Systemic correlates of cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the prevalence of skin disease among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and determine whether LE skin disease had clinical or serologic correlates with SLE. METHODS: We reviewed records of 335 patients with SLE (seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA) and abstracted skin manifestations, fulfilled mucocutaneous SLE criteria, and clinical and serologic parameters. RESULTS: Of the 231 patients with skin manifestations, 57 (24.7%) had LE-specific conditions, 102 (44.2%) had LE-nonspecific conditions, and 72 (31.2%) had both. LE skin disease was associated with photosensitivity, anti-Smith antibodies, and anti-U1RNP antibodies (all P < 0.001). Patients without LE skin disease more commonly had elevated C-reactive protein levels (P = 0.01). Patients meeting 2-4 mucocutaneous American College of Rheumatology criteria less commonly had cytopenia (P = 0.004) or anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (P = 0.004). No significant associations were observed for systemic involvement (renal, hematologic, neurologic, and arthritis) when comparing patients with or without LE skin involvement. LE skin involvement was not significantly associated with internal SLE disease flare, number of medications, or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: LE skin disease commonly occurs in patients with SLE. The presence of LE skin disease had no mitigating impact on the severity of SLE sequelae, disease flares, number of medications, or overall survival.

Incidence and medical costs of lupus in Spanish hospitals: a retrospective database analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the comorbidity profile, use of healthcare resources and medical costs of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) treated at the hospital level in Spain. METHODS: Admission records of patients with SLE and CLE that were registered between January 2016 and December 2020 were obtained from a Spanish hospital discharge database and analyzed in a retrospective multicenter study. RESULTS: 329 patients met the criteria; 64.44% were female and 35.56% were male, with a median age of 54.65 years. Mean Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 2.75 in the index admission. 31.61% of the patients suffered essential hypertension, 21.96% suffered asthma and 19.76% suffered hyperlipidemia. Mortality rate was 3.95%. The most common medical procedure was heart ultrasound (19.45%) and introduction in peripheral vein of anti-inflammatory with a percutaneous approach (17.93%). Mean admission cost was €6355.99. CONCLUSIONS: Lupus patients showed a higher incidence and prevalence in the female population, with associated cardiac diseases as the main secondary conditions.

Comparison of patients with isolated cutaneous lupus erythematosus versus systemic lupus erythematosus with cutaneous lupus erythematosus as the sole clinical feature: A monocentric study of 149 patients.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) may present as an isolated entity or be classified as Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by the presence of laboratory abnormalities, including cytopenia, low complement levels, and/or autoantibodies (CLE with laboratory SLE). OBJECTIVE: To compare isolated CLE and CLE with laboratory SLE and to validate an existing 3-item score with age < 25 years (1 point), phototypes V to VI (1 point), antinuclear antibodies ≥ 1:320 (5 points) to predict the risk of progression from CLE to severe SLE (sSLE). METHODS: Monocentric cohort study including consecutive patients with CLE. CLE with laboratory SLE was defined by 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for SLE score of ≥10 points at baseline with CLE as the sole clinical feature. RESULTS: Of the 149 patients with CLE, 20 had CLE with laboratory SLE. The median follow-up duration was 11.3 years (IQR: 5.1-20.5). Ten patients (7%) had sSLE developed. In survival analysis, the risk of progression to sSLE was higher among CLE with laboratory SLE (hazard ratio = 6.69; 95% CI: 1.93-23.14, P < .001) compared to isolated CLE. In both groups, none of the patients with a risk score ≤ 2 had sSLE developed. LIMITATIONS: Monocentric study with a limited number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: CLE with laboratory patients with SLE have a higher risk of progression to sSLE than isolated CLE.

