Systematic review of the literature on the quality of life of patients with reconstructive surgery for inflammatory bowel disease

The only curative treatment for ulcerative colitis is proctocolectomy. For this reason, over time, multiple techniques have been studied to obtain the best possible functionality and quality of life, which has being highly affected by the disease. The techniques presented for study are ileoanal anastomosis with pouch and ileostomy, considering at the beginning the pouch as the best technique. Results obtained from the variables studied: fertility is less affected in the ileostomy, sexual function did not present differences, the frequency of bowel movements in the pouch is 6-7 bowel movements per day with an incontinence of approximately 21%, and the economic impact is much more pronounced in the ileostomy, while irritation and pain is much more frequent in the ileostomy. With regard to psychosocial function, there is some variability in the results without a clear difference between the two techniques. With regard to the quality of life assessed by the tests, there is a slight improvement in the pouch compared to the state before the operation. As a conclusion, we can formulate different alternatives, in young women with genetic desire the best option is the ileostomy, while in the rest of the patients, and the ileoanal anastomosis with pouch presents an adequate quality of life

No disponible

Exploring the Differences Between Early and Traditional Diet Advancement in Postoperative Feeding Outcomes in Patients With an Ileostomy or Colostomy.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the differences in postoperative feeding outcomes when comparing early and traditional diet advancement in patients who had an ostomy creation. METHODS: At a U.S. tertiary care hospital, data from patients who underwent an ileostomy or colostomy creation from June 1, 2013, to April 30, 2017 were extracted from an institutional database. Patients who received early diet advancement (postoperative days 0 and 1) were compared with traditional diet advancement (postoperative day 2 and later) for demographics, preoperative risk factors, and operative features. The postoperative feeding outcomes included time to first flatus and ostomy output. Mann-Whitney U tests determined bivariate differences in postoperative feeding outcomes between groups. Poisson regression was used to adjust for unequal baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Data from 255 patients were included; 204 (80.0%) received early diet advancement, and 51 (20.0%) had traditional diet advancement. Time to first flatus and time to first ostomy output were significantly shorter in the early compared with traditional diet advancement group (median difference of 1 day for both flatus and ostomy output, P < 0.001). Adjusting for baseline group differences (American Society for Anesthesiology Physical Status Classification System, surgical approach, resection and ostomy type) maintained the significant findings for both time to first flatus (ß = 1.32, P = 0.01) and time to first ostomy output (ß = 1.41, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early diet advancement is associated with earlier return of flatus and first ostomy output compared with traditional diet advancement after the creation of an ileostomy or colostomy.

Factors preventing restoration of bowel continuity in patients with rectal cancer submitted to anterior rectal resection and protective ileostomy. / Fatores associados a não reconstrução do trânsito intestinal em pacientes com câncer retal submetidos à ressecção anterior do reto e ileostomia de proteção.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the factors associated with non-closure of protective ileostomy after anterior resection of the rectum with total mesorectum excision for rectal cancer, the morbidity associated with the closure of ileostomies and the rate of permanent ileostomy in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: we conducted a retrospective study with 174 consecutive patients diagnosed with rectal tumors, of whom 92 underwent anterior resection of the rectum with coloanal or colorectal anastomosis and protective ileostomy, with curative intent. We carried out a multivariate analysis to determine the factors associated with definite permanence of the stoma, as well as studied the morbidity of patients who underwent bowel continuity restoration. RESULTS: In the 84-month follow-up period, 54 of the 92 patients evaluated (58.7%) had the ileostomy closed and 38 (41.3%) remained with the stoma. Among the 62 patients who had the ileostomy closed, 11 (17.7%) presented some type of postoperative complication: three had ileal anastomosis dehiscence, five had intestinal obstruction, two had surgical wound infection, and one, pneumonia. Eight of these patients required a new stoma. CONCLUSION: according to the multivariate analysis, the factors associated with stoma permanence were anastomotic fistula, presence of metastases and closure of the ileostomy during chemotherapy.

