[Recommendations for competitive sports eligibility: what's new in the 2023 COCIS protocols]. / Raccomandazioni per il giudizio di idoneità allo sport agonistico: le novità del COCIS 2023.

The benefit of physical exercise is well established, but, at the same time, it is now well known that an intense sports activity can trigger adverse cardiac events and increase sport-related death. Since 1982, Italy has a State law which obliges athletes to undergo a pre-participation evaluation, based on history, physical examination, ECG and stress test. From its introduction, a significant reduction in cardiac sport-related adverse events has been shown. During the pre-participation screening, some cardiological issues or suspects can arise and the sports medicine doctor should deal with them before releasing the certification for participation in competitive sport. In order to give precious advices to these colleagues and help athletes to securely practice sport, the Italian Society of Sports Cardiology, the Italian Federation of Sports Medicine and the other cardiological scientific societies gathered in the COCIS Committee, periodically produce and publish a booklet named "Cardiological Protocols for Competitive Sports Eligibility". The object of this review is to underline the recent 2023 version innovations when compared to previous editions.

Glucocorticoid prescribing habits of sports medicine physicians working in high-performance sport: a 30-nation survey.

OBJECTIVES: Glucocorticoids are commonly prescribed in medicine. When administered via certain routes, glucocorticoids are prohibited for incompetition use by WADA. The glucocorticoid prescribing habits of sports medicine doctors have not been reported. METHODS: An online survey was distributed internationally to physicians working in high-performance sports. The survey queried the doctors about their use of glucocorticoids with athletes and their understanding of WADA's regulations regarding glucocorticoid use in competition. RESULTS: 603 sports medicine doctors from 30 different countries participated. The majority (>85%) routinely injected glucocorticoids and/or prescribed glucocorticoids by other routes. There were substantial differences in the common routes of injection as well as types of glucocorticoid used among the physicians from various countries. A relatively small percentage of sports doctors (<25%) accurately identified which routes of glucocorticoid administration are prohibited in competition by WADA. There was a great variation in how long before competition the use of glucocorticoids would cause the doctor to consider applying for a therapeutic use exemption (TUE). A better understanding of the clearance rates of glucocorticoids from athletes' bodies would greatly aid sports medicine doctors' decisions on how and when to apply for a TUE. A small number of doctors had observed side effects of glucocorticoid administration, with the majority of side effects being minor in nature. CONCLUSION: Glucocorticoids are widely prescribed by sports physicians. There is a need to better educate sports physicians on the current WADA regulations in relation to glucocorticoid administration.

Sports Medicine Delivery Models: Legal Risks.

Educational institutions sponsoring competitive athletics may use an athletics model, academic model, or medical model for delivery of sports medicine to student-athletes. Four types of legal risk are considered for these 3 models: litigation, contract, regulatory, and structural. The athletics model presents the greatest legal risk to institutions, whereas the medical model presents the least legal risk. Institutional administrators should consider these risks when selecting or maintaining a delivery model for sports medicine.

Global injustice in sport: The Caster Semenya ordeal - prejudice, discrimination and racial bias.

The International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) requires the blood testosterone level of female athletes with differences of sex development to be reduced to below 5 nmol/L for a continuous period of at least 6 months, and thereafter to be maintained to below 5 nmol/L continuously for as long as the athlete wishes to remain eligible. Its ruling is based on questionable research findings. Medical decisions and interventions should be based on evidence from well-designed and well-conducted research and confirmatory studies. Caster Semenya, the reigning 800-meter Olympic champion since 2015, has challenged this ruling. Gender verification was instituted with women's participation in the Olympics in 1900, and female athletes were subjected to invasive, embarrassing and humiliating procedures. In its many decades of harsh scrutiny of successful female athletes, especially those from backgrounds similar to Semenya's, the IAAF has disrespected human rights and medical ethics and allowed prejudice, discrimination and injustice to infringe on their dignity and relentlessly obstruct their international sporting careers.

Would it be ethical or legal for doctors in South Africa to administer testosterone-reducing drugs to Caster Semenya?

