The 2020 breakthroughs in early secondary prevention: dual antiplatelet therapy versus single antiplatelet therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Single antiplatelet therapy represents an established treatment in secondary prevention of ischemic strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs). In contrast with coronary artery disease, the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for secondary prevention in patients with acute cerebral ischemia (ACI) remains under debate. In this narrative review, we present and analyse the most recent findings concerning the potential efficacy and safety of DAPT therapy after ischemic strokes or TIA. RECENT FINDINGS: Following the publication of the three (CHANCE, POINT and THALES) large, randomized-controlled, clinical trials (RCTs) that showed efficacy of early DAPT for the secondary prevention after minor AIS or TIA, short-term DAPT use is becoming the most prevalent choice of treatment. Notably, DAPT is even more popular after AIS attributed to large artery atherosclerosis given randomized data from small RCTs supporting the use of DAPT in patients with extracranial or intracranial atherosclerosis and microembolization detected by transcranial Doppler. Recent subanalysis of data from the randomized trials aim to identify specific patient subgroups, which are determined by genetic, imaging or clinical characteristics, and for whom DAPT appears to be more beneficial. The potential role of different antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor) is also discussed. SUMMARY: DAPT has recently proven its efficacy for the early secondary prevention of AIS patients with minor stroke severity and high-risk TIA patients. However, the length of DAPT is still controversial, as well as the individualized selection of AIS or TIA patients with the lower risk of bleeding and with the greater benefit in prevention of ischemic cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events.

Early intervention for incipient insanity: early notions from the 19th century English literature.

AIM: Early intervention programmes in mental illnesses started to bloom in the 1990s, and many programmes have been established worldwide during the past twenty years. However, the concept of early intervention has emerged during the 19th century but it did not make much impact on practice. The aim of this review is to identify the difficulties appeared during that period of time which could provide insight into the modern development of early intervention initiatives. METHODS: A narrative review which focused on English literature about early intervention for insanity during the 19th century was undertaken. RESULTS: Clinicians during the 19th century recognized that treatment would be the most effective at the early stage of the mental illness and they had emphasized the importance of early intervention. However, because of a number of factors, such as the limited roles of asylums, lack of knowledge about mental disorder and the lack of effective treatment, the idea of early intervention did not make impact in clinical service during that period of time. CONCLUSION: During the past two hundred years, understanding towards mental illness has advanced and more effective treatments, such as the use of anti-psychotic medications, have been developed. Reflecting on the past experience and difficulties might shed light on the development of today early intervention in mental disorder.

"Abortion will deprive you of happiness!": Soviet reproductive politics in the post-Stalin era.

This article examines Soviet reproductive politics after the Communist regime legalized abortion in 1955. The regime's new abortion policy did not result in an end to the condemnation of abortion in official discourse. The government instead launched an extensive campaign against abortion. Why did authorities bother legalizing the procedure if they still disapproved of it so strongly? Using archival sources, public health materials, and medical as well as popular journals to investigate the antiabortion campaign, this article argues that the Soviet government sought to regulate gender and sexuality through medical intervention and health "education" rather than prohibition and force in the post-Stalin era. It also explores how the antiabortion public health campaign produced "knowledge" not only about the procedure and its effects, but also about gender and sexuality, subjecting both women and men to new pressures and regulatory norms.