Sinonasal inverted papilloma and predictors of health-related quality of life after endonasal endoscopic surgery: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Existing knowledge on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after surgical removal of sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) is limited. Moreover, predictors for a better or worse post-operative HRQoL outcome are not known. Our aim was to assess HRQoL in all three health domains (physical, psychological, and social), track its post-operative trajectory, investigate if pre-operative observations could predict distinct post-operative HRQoL outcomes, and evaluate whether physicians' interventions could contribute to improved post-operative HRQoL. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-four patients who underwent surgery for an IP were included. They were asked to fill in the Endonasal Endoscopic Sinus and Skull-Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) pre-operatively, and then 2 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year post-operatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Linear mixed models analyses were performed to evaluate the overall post-operative HRQoL and the separate health domains, as well as the impact of specific variables (sex, age, American Society of Anaesthesiologists [ASA] classification, smoker, Krouse staging, pre-operative EES-Q score, type of surgery, and post-operative antibiotics) on HRQoL improvement. RESULTS: The total EES-Q score (p < .001) as well as the physical (p < .001), psychological (p = .049), and the social (p = .002) domains significantly improved post-operatively. ASA classification (p = .049), pre-operative EES-Q score (p < .001) and post-operative antibiotics (p = .036) were significant variables. CONCLUSIONS: Overall HRQoL, as well as each of the three health domains, improved significantly. A higher ASA score, a higher pre-operative EES-Q score, and the administration of post-operative antibiotics were significant predictors for better HRQoL recovery post-operatively. Further research is necessary to confirm these results.

Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients With Sinonasal Malignancy After Definitive Treatment.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To describe multidimensional quality of life (QOL) outcomes in patients with sinonasal malignancies (SNM). To elucidate factors predicting worse QOL in this population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review at tertiary institution. METHODS: A retrospective chart review on patients treated for SNM from 2006 to 2019 at a tertiary medical center was conducted. QOL outcomes were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Nasopharynx (FACT-NP) score. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to assess factors predicting worse QOL. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Twelve (14.8%) patients had a subscale score >11 for anxiety (HADS-A) or depression (HADS-D) indicating significant anxiety or depression, at a median of 24 (8-68.5) months post treatment. The median FACT-NP total score was 136 (110-152). On multivariable analysis, advanced T classification, single status, and worse social support survey score were significant predictors of worse HADS score. Worse social support survey score was a significant predictor of worse total FACT-NP score. CONCLUSION: After adjusting for confounders, at a median of 24 months after completion of definitive therapy for SNM, advanced T classification and single relationship status were found to be significant predictors of anxiety and depression (based on HADS). A worse social support survey score was associated with worse anxiety, depression, and QOL (based on HADS and FACT-NP). Identifying these factors early may help to guide treatment and psychiatric referral to at-risk individuals after the treatment of SNM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E2212-E2221, 2021.

Sinonasal quality of life after endoscopic resection of malignant sinonasal and skull base tumors.

OBJECTIVES: Improvement in sinonasal quality of life (QoL) following sinus surgery has been well-documented across the literature. To our knowledge, only one series has evaluated long-term QoL in patients undergoing tumor resection, and that study demonstrated no improvement in rhinologic QoL following malignant tumor resection at 2-year follow-up. The objective of the present study was to evaluate QoL in the 2 years following endoscopic malignant tumor resection. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed, including patients with both malignant and benign sinonasal tumors in a tertiary academic medical center. Patients undergoing endoscopic tumor resection who had completed Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) questionnaires were included in the cohort. SNOT-22 questionnaires were administered preoperatively and over a 2-year follow-up period at clinic visits. Longitudinal linear mixed-effects regression was used to compare preoperative QoL to QoL over the 2 years following surgery. RESULTS: Among 145 patients included in this study, 64 had malignant tumors. There was a statistically significant improvement in SNOT-22 score from baseline to 2 years for patients with both malignant tumors (37.0, 95% confidence Interval [CI] 32.0-42.1 at baseline; 26.5 95% CI 20.8-32.2 at 2 years; P < 0.001) and benign tumors (26.5, 95% CI 21.4-30.4 at baseline; 12.9 95% CI 7.6-18.2 at 2 years; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In contrast to previously reported series, in this cohort endoscopic resection of sinonasal tumors appears to be followed by an improvement in QoL, which is sustained over a 2-year period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b. Laryngoscope, 128:789-793, 2018.

