Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 82
Filtrar
1.
Public Health Rep ; 139(1): 79-87, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36971250

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: On September 23, 2019, the North Carolina Division of Public Health identified a legionellosis increase in western North Carolina; most patients had recently attended the North Carolina Mountain State Fair. We conducted a source investigation. METHODS: Cases were fair attendees with laboratory-confirmed legionellosis and symptom onset within 2 to 14 days (Legionnaires' disease) or ≤3 days (Pontiac fever). We conducted a case-control study matching cases to non-ill fair attendees as control participants and an environmental investigation, and we performed laboratory testing (Legionella bacteria culture and polymerase chain reaction) of 27 environmental samples from fairgrounds and hot tubs and 14 specimens from case patients. We used multivariable unconditional logistic regression models to calculate adjusted odds ratios for potential Legionella exposure sources and risk factors. RESULTS: Of 136 people identified with fair-associated legionellosis, 98 (72%) were hospitalized and 4 (3%) died. Case patients were more likely than control participants to report walking by hot tub displays (adjusted odds ratio = 10.0; 95% CI, 4.2-24.1). Complete hot tub water treatment records were not kept, precluding evaluation of water maintenance conducted on display hot tubs. Legionella pneumophila sequence types (STs) were consistent among 10 typed clinical specimens (ST224) but distinct from the only positive environmental sample from the fair (ST7 and ST8). CONCLUSIONS: Hot tub displays were identified as the most likely outbreak source, making this the largest hot tub-associated Legionnaires' disease outbreak worldwide. Following the investigation, the North Carolina Division of Public Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released guidance on mitigating risk of Legionella exposure from hot tub displays. Results highlight the importance of properly maintaining equipment that aerosolizes water, including hot tubs intended for display purposes only.


Assuntos
Legionelose , Doença dos Legionários , Humanos , Doença dos Legionários/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Legionelose/epidemiologia , Legionelose/complicações , Surtos de Doenças , Microbiologia da Água
2.
Clin Lab ; 68(4)2022 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35443581

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The goal of the study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of Legionella cases caused by Legionella micdadei and explore the diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: The pathogen was identified by routine isolation and culture, biochemical identification, serum agglutination test, mass spectrometry identification, and routine PCR. Combined with the related literature review, the clinical diagnosis and treatment of Legionella micdadei were analyzed. RESULTS: The patient suffered from pulmonary infection caused by Legionella micdadei. After treatment with moxi-floxacin for 2 weeks, the body temperature dropped and the shadow of the lung was completely absorbed after 2 months. Combined with literature analysis, 8 cases of Legionella micetidis, including 7 males and 1 female, aged from 27 to 57 years old, 6 cases with basic diseases, which were treated with azithromycin, erythromycin or levofloxacin, and all of them achieved good therapeutic effect. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of Legionella should be strengthened in patients with pneumonia whose symptoms have no obvious improvement after antibiotic treatment. Azithromycin, erythromycin or levofloxacin are effective in the treatment of Legionella spp.


Assuntos
Legionella , Legionelose , Pneumonia , Adulto , Azitromicina/farmacologia , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Eritromicina/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Legionellaceae , Legionelose/complicações , Legionelose/diagnóstico , Legionelose/tratamento farmacológico , Levofloxacino/farmacologia , Levofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/diagnóstico
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(40): e12650, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30290642

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Concurrent or sequential coinfections of Legionella pneumophila and Mycoplasma pneumoniae have been reported in the past though infrequently. Distinguishing a true co-infection from cross reactivity is often challenging as the diagnosis is mostly dependent on serological testing. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 77-year-old male presented with worsening dyspnea, cough with yellow sputum, diarrhea and fever of 2-days duration. Patient had history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on home oxygen, bronchiectasis, rheumatoid arthritis (on methotrexate and leflunomide), treated pulmonary tuberculosis and 30-pack-year smoking. Chest X-ray showed bilateral interstitial changes with left lower lobe infiltrate. On day 5, his urine antigen for L pneumophila serogroup 1 was reported positive. The following day his serum M pneumoniae IgM antibody titers were reported elevated at 6647 U/mL. Patient was started on antibiotics and placed on non-invasive positive pressure ventilation. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with possible Legionella and Mycoplasma co-infection. OUTCOMES: Sputum Mycoplasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and serum cold agglutinins were obtained on day 6 and later reported negative. He was treated with azithromycin for 10 days with clinical improvement. LESSONS: Serological testing alone is an indirect measure with poor sensitivity and specificity and has its own limitations. Urine antigen detection confirms L pneumophila serogroup 1 infection in a patient with suggestive symptoms. However, diagnosis of M pneumonia should be based on combination of tests including serology and PCR to confirm true co-infection.