The Court of Arbitration for Sport recently confirmed that the decision by the International Association of Athletics Federations to require hyperandrogenic female athletes such as Caster Semenya to reduce their testosterone levels to compete in certain races has been widely condemned. The World Medical Association has warned doctors not to assist in implementing the decision, as it would be unethical. The same would apply in terms of the Health Professions Council of South Africa's rules of professional conduct. Such treatment is 'futile' in medical terms, and does not serve the purpose of providing healthcare. Therefore, doctors may lawfully refuse to prescribe it. The decision is a violation of Semenya's constitutional rights and would be regarded as unethical should doctors comply with it. However, the prescription of such drugs would not be unlawful if Semenya gave informed consent to taking them. Such consent would not be a defence to a disciplinary hearing on unprofessional conduct, but would be a good defence to any legal action arising from unpleasant side-effects - provided they were explained to her.

Concussions in Sports.

Although concussions are common, they are complex, variable, and not entirely understood in terms of pathophysiology and treatment. The incidence of concussion is expected to continue to rise with the increased participation of youth in sports and improved awareness. The role of orthopedic surgeons in concussion management is murky. However, the existing literature does provide a foundation from which orthopedic surgeons who are exposed to concussed patients can function. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(1):12-21.].

Trends in Pediatric Emergency Department Utilization for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Before and After Legislation.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of state youth traumatic brain injury (TBI) legislation on pediatric emergency department (ED) utilization for sports and recreation-related mild TBIs (mTBIs). PARTICIPANTS: ED visits by children ages 5 to 18 years between 2006 and 2014 in the Pediatric Health Information System database (N = 452 900). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. MAIN MEASURES: Rates of ED visits, and injury comparison groups (mTBI, moderate to severe TBI, minor head injury, and long bone fracture). RESULTS: Of the 452 900 ED visits, 123 192 (27.2%) were for mTBI, along with visits for moderate to severe TBIs (n = 5190), minor head injuries (n = 54 566), and long bone fractures (n = 269 952). ED visits for mTBIs were more common among males (67.5%), children ages 10-14 years (42.1%), and the privately insured (50.6%). The proportion of mTBI ED visits increased significantly, particularly from 5 years prelegislation to immediately postlegislation (57.8 to 94.8 mTBI visits per 10 000 ED visits). A similar trend was observed for minor head injuries; however, no significant changes were observed for moderate to severe TBIs and long bone fractures. CONCLUSION: Pediatric ED utilization trends for the injury comparison groups differed from each other, and from pre- and post-TBI legislation. Further research assessing effects of TBI legislation on healthcare utilization is warranted.

The evolving landscape of policies, rules, and law in sport-related concussion.

Beginning in 2009 with the passage of the Zackery Lystedt law in the state of Washington, all 50 states have passed concussion laws that implement a mandatory framework of care for high school and youth athletes. The structure of these laws generally shares the three primary components of the Lystedt law: (1) preseason concussion education; (2) mandatory removal from play with suspected concussion; and (3) clearance from a healthcare professional prior to return to play. These same three policy components are also found at the collegiate and professional levels of sport, either through established policy or labor contracts. This chapter explores concussion-specific legal and policy developments that currently inform concussion management practices across multiple levels of the US athletic system.

The Interconnected Histories of Endocrinology and Eligibility in Women's Sport.

This report illustrates the links between history, sport, endocrinology, and genetics to show the ways in which historical context is key to understanding the current conversations and controversies about who may compete in the female category in elite sport. The International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) introduced hyperandrogenemia regulations for women's competitions in 2011, followed by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) for the 2012 Olympics. The policies concern female athletes who naturally produce higher-than-average levels of testosterone and want to compete in the women's category. Hyperandrogenemia guidelines are the current effort in a long series of attempts to determine women's eligibility scientifically. Scientific endeavors to control who may participate as a woman illustrate the impossibility of neatly classifying competitors by sex and discriminate against women with differences of sex development (also called intersex by some).

Impossible "Choices": The Inherent Harms of Regulating Women's Testosterone in Sport.

