Establishing Virtual Bioequivalence and Clinically Relevant Specifications for Omeprazole Enteric-Coated Capsules by Incorporating Dissolution Data in PBPK Modeling.

Currently, Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) classes I and III are the only biological exemptions of immediate-release solid oral dosage forms eligible for regulatory approval. However, through virtual bioequivalence (VBE) studies, BCS class II drugs may qualify for biological exemptions if reliable and validated modeling is used. Here, we sought to establish physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, in vitro-in vivo relationship (IVIVR), and VBE models for enteric-coated omeprazole capsules, to establish a clinically-relevant dissolution specification (CRDS) for screening BE and non-BE batches, and to ultimately develop evaluation criteria for generic omeprazole enteric-coated capsules. To establish omeprazole's IVIVR based on the PBPK model, we explored its in vitro dissolution conditions and then combined in vitro dissolution profile studies with in vivo clinical trials. The predicted omeprazole pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles and parameters closely matched the observed PK data. Based on the VBE results, the bioequivalence study of omeprazole enteric-coated capsules required at least 48 healthy Chinese subjects. Based on the CRDS, the capsules' in vitro dissolution should not be < 28%-54%, < 52%, or < 80% after two, three, and six hours, respectively. Failure to meet these dissolution criteria may result in non-bioequivalence. Here, PBPK modeling and IVIVR methods were used to bridge the in vitro dissolution of the drug with in vivo PK to establish the BE safety space of omeprazole enteric-coated capsules. The strategy used in this study can be applied in BE studies of other BCS II generics to obtain biological exemptions and accelerate drug development.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Estradiol Valerate Tablet and Its Generic: A Phase 1 Bioequivalence Study in Healthy Chinese Postmenopausal Female Subjects.

Purpose: Estradiol valerate (Progynova®) is used as hormone therapy to supplement estrogen deficiency. This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of an estradiol valerate tablet and its generic form, under fasting and fed conditions. Methods: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-period crossover study was conducted on healthy postmenopausal Chinese female volunteers under fasting and fed conditions. For each period, the subjects received either a 1 mg tablet of estradiol valerate or its generic. Blood samples were collected before dosing and up to 72 hours after administration. Plasma levels of total estrone, estradiol, and unconjugated estrone were quantified using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Results: A total of 54 volunteers were enrolled in this study. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters, including Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞, were similar for the two drugs under both fasting and fed conditions, with 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of these parameters, all meeting the bioequivalence criterion of 80-125%. A total of 48 adverse events (AEs) were reported in the fed study compared with 24 AEs in the fasting study. Conclusion: Estradiol valerate and its generic form were bioequivalent and well tolerated under both fasting and fed conditions.

Pharmacokinetics of Generic Pediatric Dolutegravir Dispersible Tablet in Thai Young Children Living With HIV Weighing Below Twenty Kilograms.

INTRODUCTION: Dolutegravir (DTG) dispersible tablet (DTG-DT) is a pediatric-friendly formulation. We aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics and virologic responses of generic DTG-DT in children weighing <20 kg. METHODS: Children living with HIV-1 and <7 years of age weighing 6 to <20 kg were eligible. A generic 10-mg scored DTG-DT was administered to children using 3 weight bands (WB): WB1 (6 to <10 kg), WB2 (10 to <14 kg) and WB3 (14 to <20 kg), at doses of 20 mg (higher than World Health Organization recommendation of 15 mg), 20 mg and 25 mg, respectively. Steady-state intensive pharmacokinetics (PK) was performed in fasting condition with blood sampling at predose and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 24 hours postdose. DTG PK parameters were estimated using a noncompartmental analysis, and DTG trough concentrations (C 24 ) and 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve were calculated. Comparisons were made with ODYSSEY and IMPAACT 2019. And 90% effective concentration of 0.32 mg/L was used as a reference individual DTG C 24 concentration. RESULTS: From August 2021 to March 2023, 29 Thai children with a median (interquartile range) age of 3.2 (1.5-4.8) years were enrolled; 8 in WB1, 9 in WB2 and 12 in WB3. All children were treatment experienced and 59% had HIV RNA <200 copies/mL. Overall geometric mean (coefficient of variation percentage) DTG C 24 was 1.0 (46%) mg/L [WB1, 0.9 (53%); WB2, 0.9 (27%); WB3, 1.2 (51%)]. Geometric mean (coefficient of variation percentage) 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve was 83.2 (24%) mg h/L [WB1, 84.3 (31%); WB2, 76.9 (16%); WB3, 87.6 (25%)]. At weeks 24 and 48, 90% and 92% of participants had plasma HIV RNA <200 copies/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Generic DTG-DT provided adequate drug exposure in children weighing 6 to <20 kg. The exploratory dose of DTG 20 mg for children weighing 6 to <10 kg showed similar PK parameters to World Health Organization doses in the other WB.

