Clinical trial of raltegravir, an integrase inhibitor, in HAM/TSP.

OBJECTIVE: Human T-cell lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV-1)-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) is a chronic, progressive myelopathy. A high proviral load (PVL) is one of the main risk factors for HAM/TSP. Recently, it was shown that raltegravir could inhibit cell-free and cell-to-cell transmission of HTLV-1 in vitro. Given the substantial clinical experience in human immunodeficiency virus infection and its excellent safety profile, this agent may be an attractive therapeutic option for HAM/TSP patients. METHODS: Sixteen subjects with HAM/TSP received raltegravir 400 mg orally twice daily in an initial 6-month treatment phase, followed by a 9-month post-treatment phase. HTLV-1 PVLs were assessed using droplet digital PCR from the PBMCs every 3 months, and from the CSF at baseline, month 6, and month 15. We also evaluated the ability of raltegravir to regulate abnormal immune responses in HAM/TSP patients. RESULTS: While a downward trend was observed in PBMC and/or CSF PVLs of some patients, raltegravir overall did not have any impact on the PVL in this HAM/TSP patient cohort. Clinically, all patients' neurological scores and objective measurements remained relatively stable, with some expected variability. Immunologic studies showed alterations in the immune profiles of a subset of patients including decreased CD4+ CD25+ T cells and spontaneous lymphoproliferation. INTERPRETATION: Raltegravir was generally well tolerated in this HAM/TSP patient cohort. A subset of patients exhibited a mild decrease in PVL as well as variations in their immune profiles after taking raltegravir. These findings suggest that raltegravir may be a therapeutic option in select HAM/TSP patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01867320.

Uptake and Discontinuation of Integrase Inhibitors (INSTIs) in a Large Cohort Setting.

BACKGROUND: Despite increased integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) use, limited large-scale, real-life data exists on INSTI uptake and discontinuation. SETTING: International multicohort collaboration. METHODS: RESPOND participants starting dolutegravir (DTG), elvitegravir (EVG), or raltegravir (RAL) after January 1, 2012 were included. Predictors of INSTI used were assessed using multinomial logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models describe time to and factors associated with discontinuation. RESULTS: Overall, 9702 persons were included; 5051 (52.1%) starting DTG, 1933 (19.9%) EVG, and 2718 (28.0%) RAL. The likelihood of starting RAL or EVG vs DTG decreased over time and was higher in Eastern and Southern Europe compared with Western Europe. At 6 months after initiation, 8.9% (95% confidence interval: 8.3% to 9.5%) had discontinued the INSTI (6.4% DTG, 7.4% EVG, and 14.0% RAL). The main reason for discontinuation was toxicity (44.2% DTG, 42.5% EVG, 17.3% RAL). Nervous system toxicity accounted for a higher proportion of toxicity discontinuations on DTG (31.8% DTG, 23.4% EVG, 6.6% RAL). Overall, treatment simplification was highest on RAL (2.7% DTG, 1.6% EVG, and 19.8% RAL). Factors associated with a higher discontinuation risk included increasing year of INSTI initiation, female gender, hepatitis C coinfection, and previous non-AIDS-defining malignancies. Individuals in Southern and Eastern Europe were less likely to discontinue. Similar results were seen for discontinuations after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of DTG vs EVG or RAL increased over time. Discontinuation within 6 months was mainly due to toxicity; nervous system toxicity was highest on DTG. Discontinuation was highest on RAL, mainly because of treatment simplification.

Durability of first-line antiretroviral regimens in the era of integrase inhibitors: a cohort of HIV-positive individuals in Spain, 2014-2015.

BACKGROUND: We compared time to treatment change (TC), viral suppression (VS) and change in CD4+ T-cell counts of first-line antiretroviral regimens (ART). METHODS: We analysed HIV treatment-naive adults from the Cohort of the Spanish HIV/AIDS Research Network (CoRIS) initiating the most commonly used ART regimens from September 2014 to November 2015. We used proportional hazards models on the sub-distribution hazard to estimate sub-distribution hazard ratios (sHR) for time to TC, logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for VS (viral load <50 copies/ml), and linear regression to assess mean differences in CD4+ T-cell changes from ART initiation. RESULTS: Among 960 individuals, tenofovir (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC)/rilpivirine (RPV) was the most frequently prescribed regimen (24.2%), followed by elvitegravir (EVG)/cobicistat (COBI)/TDF/FTC (22.8%), abacavir (ABC)/lamivudine (3TC)/dolutegavir (DTG; 17.4%), TDF/FTC+darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) or darunavir/cobicistat (DRV/c; 12.1%), TDF/FTC/efavirenz (EFV; 8.8%), TDF/FTC+raltegravir (RAL; 7.7%) and TDF/FTC+DTG (7.0%). Initiating ART with TDF/FTC+DRV/r or DRV/c (adjusted sHR: 2.96; 95% CI: 1.44, 6.08), TDF/FTC/EFV (2.18; 0.98, 4.82), TDF/FTC+RAL (2.37; 1.08, 5.22) and TDF/FTC+DTG (6.34; 3.18, 12.64) was associated with a higher risk of TC compared to ABC/3TC/DTG. At 24 weeks, VS was lower in TDF/FTC+DRV/r or DRV/c (adjusted OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.74) compared with ABC/3TC/DTG, and CD4+ T-cell increase was lower in patients initiating with TDF/FTC/RPV (adjusted mean difference: -75.9, 95% CI: -130.6, -21.2) compared with those who did with ABC/3TC/DTG. CONCLUSIONS: Time to TC, VS and change in CD4+ T-cell counts varies by initial regimen. These differences may be useful for making decision when initiating ART.