Quality of life factors and survival after total or extended maxillectomy for sinonasal malignancies.

PURPOSE: Total and extended maxillectomy results in significant morbidity that can have an effect on quality of life factors. Modern reconstructive techniques have ameliorated this effect, but they have not been quantified. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the quality of life factors and survival of patients undergoing total or extended maxillectomy for malignant disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of all patients who had undergone total or extended maxillectomy at a tertiary care cancer center from January 2008 to May 2013. The minimum follow-up period was 6 months. The quality of life factors analyzed included swallowing function and diet consistency, pain control, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients (13 women and 12 men) met the inclusion criteria. Using the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, 76% of the patients had stage IV disease. Of the 25 patients, 13 received a free tissue transfer, 11 an obturator flap, and 1 a regional flap. None of the patients with a free tissue transfer experienced failure. The tumor size had no systemic influence on the reconstructive method chosen (P = .32 to P = .98). The median follow-up period was 41 weeks (range 24 to 252). One death was recorded, and 10 patients were lost to follow-up. Eleven patients progressed to a regular diet. Fifteen patients required a tracheostomy, and all were decannulated at a mean of 14 days postoperatively. One patient had dental implants placed. The type of reconstruction did not influence swallowing function (P = .49) or long-term pain (P = .38). The mean pain score was 4.9 ± 2.7. Pain management proved difficult in 7 patients. Also, 6 patients developed a surgical site infection, 3 of whom required a return to the operating room. Seven patients were readmitted to the hospital for complications; however, the reconstructive method did not influence the incidence of complications (P = .64). CONCLUSIONS: The inevitable morbidity, with respect to quality of life factors, that result from the disfiguring effects of total or extended maxillectomy can be deemed acceptable by patients. We recommend discussing all reconstructive options regarding the management of late-stage maxillary malignancies and the potential effect they can have on patients' quality of life.

Craniofacial resection and its role in the management of sinonasal malignancies.

Sinonasal malignancy is rare, and its presentation is commonly late. There is a wide variety of pathologies with varying natural histories and survival rates. Anatomy of the skull base is extremely complex and tumors are closely related to orbits, frontal lobes and cavernous sinus. Anatomical detail and the late presentation render surgical management a challenging task. A thorough understanding of anatomy and pathology combined with modern neuroimaging and reliable reconstruction within a multidisciplinary team is imperative to carry out skull base surgery effectively. While endoscopic approaches are gaining credibility, clearly, it will be some time before meaningful comparisons with craniofacial resection can be made. Until then, craniofacial resection will remain the gold standard for managing the sinonasal malignancies of the anterior skull base, as it has proved to be safe and effective.

Free-flap head and neck reconstruction and quality of life: a 2-year prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: This prospective study was designed to evaluate quality of life (QOL) after free-flap head and neck reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: : Between January 2004 and December 2005, a total of 95 patients underwent microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck at our Institution (Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France) and were initially included in this study. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire were completed before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months thereafter. Sixty-five patients completed the questionnaires on at least two of the assessment dates. Predictive factors of Quality of Life (QOL) scores at 6 months were researched among the following: age, sex, comorbidity, radiotherapy, tumor recurrence, tumor stage, and type of surgery. RESULTS: Global QOL remained stable over time. Physical, social, and role functioning deteriorated significantly after treatment. Pain decreased markedly. Social eating, senses, and speech difficulties increased significantly at 6 months, but stabilized between 6 and 12 months. Problems concerning mouth opening and social contact augmented progressively until the 12th postoperative month. Sex, type of surgery, and radiotherapy were the main factors influencing QOL 6 months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some functional impairments, global QOL was preserved after major head and neck ablative surgery and microvascular free-flap reconstruction.