Evaluating gender effect in the generic bioequivalence studies by physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling - A case study of dextromethorphan modified release tablets.

The United States Food and Drug Administration guidelines for the bioequivalence (BE) testing of the generic drug products suggests that there should be an equal proportion of male and female population in the BE study. Despite this requirement, many generic drug companies do not maintain the suggested proportion of female population in their studies. Several socio-economic and cultural factors lead to lower participation of the females in the BE studies. More recently, the regulatory agencies across the globe are requesting the generic drug companies to demonstrate the performance of their drug products in the under-represented sex via additional studies. In this work, we describe the case of Dextromethorphan modified release tablets where the gender effect on the product performance was evaluated by physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach. We have compared the drug product's performance by population simulations considering four different scenarios. The data from all-male population (from in house Pharmacokinetic [PK] BE studies) was considered as a reference and other scenarios were compared against the all-male population data. In the first scenario, we made a comparison between all-male (100% male) vs all-female (100% female) population. Second scenario was as per agency's requirements-equal proportion of male and female in the BE study. As an extreme scenario, 100% male vs 30:70 male:female was considered (higher females than males in the BE studies). Finally, as a more realistic scenario, 100% male versus 70:30 male:female was considered (lower females than males in the BE studies). Population PK followed by virtual BE was employed to demonstrate the similarity/differences in the drug product performance between the sexes. This approach can be potentially utilized to seek BE study waivers thus saving cost and accelerating the entry of the generic products to the market.

In Vitro In Vivo Extrapolation and Bioequivalence Prediction for Immediate-Release Capsules of Cefadroxil Based on a Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic ACAT Model.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is a mechanistic concept, which helps to judge the effects of biopharmceutical properties of drug product such as in vitro dissolution on its pharmacokinetic and in vivo performance. With the application of virtual bioequivalence (VBE) study, the drug product development using model-based approach can help in evaluating the possibility of extending BCS-based biowaiver. Therefore, the current study was intended to develop PBPK model as well as in vitro in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) for BCS class III drug i.e. cefadroxil. A PBPK model was created in GastroPlus™ 9.8.3 utilizing clinical data of immediate-release cefadroxil formulations. By the examination of simulated and observed plasma drug concentration profiles, the predictability of the proposed model was assessed for the prediction errors. Furthermore, mechanistic deconvolution was used to create IVIVE, and the plasma drug concentration profiles and pharmacokinetic parameters were predicted for different virtual formulations with variable cefadroxil in vitro release. Virtual bioequivalence study was also executed to assess the bioequivalence of the generic verses the reference drug product (Duricef®). The developed PBPK model satisfactorily predicted Cmax and AUC0-t after cefadroxil single and multiple oral dose administrations, with all individual prediction errors within the limits except in a few cases. Second order polynomial correlation function obtained accurately predict in vivo drug release and plasma concentration profile of cefadroxil test and reference (Duricef®) formulation. The VBE study also proved test formulation bioequivalent to reference formulation and the statistical analysis on pharmacokinetic parameters reported 90% confidence interval for Cmax and AUC0-t in the FDA acceptable limits. The analysis found that a validated and verified PBPK model with a mechanistic background is as a suitable approach to accelerate generic drug development.

