Specialist shortage in developing countries: comprehending delays in care.

We describe a case of a middle-aged woman who presented with progressive jaundice and was suspected to have rebound choledocholithiasis, which was initially managed with balloon extraction through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at her first presentation. Healthcare in Pakistan, like many other developing countries, is divided into public and private sectors. The public sector is not always completely free of cost. Patients seeking specialised care in the public sector may find lengthy waiting times for an urgent procedure due to a struggling system and a lack of specialists and technical expertise. Families of many patients find themselves facing 'catastrophic healthcare expenditure', an economic global health quandary much ignored.

Cost Effectiveness of Metal Stents in Relieving Obstructive Jaundice in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: ASGE and ESGE guidelines recommend endoscopic metal stent placement for pancreatic carcinoma patients with biliary obstruction, and whose estimated life expectancy is greater than 6 months. Because median overall survival (OS) of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma until recently has been less than 6 months, plastic biliary stents were preferentially placed rather than metal due to the greater upfront cost of the latter. Recent advances in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer have extended median OS beyond the 6-month range. Given this improvement in OS, we performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of initial metal biliary versus plastic stent placement in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with biliary obstruction. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to predict lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost effectiveness of metal compared with plastic stents. Adult patients entered the model with locally advanced cancer and underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with placement of metal or plastic stents. A targeted literature search was conducted to identify published sources, which were used to estimate clinical, cost, utility, and event rate inputs to the model. Results were estimated from the third-party payer perspective in 2012 US dollars per QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact on model outcomes resulting from uncertainty among inputs. RESULTS: Our analysis found that initial placement of metal stents was more cost effective than plastic biliary stents with lower overall costs due to lower restenting rates while at the same time associated with a better quality of life. Based on model projections, placement of metal stents could save approximately $1450 per patient over a lifetime, while simultaneously improving quality of life. These findings were robust in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of metal biliary stents at initial onset of obstructive jaundice in adult patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma with an expected OS greater than 6 months was found to be a more cost-effective strategy than plastic stents. These results reinforce guidelines' suggestions for metal stent placement.

Cost-effectiveness of preoperative biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice in pancreatic and periampullary cancer.

BACKGROUND: A recent Cochrane Review found that preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in patients with resectable pancreatic and periampullary cancer undergoing surgery for obstructive jaundice is associated with similar mortality but increased serious morbidity compared with no PBD. Despite this clinical evidence of its lack of effectiveness, PBD is still in use. We considered the economic implications of PBD versus direct surgery for obstructive jaundice in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Model-based cost-utility analysis estimating mean costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient from the perspective of the UK National Health Service over a 6-month time horizon. A decision tree model was constructed and populated with probabilities, outcomes, and cost data from published sources. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: PBD was more costly than direct surgery (mean cost per patient £10,775 [$15,616] versus £8221 [$11,914]) and produced fewer QALYs (mean QALYs per patient 0.337 versus 0.343). Not performing PBD would result in cost savings of approximately £2500 ($3623) per patient to the National Health Service. PBD had <10% probability of being cost-effective at a maximum willingness to pay for a QALY of £20,000 ($28,986) to £30,000 ($43,478). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant cost savings to be gained by avoiding routine PBD in patients with resectable pancreatic and periampullary cancer where PBD is still routinely used in this context; this economic evidence should be used to support the clinical argument for a change in practice.

Outcome of hepatobiliary scanning: preterm versus full-term cholestatic infants.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the specificity of a non-draining hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) for biliary atresia (BA) in preterm and full-term babies, to verify the relationship between non-draining scan and higher levels of direct bilirubin and to find an objective criterion to guide the time in performing HBS. METHODS: A total of 175 infants (113 males and 62 females, median age of 45 days) with 181 HBS performed in Tuen Mun Hospital between January 1998 and May 2010 were retrospectively analysed. A 'non-draining' scan was defined as one showing no excretion of radiolabelled tracer into the small bowel 24 h after injection. The disease category, epidemiological and laboratory data were compared between infants having non-draining and draining scans. In addition, the predictive value of a negative scan for BA was compared between preterm and full-term infants. RESULTS: Twenty infants (11.4%) were surgically confirmed to have BA. A non-draining scan was found to be 100% sensitive for BA, and the specificity was 96% and 78% among full-term infants and preterm infants, respectively. The mean direct bilirubin values of infants with BA and intrahepatic cholestasis were 141.9 and 111.3 µmol/L, respectively, which were significantly higher than 67.2 µmol/L seen in infants with draining scans. This analysis shows that using direct bilirubin ≥63 µmol/L as an objective criterion in guiding the time to perform HBS is most cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Our data supported that using direct bilirubin ≥63 µmol/L as an objective criterion in guiding the time to perform HBS will avoid unnecessary scans.

Is metallic stenting worthwhile for biliary obstruction due to lymph node metastases?

BACKGROUND: The indications for metallic stents have widened from primary hepatobiliary cancers to the other diseases such as lymph node metastases from distant organs. The present study aimed to evaluate the results and establish the efficacy of metallic stenting in patients with obstructive jaundice due to metastatic lymph nodes. METHODS: Stent patency, survival and cost per patient until death were retrospectively compared between patients with primary carcinoma of the biliary tract (PC group; n = 71) and lymph node metastases from the gastric and colorectal carcinomas. (LN group; n = 26). RESULTS: Stent occlusion occurred in 17 patients in the PC group (24%). In contrast, stent occlusion was significantly more frequent in the LN group (P = 0.0293), occurring in 13 patients (50%). Cumulative stent patency was also significantly shorter in the LN group than that in the PC group (P = 0.0016). However, survival was almost the same between the two groups. The mean medical fee was 27% higher for the LN group than for the PC group, which was attributable to additional treatment for stent occlusion. DISCUSSION: The indications for metallic stent placement for biliary obstruction caused by lymph node metastases from the gastrointestinal tract seem limited. Further investigation of the treatments alternative to metallic stents would be required.