Efficacy and Side Effects of Topiramate in Treatment of Children With Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Topiramate is often considered as a second-line medication for the treatment of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS), but limited studies exist that evaluate its efficacy in children. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients aged <21 years with PTCS who were treated with topiramate alone or in combination with acetazolamide was performed. Data regarding clinical courses and visual outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were identified. Three (6.5%) patients were treated with topiramate alone, 31 (67.4%) transitioned to topiramate from acetazolamide, and 12 (26.1%) took both topiramate and acetazolamide concurrently. The median time to resolution of papilledema on topiramate was 0.57 years (interquartile range 0.32 to 0.84). Among eyes with papilledema graded on the Frisen scale at topiramate initiation, 40 of 57 (70.2%) were grade 1, nine of 57 (15.8%) were grade 2, and eight of 57 (14.0%) were grade 3. Twenty-seven of 46 (58.7%) reported headache improvement after starting topiramate. The mean dose of topiramate was 1.3 ± 0.8 mg/kg/day. The most common side effect was patient report of cognitive slowing (10 of 46 [21.7%]). All patients on topiramate monotherapy who were compliant with treatment and follow-up had resolution of papilledema with no evidence of visual function loss. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate can effectively treat PTCS in children with mild to moderate papilledema or in those unable to tolerate acetazolamide. More research is needed to assess the efficacy of topiramate for higher grade papilledema.

Acetazolamide-induced pulmonary oedema: A disproportionality analysis from the EudraVigilance database.

To our knowledge, no prior study has analysed a possible association between acetazolamide and pulmonary oedema. The aim of this study was to use data from the EudraVigilance to detect a safety signal for acetazolamide-induced pulmonary oedema. We performed a disproportionality analysis (case-noncase method), calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs) up to 22 February 2024. Among 11 684 208 spontaneous cases of adverse reactions registered in EudraVigilance, 38 275 were pulmonary oedemas. Acetazolamide was involved in 31 cases. In more than half of those cases, the patients received a single dose of acetazolamide after undergoing cataract surgery: latency was 10-90 min. Remarkably, there were five cases of positive rechallenge and six cases resulted in death. The ROR for acetazolamide was 3.63 (95% CI 2.55-5.17). Disproportionality was also observed in VigiBase®: ROR 4.44 (95% CI 3.34-5.90). Our study confirms a signal that suggests a risk of serious pulmonary oedema associated with acetazolamide.

Inappropriate Acetazolamide Use for a Hiker Who Developed Acute Kidney Injury.

Prophylactic use of acetazolamide (ACZ) to prevent acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a common practice among high altitude travelers and mountaineers. With its use comes a possible risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). We present a case in which a 56-year-old male hiker in Grand Canyon National Park developed acute exertional rhabdomyolysis and subsequent AKI while taking prophylactic ACZ to prevent AMS. This medication was prescribed despite the hiker encountering only moderate altitude at Grand Canyon with a planned descent within <24 h. The resulting AKI was determined to be the combined result of acute exertional rhabdomyolysis and dehydration/hypovolemia, with the ACZ, a diuretic, as a contributing factor. Medical providers need to recognize the risks/benefits with ACZ use for AMS prophylaxis and avoid prescribing it to individuals whose altitude exposure and activity fall outside the clinical practice guidelines recommended for use.

Acute Myopic Shift after a Single Dose of Acetazolamide: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

We report the case of a 32-year-old male who presented with an acute myopic shift as a result of uveal effusion following a single administration of 250 mg acetazolamide. The drug was discontinued and following cycloplegia and topical steroid therapy, we observed progressive deepening of the anterior chamber, reopening of the iridocorneal angle, and complete resolution of the myopic shift after 5 days. A literature review since 1956 identified 23 cases, including ours, which developed a myopic shift after a median time of 24 h (3 - 24) following a median dose of 500 mg (125 - 1000) acetazolamide, with about a third complicated by angle closure ocular hypertension. This presumed idiosyncratic reaction can occur without prior drug exposure and independent of the phakic status. Treatment options include systematic drug withdrawal associated with cycloplegia, anti-glaucomatous agents, and/or corticosteroids. Full recovery is achieved within about 5 days (2 - 14). Given the widespread use of acetazolamide, awareness of this idiosyncratic reaction is crucial to avoid complications of acute angle-closure glaucoma.