Physiologically based absorption modeling to predict the bioequivalence of two apixaban formulations.

The equivalence of absorption rates and extents between generic drugs and their reference formulations is crucial for ensuring therapeutic comparability. Bioequivalence (BE) studies are widely utilized and play a pivotal role in substantiating the approval and promotional efforts for generic drugs. Virtual BE simulation is a valuable tool for mitigating risks and guiding clinical BE studies, thereby minimizing redundant in vivo BE assessments. Herein, we successfully developed a physiologically based absorption model for virtual BE simulations, which precisely predicts the BE of the apixaban test and reference formulations. The modeling results confirm that the test and reference formulations were bioequivalent under both fasted and fed conditions, consistent with clinical studies. This highlights the efficacy of physiologically based absorption modeling as a powerful tool for formulation screening and can be adopted as a methodological and risk assessment strategy to detect potential clinical BE risks.

Comparative Bleeding Risk of Brand Vs Generic Rivaroxaban in Elderly Inpatients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common abnormal heart rhythm in elderly patients. Rivaroxaban has been widely used for stroke prevention. The anticoagulant response to rivaroxaban increases with age, which may make elderly patients susceptible to adverse outcomes resulting from small differences in bioavailability between generic and brand products. Methods: We designed a cohort study of ≥65-year-old inpatients with AF. Sociodemographic and laboratory measures of qualified patients who received brand or generic rivaroxaban for at least 72 hours at the study hospital from January 2021 to June 2023 were collected retrospectively. The primary outcome was the incidence of bleeding. Results: A total of 1008 qualifying patients were included for analysis, with 626 (62.1%) receiving brand rivaroxaban and 382 (37.9%) receiving generic rivaroxaban. After propensity score matching and weighting to account for confounders, the odds ratios comparing brand vs generic rivaroxaban (95% confidence intervals) for the bleeding was 1.15 (0.72-1.82). Results from subgroup analyses of patients with age ≥85, HAS-BLED score ≥ 3, containment of antiplatelet drugs, and female patients were consistent with the primary analysis. Conclusion: It provides evidence regarding the clinical safety outcome of generic rivaroxaban in the elderly AF population that may be particularly susceptible to adverse outcomes resulting from small allowable differences in pharmacokinetics.

A crossover study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of hydroxychloroquine tablets in healthy Chinese subjects.

AIMS: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has a high variability and a long half-life in the human body. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a generic HCQ tablet (test preparation) versus a brand HCQ tablet (reference preparation) under fasting and fed conditions in a crossover design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, two-period randomized, single-dose, crossover study in 47 healthy Chinese subjects who were sequentially and randomly allocated either to the fed group (high-fat meal; n = 23) or the fasting group (n = 24). Participants in each group were randomized to the two arms to receive either a single 200-mg dose of the test preparation or a 200-mg dose of the reference preparation. The application of the two preparations in each patient was separated by a 28-day washout period, regarded as sufficiently long to avoid significant interference from residual drug in the body. Whole blood samples were collected over 72 hours after drug administration. RESULTS: A total of 23 subjects completed both the fed and the fasting parts of the trial. There were no significant differences in Cmax, AUC0-72h, and T1/2 between the test and reference preparation (p < 0.05). Food had no significant effect on Cmax and T1/2 (p < 0.05), but AUC0-72h values were significantly reduced under fed condition compared to fasting condition (p < 0.05). The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax and AUC0-72h were 0.84 - 1.05 and 0.89 - 0.98 in the fed study, and 0.97 - 1.07 and 0.97 - 1.05 in the fasting study, respectively. The carryover effect due to non-zero blood concentrations resulted in higher AUC0-72h values in the second period for both test and reference formulations and had no effect on the statistical results. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The investigation demonstrated that the test and reference preparations are bioequivalent and well tolerated under both fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese subjects.

Comparison of solubility profiles for pioneer and generic monensin premixes in biorelevant simulated intestinal fluid based on shake flask extractions.

