[Latex allergy: a review on the most important aspects]. / Alergia al látex: una revisión sobre los aspectos más importantes.

This allergy is a hypersensitivity reaction that is triggered by contact with latex. Symptoms vary depending on factors such as route, frequency, and exposure dose, as well as individual susceptibility. The clinical manifestations can be localized at the site of contact with latex or generalized. Exposure can occur directly as a result of contact with the skin and mucous membranes, that is by touching or being touched by objects with latex, or by inhaling (breathing) particles from objects with latex. Contact can also be indirect; for example, by ingesting food that has been handled by a worker wearing latex gloves or by having contact with a person who has been blowing up balloons. The diagnosis of latex allergy is made based on the patient's medical history and on what has been reported in the interrogation, and it is complemented with in vivo studies (such as skin tests and provocation tests) or in vitro studies (determination of specific IgE). The fundamental pillar in the treatment of latex allergy is the education of the patient to achieve the avoidance of products made with this material or the contact and intake of food that has had contact with latex. In view of the foregoing, latex allergy has a great medical and social relevance due to all the safety measures that the patient must take.

La alergia es una reacción de hipersensibilidad desencadenada tras el contacto con el látex. Los síntomas varían dependiendo de factores como la ruta, frecuencia y dosis de exposición, además de la susceptibilidad individual. Las manifestaciones clínicas pueden darse de forma localizada, en el sitio de contacto con el látex, o generalizadas. La exposición puede ocurrir de forma directa como resultado del contacto con la piel y mucosas, por tocar o ser tocado por objetos con látex, o al inhalar partículas provenientes de objetos con látex. El contacto también puede ser indirecto, al ingerir alimentos que fueron manipulados por un trabajador con guantes de látex, al tener contacto con una persona que ha estado inflando globos, por ejemplo. El diagnóstico de alergia al látex se realiza basado en la historia clínica del paciente, lo reportado en el interrogatorio y se complementa con estudios in vivo (como las pruebas cutáneas y las pruebas de provocación) o estudios in vitro (determinación de IgE específica). El pilar fundamental en el tratamiento de la alergia al látex es la educación del paciente para lograr la evitación de productos elaborados con este producto o el contacto e ingesta de alimentos que tuvieron contacto con el látex. Por lo anterior, la alergia al látex tiene una gran relevancia médica y social por todas las medidas de seguridad que debe llevar el paciente.

[Latex allergy: therapeutic options]. / Alergia al látex: opciones terapéuticas.

Latex allergy is a major problem worldwide due to both the severity of the symptomatology it produces and the risk groups that are exposed to it. Complete avoidance is difficult, if not impossible, due to its ubiquity. Natural rubber latex (NRL) is a natural polymer that is released by the Hevea brasiliensis (Hev b) tree, which functions as a protective sealant. It is currently used for the manufacture of health-care products such as tube caps, pistons, masks, and cannulas. The purpose of this review is to highlight the epidemiological, clinical, and diagnostic aspects of NRL allergy, and to conduct a review of the literature on its management through a bibliographic search of articles in databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, UpToDate, and Google Scholar, up to September 2021. About 121 articles were reviewed, of which 76 were used as a reference. We concluded that latex allergy is an entity for which its treatment, even nowadays, is avoidance, despite having a worldwide prevalence of 4.3 % and representing a surgical complication in about 20 % of surgeries with an anaphylactic reaction and a mortality rate that can reach 9 %. The only treatment that could modify the evolution of this disease is immunotherapy, but there are no standardized extracts yet and it has not been possible to determine the safest and most effective way to apply it.

La alergia al látex es un problema importante en el mundo debido a la gravedad de la sintomatología que produce y a los grupos de riesgo expuestos. La evitación completa es difícil, casi imposible, dada su ubicuidad. El látex de caucho natural (LCN) es un polímero secretado por el árbol Hevea brasiliensis (Hev b), que funciona como sellador protector. Actualmente se usa para fabricar productos para el cuidado de la salud como tapones para tubos, pistones, mascarillas y cánulas. El objetivo de esta revisión es resaltar los aspectos epidemiológicos, clínicos y diagnósticos de la alergia al LCN, y realizar una revisión de la literatura sobre su manejo, mediante una búsqueda bibliográfica de artículos en bases de datos como PubMed, Cochrane, UpToDate y Google Académico, hasta septiembre del 2021. Se revisaron aproximadamente 121 artículos, de los cuales se utilizaron 76 como referencia. Concluimos que la alergia al látex es una entidad cuyo tratamiento aún hoy en día es la evitación, a pesar de tener una prevalencia mundial de 4.3 % y representar una complicación quirúrgica de cerca de 20 % de las cirugías con una reacción anafiláctica y una mortalidad que puede llegar a 9 %. El único tratamiento que podría modificar la evolución de esta enfermedad es la inmunoterapia, pero aún no se cuenta con extractos estandarizados y no se ha podido determinar la vía más segura y efectiva.

Prevalence of latex sensitivity and allergy among physicians of a residency program in a children´s hospital of Buenos Aires. / Prevalencia de sensibilidad y alergia al látex en médicos de un programa de residencia de un hospital pediátrico de Buenos Aires.

Introduction: International publications estimate a 7 %-17 % latex sensitization (LS) prevalence among health care workers, but values in Argentina are unknown. Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of latex sensitization and allergy among residents of a children's hospital using the immediate-reading prick test and to assess associated risk factors in this population. Population and methods: Cross-sectional study. Residents, trainers, and Chief residents of the Departments of Pediatrics, Orthopedics, Surgery and Intensive Care were included between June and October 2017. All of them were administered a questionnaire (assessing atopic diseases and other risk factors) and underwent the immediatereading prick test. Total and latex-specific immunoglobulin E levels were determined in a subgroup of individuals (first- and fourth-year residents, surgical specialties, and intensive care). Results: A total of 113 participants were included. LS prevalence was 7.96 % (95 % confidence interval: 3.70-14.58); 4 participants were allergic to latex. A history of latex-related symptoms (LRS) was significantly associated with a positive result in the immediate-reading prick test (p = 0.0196; odds ratio: 6.13; 95 % confidence interval: 1.44-26.04). There was no association between LS and the year of the residency program. Conclusions: The observed LS prevalence was 7.9 %. There was a significant relation between a history of LRS and a positive result in the immediate-reading prick test.

