Coumarin-Induced Hepatotoxicity: A Narrative Review.

Coumarin is an effective treatment for primary lymphoedema, as well as lymphoedema related to breast cancer radiotherapy or surgery. However, its clinical use is limited in several countries due to the possible occurrence of hepatotoxicity, mainly in the form of mild to moderate transaminase elevation. It is worth noting that only a few cases of severe hepatotoxicity have been described in the literature, with no reported cases of liver failure. Data available on coumarin absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion have been reviewed, focusing on hepatotoxicity studies carried out in vitro and in vivo. Finally, safety and tolerability data from clinical trials have been thoroughly discussed. Based on these data, coumarin-induced hepatotoxicity is restricted to a small subset of patients, probably due to the activation in these individuals of alternative metabolic pathways involving specific CYP450s isoforms. The aim of this work is to stimulate research to clearly identify patients at risk of developing hepatotoxicity following coumarin treatment. Early identification of this subset of patients could open the possibility of more safely exploiting the therapeutical properties of coumarin, allowing patients suffering from lymphoedema to benefit from the anti-oedematous activity of the treatment.

Characteristics of Lymphedema in Patients Treated with Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors.

Purpose: To investigate the characteristics of lymphedema in patients treated with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and delineate complex decongestive therapy (CDT) outcomes. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed 24 patients with mTOR inhibitor-induced lymphedema and 7 lymphedema patients (control) not treated with mTOR inhibitors, who visited the lymphedema clinic of the department of rehabilitation medicine from March 2016 to December 2019. We comprehensively reviewed clinical features, medication history, associated diseases, lymphoscintigraphy, lower extremity computed tomography venography (LE CTV), and the effect of CDT. By using ImageJ program, we measured the cross-sectional area (CSA) of muscle and subcutaneous fat of mid-thigh image in LE CTV and compared them to a control group not treated with mTOR inhibitors. Seventeen patients on sirolimus and seven patients on everolimus were included, with an approximately equal distribution of stages 2 and 3 lymphedema, and most with pitting edema. Ten patients had breast or gynecological cancer and underwent lymph node dissection. Lymphedema developed after mTOR inhibitor initiation, not postoperatively. Lymphoscintigraphy revealed decreased lymph node uptake and dermal backflow. LE CTV revealed subcutaneous honeycomb-shaped trabecular areas in the affected limbs of seven patients. Patients treated with mTOR inhibitors had a larger mean subcutaneous fat CSA and a smaller mean muscular CSA than controls. Lymphedema improved or remained unchanged after initial CDT. Daily CDT adequately controlled 11 cases, but exacerbation occurred in 5 of 7 poorly compliant patients, and cellulitis occurred in 6 patients. Conclusion: Physicians should identify mTOR inhibitor-related lymphedema early and discuss medication alternatives and CDT with patients.

Everolimus-related unilateral abdominal lymphedema in a renal cancer patient: A case report.

RATIONALE: Unilateral manifestation of lymphedema during everolimus therapy has been described only rarely, mostly in transplant recipients. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report the first case of a patient who developed unilateral abdominal lymphedema, during a short period of everolimus treatment for renal cancer. DIAGNOSIS: The abdominal asymmetry occurred only on the right side of the abdomen, neither ultrasound nor CT scan detected ascites but showed enlargement of the abdominal wall. The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability scale was evaluated, in this case, a score of 6 indicated a probable adverse reaction to everolimus. INTERVENTIONS: Discontinuation of everolimus therapy led to immediate alleviation and reduction of the lymphedema, with worsening once again after initiating retreatment with everolimus at a reduced dose. OUTCOMES: The patient's lymphedema recovered after discontinuation of everolimus. LESSONS: This rare case demonstrates the importance of the selection of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors using caution, especially for patients with a high risk of developing lymphedema.

Analysis of Unusual Adverse Effects After Radium-223 Dichloride Administration.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, no previous study or literature review has been performed about the effects of the extravasation of therapeutic radiopharmaceutical agents and its potential consequences, especially regarding alpha-particle emitting radiopharmaceuticals. METHODS: Even if Radium-223 dichloride is known to be a relatively safe drug to manage, despite the correctness of the procedures applied , unexpected delayed adverse effects can occur. In our vast experience, we rarely observed lymphedema, even after some time, at the site of administration. RESULTS: Management of lymphedema caused by radiopharmaceuticals administration has been addressed through clinical examples. The sudden intervention allowed a fast remission of the signs and symptoms complained by patients treated with Radium-223 dichloride. CONCLUSION: The management of adverse effects after radiopharmaceuticals administration as in case of lymphedema onset, is extremely simple. These data confirm the safety of Radium-223 treatment.

Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography in a Rare Case of Everolimus-Related Lymphedema.

Everolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, which is used in immunosuppressive treatment regimens in solid-organ transplant recipients. Although mTOR inhibitors are usually well tolerated, their adverse effects have been reported: sirolimus treatment in transplant patients has been rarely reported to be associated with lymphedema of the skin and subcutaneous tissues, whereas the use of everolimus seemed to be less burdened by this type of adverse effect. We report the case of a 58-year-old man with a history of end-stage renal disease of unknown etiology who had undergone right renal transplantation 11 years before. After the transplant, the patient soon developed bilateral progressive swelling involving feet and legs. The symptoms of the left limb improved markedly after discontinuing everolimus. This condition has been classified as everolimus-induced lymphedema. The patient was referred to our department for the execution of a noncontrast magnetic resonance lymphangiography, that is, a noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging technique that has recently proposed for the study of lymphedema. Noncontrast magnetic resonance lymphangiography showed asymmetry between the lower extremities with signs of advanced lymphedema located in the right lower limb and dilated peripheral lymphatic vessels.Drug withdrawal is currently the only effective solution for treating this type of secondary lymphedema; however, with the prolonged use of the drug, lymphedema tends to persist even after mTOR inhibitor suspension, with only partial clinical improvement, as in this case.This case report describes the imaging characteristics of such condition at noncontrast magnetic resonance lymphangiography and discusses the rare adverse effects of everolimus. Immediate suspension of the drug is the only effective strategy to avoid the persistence of this disorder.

Calcium Channel Blockers and Risk of Lymphedema among Breast Cancer Patients: Nested Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: To assess the risk of lymphedema associated with the use of calcium channel blockers (CCB) among breast cancer patients. METHODS: A nested case-control study of adult female breast cancer patients receiving an antihypertensive agent was conducted using administrative claims data between 2007 and 2015. Cases were patients with lymphedema who were matched to 5 controls based on nest entry date (±180 days), age (±5 years), number of hypertensive drug classes, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), thiazide exposure, and insurance type. Exposure to CCBs and covariates was identified in the 180-day period prior to event date. Conditional logistic regression was used to assess the impact of exposure among cases and controls. RESULTS: A total of 717 cases and 1,681 matched controls were identified. After matching on baseline characteristics, mastectomy (7.8% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.0039), exposure to radiotherapy (27.1% vs. 21.7%; P = 0.0046), taxane-based chemotherapy (11.7% vs. 7.4%; P = 0.0007), anthracycline-based chemotherapy (6.0% vs. 3.6%; P = 0.0073), CCB use (28.3% vs. 23.3%; P = 0.0087), and CCI (19.8% vs. 12.7%; P < 0.0001; score of 4 or above) were all higher in cases during the 180 days prior to the event date. In the adjusted analysis, CCB exposure was significantly associated with increased risk of lymphedema (OR = 1.320; 95% confidence interval, 1.003-1.737). CONCLUSIONS: CCB use was significantly associated with the development of lymphedema in breast cancer patients. IMPACT: CCBs should be avoided or used with caution in breast cancer patients to reduce the risk for developing lymphedema.

Taxane-based chemotherapy and risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Many studies were performed to explore the correlation between taxane-based chemotherapy and the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), however, with inconsistent results. Hence, the purpose of this study is to evaluate whether taxane-based chemotherapy is a risk factor for BCRL. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic search of clinical trials published in the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases will be conducted to identify eligible studies up to the date of December 31, 2018. We will employ risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to estimate the correlations between taxane-based chemotherapy and BCRL. Meta-analysis will be performed using Stata SE version 12.0 software. RESULTS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will provide a high-quality synthesis of existing evidence of the correlations between taxane-based chemotherapy and the risk of BCRL. CONCLUSION: The protocol will provide updated evidence for the use of taxane-based chemotherapy in postoperative breast cancer patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: It is not necessary for ethical approval because it is based on published studies. The protocol will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal or presented at a topic-related conference. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review protocol has been registered with a number of CRD42019123989.