In April 2018, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) released new regulations placing a ceiling on women athletes' natural testosterone levels to "ensure fair and meaningful competition." The regulations revise previous ones with the same intent. They require women with higher natural levels of testosterone and androgen sensitivity who compete in a set of "restricted" events to lower their testosterone levels to below a designated threshold. If they do not lower their testosterone, women may compete in the male category, in an intersex category, at the national level, or in unrestricted events. Women may also challenge the regulation, whether or not they have lowered their testosterone, or quit sport. Irrespective of IAAF's stated aims, the options forced by the new regulations are impossible choices. They violate dignity, threaten privacy, and mete out both suspicion and judgement on the sex and gender identity of the athletes regulated.

A Multifactorial Approach to Sport-Related Concussion Prevention and Education: Application of the Socioecological Framework.

OBJECTIVE: To offer an overview of sport-related concussion (SRC) prevention and education strategies in the context of the socioecological framework (SEF). Athletic trainers (ATs) will understand the many factors that interact to influence SRC prevention and the implications of these interactions for effective SRC education. BACKGROUND: Concussion is a complex injury that is challenging to identify and manage, particularly when athletes fail to disclose symptoms to their health care providers. Education is 1 strategy for increasing disclosure. However, limited information addresses how ATs can integrate the many factors that may influence the effectiveness of SRC education into their specific settings. Public health models provide an example through the SEF, which highlights the interplay among various levels of society and sport that can facilitate SRC prevention strategies, including education. DESCRIPTION: For ATs to develop appropriate SRC prevention strategies, a framework for application is needed. A growing body of information concerning SRC prevention indicates that knowledge alone is insufficient to change concussion-related behaviors. The SEF allows this information to be considered at levels such as policy and societal, community, interpersonal (relationships), and intrapersonal (athlete). The use of such a framework will facilitate more comprehensive SRC prevention efforts that can be applied in all athletic training practice settings. Clinical Applications: Athletic trainers can use this information as they plan SRC prevention strategies in their specific settings. This approach will aid in addressing the layers of complexity that exist when developing a concussion-management policy and plan.

Legal Aspects of Concussion: The Ever-Evolving Standard of Care.

Today, when an athlete is catastrophically injured while playing a sport, litigation often follows. The likelihood of litigation is even greater in the event of a head injury, especially when the athlete can allege that a prior concussion somehow contributed to the current injury. Whether the potential defendants in these lawsuits, such as schools, coaches, athletic trainers, and other health care professionals, actually face legal liability depends on whether they are deemed to have conformed to the standard of care. The standard of care is a legal term, defined as acting as a reasonable professional in that position or industry would have under the circumstances based on then-existing knowledge. In this article, we examine the standard of care with regard to concussion management and treatment in the context of some of the most notable lawsuits in recent years.

Motivos de la práctica deportiva de atletas paralímpicos españoles / Motivos para la practica esportiva de atletas paralímpico Espanhois / Motives for the practicing sports of Spanish paralympic athletes

Los Juegos Paralímpicos constituyen el máximo exponente a nivel mundial del deporte de competición practicado por personas con discapacidad. En este estudio se analizaron los motivos de la práctica deportiva de los atletas paralímpicos españoles participantes en los Juegos de Londres 2012, utilizando como instrumento el cuestionario Participation Motivation Inventory, versión española, compuesto por 30 ítems. La muestra está conformada por 69 deportistas del máximo exponente del deporte paralímpico español y de diferentes discapacidades (discapacitados visuales, y discapacitados físico-motriz). El análisis factorial exploratorio llevado a cabo (con rotación Varimax) indicó con una varianza total explicado de 55.28% un conjunto de cuatro factores: Integración social, Personal, Socio-deportivo, y Superación. La importancia concedida por los atletas a los diferentes ítems de la escala nos indica que los motivos más importantes para practicar deporte estuvieron relacionados a los factores Personal y Superación. Como conclusión, podemos indicar la homogeneidad del grupo paralímpico en cuanto a la motivación en la práctica deportiva (AU)