Introducción. Publicaciones internacionales estiman una prevalencia de sensibilización al látex (SL) en el personal de salud del 7 % al 17 %, y se desconocen los valores en la Argentina. Objetivos. Estimar la prevalencia de sensibilización y alergia al látex en médicos residentes de un hospital pediátrico mediante la prueba epicutánea de lectura inmediata y evaluar factores de riesgo asociados en dicha población. Población y métodos. Estudio de corte transversal. Se incluyeron los residentes, jefes e instructores de Pediatría, Ortopedia, Cirugía y Terapia Intensiva entre junio y octubre de 2017. En todos, se realizó un cuestionario (que evaluó enfermedades atópicas y otros factores de riesgo) y la prueba epicutánea de lectura inmediata. En un subgrupo (residentes de 1ero, 4to año, especialidades quirúrgicas y terapia) se dosó inmunoglobulina E total y específica para látex. Resultados. Se incluyeron 113 participantes. La prevalencia de SL fue del 7,96 % (intervalo de confianza del 95 %: 3,70-14,58); 4 participantes resultaron alérgicos al látex. El antecedente de síntomas relacionados con el látex se asoció significativamente con prueba epicutánea de lectura inmediata + (p = 0,0196; odds ratio 6,13; intervalo de confianza del 95 %: 1,44-26,04). No hubo asociación entre SL y año de residencia. Conclusiones. La prevalencia de SL hallada fue del 7,9 %. Se evidenció una relación significativa entre el antecedente de SRL y un resultado de prueba epicutánea de lectura inmediata positiva.

Latex Allergy Risks Live On.

Reduction in the prevalence of IgE-mediated allergy to latex proteins from gloves in patients may lead to lax attention by health care personnel to avoid use of latex products in latex-allergic subjects. Recent evidence from the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System shows an alarming continuation of adverse events mostly from latex urinary catheters. We are strongly advocating that health care personnel must continue to pay close attention to avoidance of latex in patients with a history of latex allergy.

[Latex sensitization and allergy in Hospital General de Mexico surgery residents]. / Sensibilización y alergia a látex en residentes quirúrgicos del Hospital General de México.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of latex allergy ranges from 0.8 to 6.5% and is the second cause of perioperative anaphylaxis. The main risk factors are being a health worker or latex producer, hours of latex gloves or products usage, exposure to other hand irritants, history of atopy, neural tube closure defects or numerous surgeries at early age. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of latex sensitization in resident physicians of the Hospital General de México surgical area. METHODS: Prospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study where skin prick tests were applied to residents of the surgical area of the Hospital General de México, which depends on the Ministry of Health and is located in Mexico City. RESULTS: Ninety-two subjects were included and had skin tests practiced, with 11 surgical specialties participating. Latex sensitization in this population was 11.9%, whereas the presence of latex allergy was 10.8%. CONCLUSIONS: A high frequency of latex sensitization and allergy was demonstrated in Hospital General de Mexico surgery residents, which indicates the need for policies and procedures to be developed for health workers with latex allergy, as well as continuous training of employees on latex allergy.

Antecedentes: La prevalencia de alergia al látex oscila entre 0.8 y 6.5 % y es la segunda causa de anafilaxia perioperatoria. Los principales factores de riesgo son ser trabajador de la salud o productor de látex, horas de utilización de guantes o productos de látex, exposición a otros irritantes de manos, antecedente de atopia, defectos del cierre del tubo neural o numerosas cirugías a edad temprana. Objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia de sensibilización al látex en médicos residentes del área quirúrgica del Hospital General de México. Métodos: Estudio clínico prospectivo, transversal, descriptivo, mediante la realización de prueba de punción cutánea a residentes del área quirúrgica del Hospital General de México, Secretaría de Salud, Ciudad de México. Resultados: Se incluyeron 92 sujetos a los cuales se les realizó pruebas cutáneas, participando 11 especialidades quirúrgicas. La sensibilización al látex en esta población fue de 11.9 % y la presencia de alergia al látex de 10.8 %. Conclusiones: Se demuestró alta frecuencia de sensibilización y alergia al látex en los residentes quirúrgicos del Hospital General de México, lo que indica la necesidad de desarrollar políticas y procedimientos para los trabajadores de salud con alergia al látex y la capacitación continua de empleados sobre alergia al látex.

[Latex allergy self-report in medical students: prevalence and associated factors]. / Autorreporte de alergia al látex en estudiantes de medicina: prevalencia y factores asociados.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of latex allergy in medical students is not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of self-reported latex allergy and associated factors in medical students. METHODS: Cross-sectional, analytical study of students with or without self-reported latex allergy. By means of a structured questionnaire, past personal and family history of allergic disease, time and frequency of exposure to latex gloves and symptoms after exposure to products or foods associated with latex allergy were inquired. Logistic regression models were carried out. RESULTS: Out of 854 subjects, 431 (50.5%) were females. Median age was 21 years. Overall prevalence of latex allergy was 4.3% (95% CI = 3.1 to 5.9). Associated risk factors were age (OR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.79), personal history of atopic dermatitis (OR = 7.32; 95% CI = 3.14 to 17.08), use of gloves ≥ 15/week (OR = 2.59; 95% CI = 1.17 to 5.76), use of latex products (OR = 5.76; 95% CI = 2.15 to 15.49) and fruit allergy (OR = 3.24; 95% CI = 1.27 t o8.27). CONCLUSION: Four out of a hundred students reported latex allergy. Age, personal history of atopic dermatitis, higher frequency of exposure to latex gloves and history of fruit allergy were risk factors for self-report latex allergy.

