Biochemical recovery from exertional heat stroke follows a 16-day time course.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the time-resolved progression of clinical laboratory disturbances days-following an exertional heat stroke (EHS). Currently, normalization of organ injury clinical biomarker values is the primary indicator of EHS recovery. However, an archetypical biochemical recovery profile following EHS has not been established. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of EHS patient records in US military personnel from 2008-2014 using the Military Health System Data Repository (MDR). We focused on commonly reported clinical laboratory analytes measured on the day of injury and all proceeding follow-up visits. RESULTS: Over the prescribed period, there were 2,529 EHS episodes treated at 250 unique treatment locations. Laboratory results, including a standardized set of blood, serum and urine assays, were analyzed from 0-340 days following the initial injury. Indicators of acute kidney injury, including serum electrolyte disturbances and abnormal urinalysis findings, were most prevalent on the day of the injury but normalized within 24-48hours (creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and blood and protein in urine). Muscle damage and liver function-associated markers peaked 0-4 days after injury and persisted outside their respective reference ranges for 2-16 days (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatine phosphokinase, myoglobin, prothrombin time). CONCLUSION: Biochemical recovery from EHS spans a 16-day time course, and markers of end-organ damage exhibit distinct patterns over this period. This analysis underscores the prognostic value of each clinical laboratory analyte and will assist in evaluating EHS patient presentation, injury severity and physiological recovery.

Significance of oliguria in critically ill patients with chronic liver disease.

Clinical guidelines recommend using Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria for the diagnosis and classification of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Concerns have been raised about the use of urine output (UO) criteria in CLD. We examined the significance of oliguria meeting the urine output criteria for AKI (AKI-UO) and examined its association with clinical outcomes in CLD patients. Using an 8-year clinical database from a large university medical center, 3458 patients with CLD were identified. AKI occurred in 2854 (82.5%) patients when they fulfilled any KDIGO criteria. When serum creatinine (SC) and UO criteria were used, 604 patients (17.5%) had no evidence of AKI and had the lowest hospital mortality rate (5%). Using AKI-UO criteria alone, 2103 patients (60.8%) were classified as stage 2-3 AKI. When only SC criteria were applied, 1281 (61%) of those patients with stage 2-3 AKI-UO were misclassified as either no AKI or AKI stage 1. Patients reclassified with AKI according to UO criteria (AKI-UO) had nearly a 3-fold increased rate of hospital mortality compared with patients without any AKI (14.6% versus 5%; P < 0.001) and more than a 50% increased mortality compared with stage 1 AKI-SC (14.6% versus 9%; P < 0.001). Patients with transient oliguria (AKI-UO stage 1) had increased mortality rates compared with patients without oliguria (14.9% versus 6.9%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CLD patients have a high incidence of AKI. Compared with creatinine criteria alone, incorporating UO into the diagnostic criteria increased the measured incidence of AKI. Stage 2-3 AKI-UO has a high negative impact on hospital mortality. (Hepatology 2017;66:1592-1600).

Influence of renal or hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of saxagliptin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus often have impaired renal function or may have impaired hepatic function, which can pose significant safety and tolerability issues for antihyperglycaemic pharmacotherapies. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of saxagliptin and its pharmacologically active metabolite, 5-hydroxy saxagliptin, in nondiabetic subjects with mild, moderate or severe renal or hepatic impairment, or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were compared with saxagliptin and metabolite pharmacokinetics and tolerability in healthy adult subjects. METHODS: Two open-label, parallel-group, single-dose studies were conducted. Subjects received a single oral dose of saxagliptin 10 mg (Onglyza™). RESULTS: Compared with healthy subjects, the geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞) for saxagliptin was 16%, 41% and 108% (2.1-fold) higher in subjects with mild, moderate or severe renal impairment, respectively. AUC∞ values for 5-hydroxy saxagliptin were 67%, 192% (2.9-fold) and 347% (4.5-fold) higher in subjects with mild, moderate or severe renal impairment, respectively. As creatinine clearance (CLCR) values decreased, saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin AUC∞ generally increased or became more variable. Twenty-three percent of the saxagliptin dose (measured as the sum of saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin) was cleared by haemodialysis in a 4-hour dialysis session. In the hepatic impairment study, the differences in exposure to saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin were less than 2-fold across all groups. As compared with healthy subjects matched for age, bodyweight, sex and smoking status, the AUC∞ values for saxagliptin were 10%, 38% and 77% higher in subjects with mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment, respectively. These values were 22%, 7% and 33% lower, respectively, for 5-hydroxy saxagliptin compared with matched healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: One-half the usual dose of saxagliptin 5 mg (i.e. 2.5 mg orally once daily) is recommended for patients with moderate (CLCR 30-50 mL/min) or severe (CLCR<30 mL/min not on dialysis) renal impairment or ESRD, but no dose adjustment is recommended for those with mild renal impairment or any degree of hepatic impairment.