OBJETIVO: avaliar os fatores associados ao não fechamento de ileostomia protetora após ressecção anterior do reto com excisão total do mesorreto por câncer retal, a morbidade associada ao fechamento destas ileostomias e a taxa de estomia permanente em pacientes com adenocarcinoma retal. MÉTODOS: estudo retrospectivo de 174 pacientes consecutivos com diagnóstico de tumores retais, dos quais 92 foram submetidos à ressecção anterior do reto com intenção curativa, anastomose coloanal ou colorretal e ileostomia de proteção. Foi realizada análise multivariada visando a determinar os fatores associados à permanência definitiva da estomia, assim como o estudo da morbidade nos que se submeteram à reconstrução do trânsito. RESULTADOS: no período de seguimento de 84 meses, 54 dos 92 pacientes avaliados (58,7%) tiveram a ileostomia fechada e 38 (41,3%) permaneceram com a estomia. Entre os 62 pacientes que tiveram a ileostomia fechada, 11 (17,7%) apresentaram algum tipo de complicação pós-operatória: três com deiscência de anastomose ileal, cinco com obstrução intestinal, dois com infecção de ferida operatória e um com pneumonia. Oito destes pacientes necessitaram de um novo estoma. CONCLUSÃO: de acordo com a análise multivariada, os fatores associados à permanência da estomia foram fístula de anastomose, presença de metástases e fechamento da ileostomia durante quimioterapia.

The impact of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on graft survival following liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is the only life-extending intervention for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Given the co-existence with colitis, patients may also require colectomy; a factor potentially conferring improved post-transplant outcomes. AIM: To determine the impact of restorative surgery via ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) vs retaining an end ileostomy on liver-related outcomes post-transplantation. METHODS: Graft survival was evaluated across a prospectively accrued transplant database, stratified according to colectomy status and type. RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2016, 240 individuals with PSC/colitis underwent transplantation (cumulative 1870 patient-years until first graft loss or last follow-up date), of whom 75 also required colectomy. A heightened incidence of graft loss was observed for the IPAA group vs those retaining an end ileostomy (2.8 vs 0.4 per 100 patient-years, log-rank P = 0.005), whereas rates between IPAA vs no colectomy groups were not significantly different (2.8 vs 1.7, P = 0.1). In addition, the ileostomy group experienced significantly lower graft loss rates vs. patients retaining an intact colon (P = 0.044). The risks conferred by IPAA persisted when taking into account timing of colectomy as related to liver transplantation via time-dependent Cox regression analysis. Hepatic artery thrombosis and biliary strictures were the principal aetiologies of graft loss overall. Incidence rates for both were not significantly different between IPAA and no colectomy groups (P = 0.092 and P = 0.358); however, end ileostomy appeared protective (P = 0.007 and 0.031, respectively). CONCLUSION: In PSC, liver transplantation, colectomy + IPAA is associated with similar incidence rates of hepatic artery thrombosis, recurrent biliary strictures and re-transplantation compared with no colectomy. Colectomy + end ileostomy confers more favourable graft outcomes.

Fatores associados a não reconstrução do trânsito intestinal em pacientes com câncer retal submetidos à ressecção anterior do reto e ileostomia de proteção / Factors preventing restoration of bowel continuity in patients with rectal cancer submitted to anterior rectal resection and protective ileostomy

RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar os fatores associados ao não fechamento de ileostomia protetora após ressecção anterior do reto com excisão total do mesorreto por câncer retal, a morbidade associada ao fechamento destas ileostomias e a taxa de estomia permanente em pacientes com adenocarcinoma retal. Métodos: estudo retrospectivo de 174 pacientes consecutivos com diagnóstico de tumores retais, dos quais 92 foram submetidos à ressecção anterior do reto com intenção curativa, anastomose coloanal ou colorretal e ileostomia de proteção. Foi realizada análise multivariada visando a determinar os fatores associados à permanência definitiva da estomia, assim como o estudo da morbidade nos que se submeteram à reconstrução do trânsito. Resultados: no período de seguimento de 84 meses, 54 dos 92 pacientes avaliados (58,7%) tiveram a ileostomia fechada e 38 (41,3%) permaneceram com a estomia. Entre os 62 pacientes que tiveram a ileostomia fechada, 11 (17,7%) apresentaram algum tipo de complicação pós-operatória: três com deiscência de anastomose ileal, cinco com obstrução intestinal, dois com infecção de ferida operatória e um com pneumonia. Oito destes pacientes necessitaram de um novo estoma. Conclusão: de acordo com a análise multivariada, os fatores associados à permanência da estomia foram fístula de anastomose, presença de metástases e fechamento da ileostomia durante quimioterapia.

ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the factors associated with non-closure of protective ileostomy after anterior resection of the rectum with total mesorectum excision for rectal cancer, the morbidity associated with the closure of ileostomies and the rate of permanent ileostomy in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Methods: we conducted a retrospective study with 174 consecutive patients diagnosed with rectal tumors, of whom 92 underwent anterior resection of the rectum with coloanal or colorectal anastomosis and protective ileostomy, with curative intent. We carried out a multivariate analysis to determine the factors associated with definite permanence of the stoma, as well as studied the morbidity of patients who underwent bowel continuity restoration. Results: In the 84-month follow-up period, 54 of the 92 patients evaluated (58.7%) had the ileostomy closed and 38 (41.3%) remained with the stoma. Among the 62 patients who had the ileostomy closed, 11 (17.7%) presented some type of postoperative complication: three had ileal anastomosis dehiscence, five had intestinal obstruction, two had surgical wound infection, and one, pneumonia. Eight of these patients required a new stoma. Conclusion: according to the multivariate analysis, the factors associated with stoma permanence were anastomotic fistula, presence of metastases and closure of the ileostomy during chemotherapy.

Home visits as part of a new care pathway (iAID) to improve quality of care and quality of life in ostomy patients: a cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial.

AIM: Morbidity in patients with an ostomy is high. A new care pathway, including perioperative home visits by enterostomal therapists, was studied to assess whether more elaborate education and closer guidance could reduce stoma-related complications and improve quality of life (QoL), at acceptable cost. METHOD: Patients requiring an ileostomy or colostomy, for any inflammatory or malignant bowel disease, were included in a 15-centre cluster-randomized 'stepped-wedge' study. Primary outcomes were stoma-related complications and QoL, measured using the Stoma-QOL, 3 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included costs of care. RESULTS: The standard pathway (SP) was followed by 113 patients and the new pathway (NP) by 105 patients. Although the overall number of stoma-related complications was similar in both groups (SP 156, NP 150), the proportion of patients experiencing one or more stoma-related complications was significantly higher in the NP (72% vs 84%, risk difference 12%; 95% CI: 0.3-23.3%). Although in the NP more patients had stoma-related complications, QoL scores were significantly better (P < 0.001). In the SP more patients required extra care at home for their ostomy than in the NP (60.6% vs 33.7%, respectively; risk difference 26.9%, 95% CI: 13.5-40.4%). Stoma revision was done more often in the SP (n = 11) than in the NP (n = 2). Total costs in the SP did not differ significantly from the NP. CONCLUSION: The NP did not reduce the number of stoma-related complications but did lead to improved quality of care and life, against similar costs. Based on these results the NP, including perioperative home visits by an enterostomal therapist, can be recommended.

Executive Summary: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Best Practice Guideline for Care of Patients With a Fecal Diversion.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal program developed to decrease postoperative complications, improve patient safety and satisfaction, and promote early discharge. In the province of Ontario, Canada, a standardized approach to the care of adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery (including benign and malignant diseases) was adopted by 15 hospitals in March 2013. All colorectal surgery patients with or without an ostomy were included in the ERAS program targeting a length of stay of 3 days for colon surgery and 4 days for rectal surgery. To ensure the individual needs of patients requiring an ostomy in an ERAS program were being met, a Provincial ERAS Enterostomal Therapy Nurse Network was established. Our goal was to develop and implement an evidence-based, ostomy-specific best practice guideline addressing the preoperative, postoperative, and discharge phases of care. The guideline was developed over a 3-year period. It is based on existing literature, guidelines, and expert opinion. This article serves as an executive summary for this clinical resource; the full guideline is available as Supplemental Digital Content 1 (available at: http://links.lww.com/JWOCN/A36) to this executive summary.

Oral Rehydration Therapy and Feeding Replaces Total Parenteral Nutrition: A Clinical Vignette.

