Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Med Imaging ; 21(1): 59, 2021 03 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33757455

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine whether in-laboratory specimen radiography reduces turnaround time or block utilization in surgical pathology. METHODS: Specimens processed during a 48-day trial of an in-lab cabinet radiography device (Faxitron) were compared to a control group of specimens imaged in the mammography suite during a prior 1-year period, and to a second group of specimens not undergoing imaging of any type. RESULTS: Cases imaged in the mammography suite had longer turnaround time than cases not requiring imaging (by 1.15 days for core biopsies, and 1.73 days for mastectomies; p < 0.0001). In contrast, cases imaged in-lab had turnaround time that was no longer than unimaged cases (p > 0.05 for core biopsies, lumpectomies and mastectomies). Mastectomies imaged in-lab required submission of fewer blocks than controls not undergoing any imaging (mean reduction of 10.6 blocks). CONCLUSIONS: Availability of in-lab radiography resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in turnaround time and economically meaningful reductions in block utilization.


Assuntos
Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Laboratórios Clínicos , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Patologia Cirúrgica/métodos , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/estatística & dados numéricos , Mama/patologia , Mama/cirurgia , Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcinose/patologia , Feminino , Marcadores Fiduciais , Humanos , Laboratórios Clínicos/economia , Mastectomia Radical Modificada/estatística & dados numéricos , Mastectomia Segmentar/estatística & dados numéricos , Mastectomia Simples/estatística & dados numéricos , Patologia Cirúrgica/economia , Patologia Cirúrgica/instrumentação , Patologia Cirúrgica/organização & administração , Manejo de Espécimes/economia , Manejo de Espécimes/instrumentação , Manejo de Espécimes/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Inclusão do Tecido/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Mil Med ; 185(Suppl 1): 423-429, 2020 01 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32074337

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to quantify the extent of donor-cell-derived myogenesis achieved by a novel surgical technique known as Minimally Invasive Muscle Embedding (MIME). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through MIME, we implanted a single extensor digitorum longus muscle from donor mice (N = 2) that expressed a red fluorescent protein (RFP), into the left tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of immunodeficient host mice (N = 4) that expressed a green fluorescent protein (GFP). Soon after MIME, we injected a myotoxin (barium chloride), into the host TA muscle, to trigger concerted muscle degeneration and regeneration. In lieu of MIME, we performed a SHAM procedure on the right TA muscle of the same set of animals. RESULTS: In MIME-treated muscles, 22% ± 7% and 78% ± 7% muscle fibers were RFP+ and GFP+, respectively (mean ± standard deviation); and all RFP+ fibers were positive for desmin and dystrophin. Conclusion. We conclude that MIME helps generate muscle fibers of donor origin, in host muscle.


Assuntos
Desmina/análise , Distrofina/análise , Fibras Musculares Esqueléticas/transplante , Inclusão do Tecido/métodos , Animais , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Camundongos , Camundongos SCID , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Inclusão do Tecido/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 133(1): 26-30, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19123732

RESUMO

CONTEXT: The size of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a significant predictor of local tumor recurrence and is used for selection of patients for conservative versus aggressive therapy. A standardized method for size assessment is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 2 commonly used methods for measurement of DCIS extent: one based on the distribution of the lesion in sequential series of sections (mapping method) and the other on the number of sections with DCIS (block method). DESIGN: Ninety-eight consecutive cases of DCIS, measuring at least 1.0 cm, were retrieved from our files. All specimens were serially sectioned along the long axis. The size of DCIS was calculated for each case by 2 different methods: (1) mapping method (average thickness of each slice x number of consecutive slices with DCIS) and (2) block method (number of blocks with DCIS x 0.3 cm). Additional calculations were performed by using 0.35, 0.4, and 0.5 cm as multiplication factors for the block method in order to improve concordance. RESULTS: The block method underestimated the size in 71 cases (72%) by 4.5% to 81.3% (mean, 33%). Using 0.4 cm as the multiplication factor improved concordance, while multiplying by 0.5 cm led to an overestimation of size. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of DCIS size by the block method is inaccurate and underestimates size in most cases (72%), with an average reduction of 33%. Using 0.4 cm as the multiplication factor improves concordance. A standardized method for size estimation is necessary for effective patient management.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Microtomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Patologia Cirúrgica/métodos , Inclusão do Tecido/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Microtomia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Patologia Cirúrgica/normas , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sociedades Médicas , Inclusão do Tecido/métodos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...