Initial diagnosis of insignificant cancer, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, atypical small acinar proliferation, and negative have the same rate of upgrade to a Gleason score of 7 or higher on repeat prostate biopsy.

Extended prostate needle core biopsies are standard of care for the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma. Subsequent biopsies may be performed for a variety of indications. Knowledge of biopsy characteristics indicating risk for progression may have utility to guide therapeutic management. Prostate needle core biopsies performed between 2008 and 2014 were reviewed. Patients with at least 1 subsequent biopsy were identified. Cases were categorized by worst initial diagnosis. Gleason ≤6 carcinoma was further classified as significant or insignificant with insignificant defined as follows: ≤2 cores with carcinoma, sites with ≤50% carcinoma, and unilateral carcinoma. A total of 329 men underwent repeat biopsies. Gleason ≤6 insignificant carcinoma, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and/or atypical small acinar proliferation, and negative biopsies had a similar rate of Gleason ≥7 upon repeat biopsy (16%, 17%, 14%; P = .91). Initial biopsy diagnoses of Gleason ≤6 significant carcinoma had a higher rate of Gleason ≥7 on repeat biopsy compared with initial biopsies of Gleason ≤6 insignificant carcinoma (39%, 16%; P = .003). Within initial diagnoses of Gleason ≤6, 1 core compared with more than 1 core positive had a lower rate of Gleason ≥7 on repeat biopsy (17%, 30%), although this difference was not significant (P = .08). An initial biopsy diagnosed as Gleason ≤6 insignificant carcinoma, HGPIN and/or atypical small acinar proliferation, or negative had a similar substantial risk of Gleason ≥7 carcinoma upon subsequent biopsy. Our findings support the continued stratification of Gleason ≤6 and thus the diagnostic workup of all atypical foci to provide an accurate, thorough number of involved cores.

Prognostic significance of epithelial/stromal caveolin-1 expression in prostatic hyperplasia, high grade prostatic intraepithelial hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma and its correlation with microvessel density.

Caveolin-1 may play a role in cancer development and progression. The aim was to record the expression and localization of caveolin-1 in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostatic carcinoma (PCa). Microvessel density was evaluated with CD34 immunostain. Correlations with known prognostic factors of PCa were recorded. Immunohistochemical expression of caveolin-1 and the MVD was evaluated in 65 cases; BPH (25), HGPIN (20) and PCa (20). Stromal caveolin-1expression was significantly higher in BPH than HGPIN and PCca. There was significant inverse relation between stromal caveolin-1 expression and extension to lymph node and seminal vesicle in carcinoma cases. Epithelial caveolin-1 was significantly higher in carcinomas than in BPH and HGPIN. Epithelial expression in carcinoma was significantly associated with preoperative PSA, Gleason score and lymph node extension. MVD was significantly higher in PCa than in BPH and HGPIN. There were significant relations between MVD and preoperative PSA, Gleason score, lymph node and seminal vesicle extension. Stromal caveolin-1 was associated with low MVD while epithelial caveolin-1 with high MVD. CONCLUSIONS: Caveolin-1 plays an important role in prostatic carcinogenesis and metastasis. Stromal expression of caveolin-1 in PCa is lowered in relation to BPH and HGPIN. In PCa; stromal caveolin-1 was associated with good prognostic parameters. Epithelial caveolin-1 is significantly increased in PCa than BPH and HGPIN. It is associated with clinically aggressive disease. Caveolin-1 may play a role in angiogenesis.