Antecedentes: La prevalencia de la alergia al látex se desconoce en los estudiantes de medicina. Objetivo: Determinar prevalencia y factores asociados con autorreporte de alergia al látex en estudiantes de medicina. Métodos: Estudio transversal de estudiantes con o sin autorreporte de alergia al látex. Mediante cuestionario estructurado se indagó historia personal y familiar de enfermedad alérgica; tiempo y frecuencia de exposición a guantes de látex y síntomas tras la exposición a productos o alimentos relacionados con alergia al látex. Se realizaron modelos de regresión logística. Resultados: De 854 sujetos, 431 (50.5 %) fueron mujeres. La mediana de edad fue de 21 años. La prevalencia global de alergia al látex fue 4.3 % (IC 95 % = 3.1 a 5.9). Los factores de riesgo relacionados fueron edad (RM = 1.37; IC 95 % = 1.05 a 1.79), historia personal de dermatitis atópica (RM = 7.32; IC 95 % = 3.14 a 17.08), uso de guantes ≥ 15/semana (RM = 2.59; IC 95 % = 1.17 a 5.76), uso de productos con látex (RM = 5.76; IC 95 % = 2.15 a 15.49) y alergia a frutas (RM = 3.24; IC 95 % = 1.27 a 8.27). Conclusión: Cuatro de cada 100 estudiantes reportaron alergia al látex. La edad, la historia personal de dermatitis atópica, la mayor frecuencia de exposición a guantes de látex y antecedente de alergia a frutos fueron factores de riesgo.

[Perioperative allergy. A 3-year experience]. / Alergia perioperatoria. Experiencia de tres años.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative hypersensitivity reactions constitute a global health problem, with an estimated incidence of 1 per 100,000 procedures and a mortality rate of 0.1 to 9 %. Main risk factors are a history of allergy to other drugs, atopy, associated psychiatric disorders and previous surgeries. OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of sensitization and the type of drugs involved in perioperative allergy in a tertiary care hospital, over a 3-year period. METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study of perioperative allergy, corroborated by skin tests for each drug and latex, of patients treated at the Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department of Hospital General de Mexico. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients diagnosed with perioperative allergy were included. Main triggers were neuromuscular blocking agents (46.42 %), latex (28.52 %) and propofol (14.28 %). The main risk factor was a history of previous surgeries (89.28 %). Most perioperative allergic reactions were mild (71.42 %) and occurred within the postoperative period (60.71 %). CONCLUSIONS: Initial diagnosis and Treatment should always be carried out by the anesthesiologist or surgeon, who should focus on the withdrawal of possible causative agents.

Antecedentes: Las reacciones de hipersensibilidad perioperatorias constituyen un problema de salud mundial, con una incidencia estimada de uno por cada 100 000 procedimientos y una tasa de mortalidad de 0.1 a 9 %. Los principales factores de riesgo son antecedentes de alergia a otros fármacos, atopia, trastornos psiquiátricos asociados y cirugías previas. Objetivos: Determinar la frecuencia de sensibilización y tipo de medicamentos implicados en la alergia perioperatoria en un hospital de tercer nivel, durante tres años. Método: Estudio retrospectivo, transversal, descriptivo de alergia perioperatoria corroborada mediante pruebas cutáneas a cada medicamento y al látex, de pacientes atendidos en el Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica del Hospital General de México. Resultados: Se incluyeron 28 pacientes con el diagnóstico de alergia perioperatoria. Los principales desencadenantes fueron los bloqueadores neuromusculares (46.42 %), el látex (28.52 %) y el propofol (14.28 %). El principal factor de riesgo fue el antecedente de cirugías previas (89.28 %). En su mayoría, las reacciones de alergia perioperatoria fueron leves (71.42 %) y se presentaron en el periodo posoperatorio (60.71 %). Conclusiones: El diagnóstico y tratamiento iniciales siempre deberán efectuarse por el médico anestesiólogo o el cirujano, enfocados en el retiro de los posibles agentes causales.

[Self-reported prevalence of latex allergy and associated factors in healthcare workers]. / Prevalencia de autorreporte de alergia al látex y factores asociados en trabajadores de la salud.

BACKGROUND: In our country, the prevalence of latex allergy in health personnel has rarely been studied. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and associated factors to self-reported latex allergy in health care workers. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,292 health care workers of a second level hospital. All workers were included and they were required to answer a structured questionnaire aimed at identifying latex allergy, atopic personal and family history, exposure to latex gloves and surgical background. Odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) were estimated using regression logistic to investigate factors associated to latex allergy. RESULTS: The female to male ratio was 2.4:1. The men age 38.4 ± 11.6 years. The prevalence of latex allergy auto-reported was 9.7 %, with a confidence interval of 95 % (95 % CI) 8.1 %-11.3 %. There was no statistical difference by workplace (p = 0.508). Factors associated with latex allergy included female gender (OR = 1.68; 95 % CI: 1.03-2.73, p = 0.037), personal history of atopy (OR = 4.82; 95 % CI: 3.19-7.26, p < 0.0001), family history of atopic dermatitis (OR = 4.33, 95 % CI: 1.20-4.41) and history of allergy to fruits (OR = 4.33; 95 % CI: 2.62-7.14, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Up to 10 out to 100 health workers may have latex allergy. The main factors associated with latex allergy in this study were: being a female, personal or familiar atopy and allergy to fruits.

