The new classifications of ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer and their clinical implications.

The roles of histologic characterization and staging are to provide reproducible metrics for cancer classification with which to direct the most appropriate clinical care and to yield the most stable reliable system to allow both prospective and retrospective data analysis. Both the histologic and staging classifications of malignant ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancers have recently changed. The World Health Organization sponsored a review and reclassification of the pathology of cancers of the ovaries, fallopian tubes, and peritoneum, and published these updates in 2014. In so doing, they codified the two-tiered grading system that has been in use in serous ovarian cancers for nearly a decade. In parallel, FIGO reviewed and updated the surgical staging system, applied to all histotypes of ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers, also published in 2014. In both cases, the changes made are meant to encompass a better understanding of disease, but both have important merits and drawbacks. Changes in staging complicate analysis of retrospective data against current data. Though in some aspects controversial, the changes overall are meant to represent a better biologic understanding of disease that we hope will lead to an improvement in patient care and directed therapy.

[The 2016 update of the S3 guideline for malignant tumours of the ovary : Role of pathology in diagnosis, therapy and clinical management of epithelial tumours]. / Update der S3-Leitlinie für maligne Ovarialtumoren 2016 : Rolle der Pathologie in Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge epithelialer Tumoren.

Tumor stage, residual postoperative tumor, histological type and grading are considered among the main prognostic parameters in the consensus-based recommendations in the new S3 guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and clinical follow-up of malignant tumours of the ovary. Based on the 2014 update of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Female Reproductive Organs this article summarizes the most significant changes. For example now the same TNM and FIGO classification applies for tumours of the ovary, peritoneum or fallopian tube. Noninvasive implants of serous borderline tumours are now named implants. In contrast, invasive implants are regarded as low-grade serous carcinoma. By presenting the current background information, we want to provide a basis for discussion, regarding more detailed consensus recommendations for pathologists and clinicians in the future.

[Current FIGO staging classification for cancer of ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum]. / Novinky ve FIGO stagingu karcinomu ovaria, tuby a peritonea.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) include carcinoma of ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Five-year survival, irrespective of the stage, is between 35-40%. Most patients are diagnosed in advanced stages of the disease. The new revised and expanded dualistic model of ovarian carcinogenesis shows that type II tumors are composed for the most part of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, undifferentiated carcinoma and can be further subdivided into morphologic and molecular subtypes. Many type II carcinomas develop from STIC predominantly in the distal portion of the fallopian tube and it is very likely the point of the origin of a significant subset of the pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of major changes in our understanding of the origin of ovarian cancer, that led to the revision of FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) classification and its unification for the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum. We summarize the new classification, main changes compared to the former one and their clinical impact. METHODS: For this review, we have used the results of studies and review articles on the subject published in English up to October 2016. They were identified through a search of literature using PubMed, MEDLINE-Ovid, Scopus and Cochrane Library with the keywords ("serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma" or "high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma" or "FIGO ovarian cancer staging 2014"). We retrieved and assessed potentially relevant studies, and checked the reference lists of all papers of interest to identify additional relevant publications. CONCLUSION: The origin of most cases of pelvic HGSC (carcinoma of ovary, the fallopian tube, and peritoneum) is expected in the fallopian tube epithelium. The main changes in the revised FIGO classification for extrauterine pelvic serous carcinomas were subdivision of stages IC, III and IV and elimination of the stage IIC, based on new knowledge and prognostic data. A prerequisite for the proper treatment of patients is to perform adequate surgical and pathological staging, including determining the grade of carcinoma. These factors, coupled with appropriately performed operation with zero postoperative residuum (R0), are the most important prognostic factors for patients with carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum.

