RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), despite its minimally invasive nature, requires effective control of post-operative pain. The use of local anesthetics (LA) has been studied, but the level of evidence is low, and there is little information on important parameters such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or return to work. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.50% levobupivacaine infiltration of incisional sites in reducing POP after LC. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients undergoing elective LC were randomized into two groups: no infiltration (control group) and port infiltration (intervention group). POP intensity (numerical rating scale, NRS), need for rescue with opioid drugs, PONV incidence, HRQoL, and return to work data, among others, were studied. RESULTS: Two hundred and twelve patients were randomized and analyzed: 105 (control group) and 107 (intervention group). A significant difference was observed in the NRS values (control group mean NRS score: 3.41 ± 1.82 vs. 2.56 ± 1.96) (p < 0.05) and in the incidence of PONV (31.4% vs. 19.6%) (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Levobupivacaine infiltration is safe and effective in reducing POP, although this does not lead to a shorter hospital stay and does not influence HRQoL, return to work, or overall patient satisfaction.
OBJETIVO: la colecistectomía laparoscópica (CL), a pesar de su carácter mínimamente invasivo, requiere un control efectivo del dolor postoperatorio (POP). El uso de anestésicos locales (AL) ha sido estudiado pero el nivel de evidencia es bajo y existe poca información acerca de parámetros relevantes como la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS) o la reincorporación laboral. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar la eficacia de la infiltración de los sitios incisionales con levobupivacaína 0,50% en la reducción del dolor postoperatorio tras la CL. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y doble ciego. Pacientes sometidos a CL programada fueron aleatorizados en dos grupos: sin infiltración (grupo control) y con infiltración preincisional (grupo intervención). La intensidad del dolor (escala de puntuación numérica, NRS), la necesidad de rescates con opioides, la incidencia de náuseas o vómitos postoperatorios (NVPO) y datos de CVRS o reincorporación laboral, entre otros, fueron recogidos. RESULTADOS: 212 pacientes fueron aleatorizados y analizados: 105 en el grupo control y 107 en el grupo de intervención. Se observó una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la intensidad del dolor (puntuación media NRS: 3.41 ± 1.82 vs. 2.56 ± 1.96) (p < 0.05) y en la incidencia de NVPO (31.4% vs. 19.6%) (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONES: La infiltración con levobupivacaína es segura y efectiva en la reducción del dolor postoperatorio, aunque esto no conlleva una menor estancia hospitalaria y no influye en los resultados de CVRS, reincorporación laboral o satisfacción del paciente.
Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Levobupivacaína , Humanos , Anestésicos Locais , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/epidemiologia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
Hip fracture surgeries are challenging, with postoperative pain management being a critical component of patient care. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of Pericapsular nerve group block (PENGB) and fascia iliac compartment block (FICB) in postoperative wound pain management for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The study followed the PRISMA guidelines and was structured around the PICO framework. Comprehensive searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were limited to RCTs comparing the effectiveness of PENGB and FICB in adult patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Key outcomes included pain control effectiveness, safety, and complication incidence. The quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics, and meta-analysis effect values were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effect models, depending on the degree of heterogeneity. The search identified 1095 articles, with 5 studies meeting inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that PENGB and FICB were comparable in managing postoperative pain and opioid consumption. However, PENGB significantly reduced the incidence of quadriceps muscle weakness (RR = 0.12, p < 0.05) and did not increase the risk of PONV (RR = 1.36, p = 0.51), suggesting its advantage in maintaining motor function without adding to PONV complications. No significant publication bias was detected. PENGB is comparable to FICB in pain and opioid consumption management after hip fracture surgeries. Its significant benefit lies in reducing the incidence of quadriceps muscle weakness, facilitating better postoperative mobility. Additionally, PENGB does not increase the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, underlining its suitability for comprehensive postoperative care in hip fracture patients.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Manejo da Dor , Adulto , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Nervo Femoral , Fáscia , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Fraturas do Quadril/complicações , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Postpartum depression (PPD) seriously impairs the physical and mental health of mothers and their offspring, so how to prevent the occurrence of PPD has essential significance. Esketamine is a common general anesthetic that produces rapid and sustained antidepressant effects. However, the efficacy and safety of perioperative esketamine administration for PPD prevention remain uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the effect of perioperative intravenous esketamine on PPD. Randomized controlled trials were included. The primary outcome was the prevalence of PPD and postpartum Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores and esketamine-related adverse effects. Seven studies included 669 patients treated with esketamine and 619 comparisons. Esketamine could effectively reduce EPDS scores and the incidence of PPD after cesarean section. Even at 42 days postpartum, the incidence of PPD was still significantly lower in the esketamine group. Esketamine did not increase the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, dizziness, and drowsiness. In the esketamine low-dose subgroup, postoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly lower in the esketamine group. The two groups had no significant difference in postoperative pain scores. In conclusion, using esketamine during the perioperative period can reduce the incidence of PPD without increasing adverse effects.