Assuntos
Legionelose/complicações , Pneumonia por Mycoplasma/complicações , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bronquiectasia , Coinfecção , Humanos , Imunoglobulina M/imunologia , Incidência , Legionella pneumophila/isolamento & purificação , Legionelose/terapia , Masculino , Mycoplasma pneumoniae/imunologia , Ventilação não Invasiva , Pneumonia por Mycoplasma/terapia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Radiografia Torácica , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fumar/epidemiologia
5.
Am J Case Rep ; 18: 746-749, 2017 Jul 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28674380

RESUMO

BACKGROUND Rhabdomyolysis is a syndrome caused by muscle breakdown. It can be caused by traumatic as well as non-traumatic factors such as drugs, toxins, and infections. Although it has been initially associated with only traumatic causes, non-traumatic causes now appear to be at least 5 times more frequent. In rhabdomyolysis, the CK levels can range anywhere from 10 000 to 200 000 or even higher. The higher the CK levels, the greater will be the renal damage and associated complications. We present the case of a patient with exceptionally massive rhabdomyolysis with unusually high CK levels (nearly 1 million) caused by combined etiologic factors and complicated with acute renal failure. CASE REPORT A 36-year-old African American male patient with no significant past medical history and a social history of cocaine and alcohol abuse presented with diarrhea and generalized weakness of 2 days' duration. He was found to be febrile, tachycardic, tachypneic, and hypoxic. The patient was subsequently intubated and admitted to the medical ICU. Laboratory work-up showed acute renal failure with deranged liver functions test results, and elevated creatine kinase of 701,400 U/L. CK levels were subsequently too high for the lab to quantify. Urine legionella testing was positive for L. pneumophilia serogroup 1 antigen and urine toxicology was positive for cocaine. The patient had a protracted course in the ICU. He was initially started on CVVH, and later received intermittent hemodialysis for about 1 month. CONCLUSIONS In the presence of multiple etiologic factors, rhabdomyolysis can be massive with resultant significant morbidity. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for rhabdomyolysis in the presence of multiple factors, as early recognition of this diseases is very important in the prevention and active management of life-threatening conditions.


Assuntos
Creatina Quinase/análise , Rabdomiólise/complicações , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Adulto , Humanos , Legionelose/complicações , Masculino , Pneumonia Bacteriana/complicações , Rabdomiólise/etiologia , Sepse/complicações , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/complicações
6.
Sci Rep ; 7: 40114, 2017 01 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28059171

RESUMO

Bacteria of the genus Legionella cause water-based infections resulting in severe pneumonia. Here we analyze and compare the bacterial microbiome of sputum samples from pneumonia patients in relation to the presence and abundance of the genus Legionella. The prevalence of Legionella species was determined by culture, PCR, and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Nine sputum samples out of the 133 analyzed were PCR-positive using Legionella genus-specific primers. Only one sample was positive by culture. Illumina MiSeq 16S rRNA gene sequencing analyses of Legionella-positive and Legionella-negative sputum samples, confirmed that indeed, Legionella was present in the PCR-positive sputum samples. This approach allowed the identification of the sputum microbiome at the genus level, and for Legionella genus at the species and sub-species level. 42% of the sputum samples were dominated by Streptococcus. Legionella was never the dominating genus and was always accompanied by other respiratory pathogens. Interestingly, sputum samples that were Legionella positive were inhabited by aquatic bacteria that have been observed in an association with amoeba, indicating that amoeba might have transferred Legionella from the drinking water together with its microbiome. This is the first study that demonstrates the sputum major bacterial commensals and pathogens profiles with regard to Legionella presence.