Advantages of single-puncture transperineal saturation biopsy of prostate: analysis of outcomes in 125 patients using our scheme.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic biopsy has improved prostate cancer detection. Although the new approach is superior, standard procedure is still useful in a cohort of patients in whom MRI is not available. The standard saturation biopsy technique is still debatable. We describe our technique and analyze its outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-five patients underwent saturation biopsy through a single transperineal access. Mean age was 64.73 year, mean PSA was 9.49 ng/ml, mean PSA density was 0.184, and mean prostate volume was 57.95 g. All patients underwent at least one previous prostatic biopsy: 24.8% of cases had diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation, 39.2% of cases had multifocal high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and 36% of cases had inflammation or benign prostatic hyperplasia. RESULTS: The detection rate was 38.4%. Prostate cancer occurred in 61.3% of patients with previous ASAP (p < 0.007). Cancer detection rate decreased with increasing number of previous biopsy and with increasing prostate volume (p < 0.001) and increased with increasing PSA density (p = 0.03). No major complications were reported. CONCLUSION: The traditional saturation biopsy may be useful when targeted biopsy cannot be used. Our technique is accurate for cancer detection. It can offer some advantages in comparison with other approaches.

The presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypia on prostate biopsy does not adversely affect prostatectomy outcomes for patients otherwise eligible for active surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if the presence of concomitant high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) or atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) on biopsy increases the risk of occult adverse pathology in patients otherwise suitable for active surveillance (AS). METHODS: Patients with D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer on ≥ 10-core biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy at our academic center were evaluated for eligibility for AS by either Epstein criteria or Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) criteria. Prostatectomy specimens of patients eligible for AS were compared to determine if the presence of clinical HGPIN or ASAP affected the primary outcomes of pathologic upstaging and Gleason score upgrading. RESULTS: Of 553 patients with low-risk prostate cancer, 400 patients (72.3%) met the MSKCC criteria, whereas only 170 patients (30.7%) met the Epstein criteria. HGPIN was present in approximately 32%, and ASAP in approximately 12%, of each AS cohort. On univariate and multivariate analyses, HGPIN and ASAP had no impact on the rate of upgrading and upstaging in either Epstein or MSKCC AS-eligible patients. Furthermore, the presence of HGPIN and ASAP had no impact on the 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSION: The presence of HGPIN or ASAP does not increase the risk of upgrading, upstaging, or adverse pathology at the time of prostatectomy for patients who meet the AS criteria. If otherwise suitable, HGPIN and ASAP should not impact the decision to choose AS. However, analysis of prospective AS trials is required to determine if HGPIN or ASAP impacts tumor progression once on AS.

Sixth joint meeting of J-CaP and CaPSURE--a multinational perspective on prostate cancer management and patient outcomes.

This report summarizes the presentations and discussions that took place at the Sixth Joint Meeting of J-CaP and CaPSURE held in San Francisco, USA, in August 2012. The J-CaP and CaPSURE Joint Initiative was established in 2007 with the objective of analyzing, reviewing, comparing and contrasting data for prostate cancer patients from Japan and the USA within the two important large-scale, longitudinal, observational databases-J-CaP and CaPSURE. Since this initial collaboration between teams in the USA and Japan, the initiative has now expanded to include representatives of other Asian countries, several of whom have either established or are planning their own national prostate cancer databases. Several key topics were considered at this Sixth Joint Meeting including the current status of the J-CaP and CaPSURE databases and opportunities for collaboration with the more recently developed Asian prostate cancer databases. The latest comparative data from J-CaP and CaPSURE regarding outcomes following androgen deprivation therapy and combined androgen blockade were also reviewed. The possibility of a global chemoprevention trial to investigate the influence of soy isoflavones on prostate cancer incidence was considered. In addition, the ongoing debate regarding the role of screening and the use of active surveillance as a treatment option in the USA was discussed. The collaborators agreed that sharing of data and treatment practices on a global scale would undoubtedly benefit the clinical management of prostate cancer patients worldwide.

In situ and intraductal epithelial proliferations of prostate: definitions and treatment implications. Part 2: intraductal carcinoma and ductal adenocarcinoma of prostate.