Antecedentes: pocas veces ha sido estudiada la prevalencia de alergia al látex en personal de la salud en México. Objetivo: determinar la prevalencia de autorreporte de alergia al látex y los factores asociados en trabajadores de la salud. Métodos: estudio trasversal de 1292 trabajadores de la salud de un hospital de segundo nivel, a quienes se les aplicó un cuestionario estructurado para identificar alergia al látex, historia personal y familiar de atopia, exposición a guantes de látex y antecedente de cirugías. La búsqueda de asociaciones entre variables se realizó mediante regresión logística. Se calcularon razones de momios (RM) e intervalo de confianza a 95 % (IC 95 %) Resultados: la relación mujer:hombre fue de 2.4:1. Edad media de 38.4 ± 11.6 años. La prevalencia de alergia al látex fue de 9.7 %, IC 95 %, 8.1-11.3 %. No hubo diferencia estadística por área laboral (p = 0.508). Los factores asociados con la alergia al látex fueron sexo femenino (RM = 1.68; IC 95 %, 1.03-2.73), historia personal de atopia (RM = 4.82; IC 95 %, 3.19-7.26), historia familiar de dermatitis atópica (RM = 4.33; IC 95 %, 1.20-4.41) e historia de alergia a frutos (RM = 2.30; IC 95 %, 2.62-7.14). Conclusiones: hasta 10 % los trabajadores de la salud podría presentar alergia al látex; los principales factores asociados fueron sexo femenino, atopia personal o familiar y alergia a frutos.

Alergia al látex en un hospital pediátrico: Caracterización y factores de riesgo / Latex allergy in a paediatric hospital: Characteristics and risk factors

Introducción: La prevalencia de sensibilización al látex es variable. Se describen diversos factores de riesgo para la sensibilización al látex, como riesgo genético, atopia y múltiples intervenciones quirúrgicas. Objetivo: Caracterizar los pacientes con sospecha de alergia al látex, analizar sus características clínicas y factores de riesgo. Pacientes y método: Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo, en niños derivados a la Unidad de Inmunología pediátrica por sospecha de alergia al látex y para confirmación diagnóstica. Se revisaron síntomas por contacto o exposición a materiales con látex. Se identificó factores de riesgo para la sensibilización al látex: patologías con múltiples intervenciones quirúrgicas (espina bífida, mielomeningocele, escoliosis y alteraciones nefrourológicas), atopia (rinitis o asma, dermatitis atópica), y se realizó prick test y/o IgE específica para látex. Se efectuó un modelo de regresión logística multivariado para asociar síntomas de exposición al látex con enfermedades de base y condiciones de riesgo. Resultados: Se reclutaron 106 pacientes, de los cuales 50 fueron analizables. El 96% eran mayores de 5 años de edad al momento del diagnóstico. La mayoría de los factores de riesgo descritos en la literatura eran observables en estos pacientes (múltiples cirugías, malformaciones neurológicas y nefrourológicas, intervenciones quirúrgicas antes del año de edad y cateterismo vesical repetido). Luego de la exposición, las manifestaciones cutáneo-mucosas fueron las más frecuentes (52%), seguidas por las respiratorias (36%). El 100% de los pacientes estaban sensibilizados al látex. Conclusión: La sensibilización y alergia al látex es un problema relevante en niños con factores de riesgo. Los resultados mostrados plantean importantes desafíos en relación con medidas preventivas.

Introduction: The prevalence of latex sensitisation varies according to the population studied. There are various risk factors that increase latex sensitisation, such as genetic risk, atopy, and multiple surgeries. Objective: To characterise patients referred to an Immunology Unit with suspected latex allergy, and to analyse their clinical features and risk factors. Patients and method: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted on children suspected of latex allergy. Their medical records were reviewed in order to assess symptoms with contact or exposure to latex materials. Known risk factors to latex sensitisation, such as pathologies requiring repeated surgery (spina bifida, myelomeningocele, scoliosis and nephro-urological alterations), atopy (rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis) were investigated. A prick test and/or specific IgE to latex were also performed. A multivariate logistic regression model was performed to find associations between symptoms triggered by exposure to latex with underlying diseases and other risk conditions. Results: A total of 106 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 50 were evaluable. At diagnosis 96% of patients were older than five years. Most of the risk factors described were observable in these patients, such as multiple surgeries, neurological and nephro-urological malformations, surgery before one year-old, and repeated bladder catheterisation. After latex exposure, mucous cutaneous manifestations were the most common (52%), followed by respiratory symptoms (36%). All patients were sensitised and allergic to latex. Conclusion: Latex allergy is a significant problem in children with risk factors. The results shown in this study raise important challenges for preventive measures and awareness.

[Latex allergy in a paediatric hospital. Characteristics and risk factors]. / Alergia al látex en un hospital pediátrico. Caracterización y factores de riesgo.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of latex sensitisation varies according to the population studied. There are various risk factors that increase latex sensitisation, such as genetic risk, atopy, and multiple surgeries. OBJECTIVE: To characterise patients referred to an Immunology Unit with suspected latex allergy, and to analyse their clinical features and risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted on children suspected of latex allergy. Their medical records were reviewed in order to assess symptoms with contact or exposure to latex materials. Known risk factors to latex sensitisation, such as pathologies requiring repeated surgery (spina bifida, myelomeningocele, scoliosis and nephro-urological alterations), atopy (rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis) were investigated. A prick test and/or specific IgE to latex were also performed. A multivariate logistic regression model was performed to find associations between symptoms triggered by exposure to latex with underlying diseases and other risk conditions. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 50 were evaluable. At diagnosis 96% of patients were older than five years. Most of the risk factors described were observable in these patients, such as multiple surgeries, neurological and nephro-urological malformations, surgery before one year-old, and repeated bladder catheterisation. After latex exposure, mucous cutaneous manifestations were the most common (52%), followed by respiratory symptoms (36%). All patients were sensitised and allergic to latex. CONCLUSION: Latex allergy is a significant problem in children with risk factors. The results shown in this study raise important challenges for preventive measures and awareness.

[Latex sensitization prevalence through prick test in patients with genitourinary malformations and more than 3 surgeries]. / Prevalencia de sensibilización al látex mediante prueba cutánea (prick test) en pacientes con malformaciones genitourinarias con más de tres intervenciones quirúrgicas.

