Fifteen years of urea cycle disorders brain research: Looking back, looking forward.

Urea cycle disorders (UCD) are inherited diseases resulting from deficiency in one of six enzymes or two carriers that are required to remove ammonia from the body. UCD may be associated with neurological damage encompassing a spectrum from asymptomatic/mild to severe encephalopathy, which results in most cases from Hyperammonemia (HA) and elevation of other neurotoxic intermediates of metabolism. Electroencephalography (EEG), Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Proton Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) are noninvasive measures of brain function and structure that can be used during HA to guide management and provide prognostic information, in addition to being research tools to understand the pathophysiology of UCD associated brain injury. The Urea Cycle Rare disorders Consortium (UCDC) has been invested in research to understand the immediate and downstream effects of hyperammonemia (HA) on brain using electroencephalogram (EEG) and multimodal brain MRI to establish early patterns of brain injury and to track recovery and prognosis. This review highlights the evolving knowledge about the impact of UCD and HA in particular on neurological injury and recovery and use of EEG and MRI to study and evaluate prognostic factors for risk and recovery. It recognizes the work of others and discusses the UCDC's prior work and future research priorities.

Saul Brusilow: Understanding and treating diseases of ammonia toxicity.

This article reviews the scientific career and accomplishments of the late Dr. Saul Brusilow, Professor of Pediatrics at Johns Hopkins. Dr. Brusilow's career was focused on diseases involving hyperammonemia. He and his colleagues developed a set of drugs that could lower ammonia levels in patients with genetic disorders of the urea cycle by providing alternative pathways for the synthesis of excretable nitrogenous molecules. Those drugs and their derivatives represent one of the earliest and most successful drug therapies for genetic diseases. Turning their attention to brain swelling caused by liver disease, Dr. Brusilow and colleagues developed the Osmotic Gliopathy Hypothesis to help explain the mechanism of ammonia toxicity, postulating that high ammonia drives glutamine synthetase in astrocytes to produce elevated levels of glutamine that act as a potent osmolyte, drawing water into the cell and causing cerebral edema. This hypothesis suggests that inhibiting glutamine synthetase with its well-characterized inhibitor, methionine sulfoximine, might prove therapeutic in cases of hepatic encephalopathy, a conclusion supported by their subsequent studies in animals. But although the drugs developed to treat hyperammonemia resulting from urea cycle disorders were successfully developed and approved by the FDA, the compound suggested as a treatment for hepatic encephalopathy was unable to attract sufficient interest and investment to be tested for use in humans.

Historical Perspective on Clinical Trials of Carnitine in Children and Adults.

The metabolic roles of carnitine have been greatly clarified over the past 50 years, and it is now well established that carnitine is a key player in mitochondrial generation of energy and metabolism of acetyl coenzyme A. A therapeutic role for carnitine in treatment of nutritional deficiencies in infants and children was first demonstrated in 1958, and since that time it has been used to treat a number of inborn errors of metabolism. Carnitine was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1985 for treatment of 'primary carnitine deficiency', and later in 1992 for treatment of 'secondary carnitine deficiency', a definition that included the majority of relevant metabolic disorders associated with low or abnormal plasma carnitine levels. Today, carnitine treatment of inborn errors of metabolism is a safe and integral part of many treatment protocols, and a growing interest in carnitine has resulted in greater recognition of many causes of carnitine depletion. Notwithstanding, there is still a lack of data from randomized clinical trials, even on the use of carnitine in inborn errors of metabolism, although ethical issues may be a contributing factor in this regard.