Assuntos
Depressão Pós-Parto , Ketamina , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Depressão Pós-Parto/prevenção & controle , Depressão Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/complicações , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a serious complication following anaesthesia and surgery and significantly influences postoperative outcome especially in the elderly population. Intraoperative music and positive suggestions influence postoperative outcomes by attenuating analgesic demand and increasing patient satisfaction. AIMS: Here, we examined the effect of intraoperative music and positive suggestions on the development of POD in aged patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure under general anaesthesia. METHODS: For this randomized placebo-controlled study, eligible patients without cognitive deficit, indicated by a MMSE < 10 points, were anesthetized using remifentanil and sevoflurane. Anaesthetic depth was guide with bispectral index. An audiotape with positive suggestions was applied from a MP3 player via headphones. POD, pain and PONV was assessed. CAM-ICU and Nu-DESC were done twice daily for the first 5 days. RESULTS: Of 140 patients 118 patients could be analysed (57 male, 80.6 ± 5.1 years). POD was diagnosed in 16 patients (12.7%). POD was significantly more often observed in male (12, 21.1%) than in female (4, 6.6%, p = 0.02) and in patients with a low MMSE (23.6 ± 4.5 vs. 26.8 ± 2.8, p = 0.001). Anaesthetic depth did not influence the incidence of POD. Intraoperative music and suggestions did not affect the rate of POD, pain, analgesic requirement or PONV. DISCUSSION: In patients undergoing TAVR male sex and low MMSE scoring are associated with an increase in POD. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative music and positive suggestions do not influence the incidence of POD in this patient group. STUDY REGISTRATION: DRKS: 00024444, start of registration: 4.02.202, final registration: 17.09.2021.
Assuntos
Anestésicos , Delírio , Delírio do Despertar , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Delírio do Despertar/prevenção & controle , Delírio/etiologia , Delírio/prevenção & controle , Delírio/epidemiologia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Dor , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been associated with a reduction in opioid consumption and a hastening in recovery in abdominal surgery. However, their impact on laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study is to evaluate opioid consumption and other relevant outcome measures before and after implementation of a unique LDN ERAS protocol. METHODS: 244 LDN patients were included in this retrospective cohort study. Forty-six underwent LDN prior to implementation of ERAS, whereas 198 patients received ERAS perioperative care. The primary outcome was daily oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption averaged over the entire postoperative stay. Due to removal of preoperative oral morphine from the protocol partway through the study period, the ERAS group was further subdivided into morphine recipients and non-recipients for subgroup analysis. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), length of stay, pain scores, and other relevant measures. RESULTS: ERAS donors consumed significantly fewer average daily OMEs than Pre-ERAS donors (21.5 vs. 37.6, respectively; p < .0001). There were no statistically significant differences in OME consumption between morphine recipients and non-recipients. The ERAS group experienced less PONV (44.4% requiring one or more rescue antiemetic postoperatively, vs. 60.9% of Pre-ERAS donors; p = .008). CONCLUSIONS: A protocol pairing lidocaine and ketamine with a comprehensive approach to preoperative PO intake, premedication, intraoperative fluid management and postoperative pain control is associated with reduced opioid consumption in LDN.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Derivados da Morfina/uso terapêutico , Tempo de InternaçãoRESUMO
Intraoperative use of glucocorticoids is effective for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis and can also provide early postoperative analgesic effects, but the consequences for chronic post-surgical pain are debatable. In a secondary analysis of the large pragmatic Perioperative Administration of Dexamethasone and Infection trial (n=8478), the primary outcome of pain at the surgical wound at 6 months after surgery was increased in subjects receiving dexamethasone 8 mg i.v. for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, a dose not associated with the detrimental effect of surgical site infection in the original study. In contrast, a more detailed assessment of chronic post-surgical pain after exclusion of patients with preoperative pain at the surgical site showed no differences with or without intraoperative dexamethasone regarding chronic post-surgical pain characteristics (intensity and neuropathic features). Because of several confounding factors especially regarding surgical details, these unexpected findings call for more well-designed studies about the potential risk of intraoperative treatments, such as glucocorticoids, on late post-surgical pain.