A 27-year-old patient with spina bifida and a high output loss of water and electrolytes from her ileostomy was successfully liberated from dependency on total parenteral nutrition and intravenous fluid and electrolyte replacement by the use of a rice-based oral rehydration therapy (ORT). This allowed her to return home to the care of her mother. We suggest that ORT can be effective in the context of modern high-technology settings, as well as in resource-poor situations.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: faecal diversion for management of perianal Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Temporary faecal diversion is sometimes used for management of refractory perianal Crohn's disease (CD) with variable success. AIMS: To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness, long-term outcomes and factors associated with success of temporary faecal diversion for perianal CD. METHODS: Through a systematic literature review through 15 July 2015, we identified 16 cohort studies (556 patients) reporting outcomes after temporary faecal diversion. We estimated pooled rates [with 95% confidence interval (CI)] of early clinical response, attempted and successful restoration of bowel continuity after temporary faecal diversion (without symptomatic relapse), and rates of re-diversion (in patients with attempted restoration) and proctectomy (with or without colectomy and end-ileostomy). We identified factors associated with successful restoration of bowel continuity. RESULTS: On meta-analysis, 63.8% (95% CI: 54.1-72.5) of patients had early clinical response after faecal diversion for refractory perianal CD. Restoration of bowel continuity was attempted in 34.5% (95% CI: 27.0-42.8) of patients, and was successful in only 16.6% (95% CI: 11.8-22.9). Of those in whom restoration was attempted, 26.5% (95% CI: 14.1-44.2) required re-diversion because of severe relapse. Overall, 41.6% (95% CI: 32.6-51.2) of patients required proctectomy after failure of temporary faecal diversion. There was no difference in the successful restoration of bowel continuity after temporary faecal diversion in the pre-biological or biological era (13.7% vs. 17.6%, P = 0.60), in part due to selection bias. Absence of rectal involvement was the most consistent factor associated with restoration of bowel continuity. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary faecal diversion may improve symptoms in approximately two-thirds of patients with refractory perianal Crohn's disease, but bowel restoration is successful in only 17% of patients.

[Rehabilitation of patients with acid-base and fluid balance disorders with short bowel syndrome after ileostomies]. / Rehabilitation von Patienten mit Störungen des Säure-Basen- und Flüssigkeitshaushaltes mit Kurzdarmsyndrom bei Ileostoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ileostomies regularly suffer from short bowel syndrome or high volume output associated with loss of absorptive surface and subsequent impairment of absorption for drugs and different nutrients resulting in electrolyte and fluid balance disorders as well as renal insufficiency. Adaptation of these fundamental functions of the gut with adequate fluid uptake, absorption of sufficient different nutrients and vitamins represents a major challenge to rehabilitate these patients shortly after surgery. Patients with ileostomy often develop metabolic acidosis with normal anion gap. In our retrospective study we would like to draw attention to these metabolic disorders in patients with ileostomy in comparison to patients with colostomy and patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: In the period from 2005 to 2012 we examined 164 patients with ileostomy in our rehabilitation clinic, 109 patients with colostomy and 193 patients after surgery for gastric cancer of the possible presence of metabolic acidosis by using capillary blood gas analysis (metabolic acidosis was anticipated, if base excess was ≤- 3,0 mmol/l). Patients are treated as inpatients both in early stage and for follow-up rehabilitation. The length of time in our rehabilitation clinic lies in between 24-28 days. On the basis of random samples we tested blood samples in 19 patients with ileostomy in succession for ferritin, folic acid, zinc, selenium and vitamin B12. Statistical analysis comprised the classical intervals (mean and standard deviation, range and T-test for dependent and independent samples). RESULTS: In total we tested 164 inpatients with ileostomy in our rehabilitation clinic (median age 67.4 years, range 19-79 years). Surgery for ileostomy took place about 1.4 months on average ago (range »-56 months). 60 (36.5%) inpatients suffered from metabolic acidosis often combined with renal insufficiency. Supportive therapy intravenously administered in 10 patients and sodium bicarbonate given by mouth in 40 patients significantly improved metabolic acid (base excess improved on average from -7.2 to -3.2 mmol/l, p<0.00138) and renal function calculated on the basis of serum creatinine (serum creatinine decreased from 1.49 on average to 1.34 mg/dl, p<0.04039). Body weight remained constant over the whole period on average with 74 kg. Diuretics did not show any influence on the base excess. In 19 patients with ileostomy who did not take any kind of supplements, among the parameters tested were a high percentage of zinc (9 of 19 patients, 47%) and selenium deficiency (13 of 19 patients, 68%). 50 patients with ileostomy were younger than 65 years of age and thus in the working age population. In the group of patients after gastrectomy because of gastric cancer (n=193, median age 69.1 years, range 36-82 years), surgery for gastrectomy took place about 1.8 months on average ago and in this group only 14 patients (7%) showed metabolic acidosis. In the group of patients with colostomy (n=109, median age 69.5 years, range 39-82 years), surgery for colostomy took place about 2.1 months on average ago and in this group only 6 patients (5.5%) suffered from metabolic acidosis. CONCLUSION: Medical rehabilitation is indicated for patients with enterostoma. Acceptance of the enterostoma by the patient himself, psychological stabilization, achievement of self-sufficiency in stoma care, improvement of physical abilities and finally being fit for full or limited employment are the most important objectives in rehabilitation medicine. Metabolic acidosis was often found in patients with ileostomy and was an important clinical appearance. Blood gas analysis is recommended to verify metabolic acidosis and if confirmed sodium bicarbonate and in cases of high volume output salt-depleting ileostomy additionally intravenous fluid support should be offered controlling body weight in the follow-up. As could be shown by our analysis patients with ileostomy should also be tested for zinc and selenium deficiency.

