Decision models for assessing the cost effectiveness of drug-eluting stents.

Percutaneous coronary intervention is an increasingly common treatment for many people with coronary disease. Randomised trials using antiproliferative, drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown important reductions in the need for repeat procedures after initial percutaneous coronary intervention. These trials indicate that the growing use of DES has the potential to create major clinical benefits for patients; however, in actual practice, the associated costs may cause financial crises for hospital systems. This paper reviews previously published DES economic decision models from both societal and hospital perspectives. From a social perspective, additional spending for new technologies may be acceptable if these technologies convincingly improve the lives of patients. The models reviewed suggest that DES incurs large costs to both society and hospitals, and currently offers uncertain clinical benefits. More research is recommended to identify high-risk patients who stand to gain significant health benefits from this therapy.

Drug-eluting stent: a review and update.

The development of stent has been a major advance in the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease since the introduction of balloon angioplasty. However, neointimal hyperplasia occurring within the stent leading to in-stent restenosis is a main obstacle in the long-term success of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The recent introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) contributes a major breakthrough to interventional cardiology. Many large randomized clinical trials using DES have shown a remarkable reduction in angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization when compared with bare metal stents. The results of these trials also appear to be supported by evidence from everyday practice and non-controlled clinical trials. However, the expanded applications of DES, especially in treating complex lesions such as left main trunk, bifurcation, saphenous vein graft lesions, or in-stent restenosis, are still under evaluation with ongoing studies. With the availability of different types of DES in the market, the issue of cost should not be a deterrent and DES will eventually be an economically viable option for all patients. The adoption of DES in all percutaneous coronary intervention may become a reality in the near future. In this review article, we summarize the recent development and progress of DES as well as compare and update the results of clinical trials.