Rapid and Reliable HLA-B*59:01 Genotyping to Prevent Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor-Induced Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions.

OBJECTIVE: Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) are intraocular pressure-reducing medications used in ophthalmology. Human leukocyte antigen-B*59:01 (HLA-B*59:01) is strongly associated with CAI-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). This study aimed to develop and validate a rapid and economical screening method for HLA-B*59:01 to prevent carbonic anhydrase inhibitor-induced SCARs. METHODS: Duplex allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with an internal control was performed for HLA-B*59:01 genotyping. The accuracy of duplex allele-specific PCR for HLA-B*59:01 genotyping was evaluated in 200 blood samples, using sequence-based typing (SBT) as the reference method. RESULTS: In total, 50 HLA-B*59:01-positive and 150 HLA-B*59:01-negative results obtained using duplex allele-specific PCR were in complete agreement with the SBT results. CONCLUSION: Duplex allele-specific PCR is a rapid, reliable, and economical assay for screening the HLA-B*59:01 allele.

Acetazolamide for acute kidney injury in patients undergoing high dose methotrexate therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Urine alkalization is one of the standard treatments to prevent acute kidney injury in patients receiving high-dose methotrexate. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are promising adjuvants/substitutes with advantages such as faster urine alkalization time and prevention of fluid overload. However, there is limited and contradictory evidence on its efficacy and safety. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors to standard treatments in adult patients receiving high-dose methotrexate. METHODS: The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022352802) in August 2021. We evaluated the use of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in combination with standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone. We excluded articles irrelevant to the efficacy and safety of acetazolamide in patients receiving high dose methotrexate and/or did not provide sufficient data regarding doses, recruitment criteria, and follow-up period. Two authors performed the data extraction independently. RESULTS: Among 198 articles retrieved, six observational studies met all eligibility criteria. Four studies with five datasets (totaling 558 patients/cycles) had enough data to be included in the meta-analysis. We independently report the results from the two remaining studies. The results did not show a significant difference between acetazolamide versus standard treatment in acute kidney injury (AKI) rate (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.48-1.29, P = 0.34, I2 = 0%). Regarding the time to urine pH goal, there was no significant time difference between the two groups (Mean Difference = 0.07, 95% CI - 1.9 to 2.04, P = 0.95, I2 = 25%). Furthermore, our meta-analysis showed that acetazolamide did not reduce length of stay (Mean Difference = 0.75, 95% CI - 0.8 to 2.31, P = 0.34, I2 = 0%). In one study, the only reported side effect of acetazolamide was hypokalemia (nearly 50% in the acetazolamide group). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review showed no significant difference between acetazolamide and standard care treatment regarding urine alkalinization time and AKI rate in adult patients receiving high dose methotrexate. We suggest performing a large blinded, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the potential benefits of this low-cost medication.

Perianesthetic metabolic acidosis is associated with 2% dorzolamide eye drops in dogs that underwent ophthalmic surgery: a retrospective study (2019-2022).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the administration of 2% dorzolamide ophthalmic solution in dogs undergoing ophthalmic surgery is associated with perianesthetic metabolic acidosis. ANIMALS: 60 dogs, with or without dorzolamide administration, underwent arterial blood gas analysis immediately after anesthesia for ophthalmic surgery between 2019 and 2022; a total of 60 surgeries were evaluated. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between the administration of 2% dorzolamide ophthalmic solution in dogs and the development of metabolic acidosis. Additionally, the influence of various potential risk factors, including age, body weight, sex, use of topical or systemic NSAIDs, and preoperative medications on the occurrence of metabolic acidosis, was evaluated. RESULTS: A significant association was found between the use of 2% dorzolamide ophthalmic solution and perianesthetic metabolic acidosis (OR, 6.79; 95% CI, 2.00 to 23.02; P = .002). Furthermore, topical dorzolamide administration was significantly associated with both perianesthetic hypokalemia (OR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.11 to 11.20; P = .033) and perianesthetic hyperchloremia (OR, 9.25; 95% CI, 1.71 to 50.01; P = .010). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of 2% dorzolamide ophthalmic solution is associated with perianesthetic metabolic acidosis, hypokalemia, and hyperchloremia in dogs. It is prudent to be aware of these risks, especially before anesthesia.

