Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels and Statin Treatment by HIV Status Among Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study Men.

Treating cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, including dyslipidemia, is important in HIV care. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) target achievement is a readily available benchmark for dyslipidemia control, although use of this target is not uniformly endorsed by professional societies. We examined whether HIV serostatus is associated with not achieving LDL-c target. Among Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) participants completing visit 56 (10/1/2011-3/31/2012), we categorized each man as on or off statin therapy and used NCEP ATP III guidelines to determine if each man was at LDL-c target or not at target. We compared proportions of men not at target and determined predictors using multivariate logistic regression. Sixty of 543 (11.1%) HIV-infected men and 87 of 585 (14.9%) HIV-uninfected men not receiving statin therapy were not at target (p=0.07), while 31 of 230 (13.5%) HIV-infected and 29 of 204 (14.2%) HIV-uninfected men receiving statin therapy were not at target (p=0.82). Factors associated with not being at target (among men not receiving statin therapy) included current smoking (OR=2.31, 95% CI 1.31, 4.06) and a diagnosis of hypertension (OR=4.69, 95% CI 2.68, 8.21). Factors associated with not being at target (among men receiving statin therapy) included current smoking (OR=2.72, 95% CI 1.30, 5.67) and diabetes (OR=5.31, 95% CI 2.47, 11.42). HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected men receiving statin therapy demonstrated similar nonachievement of LDL-c targets. Comorbidities (e.g., diabetes) lowered targets and may explain why goals were less likely to be met.

Semiparametric methods for multistate survival models in randomised trials.

Transform methods have proved effective for networks describing a progression of events. In semi-Markov networks, we calculated the transform of time to a terminating event from corresponding transforms of intermediate steps. Saddlepoint inversion then provided survival and hazard functions, which integrated, and fully utilised, the network data. However, the presence of censored data introduces significant difficulties for these methods. Many participants in controlled trials commonly remain event-free at study completion, a consequence of the limited period of follow-up specified in the trial design. Transforms are not estimable using nonparametric methods in states with survival truncated by end-of-study censoring. We propose the use of parametric models specifying residual survival to next event. As a simple approach to extrapolation with competing alternative states, we imposed a proportional incidence (constant relative hazard) assumption beyond the range of study data. No proportional hazards assumptions are necessary for inferences concerning time to endpoint; indeed, estimation of survival and hazard functions can proceed in a single study arm. We demonstrate feasibility and efficiency of transform inversion in a large randomised controlled trial of cholesterol-lowering therapy, the Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease study. Transform inversion integrates information available in components of multistate models: estimates of transition probabilities and empirical survival distributions. As a by-product, it provides some ability to forecast survival and hazard functions forward, beyond the time horizon of available follow-up. Functionals of survival and hazard functions provide inference, which proves sharper than that of log-rank and related methods for survival comparisons ignoring intermediate events.

Effects of steady-state lopinavir/ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of pitavastatin in healthy adult volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: Pitavastatin, a statin recently approved in the United States, has a potential benefit of reduced risk of cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated drug-drug interaction due to minimal metabolism by the CYP system. The primary objective was to investigate pharmacokinetic (PK) effects of lopinavir/ritonavir 400 mg/100 mg twice daily on pitavastatin 4 mg when coadministered. DESIGN: This was an open-label one-arm study. METHOD: Pitavastatin 4 mg was administered once daily (days 1-5 and days 20-24). Lopinavir/ritonavir 400 mg/100 mg was administered twice daily (days 9-24). Plasma samples for PK assessments were collected on days 5, 19, and 24. Plasma concentrations of analytes were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection methods. RESULTS: PK data were available for 23 of 24 subjects enrolled. For pitavastatin, area under the concentration time curve (AUC0-τ) and maximum concentration (C(max)) were 136.8 ± 52.9 ng·h(-1)·mL(-1) and 58.6 ± 30.4 ng/mL, respectively, when given alone, versus 113.9 ± 53.8 ng·h(-1)·mL(-1) and 58.2 ± 32.7 ng/mL when combined with lopinavir/ritonavir. The geometric mean ratio for AUC(0-τ) for pitavastatin with lopinavir/ritonavir versus pitavastatin alone was 80.0 (90% confidence interval: 73.4 to 87.3) and C(max) was 96.1 (90% confidence interval: 83.6 to 110.4). Median T(max) of pitavastatin was approximately 0.5 hours for both treatments. The PK effect of pitavastatin on lopinavir/ritonavir was minimal. No significant safety issues were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The effect on exposures when pitavastatin and lopinavir/ritonavir are coadministered was minimal. Concomitant use of pitavastatin and lopinavir/ritonavir was safe and well tolerated in healthy adult volunteers.