Assuntos
Antieméticos , Glucocorticoides , Humanos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológico , Antieméticos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Postoperative complications after craniotomy for brain tumors include pain, nausea/vomiting, and infection. A standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is not widely accepted for this common neurosurgical procedure. Few studies have explored its application. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases was performed between January 1992 and March 2023. Original studies that implemented an ERAS protocol for patients that underwent craniotomy for brain tumors were included. The following variables were evaluated: hospital length of stay (LOS), postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis, non-opioid analgesia, and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 1309 patients met inclusion criteria, including ten randomized controlled trials, one nonrandomized controlled trial, and one quality control study. Most frequently assessed metrics included hospital LOS, PONV prophylaxis, and non-opioid analgesia. A significant reduction in postoperative LOS was observed in 7 studies with ERAS or ERAS components. ERAS was significantly associated with pain reduction on the visual analog scale and verbal numerical rating scale (n=8). Non-opioid analgesia in ERAS improved postoperative pain control (n=4) and decreased the duration of pain (n=1). Three of six studies found no difference in PONV in ERAS vs. control. No studies reported an increase in postoperative complications using ERAS vs. control. One study showed greater patient satisfaction at 30-day follow-up with improved QOL. CONCLUSION: Implementing ERAS protocol may enhance outcomes and quality of life in patients with moderate evidence for improved recovery in those undergoing craniotomy for brain tumors.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Craniotomia , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/complicações , Craniotomia/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The ideal perioperative oxygen concentration is controversial and study results are inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: Current knowledge on the beneficial and adverse effects of perioperative hyperoxia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Narrative review RESULTS: Perioperative hyperoxia is unlikely to increase the incidence of atelectasis, pulmonary or cardiovascular complications or mortality. Few and small potential beneficial effects, such as reduction of surgical wound infections or postoperative nausea and vomiting have been demonstrated. According to the current state of evidence, it is recommended to avoid perioperative hyperoxia and to aim for normoxia instead.
Assuntos
Hiperóxia , Atelectasia Pulmonar , Humanos , Hiperóxia/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/complicações , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Pulmão , Atelectasia Pulmonar/complicaçõesRESUMO
The transversus thoracis muscle plane (TTMP) block provides effective analgesia in cardiac surgery patients. The aim of this study was to assess whether bilateral TTMP blocks can reduce the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement. A group of 103 patients were randomly divided into the TTM group (n = 52) and the PLA (placebo) group (n = 51). The primary endpoint was the incidence of POCD at 1 week after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included a reduction of intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) >20% from baseline, intraoperative and postoperative sufentanil consumption, length of stay in the ICU, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time to first faeces, postoperative pain at 24 h after surgery, time to extubation and the length of hospital stay. Interleukin (IL)-6, TNF-α, S-100ß, insulin, glucose and insulin resistance were measured at before induction of anaesthesia, 1, 3and 7 days after surgery. The MoCA scores were significantly lower and the incidence of POCD decreased significantly in TTM group compared with PLA group at 7 days after surgery. Perioperative sufentanil consumption, the incidence of PONV and intraoperative MAP reduction >20% from baseline, length of stay in the ICU, postoperative pain at 24 h after surgery, time to extubation and the length of hospital stay were significantly decreased in the TTM group. Postoperatively, IL-6, TNF-α, S-100ß, HOMA-IR, insulin, glucose levels increased and the TTM group had a lower degree than the PLA group at 1, 3 and 7 days after surgery. In summary, bilateral TTMP blocks could improve postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Insulinas , Complicações Cognitivas Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Sufentanil/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Cognitivas Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa , Subunidade beta da Proteína Ligante de Cálcio S100 , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Glucose , Músculos , PoliésteresRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a major complication of neuraxial anesthesia. PDPH usually occurs after Caesarean section in obstetric patients. The efficacy of prophylactic pharmacological therapies remains controversial. METHODS: Seven pharmacological therapies (aminophylline (AMP), dexamethasone, gabapentin/pregabalin (GBP/PGB), hydrocortisone, magnesium, ondansetron (OND), and propofol (PPF)), were studied in this Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of PDPH within 7 days. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of PDPH at 24 and 48 h postoperatively, the severity of headache in PDPH patients (24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). RESULTS: Twenty-two randomized controlled trials with 4,921 pregnant women (2,723 parturients received prophylactic pharmacological therapies) were included. The analyses demonstrated that PPF, OND, and AMP were efficient in decreasing the cumulative incidence of PDPH during the follow-up period compared to the placebo group (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.70; OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.87; OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.84, respectively). PPF and OND had the lower incidence of PONV compared to the placebo group (OR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.30; and OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.63). No significant difference in other outcomes was found among different therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on available data, PPF, OND, and AMP may have better efficacy in decreasing the incidence of PDPH compared to the placebo group. No significant side effects were revealed. Better-designed studies are requested to verify these conclusions.
