Real-world evaluation of linezolid-associated serotonin toxicity with and without concurrent serotonergic agents.

BACKGROUND: The risk of linezolid-associated serotonin toxicity remains unclear. This study sought to evaluate the incidence of serotonin toxicity among hospitalized patients who received linezolid with or without concurrent serotonergic agents (SAs). Secondary outcomes were to assess the dose, agent selection and number of SAs. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients aged ≥18 years who received at least one dose of linezolid with or without SAs between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2021 was performed. Patients were excluded if they were aged <18 years, had linezolid ordered but not administered, were pregnant or were incarcerated. Up to five concurrent SAs were assessed, and dose category was classed as low, moderate or high (dose <33%, 33-66% or >66% of maximum daily dose, respectively). Serotonin toxicity was identified by searching patients' electronic medical records. If identified, the Sternbach criteria and Hunter criteria were applied. RESULTS: Of 2022 patients screened, 1743 were included in this study. Mean age, weight and linezolid duration were 58.5 years, 90.7 kg and 3.8 days, respectively. Approximately 67% (1168/1743) of patients received linezolid with at least one SA, and several patients received multiple SAs. Most patients (53.8%; 616/1144) received moderate- and/or high-dose SAs. Only two patients (0.11%) were identified as possible cases of serotonin toxicity based on the electronic medical record search. However, the incidence of serotonin toxicity was 0.06% (1/1743) based on the Sternbach criteria and 0% (0/1743) based on the Hunter criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Serotonin toxicity among hospitalized patients who received linezolid with or without SAs was exceedingly rare, even among those who received multiple and high-dose SAs.

LInezolid Monitoring to MInimise Toxicity (LIMMIT1): A multicentre retrospective review of patients receiving linezolid therapy and the impact of therapeutic drug monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial with limited use due to toxicity. This study aimed to evaluate linezolid toxicity in a large multicentre cohort. Secondary objectives were to identify factors contributing to toxicity, including the impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). METHODS: Patients administered linezolid between January 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Data were collected on patient characteristics, linezolid therapy and outcomes. Descriptive statistics were performed on all patients, and statistical comparisons were undertaken between those who did and did not experience linezolid toxicity. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to identify any covariates that correlated with toxicity. RESULTS: Linezolid was administered to 1050 patients; of these, 381 did not meet the inclusion criteria and 47 were excluded as therapy ceased for non-toxicity reasons. There were 105 of 622 (16.9%) patients assessed to have linezolid toxicity. Patients who experienced toxicity displayed a higher baseline creatinine (96.5 µmol/L vs. 79 µmol/L; P = 0.025), lower baseline platelet count (225 × 109/L vs. 278.5 × 109/L; P = 0.002) and received a longer course (median 21 vs. 14 days; P < 0.001) than those who did not. Linezolid TDM was performed in 144 patients (23%). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that TDM-guided appropriate dose adjustment significantly reduced the odds of linezolid toxicity (aOR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.21-0.96; P = 0.038) and a treatment duration > 28 days was no longer significantly associated with toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that linezolid treatment-limiting toxicity remains a problem and suggests that TDM-guided dose optimisation may reduce the risk of toxicity and facilitate prolonged courses beyond 28 days.

LINEZOLID-INDUCED MITOCHONDRIAL TOXICITY PRESENTING AS RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER MICROCYSTS AND OPTIC AND PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY IN A PATIENT WITH CHRONIC GRANULOMATOUS DISEASE.

PURPOSE: To report a case with unique changes in the retinal nerve fiber layer observed on optical coherence tomography in a 22-year-old patient on chronic linezolid therapy for recurrent pyogenic liver abscesses with underlying chronic granulomatous disease. METHODS: History and clinical examination, laboratory evaluation, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: The patient presented with best-corrected visual acuity of 20/200 in the right eye and 20/125 in the left eye. He had moderate optic disk edema and superotemporal field defects bilaterally. Swept-source optical coherence tomography revealed the presence of retinal nerve fiber layer microcystic spaces. Laboratory tests showed no positive findings except for an elevated lactic acid level. Linezolid-induced optic neuropathy was suspected, and the drug was discontinued. Six weeks after termination of oral linezolid therapy, the optic disk edema and the microcystic spaces in the retinal nerve fiber layer resolved, and the best-corrected visual acuity improved to 20/50 in the right and 20/40 in the left eye, respectively. CONCLUSION: Linezolid is a widely used antibiotic with broad-spectrum action. However, chronic use can lead to mitochondrial toxicity that may have protean manifestations. Ocular examination, particularly of the optic nerve and nerve fiber layer using multimodal imaging, is critical in diagnosing such toxicity.