Comparison of effects of morning versus evening administration of ezetimibe/simvastatin on serum cholesterol in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe, a first-in-its-class inhibitor of cholesterol absorption, is an effective agent for combined use with statins to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Ezetimibe in combination with simvastatin as a single-tablet formulation has proven to be highly effective in reducing serum LDL-C through the dual inhibition of cholesterol absorption and biosynthesis. The effect of time of administration on efficacy of this combination therapy has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of morning versus evening administration of ezetimibe/simvastatin on serum cholesterol levels of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover study, patients with primary hypercholesterolemia randomly received ezetimibe/simvastatin 10 mg/20 mg once daily, either in the morning (within 1 hour of breakfast) or in the evening (within 1 hour of dinner) for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Data on 171 patients (87 in the morning administration group and 84 in the evening administration group) were analyzed. A significant reduction (p ≤ 0.001) in the total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, apo-lipoprotein B, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) from baseline was achieved after each treatment. Noninferiority of morning administration versus evening administration was shown in the percentage reduction of the LDL-C level from baseline (difference, -1.62%; 90% CI -4.94 to 1.70). No significant difference was found between groups with respect to the percentage of changes in other lipid parameters from baseline. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the percentage of change in hs-CRP as an antiinflammatory marker between the morning and evening administration groups. The frequency of adverse events was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Morning administration of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10 mg/20 mg is noninferior to evening administration with respect to LDL-C-lowering ability.

Localized intermittent delivery of simvastatin hydroxyacid stimulates bone formation in rats.

BACKGROUND: The cholesterol-lowering drug simvastatin promotes bone formation in cell cultures and animal models. In previous studies, devices for the controlled, localized delivery of simvastatin hydroxyacid enhanced osteoblastic activity in vitro. The objective of this investigation was to determine bioactivity of the delivery system in vivo. METHODS: Devices for sustained or intermittent release of simvastatin hydroxyacid were formed using a blend of cellulose acetate phthalate and a poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(propylene oxide) block copolymer, and they were implanted directly over the calvarium of young male rats. Drug-free devices were used as controls. After 9, 18, or 28 days, specimens were histologically evaluated for new bone formation. RESULTS: All three groups showed some level of new bone formation, but the extent of osteogenesis depended on the type of implant. Devices delivering simvastatin hydroxyacid were associated with a 77.5% to 133% increase in new woven bone thickness compared to control devices without a drug (P<0.05). Furthermore, intermittent release stimulated a 32.3% greater response in bone thickness and a 74.1% greater bone area than did sustained delivery (P<0.05). Although a minimal thickness of woven bone was formed directly under the device (up to 36 microm), a significantly thicker layer was observed at the periphery (up to 205 microm), implying mechanical and/or chemical effects directly under the implant. The percentage of lamellar bone area for intermittent and sustained release was higher than that for the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the present results of enhanced bone formation, these devices for the intermittent delivery of simvastatin hydroxyacid merit further attention for localized osteogenesis.

Evaluation of the potential for steady-state pharmacokinetic interaction between vildagliptin and simvastatin in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Vildagliptin is an orally active, potent and selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4), the enzyme responsible for the degradation of incretin hormones. By enhancing prandial levels of incretin hormones, vildagliptin improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Co-administration of vildagliptin and simva statin, an HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitor may be required to treat patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia. There fore, this study was conducted to determine the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between vildagliptin and simvastatin at steady-state. METHODS: An open label, single center, multiple dose, three period, crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy subjects. All subjects received once daily doses of either vildagliptin 100 mg or simvastatin 80 mg or the combination for 7 days with an inter-period washout of 7 days. Plasma levels of vildagliptin, simvastatin, and its active metabolite, simvastatin beta-hydroxy acid (major active metabolite of simvastatin) were determined using validated LC/MS/MS methods. Pharmacokinetic and statistical analyses were performed using WinNonlin and SAS, respectively. RESULTS: The 90% confidence intervals of C(max) and AUC(tau) of vildagliptin, simvastatin, and simvastatin beta-hydroxy acid were between 80 and 125% (bioequivalence range) when vildagliptin and simvastatin were admin istered alone and in combination. These data indicate that the rate and extent of absorption of vildagliptin and simvastatin were not affected when co-administered, nor was the metabolic conversion of simvastatin to its active metabolite. All treatments were safe and well tolerated in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of vildagliptin, simvastatin, and its active metabolite were not altered when vildagliptin and simvastatin were co-administered.