Impacto del estoma derivativo en un protocolo de rehabilitación multimodal en cirugía de recto / Impact of a diverting stoma in an enhanced recovery programme for rectal cancer

OBJETIVO: La asociación de ileostomía disminuye la gravedad de las complicaciones tras anastomosis rectal baja pero puede alargar la estancia postoperatoria. El objetivo del presente estudio es averiguar si un estoma derivativo modifica la estancia postoperatoria o las complicaciones, en pacientes intervenidos bajo un régimen de rehabilitación multimodal perioperatoria (RHMM). MÉTODOS: Analizamos a 104 pacientes intervenidos de resección con anastomosis por adenocarcinoma rectal con cuidados de RHMM: 66 varones y 38 mujeres, mediana de edad de 64 años (RIQ: 55-75). En el grupo A, se incluyó a los que se asoció ileostomía derivativa y en el B a aquellos sin ileostomía. RESULTADOS: Grupo A = 58, grupo B = 46 pacientes sin diferencias en edad, ASA, IMC, factores de riesgo, ni en el tipo de abordaje, laparoscópico en un 34%, si bien hubo más neoadyuvancia en el grupo A: 77,5 frente a 36,9%. En este grupo, la intervención habitual fue la exéresis total del mesorrecto (96%) y en el B la subtotal (90%). No hubo diferencias en las complicaciones postoperatorias (34,4 frente a 28,2%; p = 0,322) ni en la de dehiscencias anastomóticas (8,3 frente a 10,8%; p = 0,475), o íleo prolongado (20,7 frente a 10,9%; p = 0,140). Tampoco las hubo en la estancia postoperatoria (7,9 frente a 6,9 días; p = 0,058), reingresos (7 frente a 13,6%; p = 0,22), o en la estancia total incluyendo reingresos (8,4 frente a 9,1 días; p = 0,49). CONCLUSIONES: La asociación de una ileostomía no alarga la EP ni incrementa las complicaciones en pacientes intervenidos de resección rectal en régimen de RHMMP

PURPOSE: The association of a loop ileostomy decreases the severity of complications after rectal surgery but can increase the postoperative stay. The aim of this study is to investigate if a diverting ileostomy influences the postoperative outcomes in a series of patients included in a multimodal rehabilitation program (MMRP). METHODS: We analyzed a series of 104 patients that underwent elective surgery with primary anastomosis for rectal adenocarcinoma using a MMRP: 66 men and 38 women, with a median age of 64 (IQR: 55-75) years. Group A included patients with an associated loop ileostomy, and Group B, those without a protective stoma. RESULTS: Group A = 58, group B = 46 patients without differences in age, ASA, BMI and other risk factors, nor in the surgical approach (laparoscopic in 34%), although there were more neoadjuvant treatments in group A: 77.5 vs. 36.9%; P=.001. In group A, the most common operation was total mesorectal excision (96%) and in the B, a subtotal mesorectal excision (90%). There were no differences in postoperative complications (Group A 34.4 vs. group B28.2%; P=.322), anastomotic leaks (8.3 vs. 10.8%; P=.475), or postoperative ileus (20.7 vs. 10.9%; P=.140), neither in postoperative stay (7.9 vs. 6.9 days; P= .058, readmissions (7 vs. 13.6%; P= .22), or postoperative stay, including readmissions (8.4 vs. 9.1 days; P= .49). CONCLUSIONS: The association of a loop ileostomy does not extend the length of stay nor increases the rate of complications in patients that underwent a rectal resection with anastomosis included in a MMRP

The effects of using a moldable skin barrier on peristomal skin condition in persons with an ostomy: results of a prospective, observational, multinational study.