Improvement of lipid profile after switching from efavirenz or ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors to rilpivirine or once-daily integrase inhibitors: results from a large observational cohort study (SCOLTA).

BACKGROUND: Dyslipidemia represents a significant non-infectious comorbidity among people living with HIV. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact on lipid profile of switches from an efavirenz (EFV) or protease inhibitor/ritonavir (PI/r)-based regimen to a rilpivirine (RPV) or a once-daily integrase inhibitor-based regimen. METHODS: We analyzed data from SCOLTA prospective database. All patients with HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml in therapy with two NRTI + EFV or PI/r were included if they switched from EFV to dolutegravir (group EFV-DTG), elvitegravir (EFV-EVG), or RPV (EFV-RPV) and from PI/r to DTG (PI/r-DTG), PI/r to EVG (PI/r-EVG), or PI/r to RPV (PI/r-RPV). Total cholesterol (TC), TC/HDL ratio, LDL-cholesterol (LDL) and triglycerides (TG) were compared at baseline, six months and one year. Comparisons among groups were performed by a general linear model. RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety patients were enrolled, 24.9% female, mean age 47.3 years (±10.1). According to ART switch, 11.4% were classified in group EFV-DTG, 3.9% in EFV-EVG, 23.9% in EFV-RPV, 17.6% in PI/r-DTG, 17.8% in PI/r-EVG, and 25.5% in PI/r-RPV. After adjusted analysis, TC significantly decreased in all groups but EFV-EVG, TC/HDL in all but EFV-DTG and EFV-EVG, while the reduction of TG was significant only in switches to RPV (EFV-RPV and PI/r-RPV). The one year decrease of TC, TC/HDL, LDL and TG was higher in patients with higher baseline levels of the same variable (p < .0001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: In SCOLTA, all switches from PI/r regimens gave advantages on lipid profile, while stopping EFV had consistently favorable lipid effects only if replaced by RPV.

Initial treatment response among HIV subtype F infected patients who started antiretroviral therapy based on integrase inhibitors.

: HIV-1 subtype B (54.4%) and subtype F (27.2%) are the most prevalent variants in patients who started antiretroviral therapy including an integrase inhibitor in the last 2 years in Northwest Spain. Virological response rates to antiretroviral therapy based on integrase inhibitor were significantly lower among F subtypes compared with B subtypes at weeks 12 (25.0% vs. 75.0%) and 24 (59.1% vs. 95.0%). Subtype F was independently associated with virological response at 24 weeks [odds ratio 11.8 (95% confidence interval 1.1-119.9); P = 0.037].

Lessons for Patient Education Around Long-Acting Injectable PrEP: Findings from a Mixed-Method Study of Phase II Trial Participants.

This study aimed to identify patients' physical and psychosocial experiences of an investigational long-acting injectable PrEP product to aid in the development of patient and provider education materials. Twenty-eight participants of a Phase 2 safety, tolerability, and acceptability study of long-acting integrase inhibitor cabotegravir (CAB-LA) were interviewed on their physical and psychosocial experiences of the injections. Five themes emerged through a framework analysis on these interview transcripts: (1) injection-related pain is highly variable across individuals; (2) pain is more impactful after the injections than during; (3) patient anxiety is critical, but does not determine the experience of injections and decreases over time; (4) intimacy and awkwardness of gluteal injections impacts patients' experiences; (5) patient education and care strategies can mitigate the above factors. These findings can inform further sociobehavioral research within Phase 3 efficacy trials of CAB-LA, as well as patient education and provider guidance for future injectable PrEP products.

Treatment with integrase inhibitor suggests a new interpretation of HIV RNA decay curves that reveals a subset of cells with slow integration.