Dural Venous Sinus Stent Placement Reduces Dosage Requirements for Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors in Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

This retrospective single-center study evaluated the change in required dosage of acetazolamide and topiramate before and after dural venous sinus stent placement (VSSP) for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Adults diagnosed with IIH who failed optimized medical management and were treated with VSSP were included. This study comprised 55 patients who underwent VSSP for the diagnosis of IIH. The median preprocedural dosage of acetazolamide and topiramate was 1,000 mg (range, 500-4,000 mg) and 100 mg (range, 0-200 mg), respectively, among patients able to tolerate the medications. The median postprocedural dosage of acetazolamide and topiramate was 375 mg (range, 0-4,000 mg), with a mean reduction of 52.9% (P = .001), and 0 mg (range, 0-200 mg), with a mean reduction of 45.9% (P = .005), respectively. Dural VSSP significantly reduced dosage requirements for acetazolamide and/or topiramate, potentially reducing the morbidity secondary to medication side effects.

A Case of Acute Chest Pain After Acetazolamide to Treat Uncontrolled Increased Intraocular Pressure.

A 61-year-old man with uncontrolled increased intraocular pressure after cataract surgery was treated with acetazolamide. Three days later, he developed acute chest pain requiring emergency treatment. What would you do next?

Intravenous or Oral Acetazolamide for Treatment of Diuretic-Induced Alkalosis in Patients With Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Acetazolamide has been used for diuretic-induced metabolic alkalosis, but the preferred dose, route, and frequency of administration remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize dosing strategies and determine the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) acetazolamide for patients with heart failure (HF) with diuretic-induced metabolic alkalosis. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study comparing the use of IV versus PO acetazolamide in patients with HF receiving at least 120 mg of furosemide for the treatment of metabolic alkalosis (serum bicarbonate CO2 ≥32). The primary outcome was the change in CO2 on the first basic metabolic panel (BMP) within 24 hours of the first dose of acetazolamide. Secondary outcomes included laboratory outcomes, such as change in bicarbonate, chloride, and incidence of hyponatremia and hypokalemia. This study was approved by the local institutional review board. RESULTS: IV acetazolamide was given in 35 patients and PO acetazolamide was given in 35 patients. Patients in both groups were given a median of 500 mg of acetazolamide in the first 24 hours. For the primary outcome, there was a significant decrease in CO2 on the first BMP within 24 hours after patients received the IV acetazolamide (-2 [interquartile range, IQR: -2, 0] vs 0 [IQR: -3, 1], P = 0.047). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: IV acetazolamide resulted in significantly decreased bicarbonate within 24 hours of administration. IV acetazolamide may be preferred to treat diuretic-induced metabolic alkalosis in patients with HF.

Acetazolamide in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Volume Overload.