In the United States, a generic Type A medicated article product can gain the FDA approval by demonstrating bioequivalence (BE) to the pioneer product by successfully conducting a blood level, pharmacodynamic, or clinical BE study. A biowaiver can be granted based on several criteria, assuming the dissolution of the test and reference products represents the only factor influencing the relative bioavailability of both products. Monensin is practically insoluble in H2O per the USP definition. Previously published data from a comparison study of monensin dissolution profiles from the pioneer product and four generic products using biorelevant media showed that generic monensin products demonstrated different dissolution profiles to the pioneer product in these USP biorelevant rumen media. This follow-up study compared the solubility profiles in simulated intestinal fluid (cFaSSIF, pH 7.5) for the pioneer product and four generic products. The generic monensin products demonstrated different in vitro dissolution profiles to the pioneer product in biorelevant media. The differences demonstrated in solubility and dissolution profiles are of concern regarding the potential efficacy of generic monensin in cattle. There are also additional concerns for the potential development of Eimeria resistance in cattle receiving a sub-therapeutic dose of monensin from a less soluble generic product.

Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle.

The recent expiration of patents for the antibiotic tulathromycin has led to a significant increase in the number of generic tulathromycin products (GTPs) available. This study aims to evaluate the bioequivalence of four GTPs, which experienced a rapid increase in market share. The bioequivalence was evaluated by performing pharmacokinetic assessments. The four selected GTPs (Tulaject, Tulagen, Toulashot, and T-raxxin) were compared with the reference product, Draxxin. A dose of 2.5 mg/kg.bw/day was administered via subcutaneous injection, and blood samples were collected 460 times from 20 Holstein cattle. Plasma concentrations of tulathromycin were measured over time using LC-MS/MS analysis. Bioequivalence was evaluated using a statistical program for pharmacokinetic parameters, including the area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). The bioequivalence was considered proven if the difference between the test and reference products was within 20% for both AUC and Cmax. The results showed that the confidence interval (CI, 90%) for both AUC and Cmax values was within the 80~120% range, demonstrating the bioequivalence of the four GTPs compared to Draxxin. This study provides evidence for the bioequivalence of the selected GTPs, contributing to their validation for use as effective antibiotics.

Bioequivalence Evaluation of Topical Metronidazole Products Using Dermal Microdialysis in New Zealand Rabbits.

Comparative assessment of cutaneous pharmacokinetics (cPK) by dermal microdialysis (dMD) appears to be suitable to evaluate the bioequivalence (BE) of topical dermatological drug products applied to the skin (TDDPs). Although dMD studies in the literature have reported inconclusive BE assessments, we have addressed several methodological deficiencies to improve dMD's capability to assess BE between reference (R) and approved generic (referred to as test (T)) gel and cream products of metronidazole (MTZ). The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratios for the Ln(AUC0-24) and Ln(Cmax) endpoints was centered within the BE limits of 80-125%. The CIs extended outside this range as the proof-of-principle study was not statistically powered to demonstrate BE (N = 7 rabbits). A power analysis suggests that, with the variability observed in this study, 21 rabbits for the cream and 11 rabbits for the gel would be sufficient to support an evaluation of BE with the 2 probe replicates we used, and only 10 and 5 rabbits would be sufficient to power the study for the cream and gel, respectively, if 4 probe replicates are used for each treatment per rabbit. These results indicate that dMD when properly controlling variables can be used to support BE assessments for TDDPs.

Biopharmaceutics Risk Assessment-Connecting Critical Bioavailability Attributes with In Vitro, In Vivo Properties and Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling to Enable Generic Regulatory Submissions.

