ABI-auditory brainstem implant.

The Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) is based on the classic cochlear implant (CI) but uses a different stimulation electrode. At MED-EL, the early development activities on ABI started in the year 1994, with the suggestion coming from J. Helms and J. Müller from Würzburg, Germany in collaboration with the Univ. of Innsbruck Austria. The first ABI surgery in a neuro-fibromatosis (NF2) patient with the MED-EL device took place in the year 1997. Later, the indication of ABI was expanded to non-NF2 patients with severe inner-ear malformation, for whom a regular CI will not be beneficial. Key translational research activities at MED-EL in collaboration with numerous clinics investigating the factors that affect the hearing performance amongst ABI patients, importance of early ABI implantation in children, tools in pre-operative assessment of ABI candidates and new concepts that were pursued with the MED-EL ABI device. The CE-mark for the MED-EL ABI to be used in adults and children down to the age of 12 months without NF-2 was granted in 2017 mainly based on two long-term clinical studies in the pediatric population. This article covers the milestones of translational research from the first concept to the widespread clinical use of ABI in association with MED-EL.

[Auditory brain stem implantation: reality and prospects].

This review describes the history of development and application of the auditory brain stem implantation techniques and current clinical progress in this field. Indications for the use of this methods adopted in different countries are considered in conjunction with peculiar features of the design of the most common types of the implants. The basic surgical approaches and the most frequently observed postoperative complications are described. The data obtained by different researchers on the functional efficacy of surgical intervention and opportunities for the improvement of its audiological outcome with the help of modern technical means and surgical modalities are discussed.

Neuroprótesis en otorrinolaringología: más allá del implante coclear / Neuroprosthesis in otolaryngology: beyond of cochlear implants

Neuroprosthesis or brain-machine interfaces are electronic devices created to directly interact with the nervous system for replacing an absent or damaged sensory or motor function. Three types of auditory neuroprosthetics devices have been developed in Otolaryngology, (i) cochlear implants, (ii) brainstem auditory implants and (iii) auditory midbrain implants. These devices allow young deaf children to acquire oral language and to restore auditory function in deafened adults. On the other hand, a new vestibular prosthesis that could be useful for patients with severe disequilibrium has been developed. Main characteristics and clinical utility of these prostheses are reviewed in this article.

Twenty-five years of auditory brainstem implants: perspectives.

The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) provides auditory sensations, recognition of environmental sounds and aid in spoken communication in more than 300 patients worldwide. It is no more a device under investigation but it is widely accepted for the treatment of patients who have lost hearing due to bilateral tumors of the vestibulocochlear nerve. Most of these patients are completely deaf when the implant is switched off. In contrast to the cochlear implants (CI), only few of the implanted patients achieve open-set speech recognition without the help of visual cues. In the last few years, patients with lesions other than tumors have also been implanted. Auditory perceptual performance in patients who are deaf due to trauma, cochlea aplasia or other non-tumor lesions of the cochlea or the vestibulocochlear nerve turned out to be much better than in NF2 tumor patients. Until recently, the target region for ABI implantation has been the ventral cochlear nucleus (CN). The electrodes are implanted via the translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid approach. Currently, new targets along the central auditory pathways and new, minimally invasive techniques for implantation are under investigation. These techniques may further improve auditory perceptual performance in ABI patients and provide hearing to a variety of types of central deafness.

Auditory brainstem implant (ABI): new frontiers in adults and children.

UNLABELLED: Previous studies have considered only patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) older than 12 years as candidates for an auditory brainstem implant (ABI). Our study expands the potential criteria to include both children and adult subjects with other cochlear or cochlear nerve malfunctions who either would not benefit at all from a cochlear implant (eg, cochlear nerve aplasia or avulsion) or whose benefit was or would be severely compromised (eg, cochlear ossification, cochlear fracture). STUDY DESIGN: In our department, over the period from April 1997 to September 2002, 29 patients, 20 adults and 9 children, were fitted with ABIs. Their ages ranged from 14 months to 70 years. Thirteen subjects had tumors, 10 NF2 and 3 solitary vestibular schwannoma, and 16 patients had a variety of nontumor (NT) cochlear or cochlear nerve diseases. A retrosigmoid-transmeatal approach was used in T and a retrosigmoid approach in NT patients. The electrode array was inserted into the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle and correct electrode positioning was monitored with the aid of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs). RESULTS: Correct implantation was achieved in all patients. No complications were observed due to implantation surgery or related to ABI activation or long-term use. Auditory sensations were induced in all patients with various numbers of electrodes (from 5 to 15). Different pitch sensations were identifiable with different electrode stimulation. Closed-set word recognition, open-set sentence recognition, and speech tracking scores achieved by the patients are reported in detail. The auditory performance of the patients showed significantly better outcomes than controls (Multicentric European clinical investigations on ABI with NF2). CONCLUSION: We have shown that the indications for the ABI can be extended to include NT patients with severe cochlear and/or cochlear nerve abnormalities. The degree of auditory benefit varies as a function of the underlying pathological conditions, with NT subjects exhibiting significantly better outcomes than the T patients.