Evaluating outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn vs multiple non-staghorn renal stones: a 10-year study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL) for staghorn stones and multiple large non-staghorn stones. METHODS: The records of 886 patients who underwent csPCNL from September 2009 to October 2019 were considered. Out of them, 201 cases met the eligibility criteria and they were divided into three groups: 63 cases of staghorn, 68 cases of multiple medium (20 mm < diameter ≤ 30 mm) non-staghorn and 70 cases of multiple large non-staghorn (> 30 mm) stones. Almost all outcomes and stone-related factors were analyzed. RESULTS: There was not any significant difference regarding age, body mass index, history of urinary tract infection, transfusion rate, complication rate, pre and post-surgery serum creatinine, hemoglobin drop and total hospital stay between the three groups. Stone free rate was 98.5% in multiple medium group, 97.1% in multiple large group and 84.1% in staghorn group (P = 0.001). The operation duration was significantly shorter for the multiple medium group (P < 0.001) but it was not significantly different between the multiple large non-staghorn and staghorn group. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that almost all outcomes were not significantly different between the three groups (especially between staghorn and larger non-staghorn ones). These findings reveal that surgeons could choose csPCNL for treatment of staghorn stones and multiple large non-staghorn stones and consider staghorn stones as challenging as multiple large (especially diameter > 30 mm) non-staghorn stones.

The impact of nephrostomy balloon inflation volume on post percutaneous nephrolithotomy hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: the study aims to match different volumes of nephrostomy balloon inflation to point out the foremost effective volume size of post percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) bleeding control. METHODS: we have retrospectively reviewed "560" medical records of patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy between (the years 2017 and 2018) at Prince Hussein Urology Center. The Patients were divided into two teams, group-1 (a number of 280 patients) with nephrostomy balloon inflated concerning three ml and group-2 (a number of 280 patients) the balloon inflated concerning one ml. The preoperative and postoperative hematocrit, the operation duration, the stone size, the postoperative pain severity, the transfusion rate and the duration of hematuria between the two groups were compared during hospitalization. RESULTS: regarding patients with ages (between 18 and 68 years); the preoperative hematocrit (mean values ± SDs) was (40.35% ± 3.57) vs (39.95% ± 3.43) for groups-1 and 2, respectively; the p value=0.066. The postoperative hematocrit was (37.91% ± 3.96) vs (34.38 ± 2.78), respectively; the p value was (0.008); the blood transfusion rate was 11.2% vs 13.4% (the p value was 0.039), respectively. The Postoperative pain score was (4.93 ± 1.44) vs (3.89 ± 1.45) (the p value was 0.012), respectively. CONCLUSION: increasing the nephrostomy balloon volume to a "3cc" competes for a task to decrease bleeding which was found to be as a secure and considerable effective procedure-related factor. However, the disadvantage of this technique resulted in increasing the postoperative pain in patients undergoing such a procedure.

Endopyelotomy versus redo pyeoloplasty for management of failed pyeloplasty in children: A single center experience.

PURPOSE: We compared endopyelotomy to redo pyeloplasty for the treatment of failed pyeloplasty in children to identify factors that may have an impact on outcome and favor one procedure over the other. METHODS: Of 43 patients with recurrent UPJO, EP was performed in 27 and RP was performed in 16. Age, gender, side, presentation of secondary UPJO, hospital stay, complications and success rates were compared. Success was defined as radiographic relief of obstruction as determined by ultrasound or diuretic renography at latest follow-up. RESULTS: Mean (Range) patient age was 7.2 years (range 6 months to 17 years) in EP (group 1) while 7.4 (range 6 months to 17 years) in RP (group 2). EP technique consisted of retrograde cold-knife in 17 patients, retrograde holmium laser in 8 and antegrade cold-knife in 2. RP was performed in 16 patients. All the patients with failed EP had a stricture greater than 15 mm. Mean length of the narrowed ureteral segment was 17.8 mm in the failed EP group vs 10 mm in the successful group (p < 0.001). Mean Hospital stay was 1 day for the EP group and 5 days for the RP group (p < 0.001). Mean follow-up was 17 months (range 12 to 43) after EP and 21 months (12 to 51) after RP. There was no statistical significance between both groups regarding the postoperative degree of hydronephrosis, parenchymal thickness, split renal functions and renal drainage. The overall success was (86%); the success was nonsignificantly higher in RP (93.8%) vs (81.5%) in EP. CONCLUSION: In selected children, retrograde endopyelotomy is safe and may give comparable short-term outcomes as open redo pyeloplasty for correction of secondary UPJO after failed pyeloplasty. Narrowed ureteral segment greater than 15 mm and preoperative grade 4 hydronephrosis were factors significantly associated with a poor outcome after EP. A LEVEL-OF-EVIDENCE RATING FOR CLASSIFYING STUDY QUALITY: LEVEL III Retrospective comparative study.

Complications of Recognized and Unrecognized Iatrogenic Ureteral Injury at Time of Hysterectomy: A Population Based Analysis.