Os Jogos Paraolímpicos constituem o maior expoente mundial do desporto de competição praticado por pessoas com deficiência. Neste estudo foram analisadas as razões para a prática esportiva de atletas paraolímpicos espanhóis que participaram nos Jogos de Londres 2012, utilizando-se como o questionário Participation Motivation Inventory, versão espanhola, composta por 30 itens. A amostra está constituída por 69 atletas do máximo expoente do esporte paralímpico espanhol com deficiências visuais e física/motora. A análise fatorial exploratória realizada (com rotação Varimax) indicou com uma variação total explicada de 55,28% um conjunto de quatro fatores: Integração social, Pessoal, Sócio-Esportiva e Superação. A importância atribuída pelos atletas aos diferentes itens da escala indica que as razões mais importantes para a prática do esporte foram relacionados a fatores Pessoais e Superação. Em conclusão, podemos indicar a homogeneidade do grupo paralímpico em termos de motivação na prática esportiva (AU)

The Paralympic Games are the greatest exponent of the world competitive sport practiced by disabilities people. This study analyzed the motives for the sports practice of the Spanish Paralympic athletes participants in the Games in 2012, using the questionnaire Participation Motivation Inventory, in Spanish version, consisting of 30 items. The sample consists of 69 athletes of the maximum exponent of the Spanish Paralympic sport, and different disabilities (blind and visually impaired, and physically disabled-motor. Exploratory factor analysis conducted (with Varimax rotation) indicated with a total variance explained of 55.28% a set of four factors: Social integration, Personal, Social and sporting and Overcoming. The importance given by athletes to different items of the scale indicates that the most important motives for sports were related to Social and Overcoming. In conclusion, we can indicate the homogeneity in Paralympic group, in terms of motivation in sport (AU)

The Legal Landscape of Concussion: Implications for Sports Medicine Providers.

CONTEXT: Concussion legislation has been enacted in all 50 of the United States, aiming to prevent mild traumatic brain injuries and the potential long-term sequelae of these injuries in youth athletics. Sports medicine providers, in addressing this major public health concern, are tasked with adhering to the established standards of medical care while also considering the legal implications. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The PubMed (2011-2016) database was searched using the following search terms: concussion, sports concussion, legislation, and concussion legislation. References from consensus statements, review articles, and book chapters were also utilized. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. RESULTS: The Lystedt law and its progeny have increased awareness of the signs and symptoms of sports concussion, but adherence to state legislation can pose some challenges. CONCLUSION: The presence of concussion legislation places a responsibility on the sports medicine provider to have a firm understanding of the legality of concussion management in the state(s) in which they practice.

Youth Concussion Laws across the Nation: Implications for the Traveling Team Physician.

There are an estimated 1.6 to 3.8 million sports and recreation-related concussions annually in the United States, with an average annual increase in incidence of 15.5% from 1998 to 2007. From 2009 to 2014, all 50 states enacted youth concussion legislation. This study clarifies core elements common to state concussion legislation and State Interscholastic Athletic Association (SIAA) implementation. A concussion literature, legislative, and SIAA concussion bylaw review was performed for all 50 U.S. states. Mandated concussion education varies in the frequency of certification and method of education. Student athletes and their parents/guardians in a majority of states are required to sign annual educational information sheets. Forty-nine states specifically mandate removal from play. Return-to-play protocols vary with regard to the timeline, content, and health care professional that can provide written clearance. In conclusion, it is important for sports medicine clinicians to stay abreast of current and revised concussion legislation in the jurisdictions in which they provide care.

Effects of Legislation on Sports-Related Concussion.

Following the lead of Washington state and passage of the Lystedt Law in 2009, all states now have sports concussion laws designed to help protect youth athletes. This article examines the 3 basic tenets of youth sports concussion laws, challenges in implementation of state laws, and the first measures of success. Some of the major differences among state laws are also discussed.

Team Physicians, Sports Medicine, and the Law: An Update.

The recognition of sports medicine and promulgation of practice guidelines for team physicians will push general medical malpractice standards to evolve into a more specialized standard of care for those who practice in this area. To the extent that practicing medicine in the sports context involves calculations that do not arise in typical medical practice, the sports medicine community can help elucidate those issues and create appropriate guidelines that can serve to inform athlete-patients and educate courts. Doing so will help best set the terms by which those who practice sports medicine are judged.