Pravastatin inhibits arrhythmias induced by coronary artery ischemia in anesthetized rats.

We have reported that chronically administered pravastatin prevented coronary artery reperfusion-induced lethal ventricular fibrillation (VF) in anesthetized rats without lowering the serum cholesterol level. The present study was undertaken to evaluate whether pravastatin prevents ischemia-induced lethal VF, simultaneously examining myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in ischemic myocardial tissues. Anesthetized rats were subjected to 30-min ischemia and 60-min reperfusion after chronic administration of pravastatin (0.02, 0.2, and 2 mg/kg), fluvastatin (2 and 4 mg/kg), or vehicle for 22 days, orally, once daily. ECG and blood pressure were continually recorded, and MPO was measured by a spectrophotometer. Pravastatin and fluvastatin significantly (P<0.05) decreased MPO activities, but only pravastatin decreased the incidence of ischemia-induced lethal VF. Both statins had no significant effects on body weight, blood pressure, heart rate, and QT interval as we reported earlier. Our results prove further that pravastatin has benefits to decrease cardiovascular mortality beyond its cholesterol-lowering effect. Pravastatin is more potent than fluvastatin in prevention of arrhythmias. A decrease in the neutrophil infiltration may be partly involved in the inhibitory effect of pravastatin on the ischemia-induced VF.

Effects of pravastatin on progression of glucose intolerance and cardiovascular remodeling in a type II diabetes model.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the effects of early treatment with a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor pravastatin on the progression of glucose intolerance and cardiovascular remodeling in a model of spontaneously developing type II diabetes mellitus (DM), the Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats. BACKGROUND: Clinical trials showed that pravastatin prevented new-onset DM in hypercholesterolemic patients, and that it was effective in prevention of cardiovascular events in diabetics. METHODS: The OLETF rats were treated with pravastatin (100 mg/kg/day) from 5 weeks of age and compared with age-matched untreated OLETF rats and normal Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) rats on serial oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) and Doppler echocardiography and on histopathological/biochemical analyses of the heart at 30 weeks. RESULTS: The OGTT revealed that 40% and 89% of untreated OLETF rats were diabetic at 20 and 30 weeks, respectively, but 0% and only 30%, respectively, were diabetic in the treated OLETF. Left ventricular diastolic function was found impaired from 20 weeks in untreated OLETF but remained normal in the treated-OLETF. The wall-to-lumen ratio and perivascular fibrosis of coronary arteries were increased in untreated-OLETF but were limited in the treated-OLETF at 30 weeks. Moreover, cardiac expressions of a fibrogenic growth factor, transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1), and a proinflammatory chemokine, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), were increased in untreated-OLETF. However, in the treated-OLETF, overexpressions of TGF-beta1 and MCP-1 were attenuated, which was associated with overexpression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) (2.5-fold of control LETO). CONCLUSIONS: Early pravastatin treatment prevented cardiovascular remodeling in the spontaneous DM model by retarding the progression of glucose intolerance, overexpressing cardiac eNOS, and inhibiting overexpressions of fibrogenic/proinflammatory cytokines.

A multiple-dose pharmacodynamic, safety, and pharmacokinetic comparison of extended- and immediate-release formulations of lovastatin.