[A case report of sinonasal tumor: the effect of corrective make up training].

Facial appearance is very important for personal identity, and some patients suffer long-term stress as a result of disfigurement caused by facial nerve paralysis and wounds. The psychological aspect of the disease has important implications for the optimal management of patients. In such cases, while aggressive rehabilitation including cosmetic surgery may be useful, cosmetics are also effective for covering visible signs of the disease. A patient who had undergone an operation for a sinonasal tumor was instructed by an expert beautician in the application of make up to correct her facial imbalance and wounds. The 60-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ60) and the European quality of life 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS were administered before the first application and one month afterwards. The GHQ60 and EQ-5D VAS scores improved after the make up instruction. We suggest that corrective make up training is an effective measure for reducing the psychological load of patients with head and neck tumors.

[Maxillary sinus cancers: Prognosis and quality of life: a retrospective study of 22 cases]. / Cancers du sinus maxillaire: pronostic et qualité de vie.

OBJECTIVES: Maxillary sinus cancer is uncommon. We present a study of 22 cases of patients managed at the Nantes University Hospital for maxillary sinus cancer during the time period 1989-2002. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and oncological characteristics of the tumors were evaluated. Treatment and results were evaluated in association with the patients' quality of life, estimated with a questionnaire survey sent to surviving patients. RESULTS: Carcinomas predominated (68%). The TNM classification was: T2: 45.5%, T3: 45.5% and T4: 9%. 89% of necks were N0 and 9% were N1. Treatment course (determined after imaging) was surgical removal of the tumor by total maxillectomy: 77.5%; partial maxillectomy: 22.5%, associated with post-operative radiotherapy. Esthetic consequences and disabilities of patients assessed by the questionnaire pointed out that 68% of them were complaining of poor quality of life. Global survival at 12 months was 63%, 20% at 24 months and 9% at 5 years. There were no statistically significant differences between specific survivals according to T-stage nor according to histological features. The difference was significant when surgical removal of the tumour was large according to post-operative histology. CONCLUSION: Authors conclude that maxillary sinus cancers exhibit poor prognosis, and focus on the necessity of quality of life assessment.

Development of a cancer-specific anterior skull base quality-of-life questionnaire.

OBJECT: The goal of this study was to develop a disease-specific, multidimensional quality of life (QOL) assessment instrument for patients undergoing surgical extirpation of anterior skull base tumors. METHODS: This investigation included 35 patients who had been surgically treated for more than 3 months before the study was begun. Relevant QOL questions were generated from a review of the literature and interviews with health professionals, patients, and their caregivers. The initial multidimensional, 80-item questionnaire was reduced to a 35-item questionnaire by using standard psychometric criteria. Six relevant domains were identified using factor analysis: performance, physical function, vitality, pain, specific symptoms, and influence on emotions. The internal consistency of the instrument had a correlation coefficient of 0.8 and a reliability coefficient (test-retest reliability) of 0.9. The validity of the construct was assessed by testing whether the clinical variable of the patient influenced his QOL domain score as hypothesized. Patients older than 60 years of age had significantly poorer scores in the domains of performance and physical function than younger patients. Patients with malignant tumors had significantly poorer scores in the domains of specific symptoms, influence on emotions, physical function, and performance compared with patients with benign tumors. Radiotherapy was associated with poorer scores in the domains of specific symptoms and influence on emotions. Comorbidity was associated with poor physical function scores. Using the final questionnaire, we prospectively evaluated the QOL of 12 additional patients before they underwent surgery and again between 5 and 6 months postoperatively to test the utility and validity of the instrument further. Again, significantly poorer QOL scores were recorded for patients with malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed questionnaire appears to be sufficiently reliable and valid in estimating a patient's QOL after extirpation of anterior skull base tumors. The instrument can be used in face-to-face interviews and via electronic or regular mail.