• High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is an intracellular proliferation of ductal epithelial cells. On its own, the presence of HGPIN does not warrant active intervention. • In contrast, intraductal carcinoma of prostate and prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma of prostate are markers of aggressive prostatic adenocarcinoma. • The presence of even small foci of these tumours on biopsy warrants immediate intervention, even in the absence of demonstrable invasive disease. • This second part of the review of in situ epithelial proliferations of the prostate looks at these conditions in more detail.

In situ and intraductal epithelial proliferations of prostate: definitions and treatment implications. Part 1: Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? In the era of extended biopsy sampling of the prostate, multifocal high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is associated with a significantly higher rate of cancer diagnosis than unifocal HGPIN or a benign diagnosis. In addition, the cancers that are subsequently diagnosed in men with HGPIN on their initial biopsy tend to be smaller, lower grade and more commonly organ-confined. This has led to a reappraisal of the need and timing of repeat biopsies. The present paper provides a series of recommendations on the optimal timing of repeat biopsies in men with HGPIN on biopsy, based on the current available evidence. This is the first of a two part series reviewing the nature and clinical significance of in situ cellular proliferations in the prostate gland. This first part examines prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), while the second part in the next supplement discusses intraductal carcinoma and ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate. PIN is a precursor lesion in the development of some forms of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. In the 1990 s, high-grade PIN (HGPIN) on biopsy was a significant predictor of carcinoma, but this was due to incomplete sampling with sextant biopsies. With more extensive sampling in the last decade, the likelihood of identifying cancer after a diagnosis of HGPIN is not significantly different from a benign diagnosis. In several recent studies, it is now recognised that multifocal HGPIN is a better predictor of cancer than unifocal HGPIN. Most cases of cancer will be detected in the vicinity of the HGPIN, but up to 40% of cancers will occur in different sextants. In assessing potential markers for carcinoma in men with HGPIN on biopsy, α-methylacyl coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR) has emerged as a promising diagnostic tool. HGPIN with strong staining for AMACR is associated with a higher rate of cancer detection in subsequent biopsies compared with AMACR-negative HGPIN. Also, AMACR positivity in HGPIN is more commonly seen adjacent to carcinoma, and this may provide guidance as to the site of future biopsies.

Activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin signalling pathway in prostate cancer and its association with patient clinicopathological characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the activation level of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling pathway in Chinese patients with prostate cancer, as this pathway is over-activated in many human cancers and is an attractive target for cancer therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used immunohistochemistry to investigate the activation level of five important markers of the mTOR pathway, including PTEN, p-Akt, p-mTOR, p-p70S6K and p-4E-BP1, in tissues from 182 patients with prostate cancer, 20 with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and 10 with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). The expression levels of these five markers were associated with patient clinical and pathological characteristics. RESULTS: Expression levels of p-Akt, p-mTOR, p-4E-BP1 and p-p70S6K were significantly higher in prostate cancer tissues than in BPH and HGPIN tissues. In 182 patients with prostate cancer the p-mTOR expression level significantly and positively correlated with its upstream p-Akt and downstream p-4E-BP1 and p-p70S6K expression levels. The cancer Gleason score was significantly correlated with p-Akt and p-mTOR expression level but not with p-4E-BP1 and p-p70S6K expression level. However, the p-4E-BP1 and p-p70S6K expression levels in primary cancer lesions were statistically significantly correlated with patient T stage and distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with prostate cancer have at least one component of the mTOR signalling pathway activated. The activation of the mTOR pathway might be involved in prostate cancer development and progression. The association between activation of mTOR pathway and patient clinicopathological variables suggested that not all patients are equally amenable to treatment strategies targeting the mTOR pathway.

Foamy gland microcarcinoma in needle prostatic biopsy.