Assuntos
Legionella/isolamento & purificação , Legionelose/microbiologia , Microbiota , Pneumonia/microbiologia , Escarro/microbiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Legionella/genética , Legionella pneumophila/genética , Legionella pneumophila/isolamento & purificação , Legionelose/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/complicações
7.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 160: D516, 2016.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27900922

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Legionella species cause 5% of all community acquired pneumonias. However, Legionella pneumonia results relatively often in admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). A significant complication is the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The ICU mortality rate for Legionella pneumonia is > 30% with conventional treatments. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 64-year-old male was admitted to the ICU with respiratory failure due to Legionella pneumonia complicated by ARDS. Despite maximum conventional therapy being given, including lung-protective invasive mechanical ventilation and prone positioning, progressive hypoxaemia persisted. In collaboration with an extracorporeal life support (ECLS) centre, venovenous ECLS was initiated. Pulmonary function recovered and the patient was successfully weaned from VV-ECLS after 17 days. After three months of hospitalisation and rehabilitation, the patient was discharged home and able to perform his activities of daily living without assistance. CONCLUSION: Legionella pneumonia relatively frequently results in ICU admission, and carries a high mortality with conventional treatments. ECLS may offer a solution if conventional therapies are not sufficiently effective.


Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Legionelose/terapia , Pneumonia Bacteriana/terapia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Humanos , Legionelose/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia Bacteriana/complicações , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/microbiologia
10.
J Infect ; 72(1): 45-51, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26496794

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immunocompromised patients, especially those receiving treatment with corticosteroids and cytotoxic chemotherapy are at increased risk for developing Legionella pneumonia. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine clinical and radiographic characteristics of pulmonary infection due to Legionella in persons undergoing treatment for cancer and stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients. METHODS: Retrospective review of Legionella cases at MSKCC over a fifteen-year study period from January 1999 and December 2013. Cases were identified by review of microbiology records. RESULTS: During the study period, 40 cases of Legionella infection were identified; nine among these were due to non-pneumophila species. Most cases occurred during the summer. The majority [8/9, (89%)] of patients with non-pneumophila infection had underlying hematologic malignancy, compared to 18/31 (58%) with Legionella pneumophila infections. Radiographic findings were varied-nodular infiltrates mimicking invasive fungal infection were seen only among patients with hematologic malignancy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients and were frequently associated with non-pneumophila infections (50% vs 16%; P = 0.0594). All cases of nodular Legionella pneumonia were found incidentally or had an indolent clinical course. CONCLUSIONS: Legionella should be considered in the differential diagnosis of nodular lung lesions in immunocompromised patients, especially those with hematologic malignancy and SCT recipients. Most cases of nodular disease due to Legionella are associated with non-pneumophila infections.


Assuntos
Legionella , Legionelose/complicações , Legionelose/microbiologia , Neoplasias/complicações , Pneumonia Bacteriana/complicações , Pneumonia Bacteriana/microbiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Legionelose/diagnóstico , Legionelose/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Radiografia Torácica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
13.
Obstet Gynecol ; 126(5): 1085-1087, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26375712

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Of eight cases of Legionella infection in pregnancy reported over 35 years, there was one case of maternal septic shock with poor outcome, one recovery with good outcome, and six with poor outcome. CASE: A 30-year-old woman, gravida 2 para 1, at 28 weeks of gestation presented with a high fever, cough, nausea, and vomiting. She deteriorated despite treatment for presumed urosepsis, was transferred to the intensive care unit, and remained intubated for 10 days receiving cardiovascular support, antivirals, antifungals, and multiple wide-spectrum antibiotics. Legionella infection antigen testing was performed on hospital day 1 and returned as positive. Azithromycin, started before the testing results became available, was continued for 14 days. The patient recovered, and the pregnancy progressed uneventfully to term. CONCLUSION: Legionella infection should be considered with maternal deterioration despite broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage. A favorable outcome is possible with early diagnosis and treatment.