Quality risk assessment following ICH Q9 principles is an important activity to ensure optimal clinical efficacy and safety of a drug product. Typically, risk assessment is focused on product performance wherein critical material attributes, formulation variables, and process parameters are evaluated from a manufacturing perspective. Extending ICH Q9 principles to biopharmaceutics risk assessment to identify factors that can impact in vivo performance is an upcoming area. This is evident by recent regulatory trends wherein a new term critical bioavailability attributes (CBA) has been coined to identify such factors. Although significant work has been performed for biopharmaceutics risk assessment for new molecules, there is a need for harmonized biopharmaceutics risk assessment workflow for generic submissions. In this manuscript, we attempted to provide a framework for performing biopharmaceutics risk assessment for generic regulatory submissions. A detailed workflow for performing biopharmaceutics risk assessment includes identification of initial CBA (iCBA), their confirmatory evaluation followed by definition of the control strategy. Tools for biopharmaceutics risk assessment, i.e., bio-discriminatory dissolution method and physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) were discussed from a practical perspective. Furthermore, a case study for CBA evaluation using PBBM modeling for an extended-release product for regulatory submission has been described using the proposed workflow. Finally, future directions of integrating CBA evaluation, biopharmaceutics risk assessment to the FDA Knowledge Aided Structured Assessment (KASA) initiative, the necessity of risk assessment templates, and knowledge sharing between industry and academia are discussed. Overall, the work described in this manuscript can facilitate and provide guidance for biopharmaceutics risk assessment for generic submissions.

Bioequivalence Study of Ezetimibe Tablets After a Single Oral Dose of 10 mg in Healthy Japanese Subjects Under Fasting Conditions.

This study compared the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles between a new generic and a branded reference product of 10-mg ezetimibe (EZE) tablets in 24 healthy Japanese male volunteers under fasting conditions, obtaining sufficient evidence for the marketing approval of the new generic product. The bioequivalence study was conducted with an open-label, 2 × 2, single-dose, crossover design in which the test and reference products were administered to volunteers after fasting for ≥10 hours. Blood samples were collected 24 times before to 72 hours after the administration of the investigational drug. We evaluated the peak drug concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last measured concentration of EZE, EZEG, and total EZE (EZE + ezetimibe glucuronide [EZEG]). The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for peak drug concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last measured concentration of the test and reference products fell within the bioequivalence limits of 0.80 to 1.25 for EZE, EZEG, and total EZE. The test and reference products were well tolerated, and no adverse events occurred during the study. The test product was bioequivalent to the reference product.

A single-dose, randomized crossover study in healthy Chinese subjects to evaluate pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two capsules of calcium dobesilate 0.5 g under fasting and fed conditions.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the rate and extent of absorption of a launched generic calcium dobesilate capsule versus the branded reference formulation under fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese subjects, and to assess their bioequivalence and tolerability. METHODS: This single-dose, open-label, randomized-sequence, 2-period crossover bioequivalence study was conducted on healthy Chinese volunteers aged 18 to 45 years. Subjects received a single 0.5 g dose of calcium dobesilate capsule under fasting or fed conditions, with a 3-day washout period between doses of the test (T) and reference (R) formulations. Blood samples were collected before and up to 24 hours after administration. The plasma concentration of calcium dobesilate was determined by a validated Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Non-compartmental analysis was applied to identify the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties. The primary PK parameters including the maximal plasma concentration (Cmax), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-t), and the AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf) were used for bioequivalence evaluation. RESULTS: The mean of PK parameters for T and R capsules under fasting (fed) condition were: Cmax, 13.57 (6.71) and 12.59 (7.25) µg/mL; AUC0-t, 97.32 (79.74) and 96.97 (80.71) h*µg/mL; AUC0-inf, 101.68 (88.01) and 101.64 (87.81) h*µg/mL. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of GMRs under fasting (fed) condition were: Cmax, 97.91%-116.62% (88.63%-96.53%); AUC0-t, 97.15%-104.00% (96.58%-101.39%); and AUC0-inf, 97.19%-102.89% (98.67%-103.99%). These 90% CIs were all within the bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. All adverse events were mild. CONCLUSION: In this study, the T calcium dobesilate 0.5 g capsule was bioequivalent to the reference product under both fasting and fed conditions. Taking food would slow down its rate and reduce its amount of absorption. Both formulations were generally well tolerated.