Foamy gland carcinoma is an uncommon variant of prostatic carcinoma. Foamy microcarcinoma of the prostate has not been studied in detail in needle biopsy. We describe here useful criteria for the diagnosis of foamy gland microcarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy. We reviewed 6 cases of foamy gland microcarcinoma. All tumors measured less than 1 mm and involved less than 5% of the biopsied tissue. A range of 4 to 40 foamy neoplastic glands were found in the 6 tumors. The original diagnosis of foamy gland microcarcinoma was made in 3 cases. They were composed of 21 to 40 glands lined by cuboidal to columnar cells with abundant foamy cytoplasm and small picnotic nuclei. Infiltrating and nodular patterns were readily identified, and absence of basal cells was shown by cytokeratin stains. The remaining 3 cases were designated as atypical foamy glands and consisted of similar but fewer glands (4-20). The diagnosis of foamy gland microcarcinoma was not made because of lack of nucleomegaly and prominent nucleoli and because an infiltrating pattern was less apparent. Subsequent biopsies confirm the diagnosis of microcarcinoma. The number of glands lined by voluminous foamy cells with hyperchromatic nuclei, an infiltrating pattern, and the absence of basal cells with high-molecular-weight cytokeratin were the most useful features in the diagnosis of foamy microcarcinoma. The presence of few atypical foamy glands in needle biopsy requires detailed analysis because they may represent foamy gland microcarcinoma.

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasialike ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a clinicopathologic study of 28 cases.

Most of the prostatic ductal adenocarcinomas of the prostate are characterized by cribriform and/or papillary architecture lined by columnar pseudostratified malignant epithelium. We report 28 cases of ductal adenocarcinomas on needle biopsy and transurethral resection of prostate closely resembling high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) composed of simple glands with flat, tufting, or micropapillary architecture. The mean age of the patients was 68 years (range, 50 to 91 y). Prostate specific antigen serum level at diagnosis ranged from 1.2 to 12.1 ng/mL. Treatment included radical prostatectomy (n=9), hormone therapy (n=7), radiotherapy (n=5), and cryotherapy (n=1). Three patients had recent biopsies without information on treatment and 3 patients were lost to follow-up after diagnosis. The number of cores involved by tumor in each case ranged from 1 to 18, with more than 1 core involved in 13 cases. Flat was the most common pattern (42%), followed by tufted (41%), and micropapillary (17%) (some with more than 1 pattern). Fourteen cases revealed segments of dilated gland on the edge of the biopsies, suggesting a large gland component. In radical prostatectomies, tumor was primarily composed of small (25%), medium (17%), or cystically dilated (58%) cancer glands, with all cases demonstrating a mixture of different gland sizes. Cytologically, tumors were characterized by tall columnar atypical cells, basally located nuclei, and amphophilic cytoplasm. The tumors lacked marked pleomorphism, necrosis, solid areas, cribriform formation, or true papillary fronds. Immunohistochemically, alpha-methyl acyl coenzyme-A racemase staining was seen in 93% of cases, with the majority showing strong and diffuse staining. No basal cells were present on p63 and/or high molecular weight cytokeratin staining. In the radical prostatectomy specimens, tumor volumes ranged from a small focus (less than 0.01 cm3) to 1.2 cm3. Concurrent conventional acinar Gleason score 6 adenocarcinomas were seen in 6 of the 9 radical prostatectomy cases, in all cases as separate nodules from the PIN-like ductal adenocarcinomas. Only one of the PIN-like ductal adenocarcinomas at radical prostatectomy had extraprostatic extension, which was focal. PIN-like ductal adenocarcinoma differs from HGPIN by the presence of cystically dilated glands, a greater predominance of flat architecture, and less frequently prominent nucleoli. Verification often requires the immunohistochemical documentation of the absence of basal cells in numerous atypical glands. Although usual ductal adenocarcinoma is considered comparable to Gleason score 8, PIN-like ductal adenocarcinoma was accompanied by Gleason score 6 acinar carcinoma and behaved similar to Gleason score 6 acinar cancer. Recognition of this entity is critical to differentiate it from both HGPIN and conventional ductal adenocarcinoma.