Pharmacodynamic Correlates of Linezolid Activity and Toxicity in Murine Models of Tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid (LZD) is bactericidal against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, but it has treatment-limiting toxicities. A better understanding of exposure-response relationships governing LZD efficacy and toxicity will inform dosing strategies. Because in vitro monotherapy studies yielded conflicting results, we explored LZD pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships in vivo against actively and nonactively multiplying bacteria, including in combination with pretomanid. METHODS: Linezolid multidose pharmacokinetics were modeled in mice. Dose-fractionation studies were performed in acute (net bacterial growth) and chronic (no net growth) infection models. In acute models, LZD was administered alone or with bacteriostatic or bactericidal pretomanid doses. Correlations between PK/PD parameters and lung colony-forming units (CFUs) and complete blood counts were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, time above minimum inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) correlated best with CFU decline. However, in growth-constrained models (ie, chronic infection, coadministration with pretomanid 50 mg/kg per day), area under the concentration-time curve over MIC (AUC/MIC) had similar explanatory power. Red blood cell counts correlated strongly with LZD minimum concentration (Cmin). CONCLUSIONS: Although T>MIC was the most consistent correlate of efficacy, AUC/MIC was equally predictive when bacterial multiplication was constrained by host immunity or pretomanid. In effective combination regimens, administering the same total LZD dose less frequently may be equally effective and cause less Cmin-dependent toxicity.

Prolonged inhibition and incomplete recovery of mitochondrial function in oxazolidinone-treated megakaryoblastic cell lines.

Thrombocytopenia is commonly seen in patients receiving linezolid for >14 days. Linezolid is a reversible inhibitor of mitochondrial function in various cell types. This study investigated the inhibitory effects of linezolid and tedizolid, and their potential recovery on (i) CYTox I expression (subunit I of cytochrome c-oxidase; encoded by the mitochondrial genome), (ii) cytochrome c-oxidase activity and (iii) mitochondrial respiration (Seahorse bioanalysis) in two megakaryocytic cell lines [UT-7 WT (human acute megakaryoblastic leukaemia cells) and UT-7 MPL (transduced to express the thrombopoietin receptor)]. Cells were exposed to linezolid (0.5-25 mg/L) or tedizolid (0.1-5 mg/L) for up to 5 days and recovery followed after drug removal. Both oxazolidinones caused concentration- and time-dependent inhibition of CYTox I expression, cytochrome c-oxidase activity and mitochondrial spare capacity. On electron microscopy, mitochondria appeared dilated with a loss of cristae. Globally, tedizolid exerted stronger effects than linezolid. While CYTox I expression recovered completely after 6 days of drug washout, only partial (linezolid) or no (tedizolid) recovery of cytochrome c-oxidase activity, and no rescue of mitochondrial spare capacity (after 3 days) was observed. Thus, and in contrast to previous studies using a variety of cell lines unrelated to megakaryocytic lineages, the inhibitory effects exerted by oxazolidinones on the mitochondrial function of megakaryoblastic cells appear to be particularly protracted. Given the dynamics of platelet production and destruction, these results may explain why oxazolidinone-induced thrombocytopenia is one of the most common side effects in patients exposed to these antibiotics.

Pharmacokinetics, toxicity and clinical efficacy of linezolid in Japanese pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the present study were (a) to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of linezolid, and (b) to assess the toxicity and clinical efficacy of linezolid in Japanese pediatric patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Routine clinical data including serum linezolid total and unbound concentrations were collected from 15 pediatric patients (0-13 years old). Pharmacokinetics of linezolid was assumed to follow one-compartment with the first-order absorption model. The relationship between risk for thrombocytopenia and linezolid concentrations, and the variations in C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and body temperatures were evaluated as clinical efficacy assessment. RESULTS: Body weight (WT) and maturation of body function were significant covariates for pharmacokinetics of linezolid in pediatric patients. The elimination half-life of linezolid in a pediatric patient with a WT of 9.9 kg and age of 24 months (median of this study) was 3.0 h. Thrombocytopenia was detected in three patients (21.4%), and the minimum concentrations (Cmin) in these patients were significantly higher than those in patients without thrombocytopenia (P < 0.05). The CRP concentrations decreased more than 50% in all pediatric patients after the treatment with linezolid, however body temperatures at the end of treatment were higher than 37.5 °C in 6 patients (42.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Although dose adjustment based on body size was performed for pediatric patients, thrombocytopenia was detected in 21.4% of pediatric patients, and higher Cmin was associated with the risk of thrombocytopenia. These results encourage the implementation of individual dose adjustment based on linezolid serum concentrations for safe and appropriate treatment with linezolid.