BACKGROUND: Whether acetazolamide, a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor that reduces proximal tubular sodium reabsorption, can improve the efficiency of loop diuretics, potentially leading to more and faster decongestion in patients with acute decompensated heart failure with volume overload, is unclear. METHODS: In this multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients with acute decompensated heart failure, clinical signs of volume overload (i.e., edema, pleural effusion, or ascites), and an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level of more than 1000 pg per milliliter or a B-type natriuretic peptide level of more than 250 pg per milliliter to receive either intravenous acetazolamide (500 mg once daily) or placebo added to standardized intravenous loop diuretics (at a dose equivalent to twice the oral maintenance dose). Randomization was stratified according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40% or >40%). The primary end point was successful decongestion, defined as the absence of signs of volume overload, within 3 days after randomization and without an indication for escalation of decongestive therapy. Secondary end points included a composite of death from any cause or rehospitalization for heart failure during 3 months of follow-up. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 519 patients underwent randomization. Successful decongestion occurred in 108 of 256 patients (42.2%) in the acetazolamide group and in 79 of 259 (30.5%) in the placebo group (risk ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17 to 1.82; P<0.001). Death from any cause or rehospitalization for heart failure occurred in 76 of 256 patients (29.7%) in the acetazolamide group and in 72 of 259 patients (27.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.48). Acetazolamide treatment was associated with higher cumulative urine output and natriuresis, findings consistent with better diuretic efficiency. The incidence of worsening kidney function, hypokalemia, hypotension, and adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of acetazolamide to loop diuretic therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure resulted in a greater incidence of successful decongestion. (Funded by the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Center; ADVOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03505788.).

Acetazolamide: Old drug, new evidence?

Acetazolamide is an old drug used as an antiepileptic agent, amongst other indications. The drug is seldom used, primarily due to perceived poor efficacy and adverse events. Acetazolamide acts as a noncompetitive inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase, of which there are several subtypes in humans. Acetazolamide causes an acidification of the intracellular and extracellular environments activating acid-sensing ion channels, and these may account for the anti-seizure effects of acetazolamide. Other potential mechanisms are modulation of neuroinflammation and attenuation of high-frequency oscillations. The overall effect increases the seizure threshold in critical structures such as the hippocampus. The evidence for its clinical efficacy was from 12 observational studies of 941 patients. The 50% responder rate was 49%, 20% of patients were rendered seizure-free, and 30% were noted to have had at least one adverse event. We conclude that the evidence from several observational studies may overestimate efficacy because they lack a comparator; hence, this drug would need further randomized placebo-controlled trials to assess effectiveness and harm.

Serious Adverse Events of Oral and Topical Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors.

IMPORTANCE: Some ophthalmologists may be reluctant to prescribe oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, given the potential for life-threatening systemic adverse reactions. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a population-based analysis of the safety of oral or topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in clinical care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This matched longitudinal cohort study took place in Ontario, Canada. Consecutive patients older than 65 years who were prescribed an oral or topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor in Ontario, Canada, between January 1, 1995, and January 1, 2020, were identified. Patients were matched 1-to-1 based on age, sex, and diabetes status. Time zero was defined as the date of the first identified prescription for the medication, and the primary analysis focused on the first 120 days of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was a severe complicated adverse event of either Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, or aplastic anemia. RESULTS: Overall, 128 942 matched patients initiated an oral or topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor during the 25-year study period. The mean (SD) age was 75 (6.6) years, 71 958 (55.8%) were women, and 25 058 (19.4%) had a diagnosis of diabetes. The oral and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor groups had similar baseline demographics. Patients prescribed an oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitor had an absolute risk of a severe complicated adverse event of 2.90 per 1000 patients, whereas patients prescribed a topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor had an absolute risk of 2.08 per 1000 patients. This difference was equivalent to a risk ratio of 1.40, with a number needed to harm of 1 in 1220 patients (95% CI, 1.12-1.74; P = .003). This generally low risk was replicated in multivariable regression controlling for confounding factors. Additional risk factors for a severe complicated adverse event included patients with more comorbidities and those with more frequent clinic contacts. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The risk of a serious adverse reaction following prescription of an oral or topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor was low and similar between agents. Given the low risk of severe adverse reactions, this population-level analysis supports reconsidering the reluctance toward prescribing an oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitor.

Systemic side effects of glaucoma medications.

Glaucoma is a progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells leading to visual field loss. Lowering intraocular pressure is currently the only modifiable risk factor to slow glaucoma progression. Intraocular pressure-lowering options include topical and systemic medications, lasers, and surgical procedures. Glaucoma eye drops play a major role in treating this blinding disease. Similar to all medications, the glaucoma medications have their own adverse effects. The majority of glaucoma medications work by stimulating or inhibiting adrenergic, cholinergic, and prostaglandin receptors, which are distributed all over the body. Therefore, the glaucoma medications can affect organs other than the eye. This review will discuss the systemic adverse effects of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, sympathomimetics, para-sympathomimetics, beta blockers, prostaglandin analogs, hyperosmotic agents, and novel glaucoma medications with a stress on pregnant patients, breastfeeding mothers, and paediatric patients.