PURPOSE: Ureteral injury represents an uncommon but potentially morbid surgical complication. We sought to characterize the complications of iatrogenic ureteral injury and assess the effect of recognized vs delayed recognition on patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent hysterectomy were identified in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project California State Inpatient Database for 2007 to 2011. Ureteral injuries were identified and categorized as recognized-diagnosed/repaired on the day of hysterectomy and unrecognized-diagnosed/repaired postoperatively. We assessed the outcomes of 90-day hospital readmission as well as 1-year outcomes of nephrostomy tube placement, urinary fistula, acute renal failure, sepsis and overall mortality. The independent effects of recognized and unrecognized ureteral injuries were determined on multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Ureteral injury occurred in 1,753 of 223,872 patients (0.78%) treated with hysterectomy and it was unrecognized in 1,094 (62.4%). The 90-day readmission rate increased from a baseline of 5.7% to 13.4% and 67.3% after recognized and unrecognized injury, respectively. Nephrostomy tubes were required in 2.3% of recognized and 23.4% of unrecognized ureteral injury cases. Recognized and unrecognized ureteral injuries independently increased the risk of sepsis (aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.5 and 11.9, 95% CI 9.9-14.3) and urinary fistula (aOR 5.9, 95% CI 2.2-16 and 124, 95% CI 95.7-160, respectively). During followup unrecognized ureteral injury increased the odds of acute renal insufficiency (aOR 23.8, 95% CI 20.1-28.2) and death (1.4, 95% CI 1.03-1.9, p = 0032). CONCLUSIONS: Iatrogenic ureteral injury increases the risk of hospital readmission and significant, potentially life threatening complications. Unrecognized ureteral injury markedly increases these risks, warranting a high level of suspicion for ureteral injury and a low threshold for diagnostic investigation.

The Morbidity of Ureteral Strictures in Patients with Prior Ureteroscopic Stone Surgery: Multi-Institutional Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Nephrolithiasis is an increasingly common ailment in the United States. Ureteroscopic management has supplanted shockwave lithotripsy as the most common treatment of upper tract stone disease. Ureteral stricture is a rare but serious complication of stone disease and its management. The impact of new technologies and more widespread ureteroscopic management on stricture rates is unknown. We describe our experience in managing strictures incurred following ureteroscopy for upper tract stone disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records for patients managed at four tertiary care centers between December 2006 and October 2015 with the diagnosis of ureteral stricture following ureteroscopy for upper tract stone disease were retrospectively reviewed. Study outcomes included number and type (endoscopic, reconstructive, or nephrectomy) of procedures required to manage stricture. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with 40 ureteral strictures following URS for upper tract stone disease were identified. Thirty-five percent of patients had hydronephrosis or known stone impaction at the time of initial URS, and 20% of cases had known ureteral perforation at the time of initial URS. After stricture diagnosis, the mean number of procedures requiring sedation or general anesthesia performed for stricture management was 3.3 ± 1.8 (range 1-10). Eleven strictures (27.5%) were successfully managed with endoscopic techniques alone, 37.5% underwent reconstruction, 10% had a chronic stent/nephrostomy, and 10 (25%) required nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical morbidity of ureteral strictures incurred following ureteroscopy for stone disease can be severe, with a low success rate of endoscopic management and a high procedural burden that may lead to nephrectomy. Further studies that assess specific technical risk factors for ureteral stricture following URS are needed.

Should mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MiniPNL/Miniperc) be the ideal tract for medium-sized renal calculi (15-30 mm)?

INTRODUCTION: Reducing the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) tract size reduces the morbidity associated with the procedure. Prolonged procedure time is a concern. Modification in technique required is to fragment the stone into smaller particles and remove them using the vacuum cleaner effect. This prospective study compares the efficacy and morbidity of reducing the tract size from the standard 24-16.5 Fr for stones sized from 16 to 30 mm. METHODS: 123 patients were enrolled in this prospective study and distributed into 2 groups based on the tract size used (group A 16.5/17.5 Fr Miniperc, N = 61 and group B: 22/24 Fr standard PCNL, N = 62). Critical factors assessed were procedure time, fluoroscopy time, blood loss, pain score, stone clearance status and complications. RESULTS: Both the groups were comparable with respect to age, creatinine and stone size. The blood loss (hemoglobin and PCV drop) was significantly less for group A (p < 0.001). Both the groups were comparable with regards to the pain score (p > 0.05). Nephrostomy was placed in 3 patients in group A and 14 patients in group B (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the procedure time amongst the 2 groups. A total of 9 patients (4 in group A and 5 in group B) had residual fragments greater than 3 mm. CONCLUSION: The 16.5 Fr Miniperc tract offers lower morbidity in terms of blood loss and maintains stone clearance comparable to larger 24 Fr tract size. It should be the ideal size used for medium sized renal stones.

Persistence of Open Stone Surgery in the United States in the 21st Century.

INTRODUCTION: In the era of minimally invasive surgery, endoscopic and percutaneous interventions for urinary tract stones have become a mainstay, and the need for open stone surgery (OSS) has decreased. We sought to determine the contemporary incidence of OSS among urologists in the United States. METHODS: Case logs submitted for certification to the American Board of Urology from 2005 to 2015 were queried for Current Procedural Terminology codes relevant to OSS. Cases were analyzed for the associated practice type, practice area population, geographic region, provider subspecialty, and certifying status of the reporting urologist. RESULTS: A total of 334 cases of OSS were identified, with 73.4% performed by urologists self-identified as generalists. The most common subspecialists performing OSS were endourologists (12.3%). Most cases were done in the private practice setting (80.4%), and in practice areas with populations exceeding 1,000,000 (43.2%). OSS was more commonly reported by urologists applying for recertification than initial certification. Thirty open stone cases were reported each year on average, and there was no decrease in stone cases over time based on linear regression analysis (R2 = 0.06). OSS was most commonly performed in the Western Section of the American Urological Association (AUA) (25.1%) and least commonly performed in the Northeastern Section (1.5%). A chi-square analysis was performed, and the Western Section had a significantly higher number of OSSs than expected as its urologists represent only 17% of the total AUA membership (p < 0.01). The Northeastern Section comprises 7% of the AUA membership but only performed 1.5% of OSSs that were significantly lower than expected (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Domestic performance of OSS remains stable. It is unclear as to whether the majority of these cases could be served by less-invasive technologies or whether the volume represents a true nadir. Future work may be warranted to assess attitudes, training, and feasibility of minimally invasive stone management in areas where OSS is most common.