Peristomal skin problems are the most commonly experienced physical complication following ostomy surgery and often are caused by leakage or a poorly fitting skin barrier. A prospective, multicenter, observational evaluation of persons with a colostomy, ileostomy, or urostomy was conducted to assess the incidence of peristomal lesions and level of patient satisfaction with moldable skin barriers. Peristomal skin was assessed using the Studio Alterazoni Cutanee Stomale (SACS™) scale, and patients were asked to rate barrier application and usage variables. During a period of 12 months, and using convenience sampling, 561 patients from 90 centers in 3 countries were enrolled: 28 in Germany, 48 in Poland, and 14 in the United States. Participants included 277 new stoma patients (average time since surgery 0.3 months; average age 64.7 ± 12.86 years) who had a colostomy (174), ileostomy (72), or urostomy (10); and 284 patients with an existing stoma (average time since surgery 18.2 months; average age 66 ± 12.62 years) who had a colostomy (174), ileostomy (88), or urostomy (22) who experienced skin complications using a traditional skin barrier (ie, a solid or flexible barrier with precut opening or one requiring cutting an opening to accommodate the stoma). All patients were assessed at baseline and after 1 and 2 months. In the patients with a new stoma, 225 (90.4%) had intact skin at baseline, 239 (95.6%) had intact skin after 2 months, and 98% rated overall satisfaction with the barrier as good or excellent. In the patients with an existing stoma, intact skin was observed in 103 patients (39.5%) at baseline and 225 (86.2%) after 2 months, with 96.5% of patients rating overall satisfaction with the barrier as good or excellent. In this group, the proportion of patients who used accessory products (eg, belt, deodorants, powder) was 73% at baseline and 64.2% at the 2-month follow-up. The moldable skin barriers evaluated were effective in preventing and healing peristomal skin complications and were rated as good or excellent by the vast majority of patients. Comparative studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this moldable skin barrier.

Patients' quality of life and role of the ambulatory in after-surgery stoma care. A single center experience.

AIM: The aim is to assess on which aspects of everyday-life the post surgery stoma-care ambulatory should physically and psychologically assist the patients. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Seventy patients (33 male, 37 female, mean age 68 years) accepted to fill-in the Stoma-QoL questionnaire from January to December 2011. The questionnaire consists of 20 questions addressing different possible discomforts of everyday life. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that patients with temporary ileostomy have a mean score of quality of life index of 63. Patients with ileostomy demonstrated a higher quality of life score compared to patients with colostomy. DISCUSSION: Our results confirmed that patients with ileostomy have a better perception of quality of life compared to patients with colostomy. Moreover, our data clearly show that patients are more concerned on stoma management compared to the hypothetical prejudice of society. CONCLUSIONS: The stoma care ambulatory have a crucial role, offering to the patient and his/her family an adequate psychological support, and teaching the management of the stoma and the pouch.

Time to readiness for discharge is a valid and reliable measure of short-term recovery after colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Short-term recovery after colorectal surgery has been traditionally investigated through length of stay (LOS). However, this measure is influenced by several confounding factors. This study aimed to investigate the construct validity and reliability of assessing the time to achieve standardized discharge criteria (time to readiness for discharge, or TRD) as a measure of short-term recovery. In a secondary analysis, we compared sample size requirements for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using TRD or LOS as outcome measures. METHODS: Seventy patients participated in the construct validity study and 21 patients participated in the reliability study. TRD was defined as the number of days to achieve discharge criteria previously defined by consensus. Construct validity was investigated by testing six hypothesis based on the assumption that TRD measures short-term recovery. Reliability was calculated by comparing measures of TRD by two independent assessors. Variability estimates (standard deviations) of LOS and TRD were used for sample size calculations. RESULTS: Five of the six hypotheses were supported by the data (p < 0.05). Interobserver reliability was excellent (ICC2.1 = 0.99). Sample size estimations showed that RCTs using TRD as an outcome measure require approximately 23 % less participants compared to RCTs using LOS. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this research support the construct-validity and reliability of TRD as a measure of short-term recovery. Using TRD as an alternative to LOS may reduce sample size requirements in future RCTs.