The kinetics of HIV-1 decay under treatment depends on the class of antiretrovirals used. Mathematical models are useful to interpret the different profiles, providing quantitative information about the kinetics of virus replication and the cell populations contributing to viral decay. We modeled proviral integration in short- and long-lived infected cells to compare viral kinetics under treatment with and without the integrase inhibitor raltegravir (RAL). We fitted the model to data obtained from participants treated with RAL-containing regimes or with a four-drug regimen of protease and reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Our model explains the existence and quantifies the three phases of HIV-1 RNA decay in RAL-based regimens vs. the two phases observed in therapies without RAL. Our findings indicate that HIV-1 infection is mostly sustained by short-lived infected cells with fast integration and a short viral production period, and by long-lived infected cells with slow integration but an equally short viral production period. We propose that these cells represent activated and resting infected CD4+ T-cells, respectively, and estimate that infection of resting cells represent ~4% of productive reverse transcription events in chronic infection. RAL reveals the kinetics of proviral integration, showing that in short-lived cells the pre-integration population has a half-life of ~7 hours, whereas in long-lived cells this half-life is ~6 weeks. We also show that the efficacy of RAL can be estimated by the difference in viral load at the start of the second phase in protocols with and without RAL. Overall, we provide a mechanistic model of viral infection that parsimoniously explains the kinetics of viral load decline under multiple classes of antiretrovirals.

Eficacia y seguridad del uso de dolutegravir en el tratamiento de pacientes con VIH multitratados / Efficacy and safety of the use of dolutegravir in the treatment of multi-treated HIV patients

INTRODUCCIÓN: Antecedentes: El presente dictamen expone la evaluación de tecnología de la eficacia y seguridad de dolutegravir para el tratamiento de pacientes con VIH multitrados. METODOLOGÍA: Estrategia de Búsqueda: Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda de la literatura con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad de dolutegravir en el tratamiento de infección por VIH en las bases de datos de PubMed, TRIPDATABASE y www.clinicaltrials.gov. Adicionalmente, se realizó una búsqueda de evaluaciones de tecnologías y guías de práctica en las páginas web de grupos dedicados a la invstigación y educación en salud en general como The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) y Teh USA Department of human and health Services (DHHS); y especializados en VIH como The British HIV Association (BHIVA), The International Antiviral Society (IAS), The British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (BC-CfE( y The European AIDS Clinical Society.RESULTADOS: Sinopsis de la Evidencia: Se llevo a cabo una búsqueda de evidencia científica relacionada al uso de dolutegravir en el tratamiento de pacientes con VIH. En la presente sinopsis se describe la evidencia disponible según el según el tipo de publicación, siguiendo lo indicado en los criterios de elegibilidad (GPC, ETS, RS, MA y ECA fase III). CONCLUSIONES: A la fecha (Febrero 2017) no se encontró ningún ensayo clínico aleatorizado controlado por placebo que evalúe la eficacia y seguridad de dolutegravir en la población con VIH previamente tratada. Se toma como evidencia dos GPC, un ensayo clínico de no-inferioridad y dos ensayos no-controlados.La evidencia de una similitud en eficacia entre dolutegravir y raltegravir y de altas tasas de respuesta sugiere un benefício del uso de dolutegravir en la problación de pacientes con VIH previamente tratados. En el caso de los pacientes en quienes el tratamiento incluyó otros inhibidores de integrasa, la evidencia es aun de baja calidad, aunque consistente en los ensayos identificados. El Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación-IETSI aprueba el uso de dolutegravir como alternativa de tratamiento en pacientes con VIH previamente tratados con 5 o más antirretrovirales. El período de vigencia del presente dictamen preliminar es de dos años y la continuación de dicha aprobación estará sujeta a los resultados obtenidos de los pacientes que se beneficien con dicho tratamiento y a nueva evidencia que pueda surgir en el tiempo.

Relapse of Kaposi's Sarcoma and HHV-8 viremia in an HIV-infected patient switching from protease inhibitor to integrase inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy.

Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) reduced the incidence of Kaposi's Sarcoma (KS), mainly mediated by the suppression of HIV replication and the recovery of the immune system. The effect of specific classes of antiretrovirals on KS remains unclear. However, both in vitro and clinical studies provided evidences that protease inhibitors (PI) can inhibit Human Herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) replication and reduce KS risk and progression. Moreover, relapses of KS in HIV-infected patients switching from a PI to a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based cART have been reported. We describe here the case of a patient who experienced a relapse of KS and a rebound of HHV-8 viremia two months after switching from a PI to an integrase inhibitor-based cART.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Integrase Inhibitors in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients.