Assuntos
Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural , Propofol , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural/etiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural/prevenção & controle , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural/epidemiologia , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/prevenção & controle , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Metanálise em Rede , Teorema de Bayes , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Ondansetron/uso terapêutico , Propofol/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) employ combined approaches to achieve postoperative analgesia. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a locoregional anaesthetic technique that may reduce postoperative pain. AIMS: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic- versus ultrasound-guided TAP block in LCS. METHODS: Databases were searched for relevant articles from inception until March 2022. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared laparoscopic (LTB) versus ultrasound-guided (UTB) TAP blocks in LCS were included. The primary outcome was narcotic consumption at 24 h postoperatively, whilst secondary outcomes included pain scores at 24 h postoperatively, operative time, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and complication rates. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. RESULTS: Three RCTs were included capturing 219 patients. Studies were clinically heterogenous. On random effects analysis, LTB was associated with significantly lower narcotic consumption (SMD - 0.30 mg, 95% CI = - 0.57 to - 0.03, p = 0.03) and pain scores (SMD - 0.29, 95% CI = - 0.56 to - 0.03, p = 0.03) at 24 h. However, there were no differences in operative time (SMD - 0.09 min, 95% CI = - 0.40 to 0.22, p = 0.56), PONV (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.36 to 2.65, p = 0.96) or complication (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 0.64 to 2.64, p = 0.47) rates. CONCLUSIONS: LTB is associated with significantly less narcotic usage and pain at 24 h postoperatively but similar PONV, operative time and complication rates, compared to UTB. However, the data were inconsistent, and our findings require further investigation. LTB obviates the need for ultrasound devices whilst also decreasing procedure logistical complexity.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Colorretal , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/epidemiologia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Músculos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Entorpecentes , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To compare impact of different anesthesia techniques on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Both general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia/epidural anesthesia can be used for lumbar spine surgery. There is still much controversy that which anesthesia technique is much more suitable for lumbar spine surgery with less complications, general anesthesia or regional anesthesia. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), PubMed, and Cochrane library for randomized controlled trials and independent reviewers assessed eligibility for included studies. Primary outcomes included incidences of intraoperative hypertension, hypotension, tachycardia, and bradycardia. Secondary outcomes included postoperative analgesic requirement, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), headache, urinary retention, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials consisting of 733 adult patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery were included. Spinal anesthesia/epidural anesthesia group had significant lower incidences of intraoperative hypertension [odds ratio (OR), 0.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.08-0.38; P <0.00001; I2 =0.0%] and tachycardia (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.79; P =0.006; I2 =0.0%), analgesic requirement in postanesthesia care unit (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08-0.22; P <0.00001; I2 =0.0%), PONV within 24 hours after surgery (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.16-0.46; P <0.00001; I2 =6.0%), and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (mean difference, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.18; P <0.00001; I2 =32.0%). There were no significant differences in incidences of intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia, PONV in postanesthesia care unit, analgesic requirement, urinary retention, and headache within 24 hours after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Low to moderate quality of evidence revealed that patient undergoing lumbar spine surgery might benefit from spinal or epidural anesthesia.