Incidence of peripheral edema in patients receiving PI3K/mTOR/CDK4/6 inhibitors for metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated development of edema in patients receiving PI3K/mTOR/CDK4/6 targeted therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: We reviewed medical records of 160 patients receiving targeted therapy with PI3K/mTOR/CDK4/6 inhibitors to treat MBC (n = 160; 185 treatment occurrences). Clinicopathologic data, treatment details, and edema incidence were recorded. RESULTS: Edema incidence was 43.1% (69/160) overall and 25.6% (41/160) in the upper extremity ipsilateral to the treated breast. In 185 therapy regimens administered, 6.8% of patients on a PI3K inhibitor, 8.8% of patients on an mTOR inhibitor, and 9.2% of patients on a CDK4/6 inhibitor experienced new onset or worsened preexisting upper extremity edema. Further, 9.1% of patients on a PI3K inhibitor, 18.8% of patients on an mTOR inhibitor, and 10.5% of patients on a CDK4/6 inhibitor experienced new onset or worsened preexisting edema elsewhere in the body. Multivariate logistic regression showed that, beyond the established breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) risk factors [axillary lymph node dissection (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.69, p = 0.020), regional lymph node irradiation (OR 6.47, p < 0.001), and body-mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 (OR 3.46, p = 0.006)], a relative decrease in serum albumin after 3 months of treatment increased risk of developing edema (OR 2.07, p = 0.062). Neither duration nor type of therapy were significant risk factors for edema. CONCLUSION: PI3K/mTOR/CDK4/6 inhibitors may influence the development of edema, which may cause or exacerbate progression of BCRL in patients with MBC. The varied incidence of edema between therapeutic regimens warrants vigilant monitoring of patients treated with these therapies, especially those at high risk of developing BCRL.

[Lymphedema in patients treated with sirolimus: 15 cases]. / Lymphœdèmes associés à la prise de sirolimus : à propos de 15 patients.

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor used after organ transplantation and to treat vascular malformations. Among its adverse effects, limb lymphedema has been described. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical features, lymphoscintigraphy and lymphedema outcome in patients treated with sirolimus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Monocentric retrospective study from January 2008 to September 2017 analyzing all consecutive patients having lymphedema occurring with sirolimus. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (7 men, 8 women), mean age at the first visit, 56 years (range: 38-76), had a kidney transplant (n=12), liver transplant (n=1), or lymphangioleiomyomatosis (n=2) treated with sirolimus at a mean daily dose of 1.8mg were included. Lymphedema involved one (n=4), or both (n=1) lower limbs, upper limb (n=9), lower limbs and upper limb (n=1). Lymphedema affected the whole limb (n=10), or the distal part (n=5). The median time between lymphedema onset and the beginning of sirolimus was 52 weeks (range: 8-232). Lymphoscintigraphy in 7 patients (lower limb: 3, superior: 4) showed no inguinal or axillary nodal fixation (n=6) or decreased uptake (n=1). Sirolimus was discontinued in 7 cases without lymphedema improvement with a median follow-up of 12 months and maintained in 8 cases. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus is associated with upper and/or lower limb lymphedema, without predominance of sex, and without disappearance after sirolimus discontinuation. Pathophysiological mechanisms remain unclear. Lymphedema management is based on low-stretch bandages and compression.

Survivorship, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

The NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship provide screening, evaluation, and treatment recommendations for common physical and psychosocial consequences of cancer and cancer treatment to help healthcare professionals who work with survivors of adult-onset cancer in the posttreatment period. This portion of the guidelines describes recommendations regarding the management of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity and lymphedema. In addition, recommendations regarding immunizations and the prevention of infections in cancer survivors are included.

Lymphedema of the Transplanted Kidney and Abdominal Wall with Ipsilateral Pleural Effusion Following Kidney Biopsy in a Patient Treated with Sirolimus: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND Sirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, which is used in immunosuppressive treatment regimens in organ transplant recipients. Although mTOR inhibitors are well tolerated, their adverse effects have been reported. Sirolimus treatment in transplant recipients has been reported to be associated with lymphedema of the skin and subcutaneous tissues, and with pleural effusion, but edema of internal organs and organomegaly have not been previously reported. A case is presented lymphedema of the transplanted kidney and abdominal wall with ipsilateral pleural effusion following kidney biopsy in a patient treated with sirolimus. CASE REPORT A 32-year-old woman with a history of end-stage renal disease of unknown etiology had undergone right renal transplantation from an unrelated living donor, eight years previously. She was referred to our hospital with dyspnea, localized abdominal pain, and swelling of the transplanted kidney. The symptoms appeared following a kidney biopsy and the replacement of cyclosporin with sirolimus four months previously. On examination, she had localized swelling of the abdominal wall overlying the transplanted kidney, and a right pleural effusion. Hydronephrosis and nephrotic syndrome were excluded as causes of kidney enlargement. Following the withdrawal of sirolimus therapy her symptoms resolved within three months. CONCLUSIONS A case is described of lymphedema of the transplanted kidney and abdominal wall with ipsilateral pleural effusion following kidney biopsy attributed to her change in anti-rejection therapy to sirolimus. This case report should raise awareness of this unusual complication of sirolimus anti-rejection therapy and its possible effects on the lymphatic system.