Generic Medicinal Products in Immunosuppressive Therapy-Should It be a Challenge for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring?

ABSTRACT: Immunosuppressants have a narrow therapeutic index (NTIDs). Indisputably cyclosporine, tacrolimus, everolimus, and sirolimus have NTIDs, and only in the case of mycophenolic acid, a scientific discussion has not been yet concluded. Their specificities highlight the implications for generics introduced into the drug market, more precisely, with bioequivalence testing. In the European Union, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) released the "Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence." The bioequivalence (BE) of the generic (tested, T) versus original (reference, R) product should be confirmed by obtaining a 90% confidence interval (CI) for the T:R ratio of each of the 2 decisive pharmacokinetic parameters, namely, the area under the curve (AUC) between 90.00% and 111.11%. A similar approach (90.00%-112.00%) for AUC was adopted by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) for NTIDs; however, the US Food and Drug Administration is still based on classic acceptance criteria: 90% CI between 80.00% and 125.00% but with special requirements of BE testing. A discussion about long-expected global consensus was performed in this study based on the literature concerning BE testing in the case of NTIDs. The narrow acceptance criteria reduce the potential mean difference in bioavailability between generic and original products by a few percent. To identify this problem, special attention has been paid to switching drugs (generic-generic, original-generic) and therapeutic drug monitoring after conversion (TDM). There is no global consensus on the acceptance criteria for the BE of generic drugs; therefore, consensus and harmonization are strictly necessary. This study presents a review of the generic drug market and its classification by manufacturers, drug agencies, and dates of marketing authorization. Guidelines for TDM optimization (during switching/conversion) have been proposed. Physicians and clinical pharmacists should pay special attention to switching immunosuppressive drugs between original versus generic formulations, and generic versus generic formulations. Patients and their families should be educated on the risks associated with uncontrolled conversion.

Mechanistic modeling of ophthalmic, nasal, injectable, and implant generic drug products: A workshop summary report.

For approval, a proposed generic drug product must demonstrate it is bioequivalent (BE) to the reference listed drug product. For locally acting drug products, conventional BE approaches may not be feasible because measurements in local tissues at the sites of action are often impractical, unethical, or cost-prohibitive. Mechanistic modeling approaches, such as physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, may integrate information from drug product properties and human physiology to predict drug concentrations in these local tissues. This may allow clinical relevance determination of critical drug product attributes for BE assessment during the development of generic drug products. In this regard, the Office of Generic Drugs of the US Food and Drug Administration has recently established scientific research programs to accelerate the development and assessment of generic products by utilizing model-integrated alternative BE approaches. This report summarizes the presentations and panel discussion from a public workshop that provided research updates and information on the current state of the use of PBPK modeling approaches to support generic product development for ophthalmic, injectable, nasal, and implant drug products.

A Bioequivalence Study With Pharmacokinetic Endpoints for Azithromycin Eye Drops.

Azithromycin eye drops with a bioadhesive ocular drug-delivery system can offer a simplified dosing regimen. In this study, we compared the pharmacokinetic properties and assessed the bioequivalence of a newly developed generic azithromycin eye drop with a branded formulation. This open-label, single-dose, randomized, crossover, sparse-sampling ocular bioequivalence study was conducted on 48 healthy Chinese volunteers. Tear samples were collected for up to 36 hours, and each participant was randomly allocated to one of the prespecified sampling times. Tear drug concentrations were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated via noncompartmental analysis. A nonparametric bootstrap method was used to obtain 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of the test and reference drugs. Tolerability was evaluated for adverse events (AEs). After bootstrapping (1000 iterations), the 90%CIs for the log-transformed ratios of Cmax , AUC0-t , and AUC0-∞ were within the acceptable bioequivalence range (80%-125%). No moderate-to-severe AEs were reported for either formulation. Bioequivalence was demonstrated between the two formulations. The sparse-sampling design with the bootstrapping technique is promising for bioequivalence studies of topical ophthalmic drugs.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of dasatinib and its generic: a phase I bioequivalence study in healthy Chinese subjects.

