Pharmacokinetic and Ocular Toxicity Evaluation of Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution, 0.005%, with Preservative Level Reduced to Below the Limit of Quantitation.

Purpose: The systemic and ocular pharmacokinetics (PK), and ocular toxicity of benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-free TearClear latanoprost ophthalmic solution, 0.005% formulation (TC-002) were evaluated. TC-002 is designed to selectively capture BAK at the time of drug administration; therefore, the dose delivered to the eye contains no quantifiable level of preservative. Methods: The systemic and ocular PK of TC-002 were compared to a BAK containing reference listed drug (RLD, Xalatan™) over a 24-h period, after a single topical ocular dose to 1 eye of male Dutch Belted (DB) rabbits (n = 3/timepoint). Latanoprost acid concentrations were measured in plasma and ocular tissues. The ocular toxicity was evaluated in a separate study and included toxicokinetic evaluation of TC-002 after once daily topical ocular dosing into each eye of DB rabbits (n = 8/group) for at least 28 days. Toxicity endpoints included ophthalmic and clinical evaluations, necropsy, and microscopic evaluation of ocular tissues. Results: Average ratios of Cmax values for TC-002/RLD ranged from 0.6 to 1.6, and Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve of last observed concentration (AUClast) exposures to latanoprost acid were similar (<2-fold) between the 2 treatments. In the 28-day study, the Tmax was achieved in both groups in <0.5 h. There were no abnormal ocular findings. Conclusions: TC-002 with no quantifiable preservative or BAK-containing RLD exhibited similar ocular and systemic PK profiles. TC-002 was well tolerated and comparable to RLD. TC-002 retains the safety and PK characteristics of RLD without the added concern of long-term exposure of the eye to preservatives.

A novel ophthalmic latanoprost 0.005% nanoemulsion: a cytotoxicity study.

BACKGROUND: Benzalkonium chloride (BAK), the most commonly used preservative in anti-glaucoma eye drops, inflicts damage to the ocular surface. A novel anti-glaucoma formulation that avoids the use of BAK has been developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of this formulation and to compare it with an ophthalmic solution containing BAK. METHODS: Two different latanoprost eye drops were used: one ophthalmic solution (LSc) containing BAK 0.02% and one ophthalmic nanoemulsion (LNe) with a soft preservative (potassium sorbate 0.18%). Human epithelial conjunctival cells were incubated for 15, 30, and 60 min with either LSc or LNe. The cytotoxicity was determined by MTT assay. Cell death was measured by flow cytometry using annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide. RESULTS: The values of cell viability and proliferation obtained from cells exposed to LNe were between 80 and 90% relative to the control group, whereas values obtained from cells exposed to LSc were around 30% at all study times (p < 0.05 at 15 and 30 min; p < 0.01 at 60 min). The percentage of viable cells decreased significantly when cells were incubated with LSc compared with cells incubated with LNe at all the study times, while the percentage of cells in late apoptosis/necrosis increased significantly in cells exposed to LSc compared to LNe. CONCLUSIONS: The new latanoprost nanoemulsion is significantly less cytotoxic on human conjunctival cells than LSc. These results suggest that the new formulation might be gentler on the eye surface than currently available BAK-preserved latanoprost solutions.

Corneal damage and its recovery after instillation of preservative-free versus preserved latanoprost eye drops.

Purpose: Latanoprost ophthalmic solution is highly effective as a therapeutic agent for glaucoma and is applied worldwide. However, harmful effects on the corneal surface have been reported regarding the commercially available latanoprost ophthalmic solution. Corneal surface toxicity may be caused by the added preservative of the ophthalmic solution. In order to ascertain whether latanoprost itself can damage the cornea or if this is solely due to the added preservatives, this study attempted to determine the corneal changes that occur at different time periods following usage of preservative-free versus preserved latanoprost eye drops.Materials and methods: Preservative-free latanoprost eye drops (Monoprost®) or preserved latanoprost eye drops (Xalatan®) containing 0.02% benzalkonium chloride (BAC) were instilled in the corneas of rabbits. For each of the two different eye drop solutions, the rabbits used in this experiment were divided into three exposure groups: 1 minute, 24 hour, and 1 week groups. Corneal transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were examined immediately (1 minute) after instillation, at 24 hours after instillation, and at 24 hours after 1 week of daily instillations of latanoprost. Hank's balanced salt solution was used in the control group.Results: The mean corneal TER of the control group was 933.8 ± 279.0 Ω cm2. In preservative-free latanoprost instilled corneas, there was no significant decrease in the TER or morphological changes at any of the time points, with the relative TER values of 117 ± 38%, 100 ± 34%, and 93 ± 21% for 1 minute, 1 day, and 1 week time points, respectively. In preserved latanoprost instilled corneas, SEM showed that only the immediate group exhibited superficial cell damage and a significant decrease in the corneal TER compared to the controls and other time points and to the immediate preservative-free latanoprost corneas. In the preserved latanoprost groups, the relative TER values were 18 ± 5%, 110 ± 28%, and 92 ± 10%, for the three respective observation time points.Conclusions: Preservative-free latanoprost can be safely instilled to the corneal epithelium. Latanoprost with 0.02% BAC has an immediate deleterious impact on the corneal epithelium; however, it disappears within 24 hours after instillation.

0.005% Preservative-Free Latanoprost Induces Dry Eye-Like Ocular Surface Damage via Promotion of Inflammation in Mice.

Purpose: To investigate the side effects of preservative-free 0.005% latanoprost on the murine ocular surface. Methods: We applied 0.005% latanoprost or vehicle in mice in two patterns for 14 to 28 days. Tear production was measured by phenol red cotton test, and corneal epithelial barrier function was assessed by Oregon-green-dextran (OGD) staining. Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining was used to quantify conjunctival goblet cells (GCs). The expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3 and -9, occludin-1 and zonula occludens (ZO)-1 in corneal epithelium was assessed by immunofluorescent staining and/or quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Inflammation in conjunctiva was assessed by activation of P38 and NF-κB, infiltration of CD4+ T cells, and production inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1ß, IFN-γ, IL-17A, and IL-13. Apoptosis in ocular surface was assessed by TUNEL and immunofluorescent staining for activated caspase-3 and -8. Cell viability assay was performed in human corneal epithelial cells. Results: Topical latanoprost treatment decreased tear production, induced conjunctival GC loss, disrupted the corneal epithelial barrier, and promoted cell apoptosis in the ocular surface. Topical latanoprost treatment increased the expression of MMP-3 and -9, and decreased the expression of ZO-1 and occludin-1 in the corneal epithelium. Topical application of latanoprost promoted activation of P38-NF-κB signaling and production of TNF-α and IL-1ß in conjunctiva. Topical application of latanoprost increased CD4+ T cells infiltration, with increased production of IFN-γ and IL-17A and decreased production of IL-13 in conjunctiva. Conclusion: 0.005% latanoprost induced dry eye-like ocular surface damage via promotion of inflammation in mice.