Lymphedema, musculoskeletal events and arm function in older patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer (Alliance A171302).

PURPOSE: Musculoskeletal events (MEs) resulting from breast cancer treatment can significantly interfere with the quality of life (QOL) of older adults. We evaluated the incidence of MEs in women 65 years and older who had surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, and the impact of treatment on MEs and arm function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient-reported data in Alliance/CALGB 49907 were collected using the EORTC QLQ-BR23 and physician-reported adverse events to characterize self-reported MEs and incidence of lymphedema. EORTC QLQ-BR23 items related to musculoskeletal events were analyzed in this study and data collected at study entry (post-operative) and 12 and 24 months post-entry. RESULTS: Lymphedema, arm function, and ME data were available for 321 patients. One or more MEs were reported by 87% (median number = 3) and 64% (median number = 1) of patients post-operatively and at 24 months. At 24 months 2% had persistence of six MEs. Seventy-four percent experienced at least ≥3/6 types of MEs over the 24-month period. Detection of lymphedema at any time during the study was noted in 7.5% of the patients and appeared to be associated with the type of chemotherapy given: CMF 16.4%, capecitabine 5.8%, and AC 4%. Mastectomy and axillary node dissection were associated with the most MEs. LROM correlated with poorer arm function at all time periods. CONCLUSION: Potentially debilitating MEs occur in three-fourths of elderly women undergoing standard therapy for breast cancer. Emphasis should be placed on prevention, identification, and treatment of these MEs to improve QOL.

Association between adjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy and breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Docetaxel-based chemotherapy can lead to fluid retention and secondary peripheral edema of the extremities, but its association with lymphedema remains unclear. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between adjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy and breast cancer-related lymphedema. Patients with stage II/III breast cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated for lymphedema on the basis of arm circumference measurements. The incidence and risk factors of lymphedema were determined by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses. A total of 320 patients were included. Specifically, 182 patients received docetaxel and 138 patients did not receive docetaxel. Compared with docetaxel-free chemotherapy, docetaxel-based chemotherapy significantly increased the 2.5-year cumulative incidence of all-grade lymphedema (19.91 vs. 32.09%; P=0.011), which was further verified in grade 1-2 (P=0.012), but not in grade 3 lymphedema (P=0.448). Similar results were found in a comparison between docetaxel and nontaxane, but not in a comparison between docetaxel and other taxanes. Multivariate analysis showed that docetaxel-based chemotherapy is an independent risk factor for both all-grade (hazard ratio=1.73; P=0.017) and grade 1-2 lymphedema (hazard ratio=1.87; P=0.022). In conclusion, adjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy significantly increased the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

[Lymphoedema after an adder bite].

Bites from the adder, Vipera berus, are well known for causing local and general toxicity. We report a case of a 63-year-old female who was bitten in one of her lower extremities. She was seen twice in the emergency department with symptoms and signs consistent with severe envenomation. Despite treatment with antihistamines and corticosteroids the oedema persisted. A lymphoscintigraphy was performed showing dermal backflow in the right leg, confirming the diagnosis of lymphoedema. Based on the present case report and review of the literature antivenom therapy should be considered more actively.

Diphtheria toxin-mediated ablation of lymphatic endothelial cells results in progressive lymphedema.

Development of novel treatments for lymphedema has been limited by the fact that the pathophysiology of this disease is poorly understood. It remains unknown, for example, why limb swelling resulting from surgical injury resolves initially, but recurs in some cases months or years later. Finding answers for these basic questions has been hampered by the lack of adequate animal models. In the current study, we used Cre-lox mice that expressed the human diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR) driven by a lymphatic-specific promoter in order to noninvasively ablate the lymphatic system of the hind limb. Animals treated in this manner developed lymphedema that was indistinguishable from clinical lymphedema temporally, radiographically, and histologically. Using this model and clinical biopsy specimens, we show that the initial resolution of edema after injury is dependent on the formation of collateral capillary lymphatics and that this process is regulated by M2-polarized macrophages. In addition, we show that despite these initial improvements in lymphatic function, persistent accumulation of CD4+ cells inhibits lymphangiogenesis and promotes sclerosis of collecting lymphatics, resulting in late onset of edema and fibrosis. Our findings therefore provide strong evidence that inflammatory changes after lymphatic injury play a key role in the pathophysiology of lymphedema.