Ameliorative effect of silymarin against linezolid-induced hepatotoxicity in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infected Wistar rats.

Linezolid has a better choice for eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, but its use is limited because of linezolid-induced hepatotoxicity, myelosuppression, and lactic acidosis. This research elucidated the role of silymarin against hepatoxicity of linezolid therapy in MRSA infected Wistar rats. The rats were rendered neutropenic by an intraperitoneal injection of cyclophosphamide injection. The neutropenic rats were injected subcutaneously with 106 CFU/ml of MRSA. The rats were divided into 6 groups. Normal control, Infected, Infected animals treated with linezolid 50 mg/kg/twice/day and Infected animals treated with linezolid and different dose of silymarin 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg/twice/day for 14 days. On the 15th day, the blood, liver, kidney, and bone marrow were collected for biochemical and histopathological examination. The MRSA was confirmed by PCR assay. The minimum inhibitory concentration of linezolid was 0.5-2 µg/ml. The linezolid induced liver damage was confirmed by elevation of marker enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, serum bilirubin, lactate, and histopathological studies of the liver. The linezolid treated rats also showed myelosuppression, lactic acidosis, oxidative stress and decreased intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP). The silymarin administration exhibited marked hepatoprotective effect by significantly lowering the liver marker enzymes, serum parameters, and cytological findings reflect the hepatoprotection. Additionally, Silymarin showed protection against myelosuppression and lactic acidosis evidenced by bone marrow smear and serum lactate estimation. Antioxidant effect of silymarin was confirmed by decreased levels of lipid peroxidation, restored the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants of the liver nearer to normal. The present study indicates that the silymarin could be a better herbal therapeutic agent which protects against the linezolid induced hepatotoxicity in MRSA infected rats.

Mitochondrial Impairment in Antibiotic Induced Toxic Optic Neuropathies.

There is growing evidence for the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in the toxic optic neuropathies. Due to the structural similarities between antibiotic targets and mitochondrial machinery, several antibiotics known to cause optic neuropathy have deleterious effects on mitochondrial function. We review the literature on the prevalence, clinical manifestations, and management of antibiotic induced toxic optic neuropathies. The effect of these antibiotics on mitochondrial function in regard to the optic nerve is discussed.

[Linezolid-induced Apoptosis through Mitochondrial Damage and Role of Superoxide Dismutase-1 in Human Monocytic Cell Line U937].

Cytopenia is a major adverse event associated with linezolid therapy. The objective of this study was to examine whether the cytotoxicity of linezolid to eukaryotic cells was associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis-like cell death in human leukemic monocyte lymphoma cell line U937. Apoptosis-like cell death was clearly observed when cells were incubated with linezolid, depending on the duration and linezolid concentration. Mitochondrial membrane potential of cells treated with linezolid collapsed in a short period of time, but the number of mitochondria did not decrease. Cytotoxicity of linezolid was relieved by the knockdown of superoxide dismutase-1 in U937 cells. On the other hand, no autophagy was observed in cells treated with linezolid. These results suggest that mitochondrial damages would be linked to the induction of apoptosis in U937 cells treated with linezolid and that its mechanism does not involve autophagy.

Influence of Mitochondrial Genetics on the Mitochondrial Toxicity of Linezolid in Blood Cells and Skin Nerve Fibers.