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors are a new class of antiretroviral agents recently licensed for the treatment of both naive and experienced HIV-infected patients. They inhibit the catalytic activity of the HIV-encoded enzyme integrase and prevent the integration of the HIV genome into the host cell genome, so slowing the propagation of the infection. Integrase strand transfer inhibitors cause a rapid drop in viral load, exhibit very low drug interactions (except elvitegravir/cobicistat), and have low pill burden and convenient dosing frequency. Drugs in this class have been compared to others in antiretroviral-naive patients with efavirenz and with protease inhibitors. Final results of the STARTMRK trial highlighted the better virologic and immunologic performance of raltegravir over efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil co-formulation. Raltegravir was also superior to atazanavir/ritonavir and darunavir/ritonavir in the ACTG 5257 study for the combined virologic/tolerability endpoint. Elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir was non-inferior to efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir and to atazanavir/ritonavir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir in terms of confirmed virologic response in the GS-US-236-0102 and GS-US-236-0103 studies, respectively. Finally, dolutegravir showed non-inferiority compared to raltegravir in the SPRING-2 study and was superior to efavirenz and darunavir/ritonavir in the SINGLE and FLAMINGO trials, respectively. The aim of this review is to analyze the data on efficacy and safety of integrase strand transfer inhibitors in antiretroviral-naive HIV patients and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of drugs within this class.

Drug combinations for HIV: what's new?

Since the advent of combined antiretroviral therapy there have been reductions in mortality and morbidity from HIV, transforming the disease into a chronic medical condition where newly diagnosed individuals can expect to live a near-normal life expectancy. When choosing therapy, probably the most important consideration is the risk of developing drug-related toxicity both in the short and long term, and new strategies to permit individualization of therapy will play a vital role in reducing this risk. The management of comorbidities including cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, bone and CNS disease, coinfections and malignancy are important considerations when choosing combined antiretroviral therapy, as is the cost of therapy. In individuals failing therapy, treatment switches will be guided by the presence of present and previously detected resistance mutations. This article will focus on the evidence for current therapies and strategies in ART-naive individuals and the potential for use of novel agents in the future.

Raltegravir: new Drug. Alternative to enfuvirtide/darunavir in multidrug-resistant HIV.

(1) HIV-infected patients who have exhausted most existing antiretroviral treatment options benefit when enfuvirtide or darunavir is added to an optimised multidrug regimen based on the resistance profile; (2) Raltegravir is the first HIV integrase inhibitor to arrive on the market. It was authorised in 2007 in the European Union for patients with multiple antidrug failure; (3) A dose-finding study and two double-blind placebo-controlled trials showed that when raltegravir is added to an optimised antiretroviral regimen about two-thirds of patients achieve undetectable viral load, compared to about one-third of patients treated with an optimised regimen plus placebo. Data are currently limited to 48 weeks. In contrast, adding raltegravir barely increases the efficacy of treatments already containing enfuvirtide and darunavir. Half of patients in whom treatment failed developed viral resistance to raltegravir during these trials; (4) In previously untreated patients, a double-blind controlled trial showed no statistically significant difference in viral load at 48 weeks between raltegravir/tenofovir/lamivudine and efavirenz/tenofovir/lamivudine, but there were only about 40 patients in each group; (5) The adverse effects of raltegravir are poorly documented. In vitro findings, along with the limited clinical data available, point to a potential risk of autoimmune and lymphoproliferative disorders in the long term. (6) Raltegravir is not metabolised by the cytochrome P450 enzyme system, meaning that it should have fewer pharmacokinetic interactions than darunavir. But raltegravir is sensitive to enzyme inducers, which activate its metabolism; (7) Raltegravir is taken orally, twice a day, either during or between meals; (8) In practice, raltegravir is an option for HIV-infected patients with multiple antiretroviral drug failure and few remaining treatment options. It represents an alternative to the darunavir/enfuvirtide combination, and has the advantage of being more convenient to use. Assessment must continue, however, especially in order to identify long-term adverse effects.

Integrase inhibitors and cellular immunity suppress retroviral replication in rhesus macaques.

We describe the efficacy of L-870812, an inhibitor of HIV-1 and SIV integrase, in rhesus macaques infected with the simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) 89.6P. When initiated before CD4 cell depletion, L-870812 therapy mediated a sustained suppression of viremia, preserving CD4 levels and permitting the induction of virus-specific cellular immunity. L-870812 was also active in chronic infection; however, the magnitude and durability of the effect varied in conjunction with the pretreatment immune response and viral load. These studies demonstrate integrase inhibitor activity in vivo and suggest that cellular immunity facilitates chemotherapeutic efficacy in retroviral infections.