Potential benefits of fast-track concepts in paediatric colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Structured care pathways optimising peri-operative care have been shown to significantly enhance post-operative recovery. We aim to determine if enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles could provide benefit for paediatric patients undergoing major colorectal resection for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Children undergoing elective bowel resection for IBD at a regional paediatric unit using standard methods of peri-operative care were matched to adult cases from an associated tertiary referral university hospital already using an ERAS program. Cases were matched for disease type, gender, operative procedure, and ASA grade. RESULTS: Forty-four children undergoing fifty procedures were identified. Thirty-four were matched to adult cases. Total length of stay in the paediatric group was significantly longer than in the adult group (6 vs. 9 days; P=0.001). Paediatric patients were slower to start solid diet (1 vs. 4 days; P<0.0001) and were slower to mobilize post-operatively (1 vs. 4 days; P<0.0001). No difference was seen in time to restoration of bowel function (2 vs. 3 days; P=0.49). Thirty day readmissions and total in-hospital morbidity were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Potentially, application of ERAS in paediatric surgery could accelerate recovery and reduce length of post-operative stay thereby improving quality and efficiency of care.

Stressors relating to patient psychological health following stoma surgery: an integrated literature review.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To summarize empirical evidence relating to stressors that may affect patients' psychosocial health following colostomy or ileostomy surgery during hospitalization and after discharge. DATA SOURCES: An extensive search was performed on the CINAHL®, Cochrane Library, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science electronic databases. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eight articles were included with three qualitative and five quantitative research designs. Most studies were conducted in Western nations with one other in Taiwan. Following colostomy or ileostomy surgery, common stressors reported by patients during hospitalization included stoma formation, diagnosis of cancer, and preparation for self-care. After discharge, stressors that patients experienced encompassed adapting to body changes, altered sexuality, and impact on social life and activities. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that patients with stomas experience various stressors during hospitalization and after discharge. Additional research is needed for better understanding of patient postoperative experiences to facilitate the provision of appropriate nursing interventions to the stressors. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: To help patients deal with stressors following stoma surgery, nurses may provide pre- and postoperative education regarding the treatment and recovery process and encourage patient self-care. Following discharge, nurses may provide long-term ongoing counseling and support, build social networks among patients with stomas, and implement home visit programs. KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION: Stoma surgery negatively affects patients' physical, psychological, social, and sexual health. Postoperative education programs in clinical settings mostly focus on physical health and underemphasize psychological issues. More pre- and postoperative education programs are needed to help patients cope with stoma stressors.

Early rehabilitation versus conventional care after laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although early rehabilitation programs have been reported to be effective after laparoscopic colectomy, there is no report of the efficacy of rehabilitation programs after rectal cancer surgery. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of an early rehabilitation program after laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid or low rectal cancer in a randomized, controlled trial. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients who had undergone a laparoscopic low anterior resection with defunctioning ileostomy were randomized on a 1:1 basis to an early rehabilitation program (n = 52) or conventional care (n = 46). The primary endpoint was recovery rate at 4 days postoperatively. The secondary endpoints were recovery time, postoperative hospital stay, complications, readmission rates, pain on a visual analogue scale, and quality of life (QOL) according to Short Form 36. RESULTS: The recovery rates were not different in both groups (rehabilitation, 25 % vs. conventional, 13 %, p = 0.135). Recovery time and postoperative hospital stay was similar between the groups (rehabilitation, 137 h [107-188] vs. conventional, 146.5 h [115-183], p = 0.47; 7.5 days [7-11] vs. 8.0 days [7-10], p = 0.882). The complication rates did not differ between the two groups, but more complications were noted in the rehabilitation program group (42.3 vs. 24.0 %, p = 0.054), which was related to postoperative ileus (28.8 vs. 13.0 %, p = 0.057) and acute voiding difficulty (19.6 vs. 4.7 %, p = 0.032). There was no readmission within 1 month of surgery. Pain and QOL were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial did not show that an early rehabilitation program is beneficial after laparoscopic low anterior resection. Our results confirm that postoperative ileus and acute voiding difficulty are major obstacles to fast-track surgery for mid or low rectal cancer. This study was registered (registration number NCT00606944).