Assuntos
Anestesia Epidural , Raquianestesia , Hipertensão , Hipotensão , Retenção Urinária , Adulto , Humanos , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/etiologia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Bradicardia/complicações , Retenção Urinária/complicações , Anestesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Hipotensão/etiologia , Analgésicos , Hipertensão/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study analysed whether local anaesthetic wound catheter infiltration (LA-WCI) as an adjunct to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) provides superior outcomes compared to IV-PCA alone following liver resection. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted for randomised control trials (RCTs) comparing LA-WCI with IV-PCA(LA-WCI group) versus IV-PCA alone (IV-PCA group). PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles. RESULTS: Six RCTs with a total of 440 patients were included. Opioid use in the initial 48 h was less in the LA-WCI group [MD -21.27 mg (-39.39,-3.15), p = 0.02]. Pain scores were lower in the LA-WCI group at rest at POD0 (post-operative day 0)6-8 h (p = 0.0009), POD1AM(p = 0.01), POD1PM(p = 0.02) and POD2 (p = 0.0006), and exertion at POD0 0-2 h (p = 0.05), POD1AM(p = 0.03), POD1PM(p = 0.03), POD2 (p = 0.03) and POD3 (p = 0.01). LA-WCI group had reduced length of hospital stay [MD -1.32 days (-2.23,-0.40),p = 0.005], time to ambulation [MD -5.94 h (-8.47,-3.42),p = 0.00001] and incidence of nausea and vomiting (PONV) [OR 0.17 (0.07,0.43),p = 0.0002]. No differences were observed in length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay or incidence of surgical site infections. DISCUSSION: LA-WCI as an adjunct to opiate IV-PCA post-hepatectomy reduces opioid use, pain scores at multiple time points at rest and exertion, length of hospital stay, time to ambulation and PONV. However, LA-WCI use does not alter length of ICU stay or incidence of wound infection.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Anestésicos Locais , Humanos , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Catéteres/efeitos adversos , Fígado/cirurgiaRESUMO
Background: The combination of the adductor canal block (ACB) and the infiltration of anesthetic solution into the interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (iPACK) has become increasingly used to augment rapid recovery protocols in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, its efficacy in comparison with periarticular anesthetic injection (PAI) alone has yet to be evaluated. Hence, we conducted a retrospective study to compare PAI and ACB + iPACK for controlling pain after TKA. Methods: Propensity scores, incorporating American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, body mass index, age, and sex, were used to match the ACB + iPACK group with the PAI group. All patients received the identical surgical technique and postoperative care. Outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, morphine consumption, knee flexion angle, straight leg raising (SLR), postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV), and length of stay (LOS) after the surgery. Results: After matching by propensity score, there were 49 patients with comparable demographic data in each group. The VAS and morphine requirements of the PAI and ACB + iPACK groups were not different during the first 48 hours after TKA. At 72 hours postoperatively, the VAS of the ACB + iPACK was 0.97 higher than that of the PAI group (p = 0.020). Knee flexion angle, SLR, PONV, and LOS were not significantly different between groups. No procedure-related complications were identified in either group. Conclusions: The anesthesiologist-administered ACB + iPACK was as effective as surgeon-administered PAI in controlling pain in the first 48 hours after TKA. However, the ACB + iPACK group had higher intensity of pain than did the PAI group at 72 hours after TKA.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Bloqueio Nervoso , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Anestésicos Locais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos OpioidesRESUMO
PURPOSE: Regional anesthesia (RA) is considered as a "minimally invasive technique" to achieve anesthesia. To assess the feasibility and the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy in regional anesthesia from the point of view of the surgeon, anesthesiologist and patient. METHODS: A retrospective search was performed to identify patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy under RA from April 2020 to September 2021. Five patients affected by benign gynecological disease (atypical endometrial hyperplasia or uterine leiomyomas) were included. RESULTS: The postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting (PONV) and the antiemetic/analgesic intake were evaluated. Postoperative surgical and anesthesiological variables were recorded. Duration of surgery was 84 ± 4.18 and no conversion to GA was required. According to VAS score, the postoperative pain during the whole observation time was less than 4 (median). A faster resumption of bowel motility (≤ 9 h) and patient's mobilization (≤ 4 h) were observed as well as a low incidence of post-operative nausea and vomit. Early discharge and greater patient's satisfaction were recorded. Intraoperatively pain score was assessed on Likert scale during all the stages of laparoscopy in RA, with only 2 patients complaining scarce pain (= 2) at pneumoperitoneum. CONCLUSION: RA showed to have a great impact on surgical stress and to guarantee a quicker recovery without compromising surgical results. RA technique could be a viable option for patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Assuntos