Contemporary clinical management of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is a premalignant lesion associated with increased risk of coexistent cancer or delayed progression to carcinoma. Extended biopsy schemes have improved the ability to rule out concurrent cancers, increased the detection of isolated HGPIN and removed the routine necessity for immediate repeat biopsy. As the natural history of HGPIN is poorly defined, and no non-invasive marker allows monitoring of progression to cancer, routine delayed interval biopsy should be considered in all patients. In this article, we present an overview of the existing literature on HGPIN and a proposed strategy for clinical management.

Unsolicited written comments: an untapped data source.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To explore methods for analysis of unsolicited comments written on forced-choice surveys related to health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among men treated for prostate cancer. DATA SOURCES: Unsolicited comments written on surveys administered as part of a study investigating HRQOL for men receiving surgery, external beam radiation therapy, or brachytherapy for prostate cancer were abstracted from the parent study database at baseline (pretreatment) and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment. DATA SYNTHESIS: Researchers read through all of the comments for each timepoint. They coded each comment for the main idea expressed by each statement in each written comment. They grouped codes into categories and counted the number of participants writing comments in each category at each timepoint. They were displayed graphically. Of 375 subjects completing surveys, 87% wrote unsolicited comments on at least one of the surveys. Thirty-four codes were derived from 3,175 comments. Grouping of the codes resulted in eight categories. CONCLUSIONS: Analyzing unsolicited comments proved to be feasible and useful in revealing additional information about respondent concerns. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: This type of analysis has value in its ability to reveal patterns in previously unused data that then can be used to explain or deepen survey findings or suggest avenues for more in-depth qualitative or quantitative nursing investigation.

Diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma after therapy.

CONTEXT: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer of men in the United States and is third only to lung and colon cancer as a cause of cancer death. In 2006, 27,350 Americans will die of prostate cancer, and 234,460 new cases will be diagnosed. Treatment changes in the benign and cancerous prostate create diagnostic challenges in pathologic interpretation, particularly in needle biopsy specimens and in evaluation of extraprostatic metastases. OBJECTIVE: To summarize therapy-related pathologic findings in the prostate with emphasis on recognition of treated adenocarcinoma. DATA SOURCES: Extensive review of published literature and the authors' experience. CONCLUSIONS: Following therapy for prostate cancer, it is critical that the clinician provide the pertinent history of androgen deprivation or radiation therapy to assist the pathologist in rendering the correct diagnosis.

Precursor lesions of prostate cancer.

Several morphological lesions have been proposed that may act as potential precursor lesions of prostate cancer. These are the morphologically distinct entities of focal atrophy or post-atrophic hyperplasia (PAH), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) or adenosis, and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). The diagnostic criteria of low-and high-grade PIN (LGPIN and HGPIN, respectively) and of lesions suspicious for cancer (LSC) have been established. In the present review, we present the current knowledge about the precursor lesions of prostate cancer. We focus on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical markers, and differential diagnosis of PIN. The similarities between HGPIN and prostate cancer are also discussed. Furthermore, potential markers and management strategies (that is, repeat biopsy, chemoprevention, radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy) are outlined along with updated recommendations.

La neoplasia prostática intraepitelial de alto grado. La perspectiva del patólogo / High degree prostatic intraepithelial cancer. The point of view of the pathologist

No disponible

Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care.