Validation of Revised FIGO Staging Classification for Cancer of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneum Based on a Single Histological Type.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO2013) staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum in patients exhibiting high-grade serous histology. METHODS: Clinical records of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma who underwent primary surgery between 2007 and 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were reclassified according to the FIGO2013 criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated for each stage using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: In total, 125 patients were included in the analysis. The distribution of the study cohort according to the revised classification was as follows; stage I, 6 patients; stage II, 9 patients; stage III, 85 patients; and stage IV, 25 patients. Median follow-up time was 36 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3-110). The median PFS and OS were 14 months (95% CI, 12.4-15.6) and 60 months (95% CI, 47.0-72.9), respectively. Both PFS and OS were significantly different among stages I, II, III, and IV (P < 0.01). Subgroup analyses for stage III disease also revealed significant differences in survival. The median PFS for stages IIIA1, IIIB, and IIIC was 56, 46, and 16 months, respectively (P < 0.01), and the median OS was 104, 95, and 60 months, respectively (P = 0.03). The outcomes of patients with stage IV disease differed slightly but nonsignificantly according to new substages. The median PFS for stages IVA and IVB was 12 and 6 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.48-2.79; P = 0.72), and the median OS was 41 and 24 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.58-4.55; P = 0.35). The study sample was insufficient in size for subgroup analyses in stages I and II. CONCLUSIONS: The revised FIGO2013 staging system is highly prognostic for discriminating outcomes of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma across stages I to IV, in subgroups of stage III, but not in subgroups of stage IV.

The new WHO classification of ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer and its clinical implications.

INTRODUCTION: Molecular pathological research has contributed to improving the knowledge of different subtypes of ovarian cancer. In parallel with the implementation of the new FIGO staging classification, the WHO classification was revised. The latter is mainly based on the histopathological findings and defines the actual type of tumor. It has, therefore, also an important impact on prognosis and therapy of the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The new WHO Classification of Ovarian Cancer published 2014 by Robert Kurman and co-authors is summarized. The major changes compared to the hitherto existing classification are presented. RESULTS: The new classification eliminates the previous focus of mesothelial origin of ovarian cancer. Instead, it features a discussion of tubal carcinogenesis of hereditary and some other high-grade serous carcinomas. The previously assumed pathogenesis pathway may be correct for some, but not for all, serous cancers. The new classification was established to classify ovarian cancer in a more consistent way. The earlier transitional cell type of ovarian cancer has been removed while seromucinous tumors have been added as a new entity. The role of some borderline tumors as one possible step in the progression from benign to invasive lesions is incorporated. The article summarizes the essential updates concerning serous, mucinous, seromucinous, endometrioid, clear-cell, and Brenner tumors. CONCLUSION: The new WHO classification takes into account the recent findings on the origin, pathogenesis, and prognosis of different ovarian cancer subtypes. The tubal origin of hereditary and some non-hereditary high-grade serous cancers is mentioned in contrast to the hitherto theory of mesothelial origin of tumors. Seromucinous tumors represent a new entity.

Low-Stage High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinomas: Support for an Extraovarian Origin.

Many adnexal high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) may derive from microscopic precursors in the fallopian tube. By studying a series of low-stage ovarian carcinomas, we anticipated that HGSCs would be distributed in a pattern suggesting secondary involvement, helping to indirectly validate the fallopian tube origin theory, and that most ovarian carcinomas other than serous carcinomas would demonstrate features consistent with derivation from precursors located in or transplanted to the ovary. Seventy-six patients with low-stage (FIGO I/II) sporadic ovarian carcinoma who underwent primary surgical management at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 1980 to 2000 were included in the study. Histologic type was assigned using Gilks' criteria. Similar to the approach taken when distinguishing primary and metastatic mucinous or endometrioid carcinoma involving ovary, cases interpreted as showing a "primary" pattern of ovarian involvement had ≥3 of the following features: unilateral tumor, size >12 cm, no surface involvement, no multinodularity, and no destructive stromal invasion. All other cases were considered to show a "metastatic" pattern of ovarian involvement. Cases were evaluated for p53 and WT-1 expression, using standard techniques on a tissue microarray. TP53 gene sequencing was also performed. Cases comprised HGSC (n=22), endometrioid carcinoma (n=30), clear cell carcinoma (n=13), and mucinous carcinoma (n=11). HGSCs displayed substantially more "metastatic features" than the non-HGSC group and a mean overall size that was smaller (8.85 vs. 14.1 cm). Statistically significant differences were found for bilaterality (63% vs. 7.3%), P=0.0001; multinodularity (55% vs. 7.3%), P=0.0001; tumor size, P=0.003; and surface involvement (50% vs. 13%), P=0.002. Five of 22 (23%) of HGSCs showed a "primary pattern" of ovarian involvement. There were no significant differences between these cases and "metastatic pattern" HGSCs when comparing morphology, immunophenotype, TP53 mutational status, and clinical outcomes. Most low-stage HGSCs demonstrate patterns of ovarian involvement that suggest metastasis from another source, such as the fallopian tube. Both metastatic pattern HGSCs and unilateral, low-stage HGSCs can behave aggressively.