BACKGROUND: Because lovastatin is efficiently extracted by the liver and because its administration in divided doses is associated with increased efficacy, an extended-release (ER) formulation may have the potential for a dose-sparing advantage relative to the immediate-release (IR) formulation in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the short-term pharmacodynamics, safety, and pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of lovastatin ER with those of lovastatin IR in patients with fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels between 130 and 250 mg/dL and fasting triglyceride levels < 350 mg/dL. METHODS: The study had a randomized, single-blind, positive-controlled, 2-way crossover design, with a 4-week diet/placebo run-in period and two 4-week active-treatment periods. During period 1, patients received either lovastatin ER or lovastatin IR (both 40 mg OD). After 4 weeks of the initial study treatment and a 2-week washout period, patients were switched to the alternate treatment (period 2). Pharmacodynamic parameters (LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels) were evaluated by combining data from weeks 3 and 4 of treatment. In a pharmacokinetic substudy, maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to 24 hours (AUC(024)) were determined for lovastatin, lovastatin acid, and total and active inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase on days 1 and 28 of active treatment. The geometric mean ratio of AUC(0-24) (lovastatin ER/lovastatin IR) was also calculated for each of these substances. RESULTS: Of 76 patients who entered the run-in period, 26 (12 men, 14 women; mean age, 56.2 years) were randomized to receive active treatment and 24 were included in the efficacy analysis; 13 patients were included in the pharmacokinetic substudy, 12 of whom had complete pharmacokinetic data. Compared with lovastatin IR, lovastatin ER produced a 3.9% greater reduction in LDL-C (P = 0.044). Changes in other lipid parameters were not statistically significant. In the pharmacokinetic substudy, C(max) values for lovastatin, lovastatin acid, and in hibitors of HMG-CoA reductase were lower at day 28 with lovastatin ER than with lovastatin IR. The AUC(0-24) ratio for lovastatin was 1.91 (90% CI, 1.77 - 3.35), reflecting higher bioavailability of the prodrug with lovastatin ER; in contrast, the ratios for lovastatin acid and active and total inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase were < 1. CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term study in a small number of patients, lovastatin ER 40 mg produced significantly greater LDL-C lowering than did an equal dose of lovastatin IR, with a relatively low C(max) and comparable systemic exposure to lovastatin acid and active and total inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase. Lovastatin ER was well tolerated, with no discontinuations due to adverse events.

Effects of statins in thrombosis and aortic lesion development in a dyslipemic rabbit model.

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are effective in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. The mechanism of action is mainly attributed to their plasma cholesterol lowering activity, although additional effects have been suggested. Our objective was to study whether atorvastatin and simvastatin exhibited an inhibitory effect on platelet deposition onto a triggering damaged vessel wall in addition to an antiatherosclerotic effect in the dyslipemic rabbit model. Statins were administered at identical doses of 2.5 mg/kg/day with a hyperlipidemic diet during 10 weeks. Both drugs similarly lowered total cholesterol and, moderately, triglycerides. Mural platelet deposition on damaged vessel wall placed in an ex-vivo flow perfusion system was reduced in atorvastatin treated animals (39.7+/-6.2 X 10(6) PLT/cm2) vs. controls (94.8+/-15.9 x 10(6) PLT/cm2, p <0.02). Simvastatin reduced aortic fatty streak surface coverage (31,7+/-5.3%) vs. controls (47.9+/-4.1%, p <0.005) and intimal thickening in thoracic aorta (0.15+/-0.05 intima to total area ratio in simvastatin treated animals vs. 0.36+/-0.03 in control animals, p <0.05). Atherosclerotic fatty streak coverage correlated positively with total cholesterol, tryglicerides and LDL-cholesterol levels in all groups. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors similarly lowered plasma lipids but exhibited significantly different effects in the modulation of atherosclerotic development and platelet response at the tested dose. Therefore, the effect of statins on the progression and manifestation of cardiovascular disease might be also mediated by regulating platelet response to vessel injury.

Effect of fluvastatin for safely lowering atherogenic lipids in renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine.

The lipophilic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors have been associated with rhabdomyolysis in cyclosporine-treated treated patients, indicating an interaction of drugs. We therefore studied the safety and efficacy of the hydrophilic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor fluvastatin in 14 cyclosporine-treated renal transplant patients. To qualify for inclusion, total cholesterol after dietary stabilization had to be > 240 mg/dL. Prior to starting active medication, patients underwent a 4-week placebo period. Fluvastatin was given in a dose of 20 mg once daily for 12 weeks, which was increased to 20 mg twice daily for a further 8 weeks. Fluvastatin reduced total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol in all patients at both dosages whereas no effect on high density lipoprotein cholesterol was observed. Triglyceride levels were lowered at week 20. Incremental dosages of fluvastatin did not affect cyclosporine concentration and no adjustment of cyclosporine dosage was necessary. The higher doses of fluvastatin also had no effect on renal function as judged by serum creatinine levels. Creatine phosphokinase remained unchanged throughout the study. No serious side-effects were observed. In conclusion, the hydrophilic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor fluvastatin at either 20 or 40 mg/day appears to be both safe and effective in lowering atherogenic lipids in renal transplant patients.