Case series of anifrolumab for treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus and lupus-related mucocutaneous manifestations in patients with SLE.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of anifrolumab, a type-1 interferon receptor subunit-1 monoclonal antibody, in treating refractory cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) and lupus non-specific mucocutaneous manifestations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: A case series comprising four SLE patients with refractory CLE received anifrolumab (300mg) as add-on therapy. Medical history, serological markers and images were collected. Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-Activity (CLASI-A) was assessed at baseline and post-treatment visits. RESULTS: Patient 1: Anifrolumab effectively treated refractory chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus with lupus panniculitis and calcinosis cutis.Patient 2: Anifrolumab demonstrated rapid improvement in generalised discoid lupus, achieving a substantial reduction in CLASI-A from 40 to 8.Patient 3: Switching from belimumab to anifrolumab led to notable improvement in photosensitivity and tumid lupus.Patient 4: Anifrolumab effectively managed refractory subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, resulting in remarkable cutaneous improvement and successful tapering of prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil. CONCLUSION: Anifrolumab demonstrates efficacy in treating refractory CLE subtypes and lupus non-specific mucocutaneous manifestations in SLE patients. Further studies are needed to establish response rates, optimal dosing, and long-term outcomes.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus is associated with an increased risk of cardiac and vascular diseases: a large-scale, propensity-matched global retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune skin diseases can expedite various systemic sequelae involving other organs. Although limited to the skin, cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) was noted to be associated with thromboembolic diseases. However, small cohort sizes, partially discrepant outcomes, missing data on CLE subtypes, and incomplete risk assessment limits these findings. METHODS: The Global Collaborative Network of TriNetX provides access to medical records of more than 120 million patients worldwide. We used TriNetX to elucidate the risk for cardiac and vascular diseases after diagnosis of CLE, and its subtypes chronic discoid (DLE) and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). We included 30,315 CLE, 27,427 DLE, and 1613 SCLE patients. We performed propensity-matched cohort studies determining the risk to develop cardiac and vascular diseases (ICD10CM:I00-99) following diagnosis of CLE, DLE, or SCLE. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus were excluded. FINDINGS: We document that CLE and its subtype DLE but less so SCLE are associated with a higher risk for various cardiac and vascular diseases. This included predominantly thromboembolic events such as pulmonary embolism, cerebral infarction, and acute myocardial infarction, but also peripheral vascular disease and pericarditis. For example, the hazard ratio of arterial embolism and thrombosis was 1.399 (confidence interval: 1.230-1.591, p < 0.0001) following CLE diagnosis. The study is limited by retrospective data collection and reliance on ICD10-disease classification. INTERPRETATION: CLE and its major subtype DLE are associated with an increased risk for the development of a wide range of cardiac and vascular diseases. FUNDING: This research was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC 2167, CSSL/CS01-2022) and the Excellence-Chair Program of the State of Schleswig-Holstein.

Serum pentraxin 3 in systemic lupus erythematosus: A potential indicator of cutaneous disease activity.

BACKGROUND: Although skin manifestations are common in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), there is still a lack of a diagnostic marker for cutaneous involvement. Pentraxin3 (PTX3) has been studied in SLE patients; however, it has not been investigated in relation to cutaneous manifestations. OBJECTIVE: To assess the serum PTX3 level in SLE patients, and to investigate its relationship with disease activity as well as with variable skin manifestations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with SLE (17 patients with skin manifestations and 17 without) and 30 healthy subjects were included in the study. Patients were evaluated clinically for systemic and skin manifestations of SLE. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI-2k) and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Activity and Severity Index (CLASI) scores were calculated. Serum level of PTX3 was measured in patients and controls using ELISA. RESULTS: Higher serum PTX3 level was found in SLE patients compared to controls (p < 0.001). Patients with skin manifestations showed higher SLEDAI-2k scores and had higher PTX3 level compared to those without skin manifestations (p = 0.015 and p < 0.001, respectively). PTX3 showed higher levels in association with malar rash (p < 0.001), mucosal ulcers (p < 0.001), alopecia (p < 0.001), and purpuric eruption (p = 0.002). Moreover, PTX3 level positively correlated with CLASI scores (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results reinforce the important role of Pentraxin3 in SLE patients with skin manifestations, and it may be considered an interesting biomarker for the pattern and extent of cutaneous involvement in SLE.

Panoramic view of clinical features of lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional multicentre study from China.