The antibiotic linezolid is a ribosomal inhibitor with excellent efficacy. Although the administration period has been reduced to 28 days, side effects, usually of hematologic or neuropathic origin, are still reported due to secondary inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis. Susceptibility to linezolid toxicity remains unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to gain an understanding of clinical heterogeneity in response to identical linezolid exposures through exhaustive examination of the molecular basis of tissue-dependent mitotoxicity, consequent cell dysfunction, and the association of mitochondrial genetics with adverse effects of linezolid administered for the recommended period. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and skin nerve fibers from 19 and 6 patients, respectively, were evaluated before and after a 28-day linezolid treatment in order to assess toxic effects on mitochondria and cells. Mitochondrial DNA haplotypes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ribosomal sequences where linezolid binds to mitochondrial ribosomes were also analyzed to investigate their genetic contributions. We found that linezolid reduced mitochondrial protein levels, complex IV activity, and mitochondrial mass in PBMC and was associated with a trend toward an increase in the rate of apoptosis. In skin tissue, mitochondrial mass increased within nerve fibers, accompanied by subclinical axonal swelling. Mitochondrial haplogroup U, mutations in 12S rRNA, and the m.2706A→G, m.3197T→C, and m.3010G→A polymorphisms in 16S rRNA showed a trend toward an association with increased mitochondrial and clinical adverse effects. We conclude that even when linezolid is administered for a shorter time than formerly, adverse effects are reported by 63% of patients. Linezolid exerts tissue-dependent mitotoxicity that is responsible for downstream cellular consequences (blood cell death and nerve fiber swelling), leading to adverse hematologic and peripheral nervous side effects. Multicentric studies should confirm genetic susceptibility in larger cohorts.

Evaluation of drug-induced hematotoxicity using novel in vitro monkey CFU-GM and BFU-E colony assays.

In order to evaluate drug-induced hematotoxicity in monkey cells in vitro, colony-forming unit-granulocyte, macrophage (CFU-GM), and burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) colony assays were established using mononuclear cells in the bone marrow collected from male cynomolgus monkeys. Furthermore, the effects of doxorubicin, chloramphenicol, and linezolid on CFU-GM and BFU-E colony formation were investigated using established monkey CFU-GM and BFU-E colony assays in comparison with those on human CFU-GM and BFU-E colonies acquired from human umbilical cord blood cells. Bone marrow mononuclear cells were collected from the ischial or iliac bone of male cynomolgus monkeys. The cells were subsequently processed by density gradient separation at 1.067, 1.070, or 1.077 g/mL for CFU-GM or 1.077 g/mL for BFU-E, and then cultured in methylcellulose medium for 9 or 13 days, respectively. A sufficient number of CFU-GM colonies were formed from mononuclear cells processed at a density of 1.070 g/mL. Moreover, the number of BFU-E colonies from the cells processed at a density of 1.077 g/mL was sufficient for the colony assay. The number of CFU-GM or BFU-E colonies decreased after treatment with the drugs of interest in a concentration-dependent manner. Compared with human CFU-GM, monkey CFU-GM were more sensitive to chloramphenicol and resistant to doxorubicin, whereas monkey BFU-E were more sensitive to all compounds in comparison to the sensitivity of human BFU-E. In conclusion, monkey CFU-GM and BFU-E colony assays were established and considered useful tools to evaluate the differences in drug-induced hematotoxicity between species.

Two cases of serious rhabdomyolysis during linezolid treatment.

Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic with activity against gram-positive organisms, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). To the best of our knowledge, there are only two case reports on rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with linezolid. Here, we describe two cases of serious rhabdomyolysis: one in a patient with septic community-acquired (CA)-MRSA pneumonia and a second case in a patient with suspected catheter-related blood stream infection.

Are the leading drugs against Staphylococcus aureus really toxic to cartilage?

Many studies have shown that the toxic effects of local antibiotics on bone and cartilage limit orthopedic surgeons. In this study, we evaluated three antibacterial agents used locally to treat highly mortal and morbid diseases in the field of orthopedics, such as septic arthritis. Are vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid, which are archenemies of Staphylococcus aureus, really toxic to chondrocytes? The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of antibiotics, which are used against S. aureus, on human chondrocytes in vitro. Primary cell cultures obtained from gonarthrosis patients were divided into two main groups. One of these groups was designated as the control chondrocyte culture. The other group was divided into three subgroups, and each group was exposed to vancomycin, teicoplanin, or linezolid. Cell culture samples were characterized by immunophenotyping following incubation with the three different antibiotics. Before and after the agents were administered, the cultures were subjected to inverted and environmental scanning electron microscopy. The number of live cells and the proliferation rate were monitored with the MTT-assay. We found that vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid do not have chondrotoxic effects. Vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid had no chondrotoxic activity during in vitro culture, which supports the argument that these agents can safely be used in orthopedic surgery, especially against methicillin-resistant S. aureus agents.