Effects of fluvastatin on growth of porcine and human vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro.

The effects of fluvastatin, a new fully synthetic inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, on growth and cell-cycle kinetics of porcine and human vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC) were studied by growth curves and flow cytometric determination of cell-cycle distribution. Growth curves were obtained from counting after 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, and 14 days of incubation in Dulbecco's minimum essential medium and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). For cell-cycle phase determination, cells were synchronized in G0 by 48 hours of incubation in serum-free medium, then stimulated by incubation in 10% FCS, with or without fluvastatin. There was a concentration-dependent decrease in the proliferation of human and porcine SMC when cells were incubated in the presence of fluvastatin. The reduction in the number of cells was significant with 10(-5) M and 10(-4) M fluvastatin. The G/S-phase transition of human and porcine vascular SMC was reduced to 50% of controls by 10(-4) M fluvastatin, as revealed by cell-cycle analysis. The effects of fluvastatin on growth kinetics and cell-cycle distribution could be completely reversed by the addition of 1 mM mevalonolactone, indicating that the fluvastatin effects are due to specific inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. The addition of low density lipoprotein as a source of cholesterol failed to support SMC growth and phase transition. Addition of squalene or cholesterol to the culture medium also failed to normalize cell growth. It is concluded that nonsterol products synthesized from mevalonate are necessary for the growth of SMC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of fluvastatin on human biliary lipids.

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors have rapidly become widespread in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and are known to be variable in efficacy. To investigate the effect on biliary lipids, a 3-month study using fluvastatin was devised. A total of 19 patients were enrolled in this study: all had hypercholesterolemia (7 men, 12 women; 13 with type IIa, 6 with type IIb). After an observation period of 4-6 weeks with placebo, fluvastatin at a daily dose of 30 mg was administered for 3 months. Fasting blood samples were taken early in the morning, before, and once a month during 3 months of fluvastatin treatment, for measurement of serum lipids. Cerulein-stimulated bile in the gallbladder was sampled using a duodenal tube, and the changes in biliary lipids were assessed. There was a marked decrease in serum total cholesterol after 12 weeks of treatment (21%; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the bile cholesterol saturation index (CSI): values before and after 3 months of drug administration were 0.93 and 0.99, respectively (Admirand-Small method). There were no significant changes in either the fatty acid composition of biliary lecithin or in the bile acid composition of bile. In conclusion, on the basis of these results, short-term (3 months) administration of fluvastatin does not appear to affect CSI.

Improvement of myocardial perfusion by short-term fluvastatin therapy in coronary artery disease.

Patients with hypercholesterolemia have impaired coronary and peripheral endothelial function. In patients with coronary artery disease, intracoronary acetylcholine infusion or mental stress causes paradoxical vasoconstriction, whereas lowering cholesterol restores endothelial function. The impact of lipid lowering by fluvastatin on myocardial perfusion in hypercholesterolemic patients with perfusion abnormalities was assessed by thallium-201 single photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT). A total of 22 patients were treated with fluvastatin (40 mg once daily) for 6 weeks, followed by 40 mg twice daily if low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were decreased by < or = 30%. During the 12-week treatment period, myocardial perfusion was measured by quantitative SPECT after standardized stress testing at baseline and after 12 weeks. Preliminary results for 17 male patients (mean age, 59.3 +/- 6.7 years) are presented here. LDL-C decreased from 191 +/- 26 to 146 +/- 28 mg/dL (p < 0.001). In ischemic segments myocardial perfusion increased by 30% (280 +/- 100 to 365 +/- 110 counts per matrix; p < 0.001). In normal segments perfusion increased by only 5% (451 +/- 74 to 473 +/- 69 counts per matrix; p < 0.005). The change in perfusion rate between ischemic and normal segments was significant (p < 0.005). In conclusion, LDL-C lowering with short-term fluvastatin therapy improved myocardial perfusion, especially in areas of ischemia. This suggests that improvement is due to functional restoration of coronary endothelium by fluvastatin, before anatomic regression of stenosis can occur following long-term treatment.