Should All Cases of High-Grade Serous Ovarian, Tubal, and Primary Peritoneal Carcinomas Be Reclassified as Tubo-Ovarian Serous Carcinoma?

INTRODUCTION: The dualistic theory of ovarian carcinogenesis proposes that epithelial "ovarian" cancer is not one entity with several histological subtypes but a collection of different diseases arising from cells of different origin, some of which may not originate in the ovarian surface epithelium. METHODS: All cases referred to the Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre with an ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancer between April 2006 and April 2012 were identified from the West Midlands Cancer Registry. Tumors were classified into type I (low-grade endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous, and low-grade serous) and type II (high-grade serous, high-grade endometrioid, carcinosarcoma, and undifferentiated) cancers. RESULTS: Ovarian (83.5%), tubal (4.3%), or primary peritoneal carcinoma (12.2%) were diagnosed in a total of 583 woman. The ovarian tumors were type I in 134 cases (27.5%), type II in 325 cases (66.7%), and contained elements of both type I and type II tumors in 28 cases (5.7%). Most tubal and primary peritoneal cases, however, were type II tumors: 24 (96.0%) and 64 (90.1%), respectively. Only 16 (5.8%) of the ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas were stage I at diagnosis, whereas 240 (86.6%) were stage III+. Overall survival varied between the subtypes when matched for stage. Stage III low-grade serous and high-grade serous carcinomas had a significantly better survival compared to clear cell and mucinous cases, P = 0.0134. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the high-grade serous ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal carcinomas when matched for stage (stage III, P = 0.3758; stage IV, P = 0.4820). CONCLUSIONS: Type II tumors are more common than type I and account for most tubal and peritoneal cancers. High-grade serous carcinomas, whether classified as ovarian/tubal/peritoneal, seem to behave as one disease entity with no significant difference in survival outcomes, therefore supporting the proposition of a separate classification of "tubo-ovarian serous carcinoma".

Nongynecologic metastases to fallopian tube mucosa: a potential mimic of tubal high-grade serous carcinoma and benign tubal mucinous metaplasia or nonmucinous hyperplasia.

Mucosal alterations of the fallopian tube are generally thought to represent alterations of the native tubal mucosal epithelium, whether benign or malignant. The current paradigm implicating the fallopian tube fimbriae as the origin of most pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) is based on the premise that HGSC growing within the tubal mucosa originated there. This has fueled proposals to redefine classification rules for assigning the primary site of origin on the basis of the presence or absence of HGSC in the tubal mucosa. The corollary is that it is unlikely for metastatic carcinoma to grow within fallopian tube mucosa. Evidence to support or refute this corollary is minimal, in part because the fallopian tubes historically have been ignored. This study reports the pattern and topography of 100 nongynecologic cancers that metastasized to the fallopian tubes. Most tumors were adenocarcinoma (87%), and the remainder included lymphomas, neuroendocrine tumors, and mesotheliomas. The most common primary origins of tumor were the colon (35%) and breast (15%). Gross evidence of a tubal nodule or mass was only seen in 35% of cases. Ovarian metastases were present in 95% of cases, although 23% did not exhibit gross evidence of metastasis. Tumor involved the fimbriae in 49% of cases, including 10% of cases in which the tumor was restricted to the fimbriae without involving the nonfimbriated portion of the tube. The anatomic distribution of metastases included the tubal mucosa (29%), submucosa (43%), muscularis (54%), serosa (76%), lymphovascular spaces (38%), intraluminal space (16%), and mesonephric remnants (39%). The most common architectural pattern of mucosal growth was a flat layer (22/29 cases), followed by varying degrees of stratification, tufting, and papillary growth. High-grade atypia was present in 18/29 cases of mucosal growth, resulting in patterns that resembled primary tubal HGSC. Accompanying growth in the tubal submucosa frequently produced a pseudoinvasive pattern mimicking invasive tubal HGSC. Immunohistochemical expression of p53 by 8/18 high-grade mucosal metastases further contributed to the resemblance to primary tubal HGSC. Bland cytology was present in 11/29 cases of mucosal growth, some of which also exhibited mucinous features, resulting in patterns that resembled either tubal mucinous metaplasia or nonmucinous tubal hyperplasia. Although uncommon, it is possible for metastases of nongynecologic cancers to grow within the mucosa of the fallopian tube and create a potential diagnostic pitfall. Intramucosal growth of a tumor in the fallopian tube is not pathognomonic of a primary tubal origin of the tumor. These findings may carry implications for proposed criteria using the status of the fallopian tube mucosa to assign primary origin of a gynecologic cancer.

