Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Neuropathology ; 29(5): 528-35, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19389078

RESUMO

To investigate the possible ameliorating effect of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) on white matter damage, pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine induction in developing rat brain after intra-uterine Escherichia coli infection. E. coli was inoculated into uterine cervix of the time-pregnant rats and the control was injected with normal saline. Following maternal E. coli inoculation, the pups received a single intraperitoneal injection of rhEPO at a dose of 5000 IU/kg body weight immediately after birth. Immunohistochemical staining and Western blot analysis for 2', 3'-cyclic nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterase (CNPase), neurofilament (NF) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were performed to assess white matter damage in pup brains at post-natal day 1 (P1), P3 and P7. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines were detected by real-time quantitative RT-PCR at the mRNA levels to evaluate the inflammatory response in pup brains at P1, P3 and P7. A single dose of rhEPO treatment (5000 IU/kg body weight) attenuated white matter damage in developing rat brain after intra-uterine E. coli infection. The protein levels of CNPase and NF in pup brains at P7 significantly increased after post-natal rhEPO treatment as compared with the intra-uterine E. coli-treated group. Also, post-natal rhEPO injection markedly attenuated the intra-uterine E. coli infection-induced increases in GFAP protein expression and the mRNA levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Post-natal EPO administration as a single dose may exert a neuroprotective effect on white matter damage by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine induction in developing rat brain after intra-uterine E. coli infection.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Eritropoetina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/fisiopatologia , Doenças Fetais/fisiopatologia , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/uso terapêutico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/fisiopatologia , Animais , Animais Recém-Nascidos , Encéfalo/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Quimiocinas/metabolismo , Citocinas/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Fibras Nervosas Mielinizadas/efeitos dos fármacos , Fibras Nervosas Mielinizadas/patologia , Fibras Nervosas Mielinizadas/fisiologia , Infecção Pélvica/fisiopatologia , Gravidez , Distribuição Aleatória , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Proteínas Recombinantes , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 46(9): 787-90, 2007 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17641126

RESUMO

Pelvic osteomyelitis is unusual in children. We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients with this infection seen at our institution. From 1998 to 2005, 31 patients with pelvic osteomyelitis were identified: 19 males and 12 females with an age range of 1.5 months to 17 years 9 months. Duration of illness prior to admission ranged from 1 day to 2.5 months. Chief complaints included nonspecific pain, fever, limp, and decreased weight bearing. Microorganisms isolated included Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella, Enterobacter cloacae, and Kingella kingae. Bones involved were acetabulum/ilium (22 patients), ischium (7 patients), and pubis (4 patients); 2 patients had several bones involved. Imaging studies performed included magnetic resonance imaging (21 patients), computed tomography (14 patients), and nuclear bone scan (25 patients). Our study, the largest contemporary series of pediatric pelvic osteomyelitis from one institution, highlights the consequences of prolonged duration of illness and delayed diagnosis.


Assuntos
Osteomielite/fisiopatologia , Infecção Pélvica/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Osteomielite/tratamento farmacológico , Osteomielite/microbiologia , Infecção Pélvica/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Pélvica/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 20(6): 529-33, 2005 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15864610

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become a standard procedure for patients with ulcerative colitis requiring surgical intervention. The technique has greatly improved and, since 1990, all patients at Huddinge University Hospital have been operated on with the double stapled technique. Pelvic sepsis is one of the most serious complications postoperatively, and, according to previous reports, leads to impaired function of the pouch and, in some cases, extirpation of the pouch. AIM: The purpose of this study was to find out if pelvic sepsis postoperatively after IPAA leads to impaired functional outcome at long-term follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis operated on between 1990 and 1997 with double stapled J-shaped pouches were followed prospectively with a standardised questionnaire, clinical follow-up and endoscopy of the pouch. The function of the pouch has been evaluated at a minimum of 2 years after surgery to compare the functional outcome between patients with and without pelvic sepsis postoperatively. RESULTS: Twelve patients developed pelvic sepsis postoperatively. No significant differences were found in pouch evacuation frequency, incontinence, deferral time, usage of protecting pads, skin irritation, evacuation problems, diet, usage of medication or social handicap. There was one failure in the control group. CONCLUSION: In this study, no evidence was found that suggested pelvic sepsis postoperatively impairs functional outcome after IPAA at long-term follow-up.


Assuntos
Bolsas Cólicas/efeitos adversos , Motilidade Gastrointestinal/fisiologia , Infecção Pélvica/fisiopatologia , Sepse/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Colite Ulcerativa/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecção Pélvica/etiologia , Infecção Pélvica/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Reoperação , Sepse/etiologia , Sepse/cirurgia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
5.
Radiology ; 233(3): 750-6, 2004 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15516608

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate current practice patterns of percutaneous image-guided abdominal and pelvic abscess drainage in academic and private practice centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board did not require approval for this study. In a survey conducted between November 2002 and February 2003, 493 questionnaires were sent to 193 academic and 300 private practice radiology departments in the United States. All recipients were informed of the study purpose. The survey included questions about departmental demographics, patient selection criteria for percutaneous abscess drainage (eg, abscess diameter at imaging, laboratory parameters such as white blood cell count, and clinical indications such as fever), use of analgesia or conscious sedation, drainage method, and imaging technique. The statistical significance of differences between respondent subgroups was analyzed with a Pearson or Mantel-Haenszel chi(2) test. RESULTS: Academic centers returned 95 questionnaires (49%), and private practice centers, 72 (24%). Percutaneous abscess drainage is performed by a fellowship-trained radiologist at 92 (97%) of 95 academic centers and 41 (79%) of 52 private practice centers (P < .001). Among 95 academic respondents and 52 private practice respondents, respectively, 56 (59%) and 33 (63%) do not perform drainage if an abscess has a diameter of less than 3 cm; 30 (32%) and nine (17%), if the white blood cell count is normal; and 16 (17%) and six (12%), if the patient is afebrile. Most (90 [95%] of 95 academic, 45 [87%] of 52 private practice) respondents use conscious sedation. A transabdominal approach and 8-12-F catheters are most frequently used by both groups. Academic respondents more frequently use transvaginal and transrectal approaches (54 [57%] and 51 [54%] of 95, vs 16 [31%] and 15 [29%] of 52 private practice respondents; P = .003) and 14-F catheters (69 [73%] of 95 vs 18 [35%] of 52; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous drainage is usually performed by fellowship-trained radiologists in abscesses of more than 3 cm in diameter, for appropriate clinical indications (multiple parameters above the established threshold), by using conscious sedation and 8-12-F catheters.


Assuntos
Abscesso Abdominal/terapia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Prática Privada , Radiografia Intervencionista , Radiologia , Abscesso Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Contagem de Células Sanguíneas , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea , Cateterismo/instrumentação , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Sedação Consciente , Drenagem/instrumentação , Febre/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Seleção de Pacientes , Infecção Pélvica/fisiopatologia , Infecção Pélvica/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Radiologia , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...