Inhibition of neuronal Na+ currents by lacosamide: Differential binding affinity and kinetics to different inactivated states.

Lacosamide is a new-generation anticonvulsant acting on Na+ channels. Compared to the classic anticonvulsants targeting Na+ channels, lacosamide is unique in structure and in its molecular action requiring longer membrane depolarization. Selective binding to the slow inactivated state of Na+ channels was then advocated for lacosamide, although slow binding to the fast inactivated state was alternatively proposed recently. In addition, quantitative characterization of lacosamide action has been deficient. We investigated the interactions between lacosamide and Na+ channels in native mammalian neurons, and found that the apparent dissociation constant (~13.7 µM) of lacosamide to the slow inactivated state is well within the therapeutic concentration range and is much (>15-fold) lower than the dissociation constant of lacosamide to the fast inactivated state. Besides, lacosamide has extremely slow binding rates (<400 M-1sec-1) to the fast but much faster binding rates (>3000 M-1sec-1) to the slow inactivated Na+ channels. Consistent with these biophysical characters, we further demonstrated that lacosamide is much more effective against the repetitive burst discharges with interburst intervals at -60 mV than -80 mV. With preponderant binding to the slow inactivation state in therapeutic concentrations and thus less propensity to affect normal discharges, lacosamide could be a drug of choice for seizure discharges characterized by relatively depolarized interburst intervals, during which more slow inactivated states could be generated and more binding of lacosamide would ensue.

Improvement of epilepsy with lacosamide in a patient with ring chromosome 20 syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Ring chromosome 20 syndrome is a rare chromosomal disorder characterized by refractory seizure, mental retardation, and behavioral problems. Although there are reports of the effective treatment of patients with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), no study has reported the effects of lacosamide(LCM) in children with this syndrome. We report a 7-year-old boy with this syndrome whose refractory and behavioral abnormalities have been remarkably improved by treatment with LCM. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 7-year-old boy with no medical or family history of epilepsy. He developed epilepsy with cessation of movement and derivation of the eyes followed by hyperkinetic seizures that made him squeak strangely and cling to his parents. The seizures lasted for less than a minute and were frequent (they occurred more than 30 times a day), particularly at night. Behavioral abnormalities such as hyperactivity also presented. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed no structural abnormalities, but an interictal electroencephalogram (EEG) indicated spikes and waves in the frontal lobe dominantly, and ictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) revealed a blood flow increase in the bilateral orbital frontal area in comparison to interictal SPECT. After chromosome examination, we diagnosed the patient with ring chromosome 20 syndrome (4/30 mosaic). Carbamazepine was ineffective, and seizures were exacerbated with levetiracetam (LEV). LCM was added to the treatment regimen with valproic acid (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG); consequently, the seizures disappeared, and EEG results also improved. The patient's behavioral disorders, such as hyperactivity, were improved, and he was able to return to elementary school. CONCLUSION: Although VPA and LTG are generally effective for the treatment of ring chromosome 20 syndrome, they do not completely suppress seizures. LCM can be considered an effective option for seizure control in patients with this syndrome.

Pharmacodynamic interactions of antiepileptic drugs: From bench to clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of patients do not achieve seizure control with antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy, and polytherapy, with more than one AED, is often required. To date, no evidence-based criteria on how to combine AEDs exist. OBJECTIVE: This narrative review aimed to provide critical findings of the available literature about the role of pharmacodynamic AEDs' interactions in patients whose epilepsies were treated with polytherapy. METHODS: Electronic databases, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) and Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), were systematically searched to identify relevant studies on pharmacodynamic AEDs' interactions in patients with epilepsy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Most data on AED combinations are coming from animal models and preclinical studies. Combining AEDs with different mechanisms of actions seems to have greater effectiveness and lower risk of adverse event development. Conversely, the combination of AEDs may cause pharmacodynamic synergistic effects that may result in not only increased efficacy but also more adverse effects. Despite some AED associations that have been proven to be effective in specific epilepsy/seizure type (e.g., phenobarbital+/phenytoin for tonic seizures and ethosiximide + valproate for absences; lamotrigine + valproate for various epilepsy/seizure types), no clear and definitive evidence exists about AED combinations in humans. Examples of pharmacodynamic interactions that possibly explain the synergistic effects on efficacy or adverse effects include the combination between vigabatrin or pregabalin and sodium channel blockers (supra-additive antiseizure effect) and lacosamide combined with other sodium channel blockers (infra-additive antiseizure effect and neurotoxicity synergistic). The pharmacodynamic lamotrigine-valproate interaction is also supported by synergistic adverse events. Therefore, well-designed double-blind prospective studies recruiting a sufficient number of patients possibly with a crossover design and carefully ascertain the role of pharmacokinetic interactions and variations of AEDs' levels in the blood are needed.