FIGO's staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: abridged republication / 부인종양

No abstract available.

The new FIGO staging system for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Recent molecular research has revolutionized the understanding of ovarian cancer. It is now non-controversial that the term ovarian cancer summarizes a heterogenous group of malignant epithelial tumors. Findings of large clinical trials investigating surgical and systemic therapeutic approaches have defined the most important prognostic parameters. Therefore, the oncology committee of FIGO, headed by the South African gynecologic oncologist Lynette Denny, took the effort to revise the FIGO classification of ovarian cancer that was implemented in 1988. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The recent publication of Jaime Prat describing the new FIGO classification is summarized. The major changes compared to the hitherto existing classification from 1988 are presented. RESULTS: The primary anatomy is now documented (ov for ovarian, ft for fallopian tube, p for peritoneal, X for not assessed). The histological subtype is also documented (HGSC for high-grade serous carcinoma, LGSC for low-grade serous carcinoma, MC for mucinous carcinoma, CCC for clear cell carcinoma, and EC for endometrioid carcinoma). There is no stage I peritoneal cancer. Stage IC is subdivided into intraoperative rupture (IC1), pre-operative rupture (IC2), and malignant ascites or peritoneal washings (IC3). Due to its anatomic position within the pelvis, metastasis to the sigmoid colon is considered stage II. Former stage IIC has been erased. Stage IIIA1 and IIIA2 have been defined for intra-pelvic tumor with metastasis to retro-peritoneal lymph nodes up to 1 cm (IIIA1) or larger than 1 cm (IIIA2). With this, some of the former stage IIIC cases become IIIA and some IIIB, respectively. Involvement of retroperitoneal lymph nodes must be proven cytologically or histologically. Stage IV has been subdivided into IVA (malignant pleural effusions) and IVB (parenchymal metastases and/or extra-abdominal metastases including tumors in inguinal lymph nodes or lymph nodes outside of the abdominal cavity, umbilical tumor deposit, and transmural bowel infiltration (with mucosal involvement). CONCLUSION: The new FIGO classification takes into account the recent findings on the origin, pathogenesis, and prognosis of different ovarian cancer subtypes, summarizes groups of tumors pragmatically, and implies a reproducible and stage-dependent therapeutical approach.

[New FIGO classification of ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer]. / Neue FIGO-Klassifikation des Ovarial-, Tuben und primären Peritonealkarzinoms.