Treatment of combined hyperlipidemia with fluvastatin and gemfibrozil, alone or in combination, does not induce muscle damage.

Although combination therapy using 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-Co-A) reductase inhibitors and fibrates is efficacious in combined hyperlipidemia, such treatment has been associated with myopathy. For this reason, we studied the effects of fluvastatin and gemfibrozil, alone or in combination, on muscle. A total of 21 patients with combined hyperlipidemia were recruited who were matched for age, body mass index, and baseline levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, creatine phosphokinase, and myoglobin. Patients were randomized to three groups for 6-week treatment with fluvastatin at 40 mg/day, gemfibrozil at 600 mg twice daily, or a combination of the two drugs. Parameters for muscle damage were rises in levels of serum creatine phosphokinase and myoglobin compared with pre-exercise levels; these were assessed 1 hr and 8 hr after a 45 min lean body mass standardized ergometer test, which was performed before and after treatment in all patients. Biopsies from the quadriceps muscle were taken 48 hr after each test. Fluvastatin lowered total cholesterol and LDL-C by 23% and 35%, respectively (p < 0.01), with no effects on triglycerides and HDL-C. Gemfibrozil lowered triglycerides by 40% (p < 0.01) but did not lower total cholesterol or LDL-C significantly. The combination therapy decreased total cholesterol, LDL-C, and triglycerides by 28%, 29%, and 39%, respectively (p < 0.05). Pre-exercise creatine phosphokinase and myoglobin levels were not affected by treatment in any group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical efficacy of fluvastatin for hyperlipidemia in Japanese patients.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia, including heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, in a 1-year study (a 12-week open assessment, followed by 40 weeks of active treatment). Of the 337 patients enrolled in the study, the effects of fluvastatin were analyzed in 296 patients at baseline and at 12 weeks. Of these, 265 were receiving 20 mg/day fluvastatin at week 12 and in 20 patients the dose had been increased to 30 mg/day; 11 patients violated the dosing protocol. A total of 229 patients continued into the 40-week, long-term phase, and 212 patients were analyzed at baseline and after 24 and 52 weeks. At the end of treatment, 153 evaluable patients were still taking 20 mg/day fluvastatin, 1 was taking 10 mg/day, and 48 patients were taking 30 mg/day, and 10 were taking 40 mg/day. In the 20 mg/day fluvastatin group, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels decreased by 24.1% at week 12 and by 29.3% at week 52. In those patients requiring the higher doses, the corresponding reductions in LDL-C were 20.2% (week 12) and 26.7% (week 52). Total cholesterol was also reduced at week 12 by 17.0% (20 mg/day) and 15.7% (20-30 mg/day), and at week 52 by 20.4% (< or = 20 mg/day) and 19.2% (> or = 30 mg/day). Throughout the study, fluvastatin was generally well tolerated and no serious clinical adverse events were observed. In conclusion, long-term treatment of hypercholesterolemia with fluvastatin at dosages of 20-40 mg daily can be considered both safe and effective.

Long-term efficacy with fluvastatin as monotherapy and combined with cholestyramine (a 156-week multicenter study). French-Dutch Fluvastatin Study Group.

Fluvastatin monotherapy up to 40 mg/day over 52 weeks in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia decreased plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 28%, with varying decreases in plasma triglycerides and increases in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Patients completing the 52-week study participated in a further trial to assess whether the efficacy of fluvastatin (20-40 mg/day), either as monotherapy or in combination with cholestyramine (CME; 4-16 g/day), taken at least 4 hours prior to fluvastatin, is sustained for up to 3 years. Patients were assessed every 12 weeks on average for safety and efficacy, the latter being calculated as a percent change from baseline of lipids or lipoproteins. During the second year (endpoint up to week 104), 147 patients received monotherapy (estimated mean dose, 30.2 mg/day) and 127 received additional CME (38.1 mg/day fluvastatin plus 10.1 g/day CME). During the third year (endpoint up to week 156), 140 patients received monotherapy (32.5 mg/day) and 67 received additional CME (39.3 mg/day fluvastatin plus 10.3 mg/day CME). Statistically significant reductions in mean total cholesterol and LDL-C and increases in mean HDL-C were achieved in both treatment groups and maintained throughout the study. A significant reduction in triglyceride levels was only observed at the second year endpoint in patients receiving monotherapy (-10.0%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)