Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Public Health Rep ; 134(2): 150-154, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30657730

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Social distancing is the practice of restricting contact among persons to prevent the spread of infection. This study sought to (1) identify key features of preparedness and the primary concerns of local public health officials in deciding to implement social distancing measures and (2) determine whether any particular factor could explain the widespread variation among health departments in responses to past outbreaks. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of health departments in the United States in 2015 to understand factors influencing health departments' decision making when choosing whether to implement social distancing measures. We paired survey results with data on area population demographic characteristics and analyzed them with a focus on broad trends. RESULTS: Of 600 health departments contacted, 150 (25%) responded. Of these 150 health departments, 63 (42%) indicated that they had implemented social distancing in the past 10 years. Only 10 (7%) health departments had a line-item budget for isolation or quarantine. The most common concern about social distancing was public health impact (n = 62, 41%). Concerns about law, politics, finances, vulnerable populations, and sociocultural issues were each identified by 7% to 10% of health departments. We were unable to clearly predict which factors would influence these decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in the decision to implement social distancing are likely the result of differences in organizational authority and resources and in the primary concerns about implementing social distancing. Research and current social distancing guidelines for health departments should address these factors.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Isolamento de Pacientes/organização & administração , Administração em Saúde Pública/métodos , Hospitais de Isolamento/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Política , Administração em Saúde Pública/economia , Administração em Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Quarentena/organização & administração , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 23(6): 965-967, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28518036

RESUMO

To identify barriers to maintaining and applying capabilities of US high-level isolation units (HLIUs) used during the Ebola virus disease outbreak, during 2016 we surveyed HLIUs. HLIUs identified sustainability challenges and reported the highly infectious diseases they would treat. HLIUs expended substantial resources in development but must strategize models of sustainability to maintain readiness.


Assuntos
Defesa Civil/organização & administração , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/prevenção & controle , Hospitais de Isolamento/provisão & distribuição , Ebolavirus/patogenicidade , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/economia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/transmissão , Hospitais de Isolamento/economia , Humanos , Saúde Pública/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...