BACKGROUND: Latex allergy is a public health issue. It presents elevated prevalence in known risk groups, especially in those patients with spine bifida condition, urinal malformation and for those with orthopedic problems - multiple surgeries. Health Services in Mexico do not have the enough studies about prevalence and risk associated to latex allergy. OBJECTIVE: Determine latex sensitization prevalence through PRICK test in patients with genitourinary malformations and more than 3 surgeries in UMAE pediatric CMNO unit, considering too related factors. MATERIAL AND METHOD: An analytical and descriptive cross-sectional study was performed, which included men and women from 1 to 16 years with genitourinary malformations and more than three surgeries performed. A survey to know the risk factors associated and skin puncture test was performed with latex extract, with positive and negative control. Serum levels of total IgE and eosinophils were measured in peripheral blood. RESULTS: The study exposed prevalence of 30.72%. Related to associated factors as follows: atopy (p=0.047), previous antecedent reaction to latex products (p=0.003) specific for balloons (p=0.000) and gloves (p=0.002). There was not association related to amount of surgeries and surgical interventions on early age, either for high levels of total serum IgE. CONCLUSION: Prevalence to latex sensitization is high in risk groups. Especially in those with atopy thereby is important for health personal to identify these patients in order to implement on time the preventive primary/secondary measures. With these actions potential mortal risks like anaphylaxis will be avoided. This will decrease sanitary costs and mortality.

Antecedentes: la alergia al látex tiene alta prevalencia en grupos de riesgo conocidos, especialmente en pacientes con espina bífida, malformaciones urinarias y ortopédicas con múltiples cirugías. En México no se cuenta con suficientes estudios que reporten la prevalencia y factores de riesgo asociados. Objetivo: determinar la prevalencia de sensibilización al látex mediante prueba de prick con extracto de látex en pacientes con malformaciones genitourinarias y más de tres cirugías en la Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad de Pediatría del Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, así como los factores asociados. Material y método: Se realizó un estudio transversal analítico y descriptivo, que incluyó hombres y mujeres de 1 a 16 años, con malformaciones genitourinarias y más de tres cirugías. Se aplicó una encuesta para conocer los factores de riesgo asociados y se realizó prueba cutánea por punción con extracto de látex, con control positivo y negativo. Se midieron niveles séricos de IgE total y eosinófilos en sangre periférica. Resultados: la prevalencia encontrada fue de 30.7% y los factores de riesgo asociados: atopia personal (p=0.047), antecedente de reacción previa con productos con látex (p=0.003), específicamente con globos (p=0.000) y guantes (p=0.002). No hubo asociación entre el número de cirugías e intervenciones quirúrgicas a edades tempranas, tampoco con concentraciones elevadas de IgE sérica total. Tuvieron reacción cruzada a frutas-látex 25% de los pacientes, los alimentos asociados fueron: aguacate, papaya, fresa y kiwi. Conclusión: la prevalencia de sensibilización al látex es alta en los grupos de riesgo, sobre todo con antecedente de atopia, por lo que es importante que el personal de salud identifique a estos pacientes a fin de implementar oportunamente las medidas de prevención primaria y secundaria; evitar efectos severos potencialmente mortales, como la anafilaxia, para disminuir la morbilidad y la mortalidad y los costos sanitarios.

Prevalence of latex allergy in a population of patients diagnosed with myelomeningocele.

INTRODUCTION: Latex allergy is one of the main reasons of anaphylaxis in the operating room. The prevalence of this condition is higher among patients with myelomeningocele. Epidemiological data obtained from Argentine patients is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of latex sensitivity and latex allergy in a population of patients with myelomeningocele and to describe associated risk factors. POPULATION AND METHODS: Descriptive, cross-sectional, observational study. Family and personal history of allergy, number of surgeries, history of symptoms caused by having been in contact with latex or cross-reactive foods, eosinophil count, measurement of total immunoglobulin E and specific immunoglobulin E levels by means of skin and serologic testing for latex, aeroallergens and cross-reactive fruit. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients diagnosed with myelomeningocele were assessed: 41 were males and their average age was 15.3 ± 7.66 years old. Out of all patients, two did not complete skin and serologic testing. Among the remaining 80 patients, 16 (19.51%) had latex allergy, 46 (57.5%) were not allergic, and 18 (22%) showed sensitivity but not allergy. Having undergone more than five surgeries was a risk factor associated with latex allergy (p= 0.035). No significant association was observed with the remaining outcome measures. CONCLUSION: According to this study, the prevalence of latex allergy in this population of patients is 19.51% and the most important risk factor for this condition is a history of having undergone more than five surgeries.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La alergia al látex se encuentra dentro de las primeras causas de anafilaxia en el quirófano. La prevalencia de esta enfermedad es más elevada en pacientes con mielomenigocele. Existen escasos datos epidemiológicos en pacientes argentinos. OBJETIVO: Estimar la prevalencia de la sensibilidad y de la alergia al látex en una población de pacientes con mielomeningocele y describir los factores de riesgo asociados. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo, transversal, observacional. Se analizaron los antecedentes familiares y personales de alergia, el número de procedimientos quirúrgicos, la historia de síntomas ante el contacto con látex o alimentos con reactividad cruzada, el recuento de eosinófilos, la inmunoglobulina E total y la inmunoglobulina E específica mediante pruebas serológicas y cutáneas para el látex, los aeroalérgenos y las frutas con reactividad cruzada. RESULTADOS: Se evaluaron 82 pacientes con diagnóstico de mielomeningocele, 41 del sexo masculino (50%), con edad promedio de 15,3 ± 7,66 años. Del total de los pacientes, 2 no realizaron las pruebas cutáneas y serológicas. De los 80 restantes, 16 (19,51%) presentaban alergia al látex, 46 (57,5%) no eran alérgicos y 18 (22%) fueron sensibles pero no alérgicos. Se observó que haber tenido más de 5 cirugías representaba un factor de riesgo asociado a alergia al látex (p= 0,035). No se encontró una asociación significativa con el resto de las variables evaluadas. CONCLUSION: El estudio estima que la prevalencia de alergia al látex en esta población de pacientes es de 19,51% y que el factor de riesgo más importante para el desarrollo de esta patología es el antecedente de haber sido sometido a más de 5 intervenciones.

