Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
South Med J ; 114(7): 380-383, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34215887

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate caregivers' practice of prescription medication storage, particularly of opioid medications, as well as to provide educational materials to families about the opioid crisis. METHODS: Caregivers of patients in a pediatric emergency department were asked to participate in a survey about medication storage practices and beliefs, focusing on opioid medications. Data were collected through a survey documenting demographic data along with knowledge and behaviors of medication storage. Brief education about the US opioid crisis and safe storage was provided. RESULTS: In total, 233 families participated; 3 families declined; 11.5% of caregivers reported storing prescribed medications in a locked or latched place, although most store them "out of reach." Most believed their child or children's friends could not easily access their medications (81.8%). Families who did not keep their medications in locked or latched places had never thought about it (39.7%). In total, 33% of respondents were unaware of the opioid crisis; 87.4% of caregivers said they would use a medication lock box if given one. CONCLUSIONS: Many caregivers are not aware of the opioid crisis and do not keep opioid medications locked up. Half of the caregivers surveyed stated they "never thought about" locking up medications. Most parents would use a lock box if given to them. This opens the door to further study, education, and interventions.


Assuntos
Armazenamento de Medicamentos/normas , Sistemas de Medicação/classificação , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Armazenamento de Medicamentos/métodos , Armazenamento de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Sistemas de Medicação/normas , Sistemas de Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/instrumentação , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Intern Emerg Med ; 15(6): 1075-1079, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32133576

RESUMO

Gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) are frequently used in children for feeding and nutrition. Complications related to G-tubes (and G-buttons) in children represent a common presentation to the emergency department (ED). G-tube replacement is usually performed by pediatric emergency medicine physicians. Misplacement may lead to tract disruption, perforation, fistula tract formation, or feeding into the peritoneum. Contrast-enhanced radiographs are traditionally used for confirmation. In addition to a longer length-of-stay, repeat ED visits result in repeated radiation exposure. The use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) instead of radiography avoids this exposure to ionizing radiation. Here, we describe three patients who presented with G-tube complications in whom POCUS alone performed by pediatricians was used for confirmation of the tubes' replacement. Two children presented to the ED with G-tube dislodgement, and one child presented with a ruptured balloon. In all three cases, a new G-tube was replaced at the bedside using POCUS guidance without the need for further radiographic studies. There were no known ED or clinic returns for G-tube complaints over the next 30 days. This is the first report of pediatricians using POCUS to guide and confirm G-tube replacement in children. The success of these cases suggests the technique's feasibility. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate the learning curves, diagnostic accuracy, ED length-of-stay, and use of confirmatory imaging.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/normas , Gastrostomia/instrumentação , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Cateterismo/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Gastrostomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/instrumentação , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/métodos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/normas , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
J Emerg Med ; 57(4): 469-477, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31561928

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Internet is a universal source of information for parents of children with acute complaints. OBJECTIVES: We sought to analyze information directed at parents regarding common acute pediatric complaints. METHODS: Authors searched three search engines for four complaints (child + fever, vomiting, cough, stomach pain), assessing the first 20 results for each query. Readability was evaluated using: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and the Coleman-Liau Index. Two reviewers independently evaluated Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria and National Library of Medicine (NLM) Trustworthy scores. Two physicians (emergency medicine/EM, pediatric EM) analyzed text accuracy (number correct divided by total number of facts). Disagreements were settled by a third physician. Accuracy was defined as ≥ 95% correct, readability as an 8th-grade reading level, high quality as at least three JAMA criteria, and trustworthiness as an NLM score ≥ 3. Accurate and inaccurate websites were compared using chi-squared analysis and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Eighty-seven websites (60%) were accurate (k = 0.94). Sixty (42%) of 144 evaluable websites were readable, 38 (26%) had high-quality JAMA criteria (kappa/k = 0.68), and 44 (31%) had reliable NLM trustworthy scores (k = 0.66). Accurate websites were more frequently published by professional medical organizations (hospitals, academic societies, governments) compared with inaccurate websites (63% vs. 33%, p < 0.01). There was no association between accuracy and physician authorship, search rank, quality, trustworthiness, or readability. CONCLUSION: Many studied websites had inadequate accuracy, quality, trustworthiness, and readability. Measures should be taken to improve web-based information related to acute pediatric complaints.


Assuntos
Confiabilidade dos Dados , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/instrumentação , Mídias Sociais/normas , Humanos , Internet , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/métodos , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/normas , Mídias Sociais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...