During recent years paramount changes have occurred in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer and recent clinical studies identified new prognostic factors. Consequently, the FIGO has established a new staging system collectively covering carcinomas derived from the ovaries, the fallopian tubes and primary peritoneal cancers as well as malignant ovarian germ cell and sex-cord stromal tumors. The new staging system started on 01 January 2014. Major changes occurred in the FIGO IC/T1c stage with surgical spill (FIGO IC1/T1c1) versus capsule ruptured before surgery or tumor on ovarian or fallopian tube surface (FIGO IC2/T1c2) versus malignant cells in the ascites or peritoneal washings (FIGO IC3/T1c3). The regional lymph node metastases were subcategorised using a cut-off value of 10 mm as the largest dimension of the metastatic deposits. Distant metastases (excluding peritoneal metastases) were substaged as FIGO IVA/M1a in cases of cytologically or histologically proven pleural involvement and as FIGO IVB/M1b in cases of parenchymal metastases and metastases in extra-abdominal organs (including lymph nodes outside the peritoneal cavity and the inguinal lymph nodes).

Sonographic discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopause.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of sonographic pattern recognition by experts, a standardized morphological scoring system, the risk malignancy index (RMI) and CA 125 assay for the preoperative assessment of ovarian lesions in premenopausal patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Diagnostic work-up of 1320 patients who underwent surgical exploration due to an adnexal mass at a tertiary referral center were included. We assessed the discriminative value of pattern recognition, a sonographic morphological scoring system, RMI and CA 125 by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and Cohen's kappa for each diagnostic approach while using histopathology as the reference standard. RESULTS: Pattern recognition showed the highest discriminative power with an observed kappa of 0.53. Sensitivity and specificity yielded 0.76 and 0.97 respectively. Combining pattern recognition with CA 125 serum measurement in the context of a triage system diminished the diagnostic value (kappa: 0.24; sensitivity: 0.29 specificity: 0.97). For the RMI we observed a sensitivity of 0.54 and a specificity of 0.96 and estimated kappa value yielded 0.37. Omitting the CA 125 assay and using a morphological sonographic assessment system increased the kappa value to 0.45 with sensitivity and specificity observed at 0.61 and 0.97 respectively. CONCLUSION: Expert pattern recognition was found to be the method with the highest discriminative power in assessing an adnexal mass during premenopause. Additional assessment of serum CA 125 diminished the diagnostic accuracy. Standardized morphological sonographic assessment resulted in a moderate diagnostic accuracy. Supplementing the morphological sonographic assessment with CA 125 by using the RMI algorithm did not improve the diagnostic value.

Clinically occult tubal and ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas presenting in uterine samples: diagnostic pitfalls and clues to improve recognition of tumor origin.

We report the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features in 8 patients with tubal or ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma that was present in uterine samples, in which there was the potential for clinical and morphologic misinterpretation as a primary uterine lesion before hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Patients ranged in age from 45 to 70 yr (mean, 57 yr). The initial presentation was variable, ranging from incidental findings on routine Pap smears to pleural effusion. During the preoperative clinical investigation, 7 of 8 patients did not have evidence of an adnexal tumor based on physical examination and radiologic imaging, and serum CA-125 levels were normal to low in 4 of 5 patients. Six patients required multiple rounds of uterine samples, and the preoperative uterine specimens that contained lesional tissue and were available for rereview in all 8 patients included endometrial biopsies/curettages (n=6), endocervical curettages (n=3), Pap smears (n=2), and a hysteroscopic myomectomy specimen (n=1). The amount of carcinoma in these specimens was typically scanty. The lesions in most cases were characterized by detached and minute epithelial clusters, small papillae, and/or individual cells. The constituent glandular cells exhibited notable atypia. Psammoma bodies were identified in only 2 cases. Immunostains for WT-1 were positive in 3 of 4 preoperative specimens. All patients ultimately underwent a hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which revealed an invasive high-grade serous carcinoma of tubal (n=6) or ovarian (n=2) origin. The mean/median tumor size was 3.2/1.7 cm. Transtubal spread was considered the most likely mechanism resulting in tubal/ovarian carcinoma being found in the preoperative uterine samples. These findings highlight the deceptive clinical features of some tubal/ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas, and demonstrate that small and clinically undetectable adnexal high-grade serous carcinomas can initially present in uterine biopsies/curettages. To guide clinical evaluation more accurately and prevent histologic misdiagnosis/misclassification, a possible adnexal origin should be considered in the differential diagnosis of small, detached, and markedly atypical glandular fragments in endometrial or cervical specimens, and immunohistochemical staining for WT-1 is recommended in this setting.