Prevalencia de alergia al látex en una población de pacientes con diagnóstico de mielomeningocele / Prevalence of latex allergy in a population of patients diagnosed with myelomeningocele

Introducción: La alergia al látex se encuentra dentro de las primeras causas de anafilaxia en el quirófano. La prevalencia de esta enfermedad es más elevada en pacientes con mielomenigocele. Existen escasos datos epidemiológicos en pacientes argentinos. Objetivo: Estimar la prevalencia de la sensibilidad y de la alergia al látex en una población de pacientes con mielomeningocele y describir los factores de riesgo asociados. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio descriptivo, transversal, observacional. Se analizaron los antecedentes familiares y personales de alergia, el número de procedimientos quirúrgicos, la historia de síntomas ante el contacto con látex o alimentos con reactividad cruzada, el recuento de eosinófilos, la inmunoglobulina E total y la inmunoglobulina E específica mediante pruebas serológicas y cutáneas para el látex, los aeroalérgenos y las frutas con reactividad cruzada. Resultados: Se evaluaron 82 pacientes con diagnóstico de mielomeningocele, 41 del sexo masculino (50%), con edad promedio de 15,3 ± 7,66 años. Del total de los pacientes, 2 no realizaron las pruebas cutáneas y serológicas. De los 80 restantes, 16 (19,51%) presentaban alergia al látex, 46 (57,5%) no eran alérgicos y 18 (22%) fueron sensibles pero no alérgicos. Se observó que haber tenido más de 5 cirugías representaba un factor de riesgo asociado a alergia al látex (p= 0,035). No se encontró una asociación significativa con el resto de las variables evaluadas. Conclusión: El estudio estima que la prevalencia de alergia al látex en esta población de pacientes es de 19,51% y que el factor de riesgo más importante para el desarrollo de esta patología es el antecedente de haber sido sometido a más de 5 intervenciones.

Introduction: Latex allergy is one of the main reasons of anaphylaxis in the operating room. The prevalence of this condition is higher among patients with myelomeningocele. Epidemiological data obtained from Argentine patients is scarce. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of latex sensitivity and latex allergy in a population of patients with myelomeningocele and to describe associated risk factors. Population and Methods: Descriptive, crosssectional, observational study. Family and personal history of allergy, number of surgeries, history of symptoms caused by having been in contact withlatex or cross-reactive foods, eosinophil count, measurement of total immunoglobulin E and specific immunoglobulin E levels by means of skin and serologic testing for latex, aeroallergens and cross-reactive fruit. Results: Eighty-two patients diagnosed with myelomeningocele were assessed: 41 were males and their average age was 15.3 ? 7.66 years old. Out of all patients, two did not complete skin and serologic testing. Among the remaining 80 patients, 16 (19.51%) had latex allergy, 46 (57.5%) were not allergic, and 18 (22%) showed sensitivity but not allergy. Having undergone more than five surgeries was a risk factor associated with latex allergy (p= 0.035). No significant association was observed with the remaining outcome measures. Conclusion: According to this study, the prevalence of latex allergy in this population of patients is 19.51% and the most important risk factor for this condition is a history of having undergone more than five surgeries.

Alergia al látex en el período perioperatorio / Latex allergy in the perioperative period

Latex or natural rubber latex is a processed plant-based product, extracted from the tropical tree Hevea Brasiliensis. This raw material is widely used in about 40.000 medical and daily-used products. Latex allergy is a relevant pathology in surgical environments that arose after the establishment of universal precautions during the nineties. Risk groups include health-care workers and children with spine bifida who have a prevalence ranging between 2.9-17 percent and 30-70 percent, respectively. Latex allergy occurs in a variety of ways in health facilities including hypersensitivity reaction type IV or type I. In the former, chemical substances added to latex trigger the allergic reactions; where allergic dermatitis is the most-frequently found case. In the latter, the reactions are triggered by the contact with latex proteins causing from urticarial to anaphylactic shock and death. Diagnosis of latex allergy is based on a clinical history and/or physical examination associated with a confirmatory test as prick test (latex allergy type I) or cutaneous patches (latex allergy type IV). Nowadays, there is no definitive cure for the latex allergy and its treatment is based on allergen avoidance.

El látex o caucho natural es un producto vegetal procesado que se obtiene a partir del árbol tropical Hevea Brasiliensis. Esta materia prima es ampliamente usada, estando presente en hasta 40.000 productos médicos y de uso diario. La alergia al látex es una patología relevante en el ámbito quirúrgico, que surgió posterior a la instauración de las precauciones universales en la década del 90. Dentro de los grupos de riesgo se encuentran trabajadores de la salud y pacientes con espina bífida con una prevalencia que oscila entre 2,9 a 17 por ciento y 30 a 70 por ciento, respectivamente. La presentación clínica de alergia al látex tiene un espectro amplio, pudiendo presentarse como reacciones por hipersensibilidad tipo IV o tipo I. En el primer grupo, las reacciones son gatilladas por los químicos adicionados al látex, siendo la dermatitis alérgica de contacto su presentación más frecuente. En el segundo grupo, las reacciones son secundarias al contacto con proteínas del látex, pudiéndose manifestar desde urticaria hasta shock anafiláctico y muerte. El diagnóstico de alergia al látex se basa en una historia clínica y/o examen físico compatible asociado a un examen confirmatorio, como el prick test (alergia al látex tipo I) y el parche cutáneo (alergia al látex tipo IV). Actualmente no existe una cura definitiva para la alergia al látex y su tratamiento se basa en evitar la exposición al alérgeno.