PURPOSE: We identified information critical for patient treatment on prostate needle biopsies diagnosed with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search was performed using the MEDLINE database and referenced lists of relevant studies to obtain articles addressing the significance of finding PIN or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma on needle biopsy. RESULTS: There were certain results concerning PIN. 1) Low grade PIN should not be documented in pathology reports due to poor interobserver reproducibility and a relatively low risk of cancer following re-biopsy. 2) The expected incidence of HGPIN on needle biopsy is between 5% and 8%. 3) Although the diagnosis of HGPIN is subjective, interobserver reproducibility for its diagnosis is fairly high among urological pathologists, and yet only moderate among pathologists without special expertise in prostate pathology. 4) The median risk recorded in the literature for cancer following the diagnosis of HGPIN on needle biopsy is 24.1%, which is not much higher than the risk reported in the literature for repeat biopsy following a benign diagnosis. 5) The majority of publications that compared the risk of cancer in the same study following a needle biopsy diagnosis of HGPIN to the risk of cancer following a benign diagnosis on needle biopsy show no differences between the 2 groups. 6) Clinical and pathological parameters do not help stratify which men with HGPIN are at increased risk for a cancer diagnosis. 7) A major factor contributing to the decreased incidence of cancer following a diagnosis of HGPIN on needle biopsy in the contemporary era is related to increased needle biopsy core sampling, which detects many associated cancers on initial biopsy, such that re-biopsy, even with good sampling, does not detect many additional cancers. 8) It is recommended that men do not need routine repeat needle biopsy within the first year following the diagnosis of HGPIN, while further studies are needed to confirm whether routine repeat biopsies should be performed several years following a HGPIN diagnosis on needle biopsy. There were certain results concerning atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma. 1) An average of 5% of needle biopsy pathology reports are diagnosed as atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma. 2) Cases diagnosed as atypical have the highest likelihood of being changed upon expert review and urologists should consider sending such cases for consultation in an attempt to resolve the diagnosis as definitively benign or malignant before subjecting the patient to repeat biopsy. 3) Ancillary techniques using basal cell markers and AMACR (alpha-methyl-acyl-coenzyme A racemase) can decrease the number of atypical diagnoses, and yet one must use these techniques with caution since there are numerous false-positive and false-negative results. 4) The average risk of cancer following an atypical diagnosis is approximately 40%. 5) Clinical and pathological parameters do not help predict which men with an atypical diagnosis have cancer on repeat biopsy. 6) Repeat biopsy should include increased sampling of the initial atypical site, and adjacent ipsilateral and contralateral sites with routine sampling of all sextant sites. Therefore, it is critical for urologists to submit needle biopsy specimens in a manner in which the sextant location of each core can be determined. 7) All men with an atypical diagnosis need re-biopsy within 3 to 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: It is critical for urologists to distinguish between a diagnosis of HGPIN and that of atypical foci suspicious for cancer on needle biopsy. These 2 entities indicate different risks of carcinoma on re-biopsy and different recommendations for followup.

Predictors of prostate cancer on extended biopsy in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a multivariate analysis model.

OBJECTIVE: To define the importance of extended biopsy in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and to define predictors of cancer in extended biopsy in patients with HGPIN, using multivariate analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 83 patients with previous sextant biopsy of HGPIN had an extended 11-core biopsy taken. Patients with a negative biopsy for cancer were followed by serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) every 6 months. The extended biopsy was repeated in 21 patients. The criteria for second biopsy were an increase in PSA and/or abnormal changes on DRE. Overall, 49 patients had a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The cancer-detection rate on extended biopsy was correlated with risk factors using the chi-square test and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Extended biopsy detected prostate cancer in 30 of the 83 men (36%), with positive cores in only 20 sextant biopsy sites (67%), in only seven in additional sites (23%), and both in three (10%). Of the 21 patients who had repeat extended biopsy, four (19%) had cancers. There were two carcinomas in the 49 TURP specimens (4%). The PSA level, DRE and transrectal ultrasonography findings were not predictive of cancer in extended biopsies (chi-square test). Patient age, PSA density and the number of cores with HGPIN (all P < 0.001) had a significant effect on the cancer-detection rate, and multivariate analysis showed that all three were independent predictors of cancer. A logistic regression model was designed to predict the probability of cancer in extended biopsy, with an overall accuracy of 78%. CONCLUSION: Extended biopsy improved the cancer detection rate by 23% in patients with HGPIN. Patient age, PSA density and the number of cores with HGPIN were the only independent predictors of cancer.