Patient education has a positive effect in patients with a stoma: a systematic review.

AIM: A systematic review was performed to assess whether education of patients having stoma formation improves quality of life and whether it is cost effective. METHOD: A literature search was performed to identify studies on the structured education of ostomates and outcome using the following databases: MEDLINE, Cinahl, Embase, Cochrane and PsycInfo. Inclusion criteria were: clinical studies reporting effects of educational interventions in relation to patients with a stoma. Commentaries or studies not testing an intervention were excluded. RESULTS: Seven articles met the inclusion criteria of having rigorously evaluated an educational programme related to living with a stoma. The programmes were organized in different ways and had explored various interventions. The results showed an increase in health-related quality of life, as measured using a stoma quality of life instrument (P = 0.00001) and with the Short Form 36 (SF-36) (P = 0.000-0.006), an increase in proficiency in management of the stoma (P = 0.0005), two studies pointed to a reduction in postoperative hospital stay (8 days vs 10 days, P = 0.029; and 8 days vs 14 days, P = 0.17), a significant reduction in cost in the intervention group ($US 8570.54) compared with the control group ($US 7396.90) as well as higher effectiveness scores in the intervention group (166.89) compared with the control group (110.98), a significant rise in stoma-related knowledge (P = 0.0000) and an increase in psychosocial adjustment (P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Structured patient education aimed at patients' psychosocial needs seems to have a positive effect on quality of life as well as on cost. The interventions may be performed before, during or after hospital stay. However, the available data come from few studies with differences in interventions and in study design, and further studies are therefore needed before a final conclusion can be drawn.

Estimulación del asa eferente previa al cierre de ileostomía / Afferent loop stimulation prior to ileostomy closure

El número de complicaciones tras el cierre de ileostomía es del 17%. El íleo paralítico es la complicación más frecuente. Con el objetivo de disminuir esta complicación, en las 2 semanas previas al cierre del estoma, se realizó una estimulación diaria a través del asa eferente (AU)

There is a 17% complications rate after ileostomy closure, with paralytic ileus being the most common. With the aim of reducing this complication, stimulation via the afferent loop was performed daily for the 2 weeks prior to the stoma (AU)

Traditional nurse instruction versus 2 session nurse instruction plus DVD for teaching ostomy care: a multisite randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This randomized controlled trial compared 2 methods of ostomy care instruction to determine their effect on patients' knowledge, skills, and confidence related to postoperative ostomy care. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Eighty-eight adults with newly created ostomies were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. Of the 88 enrolled patients, 68 completed the study: 10 patients were discharged from the hospital prior to completion of the study interventions; 10 others were withdrawn because they no longer met study inclusion criteria. The remaining subjects, who were equally split between men and women, ranged in age from 23 to 84 years. There were 23 colostomy and 45 ileostomy patients in our sample. The study setting was 2 acute care hospitals within a large tertiary health care system in the midwestern United States. METHODS: We used a posttest-only experimental design to compare 2 methods of postoperative ostomy education. Traditional education comprised 3 WOC nurse-led instruction sessions and the experimental intervention comprised 2 nurse-led instruction sessions plus DVD instruction that could be accessed in between nurse-led sessions. All patients received one-on-one instruction from certified WOC nurse at their bedside. Patients completed a written test of ostomy knowledge, a self-care skills demonstration, and a Visual Analog Scale rating their confidence with ostomy self-care. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 teaching methods or type of ostomy with regard to knowledge of ostomy care (F3,64 5 1.308, P 5 0.28), ostomy care skills (F3,64 5 0.163, P 5 0.92), or confidence in performing ostomy self-care (F3,64 5 0.629, P 5 0.59). Differences between the study groups' self-reported learning style, education level, age, room type, and gender also did not significantly impact their knowledge, skills, or confidence. CONCLUSION: When teaching first-time ostomy patients postoperative self-care, a Nurse Instruction plus DVD method is as effective as Nurse Instruction alone.