Profile of latex sensitization and allergies in children and adolescents with myelomeningocele in São Paulo, Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Latex allergy is an important cause of occupational allergy. In many countries the prevalence of latex allergy is still high and the profile of latex sensitization is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the frequency of sensitization and allergy to latex in children and adolescents with myelomeningocele and to identify associated risk factors. METHODS: The study included 55 children and adolescents with myelomeningocele followed at a specialized center. In addition to a standard questionnaire and skin prick tests (SPTs) to aeroallergens and total latex, the patients underwent determination of total and specific serum IgE to latex and recombinant allergens. RESULTS: We observed a prevalence of 25% for latex sensitization and of 20% for latex allergy. Twenty-four patients (43.6%) were atopic and the average age for the first reaction to latex was 44.5 months. Cutaneous reactions were the most frequently reported reactions (72.7%). Specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E to rHev b 1, rHev b 3, rHev b 5, rHev b 6.1, and rHev b 6.2 was detected in over 50% of patients allergic to latex. Multivariate analysis showed current asthma, atopy, and having undergone 4 or more operations to be risk factors for latex sensitization. CONCLUSIONS: Our study documented a high prevalence of sensitization and allergy to latex in patients with myelomeningocele. Specific IgE to rHev b 1, rHev b 3, rHev b 5, rHev b 6.1, and rHev b 6.2 was detected in over 50% of children and adolescents with myelomeningocele who are allergic to latex. A history of current asthma, atopy, and having undergone 4 or more operations were independent risk factors for latex allergy.

Perioperative latex hypersensitivity reactions: an integrative literature review.

This article characterizes hypersensitivity reactions during anesthetic-surgical procedures. This integrative literature review was conducted in the LILACS, CINAHL, COCHRANE and MEDLINE databases including papers published from 1966 to September 2011. A total of 17 case reports, two prevalence studies and one cohort study were identified. Latex reactions were mainly type III and the primary source of intraoperative reaction was latex gloves. The average time for clinical manifestation was 59.8 minutes after anesthetic induction; 44.4% of patients reported a reaction to latex at the pre-anesthetic evaluation. It was determined that the history of allergic reactions to latex obtained in the pre-anesthetic evaluation does not ensure the safety of patients if the staff is inattentive to the severity of the issue. There is also a tendency to initially attribute the anaphylactic event to the anesthetic drugs.

Perioperative latex hypersensitivity reactions: an integrative literature review / Hipersensibilidade ao látex no período perioperatório: revisão integrativa da literatura / Hipersensibilidad al latex en el peri-operatório: una revisión integradora de la literatura

This article characterizes hypersensitivity reactions during anesthetic-surgical procedures. This integrative literature review was conducted in the LILACS, CINAHL, COCHRANE and MEDLINE databases including papers published from 1966 to September 2011. A total of 17 case reports, two prevalence studies and one cohort study were identified. Latex reactions were mainly type III and the primary source of intraoperative reaction was latex gloves. The average time for clinical manifestation was 59.8 minutes after anesthetic induction; 44.4% of patients reported a reaction to latex at the pre-anesthetic evaluation. It was determined that the history of allergic reactions to latex obtained in the pre-anesthetic evaluation does not ensure the safety of patients if the staff is inattentive to the severity of the issue. There is also a tendency to initially attribute the anaphylactic event to the anesthetic drugs.

Este estudo teve por objetivo caracterizar as reações de hipersensibilidade ao látex em procedimentos anestésico-cirúrgicos. Foi realizada revisão integrativa da literatura nas bases LILACS, CINAHL, COCHRANE e MEDLINE, com seleção de artigos publicados em periódicos indexados de 1966 a setembro de 2011. Foram identificados 17 relatos de caso, dois estudos de prevalência e um de coorte. As reações ao látex foram majoritariamente do tipo III, e a principal fonte desencadeadora de reações no intraoperatório foram as luvas de látex; o tempo médio para manifestação da reação foi de 59,8 minutos após a indução anestésica; 44,4% dos pacientes relataram episódio de reação ao látex na avaliação pré-anestésica. Identificou-se que a história de episódios de reações a materiais de borracha, ou alimentos, na avaliação pré-anestésica não garante a segurança dos pacientes, se o profissional não estiver alerta à gravidade do problema; no caso de ocorrência de um evento anafilactoide, os profissionais tendem a suspeitar inicialmente dos medicamentos anestésicos.

Este estudio tuvo como objetivo caracterizar las reacciones de hipersensibilidad al látex en la anestesia. Ha sido realizada una revisión integradora de la literatura en LILACS, CINAHL, COCHRANE y MEDLINE, con una selección de artículos publicados en periódicos indexados de 1966 hasta septiembre 2011. Fueron identificados 17 casos clínicos, 2 estudios de prevalencia y 1 de la cohorte. Las reacciones al látex fueron en su mayoría del tipo III y la principal fuente de reacción intra-operatoria fue el contacto con los guantes de látex. El tiempo medio hasta la aparición de respuesta fue de 59.8 minutos después de la inducción, 44,4% de los pacientes informaron una reacción al látex en el periodo pre-anestésico. La historia de reacciones alérgicas al látex en el periodo pre-anestésico no garantiza la seguridad de los pacientes si el profesional no está atento a la gravedad del problema. Al principio, se tiende a atribuir que el efecto de la anafilaxia se debe a los medicamentos anestésicos.

