORS distribution: (1) free delivery of ORS prior to illness (free and convenient); (2) home sales of ORS prior to illness (convenient only); (3) free ORS upon retrieval using voucher (free only); and (4) status quo CHW distribution, where ORS is sold and not delivered (control). CHWs offered zinc supplements in addition to ORS in all treatment arms (free in groups 1 and 3 and for sale in group 2), following international treatment guidelines. We used household surveys to measure ORS (primary outcome) and ORS + zinc use 4 weeks after the interventions began (between April and May 2017). We assessed impact using an intention-to-treat (ITT) framework. During follow-up, we identified 2,363 child cases of diarrhea within 4 weeks of the survey (584 in free and convenient [25.6% of households], 527 in convenient only [26.1% of households], 648 in free only [26.8% of households], and 597 in control [28.5% of households]). The share of cases treated with ORS was 77% (448/584) in the free and convenient group, 64% (340/527) in the convenient only group, 74% (447/648) in the free only group, and 56% (335/597) in the control group. After adjusting for potential confounders, instructing CHWs to provide free and convenient distribution increased ORS coverage by 19 percentage points relative to the control group (95% CI 13-26; P < 0.001), 12 percentage points relative to convenient only (95% CI 6-18; P < 0.001), and 2 percentage points (not significant) relative to free only (95% CI -4 to 8; P = 0.38). Effect sizes were similar, but more pronounced, for the use of both ORS and zinc. Limitations include short follow-up period, self-reported outcomes, and limited generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: Most caretakers of children with diarrhea in low-income countries seek care in the private sector where they are required to pay for ORS. However, our results suggest that price is an important barrier to ORS use and that switching to free distribution by CHWs substantially increases ORS coverage. Switching to free distribution is low-cost, easily scalable, and could substantially reduce child mortality. Convenience was not important in this context. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registry number AEARCTR-0001288.


Assuntos
Diarreia Infantil/terapia , Hidratação , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Diarreia/economia , Diarreia/terapia , Diarreia Infantil/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Hidratação/economia , Hidratação/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Uganda
20.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 31(3): 345-351, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30312183

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Albumin infusion reduces the incidence of postparacentesis circulatory dysfunction among patients with cirrhosis and tense ascites compared with no treatment. Less costly treatment alternatives such as vasoconstrictors have been investigated, but the results are controversial. Midodrine, an oral α1-adrenergic agonist, increases effective circulating blood volume and renal perfusion by increasing systemic and splanchnic blood pressure. Our aim is to assess whether or not morbidity in terms of renal dysfunction, hyponatremia, systemic, or portal hemodynamics derangement or mortality differed in patients receiving albumin versus midodrine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites were randomized to receive albumin infusion, oral midodrine for 2 days, or oral midodrine for 30 days after therapeutic large volume paracentesis (LVP). The primary endpoints were development of renal impairment or hyponatremia, change in systemic and portal hemodynamics, cost, and mortality in the short-term and long-term follow-up. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between groups in the development of renal impairment, hyponatremia, or mortality 6 and 30 days after LVP. A significant increase in 24-h urine sodium excretion was noted in the midodrine 30-day group. Renal perfusion improved significantly with the midodrine intake for 30 days only. The cost of midodrine therapy was significantly lower than albumin. CONCLUSION: Midodrine is as effective as albumin in reducing morbidity and mortality among patients with refractory ascites undergoing LVP at a significantly lower cost. Long-duration midodrine intake can be more useful than shorter duration intake in terms of improvement of renal perfusion and sodium excretion.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/administração & dosagem , Albuminas/administração & dosagem , Ascite/terapia , Hidratação/métodos , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Midodrina/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/efeitos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/economia , Adulto , Albuminas/efeitos adversos , Albuminas/economia , Ascite/etiologia , Ascite/mortalidade , Ascite/fisiopatologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos , Egito , Feminino , Hidratação/efeitos adversos , Hidratação/economia , Hidratação/mortalidade , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/mortalidade , Cirrose Hepática/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Midodrina/efeitos adversos , Projetos Piloto , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...