Anestesia , Laparoscopia , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Anestesia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
The effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative agitation of patients with craniocerebral injury was investigated based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the sparse reconstruction algorithm. Sixty patients with craniocerebral injury who underwent tracheal intubation and craniotomy hematoma removal under general anesthesia in hospital were selected as the research objects. Patients were randomly and averagely divided into the normal saline group (group A) and the dexmedetomidine (DEX) group (group B). DEX was added to patients in group A during anesthesia. Other operations in group B were the same as those in group A, where DEX needed to be used was replaced by an equal amount of the normal saline. All patients received the MRI examination, and the images were processed by using the sparse reconstruction algorithm. After the surgery, some indexes, such as hemodynamics (mean arterial pressure (MAP) and hear rate (HR)), the Riker sedation agitation score, the Ramsay sedation score, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score were recorded and compared. The results showed that the MRI image quality processed by sparse reconstruction algorithm was observably improved. After reconstruction, the sharpness of the image was significantly improved, and the distinction between lesions and tissues was also increased. The Riker sedation agitation score and the incidence of agitation in group A were greatly lower than those in group B (16% VS 76%, P < 0.05). The Ramsay sedation score of group A was manifestly higher than that of group B. The cases of postoperative nausea, vomiting, chills, delirium, and bradycardia in group A were 2, 1, 1, 0, and 1, respectively. The cases of postoperative nausea, vomiting, chills, delirium, and bradycardia in group B were 3, 9, 6, 5, and 0, respectively. The cases of chills and delirium in group A were observably less than those in group B (P < 0.05). In conclusion, based on the sparse reconstruction algorithm, the MRI technology and DEX had high adoption value in preventing postoperative agitation of patients with craniocerebral injury. Compared with group B, the hemodynamics of patients in group A was more stable.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Delírio , Dexmedetomidina , Algoritmos , Anestesia Intravenosa/efeitos adversos , Bradicardia/complicações , Calafrios/complicações , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/complicações , Delírio/etiologia , Delírio/prevenção & controle , Dexmedetomidina/farmacologia , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Solução SalinaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Dexmedetomidine has been introduced in emergence coughing, agitation, and shivering prevention. This study aimed to investigate the optimal dose of dexmedetomidine for emergence cough prophylaxis. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blinded, and prospective trial, 356 patients scheduled for an endovascular interventional procedure were randomly assigned to 0.3 (D 0.3), 0.4 (D 0.4), 0.5 (D 0.5), and 0.6 (D 0.6) µg·kg-1·h-1 dexmedetomidine rate, or saline control (C), from anesthesia induction until the end of surgery. The primary outcomes measured were cough grade and frequency. Additionally, groups were compared according to mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, agitation, shivering, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), extubation time, sedation scores, and postoperative first night sleep quality (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were included in the analysis. The respective incidences of D 0.3, D 0.4, and D 0.5 versus C group were: 78.6%, 68.6%, 53.4% and 42.9% vs 89.7% for cough (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001 between group D 0.4, D 0.5 and D 0.6 vs C, respectively); 30%, 27.1%, 20.5%, 15.7% vs 44.1% for agitation (p = 0.04, p = 0.003, and p < 0.001 between group D 0.4, D 0.5 and D 0.6 vs C, respectively); 8.6%, 7.1%, 6.8%, 5.7% vs 22.1% for shivering (p = 0.027, p = 0.013, p = 0.01, and p = 0.01 between D 0.3, D 0.4, D 0.5 and D 0.6 vs C, respectively); and 52.9%, 57.1%, 42.5%, 44.3% vs 61.8% for poor sleep quality (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04 between group D 0.5 and D 0.6 vs C, respectively). D 0.4, D 0.5 and D 0.6 showed lower MAP during extubation, compared with the C group. Also, D 0.5 and D 0.6 presented a slight delay in extubation (3.1 and 3.3 min longer than C; p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). Meanwhile, the frequency of atropine, vasopressor administration, PONV and dizziness were similar to the control. CONCLUSIONS: Both 0.5 and 0.6 µg·kg-1·h-1 dexmedetomidine infusion rates effectively mitigated emergence coughing with prolonged extubation time, besides sleep disturbance. D 0.4, D 0.5, and D 0.6 reduced agitation and sustained hemodynamic stability. Finally, the four doses applied were effective in shivering attenuation.