Assuntos
Legionelose/complicações , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/microbiologia , Choque Séptico/microbiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Legionelose/terapia , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/terapia , Choque Séptico/terapia
14.
Clin Infect Dis ; 60(11): e66-79, 2015 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25722195

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend azithromycin or a quinolone antibiotic for treatment of Legionella pneumonia. No clinical study has compared these strategies. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of adults hospitalized in the United States with a diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia in the Premier Perspectives database (1 July 2008-30 June 2013). Our primary outcome was hospital mortality; we additionally evaluated hospital length of stay, development of Clostridium difficile colitis, and total hospital cost. We used propensity-based matching to compare patients treated with azithromycin vs a quinolone. All analyses were repeated on a subgroup of more severely ill patients, defined as requiring intensive care unit admission or mechanical ventilation or having a predicted probability of hospital mortality in the top quartile for all patients. RESULTS: Legionella pneumonia was diagnosed in 3152 adults across 437 hospitals. Quinolones alone were used in 28.8%, azithromycin alone was used in 34.0%, and 1.8% received both. Crude hospital mortality was similar: 6.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0%-8.2%) for quinolones vs 6.4% (95% CI, 5.0%-7.9%) for azithromycin (P = .87); after propensity matching (n = 813 in each group), mortality remained similar (6.3% [95% CI, 4.6%-7.9%] vs 6.5% [95% CI, 4.8%-8.2%], P = .84 for the whole cohort, and 14.9% [95% CI, 10.0%-19.8%] vs 18.3% [95% CI, 13.0%-23.6%], P = .36 for the more severely ill). There was no difference in hospital length of stay, development of C. difficile, or total hospital cost. CONCLUSIONS: Use of azithromycin alone or a quinolone alone for treatment of Legionella pneumonia was associated with similar hospital mortality. Few patients receive combination therapy.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Legionelose/tratamento farmacológico , Legionelose/mortalidade , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções por Clostridium/induzido quimicamente , Estudos de Coortes , Colite/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Legionelose/complicações , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 69(9): 2354-60, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24827889

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Legionellosis is a life-threatening disease. The clinical superiority of quinolones or macrolides for treating patients with legionellosis has not been established. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting data that allowed the comparison of quinolones versus macrolides in the treatment of proven legionellosis published from 1 January 1985 to 31 January 2013. We collected baseline aggregate patient characteristics. Studied outcomes included mortality, clinical cure, time to apyrexia, length of hospital stay and occurrence of complications in each treatment group. Treatment effect was assessed using a Mantel-Haenszel random effects model. RESULTS: Among 1005 abstracts reviewed, 12 studies were selected (n=879 patients). No randomized controlled trial was performed directly comparing quinolone and macrolide efficacy in legionellosis. Mean age was 58.3 years, 27.7% were women and Fine score was ≥ 4 in 35.8%. Among 253 patients who received quinolone monotherapy, 10 died (4.0%). Among 211 patients who received macrolide monotherapy, 23 died (10.9%). The pooled OR of death for treatment with a quinolone versus a macrolide was 0.5 (95% CI 0.2-1.3, n=8 studies, 464 patients). Length of stay was significantly shorter in the quinolone monotherapy group. The difference was 3.0 days (95% CI 0.7-5.3, P=0.001, n=3 studies, 263 patients). Neither of two tests for heterogeneity was significant (I (2)=0% for both, P=1). Other studied outcomes were not significantly different among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Few clinical data on legionellosis treatment are available. This first meta-analysis showed a trend toward a lower mortality rate and a significant decrease in length of hospital stay among patients receiving quinolones. These results must be confirmed by a randomized controlled trial.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Legionelose/tratamento farmacológico , Macrolídeos/uso terapêutico , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Legionelose/complicações , Tempo de Internação , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
ASAIO J ; 59(3): 328-30, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23644625

RESUMO

Legionella-associated respiratory failure has a high mortality, despite modern ventilation modalities. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to achieve gas exchange independent of pulmonary function in patients with severe respiratory failure. This was a retrospective review of the management and outcome of patients with Legionella-associated respiratory failure treated with ECMO support in a large ECMO center over the past 10 years. A retrospective review of patients with confirmed Legionella-associated severe respiratory failure managed with ECMO support at a single center. Between 2000 and 2010, 19 patients with severe respiratory failure caused by Legionella were managed with ECMO after failure to respond to conventional intensive care management. Median PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 66 and median pCO2 was 60 torr. Sixteen patients (84%) survived to hospital discharge. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be considered in patients with Legionella-associated respiratory failure, who have failed conventional ventilation.


Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Legionella , Legionelose/complicações , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/microbiologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Adulto , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Legionelose/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...