Laparoscopic specimen retrieval and attitudes towards morcellation: a questionnaire survey of gynaecology consultants in the United Kingdom.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the practices of laparoscopic specimen retrieval among Gynaecologists in the United Kingdom and to determine any variation in practice. A survey of Consultant Gynaecologist members of the British Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE) was conducted using Survey Monkey™. Of the 460 registered consultants, 187 (40%) responded to the questionnaire. Sixty-two percent (62%) of the respondents considered themselves to be advanced laparoscopic surgeons whilst 34% considered themselves to be intermediate laparoscopic surgeons. The umbilical port was the most commonly used port for specimen retrieval and it was used to remove 49% of ectopic pregnancies, 43% of ovarian cysts and 43% of endometrioma. Most respondents would not insert an extra port or extend the existing port just for the retrieval of a specimen. The level of laparoscopic experience and the gender did not affect the method of specimen retrieval in cases of ectopic pregnancies, endometrioma and ovarian cysts (p value >.05, not significant). The majority of respondents used power morcellation for a laparoscopic myomectomy (85% of respondents) and laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy (93% of respondents), despite the recent concerns surrounding power morcellation. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? There is a paucity of literature regarding laparoscopic specimen retrieval in gynaecology. In view of recent controversy pertaining to the potential upstaging of leiomyosarcoma with morcellation, other methods of specimen retrieval are gaining an importance. What do the results of this study add? This study shows that the umbilical port is the most commonly used port for specimen retrieval among UK gynaecologists and that most gynaecologists would not insert an additional port purely for specimen retrieval. Most respondents would still use power morcellation for a laparoscopic myomectomy and subtotal hysterectomy, despite the recent concerns over morcellation and its safety. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This paper demonstrates the need for development of a database of morcellation practices to enable analysis of both benefits and potential adverse outcomes. This paper will also encourage future research and the audit of specimen retrieval.

Patients' Knowledge and Perceptions of Morcellation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Morcellation has received increased media and professional attention, but it remains unclear how much the average patient knows about this topic. We sought to evaluate patients' knowledge of morcellation, assess their perceptions of the risks and benefits, and determine how these perceptions affect their decision regarding the route of surgery. METHODS: Anonymous paper surveys were administered to 500 patients attending gynecologic appointments at the University of Michigan. Survey questions gathered demographic information and assessed knowledge of various surgical approaches for hysterectomy and myomectomy. Questions regarding patients' knowledge of morcellation explored various types of morcellation and the risks and benefits of this procedure. RESULTS: Of the 500 surveys administered, 396 patients answered at least 1 survey question resulting in a response rate of 79.2%. The mean ± SD age of respondents was 47.0 ± 14.1 years, 80.8% were white, and 83.1% had completed some college. Only 8.3% of patients reported that they had ever heard of morcellation. Even among women who were actively considering a hysterectomy or myomectomy (n = 33) or those who had undergone a hysterectomy or myomectomy (n = 98), only 12.1 and 7.1%, respectively, had heard of morcellation. Of those who had heard of morcellation (n = 32), only 9.4% correctly identified the definition in a multiple-choice question. Only 4.0% of women would choose an abdominal approach to avoid morcellation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients have very little knowledge about morcellation and most patients have never heard of the procedure. Very few patients would refuse morcellation and opt for an abdominal surgery instead.

The Unintended Consequences of an FDA Warning: The Case of Power Morcellation in Myoma Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To study patients' perspectives regarding the risks and benefits of the use of power morcellation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: Academic tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Women waiting in gynecology waiting rooms. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 321 women invited, 310 (97%) responded to the survey; 19% of the participants had myomas requiring treatment, and the other 81% did not. Women with myomas were more likely to be aware of the risks of morcellation (32% vs 14%; p < .001); 29% obtained their information directly from their physicians, while 71% obtained it from other resources. After reading about the risks and benefits of open and MIS approaches to myoma removal, 65% would choose an MIS approach if the risk of cancer spread was up to 0.3% (1 in 350). The majority of women (75%) felt that the government should not have a role in surgical decision making, but should provide information to help patients make decisions. CONCLUSION: Women have different risk tolerances. Most women would be willing to take the 1 in 350 (0.3%) risk of undiagnosed sarcoma spread to benefit from MIS approaches. FDA warnings may have unintended consequences by limiting the acceptable medical choices available for patients.