Assuntos
Dexmedetomidina , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Tosse/epidemiologia , Tosse/etiologia , Tosse/prevenção & controle , Dexmedetomidina/farmacologia , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/induzido quimicamente , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Introduction: post-operative laryngeal pain (POLP) is frequent and embarrassing. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of endotracheal tube balloon (ETB) inflation with alkalinized lidocaine in the prevention of the POLP. Methods: we conducted a prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized study including patients undergoing general anesthesia with tracheal intubation (OTI) with an expected duration of less than 240 min. Patients were divided into two equivalent groups: lidocaine (GL) group: patients with ETB inflated with alkaline lidocaine and the control group (GT): patients whose ETB was inflated with normal saline solution. The primary endpoint was the incidence of POLP in the first 24 hours after surgery and the secondary endpoint was the incidence of cough, dysphonia and postoperative vomiting, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the first 24 hours after surgery. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software version 25. The difference was considered significant when p< 0.05. Results: the study included 60 patients randomized into 2 groups of 30 patients each. Both groups were comparable with regard to their demographic and anesthetic criteria. ETB inflation with alkalinized lidocaine reduced the incidence of POLP, cough, dysphonia and PONV. No cases of balloon rupture or lidocaine toxicity were reported. Conclusion: ETB inflation with alkaline lidocaine prevents POLP.
Assuntos
Disfonia , Faringite , Anestésicos Locais , Tosse/epidemiologia , Tosse/etiologia , Tosse/prevenção & controle , Método Duplo-Cego , Rouquidão/etiologia , Humanos , Intubação Intratraqueal/efeitos adversos , Lidocaína , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Faringite/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Cateteres UrináriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this pediatric study of otologic surgery was to analyze factors for success of outpatient management. The secondary objective was to study unscheduled postoperative consultations and readmissions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study analyzed clinical characteristics and procedures in consecutive children undergoing major ear surgery over a 3-year period in a teaching hospital. The study followed STROBE recommendations. RESULTS: We included 214 day-cases from a total population of 271 children. Median age was 109±44months (9years) [range: 8-196months (16years)]. In 57% of cases, the procedure was performed without mastoidectomy: 84 myringoplasties and 37 tympanoplasties. In 43% of cases, mastoidectomy was associated: 47 cochlear implants and 46 closed tympanoplasties for cholesteatoma. Ninety-five percent of day-surgeries were successful; in 5%, there was crossover to pediatric ENT department admission, for the following symptoms: postoperative nausea and vomiting in 3 cases, pain in 3, and late awakening in 5. Univariate analysis showed a relationship between failure and age under 36months (P=0.002). There were no readmissions. There were unscheduled consultations in 3% of cases: for minor otorrhagia in 5 cases and uncomplicated otorrhea in 2. CONCLUSION: Major otologic surgery in children is compatible with day-surgery. Younger patients, usually candidates for cochlear implantation, had greater risk of crossover to conventional admission. In this age group, scheduling should be earlier in the morning, with rigorous postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.
Assuntos
Colesteatoma da Orelha Média , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Criança , Colesteatoma da Orelha Média/cirurgia , Humanos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Timpanoplastia/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of analgesia and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) of several widely used clinical treatments for postoperative analgesia following abdominal surgery through network meta-analysis (NMA) based on published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: This NMA was registered on PROSPERO as CRD 42020169606. Primary outcomes were pain scores (visual analog scale) and accumulative opioid consumption, and secondary outcomes assessed the incidence of PONV at 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 215 RCTs and 15,114 patients were identified in this NMA. In comparison with placebo, use of a preoperative paravertebral block (mean: -12.63, 95% CI: -21.12 to -4.13), continuous wound infiltration (mean: -9.68, 95%CI: -13.15 to -6.22) and postoperative wound infiltration (mean: -6.34, 95%CI: -10.59 to -2.08) had significantly lower pain scores, less opioid consumption (mean: -2.00, 95%CI: -3.52 to -0.48; mean: -1.34, 95%CI: -1.87 to -0.81; mean: -1.41, 95%CI: -2.07 to -0.74, respectively) and lower incidence of PONV (OR: 0.30, 95%CI: 0.13 to 0.67; OR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.24 to 0.98; OR: 0.55, 95%CI: 0.34 to 0.89, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from our work provide evidence that preoperative paravertebral block was superior to continuous or postoperative wound infiltration to provide postoperative analgesia, nausea and vomiting after abdominal surgery.