Carcinoma of the fallopian tube: Results of a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of 127 patients with evaluation of staging and prognostic factors.

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of prognostic factors in primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC). All cases of PFTC diagnosed between 1990 and 2010 were retrieved from the files of 6 academic centers. The cases were staged according to a modification of the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology staging system proposed by Alvarado-Cabrero et al (Gynecol Oncol 1999; 72: 367-379). One hundred twenty-seven PFTC cases were identified. The mean age of the patients was 64.2 years. Stage distribution was as follows: 72 (57%), stage I; 19 (15%), stage II; 28 (22%), stage III; and 8 (6.2%), stage IV. Depth of infiltration of the tubal wall was an independent prognostic factor in stage I cases (P < .001). Carcinomas located in the fimbriated end even without invasion had a worse prognosis than did carcinomas involving the tubal portion of the organ. The presence of vascular space invasion correlated with the depth of tubal wall invasion (P = .001) and the presence of lymph node metastases (P = .003). Tumor grade significantly correlated with survival (P < .0001), but histologic type was of marginal significance and only if it was grouped as nonserous/non-clear cell vs serous/clear cell (P = .04). The depth of invasion of the tubal wall and the presence of carcinoma in the fimbriated end even without invasion are important prognostic indicators. The modified International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology staging system should be used on a routine basis in all carcinomas of the fallopian tube.

Diagnosis of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma based on morphologic and immunohistochemical features: a reproducibility study.

There is compelling evidence that serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is a precursor of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Large-scale studies are now required to determine its biological significance and clinical implication. Before conducting these studies, a reproducible classification for STIC is needed, and that is the goal of this study. This study involved 6 gynecologic pathologists from 4 academic institutions and 3 independent rounds of review. In round 1, sixty-seven lesions ranging from normal, atypical, to STICs were classified by 5 pathologists on the basis of predetermined morphologic criteria. Interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of STIC versus not STIC was fair [κ = 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26, 0.52], and intraobserver reproducibility ranged from fair to moderate on the basis of percentage agreement and κ. Round 2 involved testing revised criteria that incorporated morphology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for p53 protein expression and Ki-67 labeling in 10 sets by 3 of the pathologists. The result was an improvement in interobserver agreement for the classification of STIC (κ = 0.62; 95% CI 0.18, 1.00). An algorithm was then created combining morphology and IHC for p53 and Ki-67, and reproducibility was assessed as part of round 3. In 37 lesions reviewed by 6 pathologists, substantial agreement for STIC versus no STIC was observed (κ = 0.73; 95% CI 0.58, 0.86). In conclusion, we have developed reproducible criteria for the diagnosis of STIC that incorporate morphologic and IHC markers for p53 and Ki-67. The algorithm we propose is expected to help standardize the classification of STIC for future studies.

Tubal and ovarian pathways to pelvic epithelial cancer: a pathological perspective.

Prolongation of ovarian epithelial cancer survival depends on early detection or improved responses to chemotherapy. Gains in either have been modest at best. Understanding the diverse pathogenesis of this disease is critical to early intervention or prevention. This review addresses six important variables, including (i) cell of origin, (ii) site of origin, (iii) initial genotoxic events, (iv) risks imposed by hereditary and other promoting conditions, (v) subsequent factors that promote different patterns of metastatic spread, and (vi) prospects for intervention. This review proposes two distinct pathways to pelvic epithelial cancer. The first initiates in ovarian surface epithelium (OSE), Mullerian inclusions or endometriosis in the ovary. The second arises from the endosalpinx and encompasses a subset of serous carcinomas. The serous carcinogenic sequence in the distal fallopian tube is described and contrasted with lower grade serous tumors based on tumour location, earliest genetic change and ability (or lack of) to undergo terminal (ciliated) differentiation. Ultimately, a clear understanding of tumour origin and the mechanism(s) leading to the earliest phases of the serous and endometrioid carcinogenic sequences may hold the greatest promise for designing prevention strategies and/or developing new therapies.