BACKGROUND: Dasatinib (Sprycel®) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor for treating chronic myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. RESEARCH DESIGN & METHODS: We designed a clinical study to demonstrate that the dasatinib tablet (YiNiShu®) (Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd) and Dasatinib (Bristol Myers Squibb) were bioequivalent under fasting and fed conditions. The whole study was structured into the fasting trial and the postprandial trial. Each period, subjects were given 50 mg dasatinib or its generic. The RSABE (reference scale average bioequivalence) and ABE (average bioequivalence) methods were employed to assess bioequivalence by pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters for a highly variable drug. RESULTS: 32 and 24 eligible volunteers were enrolled in the fasting and postprandial trials, respectively. In the fasting trial, the RSABE method was performed, and point estimates of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ met the bioequivalence criteria. In the postprandial trial, the ABE method was performed, and the 90% CI of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) for PK parameters met the requirements of bioequivalence standards. CONCLUSION: The results proved that the PK parameters of the two drugs were similar and bioequivalent, indicating that both drugs had a good safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Number: NCT05640804) and Drug Clinical Trial Registration and Information Disclosure Platform (Number: CTR20181708).

Regulatory utility of mechanistic modeling to support alternative bioequivalence approaches: A workshop overview.

On September 30 and October 1, 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics cosponsored a live virtual workshop titled "Regulatory Utility of Mechanistic Modeling to Support Alternative Bioequivalence Approaches." The overall aims of the workshop included (i) engaging the generic drug industry and other involved stakeholders regarding how mechanistic modeling and simulation can support their product development and regulatory submissions; (ii) sharing the current state of mechanistic modeling for bioequivalence (BE) assessment through case studies; (iii) establishing a consensus on best practices for using mechanistic modeling approaches, such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and computational fluid dynamics modeling, for BE assessment; and (iv) introducing the concept of a Model Master File to improve model sharing between model developers, industry, and the FDA. More than 1500 people registered for the workshop. Based on a postworkshop survey, the majority of participants reported that their fundamental scientific understanding of mechanistic models was enhanced, there was greater consensus on model validation and verification, and regulatory expectations for mechanistic modeling submitted in abbreviated new drug applications were clarified by the workshop.

Generic lamotrigine extended-release tablets are bioequivalent to innovator drug in fully replicated crossover bioequivalence study.

OBJECTIVE: Lamotrigine is a commonly prescribed antiepileptic drug. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-funded clinical studies have demonstrated bioequivalence (BE) for generic lamotrigine immediate-release (IR) products in epilepsy patients with generic substitution. To address the potential concerns about the risk of generic-brand substitution of lamotrigine extended-release (ER) products, considering the complexity of controlled release systems and pharmacokinetic variations associated with possible within-subject variability (WSV), this prospective study assessed (1) BE of generic and brand lamotrigine ER products in a fully replicated BE study design in healthy subjects and (2) whether such fully replicated study design and WSV data can better support the approval of generic lamotrigine ER products. METHODS: This open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, four-period, two-sequence, fully replicated crossover BE study compared generic lamotrigine ER tablet to brand Lamictal XR (200 mg) in 30 healthy subjects under fed conditions. Pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles were generated based on intensive blood sampling up to 144 h. RESULTS: The two products showed comparable peak plasma concentration (Cmax ), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last measurable time point (AUC0-t ) and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf ), whereas median time to Cmax (Tmax ) values differed, that is, 10 h for generic and 22 h for brand products, respectively. WSVs for PK metrics were small (~8% of Cmax and ~6% of AUC) and similar between these two products. PK simulation predicted equivalent PK measurements of both products at steady state and after brand-to-generic switch, except the first day upon switching. No serious adverse events were reported. SIGNIFICANCE: The generic lamotrigine ER tablet product demonstrates BE to the brand product in a fully replicated BE study design with healthy subjects, supporting the adequacy of the two-way crossover study design to demonstrate BE and generic-brand substitution of lamotrigine ER products.