OBJECTIVE: Lupus erythematosus (LE) is a complicated disease with highly heterogeneous clinical manifestations. Previous studies have rarely included all subgroups of patients with lupus and have overlooked the importance of the cutaneous manifestations thereof. We aimed to compare the demographic and clinical differences among patients with different subtypes of lupus. METHODS: This is the first real-world study with a relatively large sample size that simultaneously includes patients with isolated cutaneous lupus erythematosus (iCLE) and SLE. All samples were obtained from the Lupus Erythematosus Multicenter Case-control Study in Chinese populations (LEMCSC) (registration number: ChiCTR2100048939). Comparative analyses between different LE subgroups were performed. RESULTS: A total of 2097 patients with lupus were included, with 1865 patients with SLE, 1648 with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), and 232 with iCLE. Among the patients with CLE, 1330 had acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE); 160 had subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE); and 546 had chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE). The study included a relatively large number of patients with CCLE subtypes, including 311 with discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), 262 with chilblain lupus erythematosus (CHLE) and 45 with lupus erythematosus profundus (LEP). Demographic characteristics, systemic involvement, mucocutaneous manifestations and autoantibodies were significantly different among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: CLE and iCLE are two distinct disease states, and the selection of broad or narrow CLE definitions should be emphasised in scientific reports. LE-non-specific cutaneous lesions imply more severity, while self-reported photosensitivity and LE-specific cutaneous manifestations imply milder severity. Generalised ACLE appears to be a more severe state than localised ACLE, and CHLE appears to be more severe than DLE. Anti-Sjögren's syndrome-related antigen B (SSB) antibodies have higher specific directivity than anti-Sjögren's syndrome-related antigen A (SSA) antibodies for SCLE lesions. Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies have a higher co-occurrence with ACLE and a lower co-occurrence with SCLE and CCLE. Compared with DLE, CHLE has significantly higher positive rates of anti-SSA/Ro60 (71%) and anti-SSA/Ro52 (42.4%) antibodies, whereas LEP is associated with a higher positive rate of antinucleosome antibodies (31.1%).

Topical niacinamide (Nicotinamide) treatment for discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE): A prospective pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus is an umbrella term for a group of autoimmune connective tissue disorders affecting the skin. Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is the chronic condition and most common form of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. AIMS: Current therapies of DLE are challenging and not completely satisfactory, highly expensive, off-label, or poorly available (like antimalarials due to COVID-19 outbreaks). Nicotinamide, also called niacinamide, is a water-soluble form of vitamin B3 (niacin). Its multiple effects let us think that nicotinamide could be a therapy for lupus-associated skin lesions. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial on 60 subjects diagnosed with Discoid lupus erythematosus using topical Nicotinamide 2% and 4% preparations in form of cream and gel on skin and scalp lesions. Control group was included using only cream/gel base as placebo control. RESULTS: Obtained data showed that topical Nicotinamide can be used for the treatment of DLE as adjuvant to other treatment regimens with good cosmetic results and minimal side effects. Topical 4% Nicotinamide is superior to 2% preparation in response but associated with a higher incidence of irritation. CONCLUSION: Topical Nicotinamide can be used for the treatment of DLE as an adjuvant to other treatment regimens with good cosmetic results and minimal side effects. Further trials with long-term therapy, follow-up period, and bigger sample sizes are required.

Hepatitis B and C virus infection in patients with Systemic and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by a multifactorial etiology. The primary aim of this study was to estimate HCV and HBV infection prevalence in a cohort of SLE and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE). We assessed the frequency of these infections in our cohort and the possible associations with disease clinical/laboratory features and disease activity status. The prevalence of chronic HBV infection was 2.2% in the CLE group, while no HBsAg positive patients were identified in the SLE group. Conversely, the prevalence of anti-HCV positive was 2.2% in the SLE group while no anti-HCV positive patients were identified in the CLE group. We found no significant association between anti-HBc positive status and clinical manifestations or disease activity status in either group of patients. Hemodialysis resulted significantly associated with anti-HBc positivity in SLE. In the present study, we found HBsAg positivity in CLE patients but not in the Systemic form (SLE); conversely, a similar prevalence of anti-HBc antibodies in both groups was observed. A possible protective role exerted by SLE in HBV infection may be hypothesized. A higher frequency of HCV infection in SLE compared to CLE suggests a possible involvement of HCV in some SLE-related clinical and immunological features.

Concurrent Interstitial Granulomatous Dermatitis and TNF-α Antagonist-Induced Lupus Syndrome Secondary to Adalimumab for Crohn's Disease.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists have revolutionized management for various autoimmune and inflammatory conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease, hidradenitis suppurativa, psoriatic arthritis, and plaque psoriasis. However, adverse effects may necessitate switching to another biologic with a different mechanism of action. Here we report TNF-α antagonist-induced lupus syndrome (TAILS) revealed by interstitial granulomatous dermatitis (IGD), in the atypical context of Crohn's disease (CD).