Acetazolamide to Prevent Adverse Altitude Effects in COPD and Healthy Adults.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of acetazolamide in preventing adverse altitude effects in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in healthy lowlanders 40 years of age or older. METHODS: Trial 1 was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-design trial in which 176 patients with COPD were treated with acetazolamide capsules (375 mg/day) or placebo, starting 24 hours before staying for 2 days at 3100 m. The mean (±SD) age of participants was 57±9 years, and 34% were women. At 760 m, COPD patients had oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry of 92% or greater, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide less than 45 mm Hg, and mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 63±11% of predicted. The primary outcome in trial 1 was the incidence of the composite end point of altitude-related adverse health effects (ARAHE) at 3100 m. Criteria for ARAHE included acute mountain sickness (AMS) and symptoms or findings relevant to well-being and safety, such as severe hypoxemia, requiring intervention. Trial 2 comprised 345 healthy lowlanders. Their mean age was 53±7 years, and 69% were women. The participants in trial 2 underwent the same protocol as did the patients with COPD in trial 1. The primary outcome in trial 2 was the incidence of AMS assessed at 3100 m by the Lake Louise questionnaire score (the scale of self-assessed symptoms ranges from 0 to 15 points, indicating absent to severe, with 3 or more points including headache, indicating AMS). RESULTS: In trial 1 of patients with COPD, 68 of 90 (76%) receiving placebo and 42 of 86 (49%) receiving acetazolamide experienced ARAHE (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.79; P<0.001). The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one case of ARAHE was 4 (95% CI, 3 to 8). In trial 2 of healthy individuals, 54 of 170 (32%) receiving placebo and 38 of 175 (22%) receiving acetazolamide experienced AMS (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.80; chi-square statistic P=0.035). The NNT to prevent one case of AMS was 10 (95% CI, 5 to 141). No serious adverse events occurred in these trials. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive treatment with acetazolamide reduced the incidence of adverse altitude effects requiring an intervention in patients with COPD and the incidence of AMS in healthy lowlanders 40 years of age or older during a high-altitude sojourn. (Funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation [Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung], Lunge Zürich, and the Swiss Lung Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03156231 and NCT03561675.)

Pediatric Intracranial Hypertension: A Spotlight on Imaging, the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial, and COVID-19 Associated Cases.

Primary intracranial hypertension (PIH) is characterized by clinical signs of increased intracranial pressure, papilledema, elevated opening pressure, and absence of mass lesion, hydrocephalus, or meningeal enhancement on neuroimaging. Visual changes are a common presenting feature and if untreated there is risk of irreversible vision loss. There have been recent proposed changes to the criteria for PIH along with studies looking at the differences in imaging characteristics between adult and pediatric PIH. The presence of transverse sinus stenosis alone was highly sensitive and specific for pediatric PIH. The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial was an adult, multicenter study that examined the use of acetazolamide and weight loss on the course of PIH. The study confirmed many previously held beliefs including the most common presenting symptom in PIH is headache. Most patients present with bilateral papilledema with 58.2% of patients having symmetric Frisen scale grading and within one grade in 92.8%. Although diplopia is a common reported symptom, very few have evidence of cranial nerve palsy. Male gender, high-grade papilledema, and decreased visual acuity at presentation are risk factors for treatment failure. Acetazolamide use is associated with mild metabolic acidosis. During acetazolamide treatment, monitoring for hypokalemia or aplastic anemia is not recommended. Monitoring transaminases in the titration phase of treatment should be considered due to a case of transaminitis and pancreatitis with elevated lipase. Newer case reports have also seen associations of secondary intracranial hypertension with concurrent COVID-19 infection and MIS-C.