Prevalência de sinais de sensibilidade ao látex em pacientes com mielomeningocele submetidos a múltiplos procedimentos cirúrgicos / Prevalence of sensitivity signals to latex in meningomyelocele patients undergoing multiple surgical procedures

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O número de pacientes alérgicos ao látex vem aumentando significativamente. É essencial reconhecê-los para preve nir e aplicar o tratamento adequado. O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a prevalência de alergia ao látex em pacientes com mielomeningocele. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados, retrospectivamente, os prontuários médicos de pacientes com diagnóstico de mielomeningocele no período de janeiro de 2002 a dezembro de 2007. Os pacientes foram agrupados em alérgicos e não alérgicos. A comparação dos grupos em relação ao gênero foi feita pelo teste do Qui-quadrado, pelo teste t de Student em relação à idade, e o teste de Mann-Whitney para comparação entre os grupos em relação as manifestações clínicas de alergia, número de procedimentos sob anestesia, de internações hospitalares e de cateterizações vesicais. RESULTADOS: O número médio de procedimentos sob anestesia foi de 7 no grupo com alergia e 4 no grupo sem alergia, sendo esta diferença estatisticamente significante (p = 0,028). O número médio de internações hospitalares foi de 4,5 no grupo com alergia e 3,4 no grupo sem alergia e a média de cateterização vesical foi 24,5 nos alérgicos e 21,7 nos não alérgicos. CONCLUSÕES: Os pacientes portadores de mielomeningocele submetidos a múltiplos procedimentos sob anestesia apresentam alto risco de desenvolvimento de sinais clínicos de alergia ao látex. Há necessidade de que pacientes com diagnóstico de mielomeningocele sejam submetidos exclusivamente a procedimentos latex-free, evitando o alto risco de sensibilização e suas complicações. Testes específicos para avaliação da sensibilização, marcadores genéticos e relação látex-fruta poderão contribuir para melhor entendimento dos fatores de risco relacionados à alergia ao látex e formas de prevenção.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The number of patients allergic to latex has increased significantly. It is crucial to recognize the cases in order to prevent and apply adequate treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of allergy to latex in meningomyelocele patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of medical records of patients with meningomyelocele diagnosis from January 2002 to December 2007 was conducted. Patients were grouped into allergics and non-allergics. The comparison of groups for gender was made by the Chi-Squared test, the Student's t test was used to compare age, and Mann-Whitney test was used to compare groups for clinical manifestations of allergy, number of procedures under anesthesia, hospital admissions and vesical catheterizations. RESULTS: The mean number of procedures under anesthesia was 7 in the group with allergy and 4 in the group without allergy; this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.028). The mean number of hospital admissions was 4.5 in the group with allergy and 3.4 in group without allergy and mean vesical catheterization was 24.5 in allergic patients and 21.7 in non allergic ones. CONCLUSIONS: Meningomyelocele patients undergoing multiple procedures under anesthesia have high risk of developing clinical signals of allergy to latex. It is necessary that patients with meningomyelocele diagnosis should undergo exclusively latex-free procedures, avoiding high risk of sensitization and its complications. Specific tests to evaluate sensitization, genetic markers and latex-fruit relationship may contribute to a better understanding of risk factors related to allergy to latex and ways to prevent it.

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: El número de pacientes alérgicos al látex ha venido aumentando significativamente. Es esencial reconocer los casos para prevenir y aplicar el tratamiento adecuado. El objetivo del estudio, fue evaluar la prevalencia de alergia al látex en pacientes con mielomeningocele. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Fueron evaluadas retrospectivamente, las historias clínicas de pacientes con diagnóstico de mielomeningocele en el período de enero de 2002 a diciembre de 2007. Los pacientes fueron agrupados en alérgicos y no alérgicos. La comparación de los grupos con relación al sexo se hizo por medio del test del Xi-Cuadrado (Xi²), por el test t de Student con relación a la edad, y el test de Mann-Whitney para la comparación entre los grupos, con relación a las manifestaciones clínicas de alergia, número de procedimientos bajo anestesia, de ingresos hospitalarios y de cateterizaciones vesicales. RESULTADOS: El número promedio de procedimientos bajo anestesia fue de 7 en el grupo con alergia y 4 en el grupo sin alergia, siendo que esa diferencia es estadísticamente significativa (p = 0,028). El número promedio de ingresos fue de 4,5 en el grupo con alergia y de 3,4 en el grupo sin alergia, y el promedio de cateterización vesical fue 24,5 en los alérgicos y de 21,7 en los no alérgicos. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes portadores de mielomeningocele sometidos a múltiples procedimientos bajo anestesia, presentan un alto riesgo de desarrollar signos clínicos de alergia al látex. Existe la necesidad de que pacientes con diagnóstico de mielomeningocele se sometan exclusivamente a procedimientos latex-free, evitando así el alto riesgo de sensibilización y sus complicaciones. Test específicos para la evaluación de la sensibilización, marcadores genéticos y relación látex-fruta, podrán contribuir para un mejor entendimiento de los factores de riesgo relacionados con la alergia al látex y con las formas de prevención.

Prevalence of sensitivity signals to latex in meningomyelocele patients undergoing multiple surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The number of patients allergic to latex has increased significantly. It is crucial to recognize the cases in order to prevent and apply adequate treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of allergy to latex in meningomyelocele patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of medical records of patients with meningomyelocele diagnosis from January 2002 to December 2007 was conducted. Patients were grouped into allergics and non-allergics. The comparison of groups for gender was made by the Chi-Squared test, the Student's t test was used to compare age, and Mann-Whitney test was used to compare groups for clinical manifestations of allergy, number of procedures under anesthesia, hospital admissions and vesical catheterizations. RESULTS: The mean number of procedures under anesthesia was 7 in the group with allergy and 4 in the group without allergy; this difference was statistically significant (p=0.028). The mean number of hospital admissions was 4.5 in the group with allergy and 3.4 in group without allergy and mean vesical catheterization was 24.5 in allergic patients and 21.7 in non allergic ones. CONCLUSIONS: Meningomyelocele patients undergoing multiple procedures under anesthesia have high risk of developing clinical signals of allergy to latex. It is necessary that patients with meningomyelocele diagnosis should undergo exclusively latex-free procedures, avoiding high risk of sensitization and its complications. Specific tests to evaluate sensitization, genetic markers and latex-fruit relationship may contribute to a better understanding of risk factors related to allergy to latex and ways to prevent it.