Menogaril in the treatment of malignant mesothelioma: a phase II study.

Menogaril is a new semisynthetic anthracycline agent derived from the antitumor antibiotic Nogalomycin. Compared to doxorubicin it has similar or improved activity in anti-tumor cell line screening; human tumor cloning assays suggest modest anti-tumor activity as well. Menogaril is much less cardiotoxic than doxorubicin. We performed a phase II trial of this agent in 22 patients with advanced malignant mesothelioma. At a dose of 200 mg/m2 iv every 4 weeks (160 mg/m2 in previously radiated patients) only 1 of 22 (5%) evaluable patients had a partial remission lasting 4 months. (95% confidence limits 0.1-23%). The major toxic effects included pain at the site of infusion and granulocytopenia. While well tolerated, Menogaril has minimal activity in malignant mesothelioma. We do not plan further studies with Menogaril in this disease.

Justification for evaluating new anticancer drugs in selected untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that response to a given chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer is superior to that in patients previously treated with other regimens. This finding raises the question of whether it is necessary and ethical to study the effects of new anticancer agents in untreated patients. Such studies appear to be the best test for drug development, but there has been no evaluation of whether survival of untreated patients, whose cancer is sensitive to established drugs, is adversely affected in trials of new drugs. PURPOSE: This randomized study of untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer was designed (a) to compare the survival of patients treated with either effective standard chemotherapy or an investigational anticancer drug as initial therapy and (b) to evaluate response rates and toxic effects of such therapies. METHODS: Eighty-six patients were randomly assigned to receive, as initial therapy, either the standard CAV regimen--cyclophosphamide (1000 mg/m2), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2), and vincristine (1.4 mg/m2) every 3 weeks--or the phase II drug menogaril (200 mg/m2) every 4 weeks. Treatment after induction therapy varied, depending on patient response, but nonresponders and those with disease progression received salvage chemotherapy--etoposide (120 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1), repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 43 patients on CAV, 42% responded (eight complete responses and 10 partial responses); 5% of the 43 on menogaril responded (two partial responses) (P = .0001). Twelve (22%) of 54 patients responded to salvage chemotherapy (five complete responses and seven partial responses). Within 3 months from start of treatment, twelve patients died--3 patients in the CAV group and nine patients in the menogaril group (P = .12). The estimated median survival was 37 weeks with menogaril and 45 weeks with CAV (P = .28). At 6 months, survival was 76.7% for the CAV group and 67.4% for the menogaril group. At 12 months, survival rates were 24.4% and 27.9%, respectively. Confidence intervals (95%) for the differences between the proportions surviving in the two groups were -9%-28% at 6 months and -25%-14% at 12 months. Use of CAV resulted in significantly higher occurrence of severe and life-threatening treatment-related complications (P = .002). CONCLUSION: The confidence intervals for the differences in survival are too wide to conclude that evaluation of a new drug in untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer is or is not harmful. The data do suggest, however, that use of this study design may have no adverse effect on survival.

Phase I study of oral menogaril administered daily for 14 consecutive days.

Twenty-eight patients were treated with oral menogaril daily x 14 every 4 weeks. Granulocytopenia was dose-limiting at 50-60 mg/m2 per day. Neutropenic fever occurred in one patient. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 3 of 6 patients treated with menogaril 60 mg/m2/day. Nausea and vomiting and other toxic effects were generally mild. No cardiac toxicity was seen. One partial remission and three minor responses were noted among 11 previously treated patients with carcinoma of the bladder. One minor response was noted among 3 patients with colorectal cancer. The dose recommended for phase II studies is 50 mg/m2 per day for 14 days. Phase II studies are recommended in carcinoma of the bladder. Gastrointestinal toxicity is substantially less on this schedule than with oral menogaril administered on a weekly or q4wk schedule, but thrombocytopenia may be more common.

Phase II study of oral menogaril as first line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study.

The National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) Clinical Trials Group conducted a phase II study of weekly oral menogaril as first-line therapy in 51 patients with incurable, metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer. While no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease was permitted, prior adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed provided that no anthracycline or anthracene had been given. Forty-eight patients were evaluable for response. Two patients (4%) achieved complete remissions, 9 patients (19%) achieved partial remissions, 26 patients (54%) were stable and 11 patients (23%) failed. At the initial menogaril dose of 275 mg/m2 per week, 13 of 14 patients required a dose reduction and/or a treatment delay of one or more weeks. Therefore, the menogaril dose was reduced to 225 mg/m2 per week for the last 37 patients. At that those, 20 of 37 patients developed grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia and 22 required dosage delays. At the initial starting dose, the average dose intensity actually delivered was 169 mg/m2 per week. At 225 mg/m2 the average dose intensity actually delivered was 197 mg/m2 per week. Toxic effects included mild to moderate nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, hair loss and occasional hyperpigmentation. In summary, menogaril is an anthracycline derivative that has modest activity when administered orally to minimally pretreated patients with breast cancer.

Phase II evaluation of menogaril in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma. A collaborative trial of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group and Mayo Clinic.

Fourteen patients with advanced/recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix received menogaril, 200 mg/m2 by one hour intravenous infusion at four-week intervals. No objective regressions were observed. Median time to progression was less than two months and median survival was seven months. All patients experienced neutropenia. Platelet toxicity was negligible. Venous irritation and phlebitis occurred at the infusion site in 43% of patients. Menogaril as administered in this protocol is ineffective in treating previously irradiated advanced/recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix and warrants no further investigation in this disease at the dosage and administration schedule used in this protocol.

Phase II evaluation of menogaril in patients with advanced hypernephroma.

Fifteen patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were treated with Menogaril, 200 mg/m2 by one-hour, intravenous infusion at four-week intervals. No objective regressions were observed. Median time to progression was two months, and median survival was seven months. All patients experienced neutropenia. Platelet toxicity was negligible. Venous irritation and phlebitis at the infusion site was seen in 47% of patients. Menogaril as administered in this protocol is ineffective in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

A phase II evaluation of menogaril in cisplatin-refractory advanced ovarian carcinoma. A collaborative trial of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group and the Mayo Clinic.

Forty-one women with advanced, recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma (in whom prior chemotherapy with a platinum-based regimen failed) were treated with menogaril 200 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks in a Phase II trial. Partial responses were seen in two of 19 (10.5%) measurable disease patients and three of 12 (25%) nonmeasurable but evaluable patients, an overall objective response rate of 16.1% (95% confidence interval, 5% to 34%). Median time to progression for all patients was 2 months and median survival, 5 months. Toxicities were acceptable and consisted primarily of leukopenia and gastrointestinal toxicity. Twenty-nine percent of the patients had venous irritation or painful phlebitis at the intravenous injection site. Menogaril, as administered in this protocol, had modest antineoplastic activity in previously treated ovarian carcinoma patients. The responses were of short duration, and there appeared to be no survival advantage with menogaril treatment.

Phase II evaluation of menogaril (NSC-269148) in non-small cell lung carcinoma. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Forty-five patients with non-small cell lung cancer were treated in a phase II trial with menogaril 200 mg/m2 IV every twenty-eight days by a one-hour infusion. One partial response was noted while twenty-two patients had stable disease (51%). Progressive disease was noted in the remaining twenty-two patients. There was one fatal complication due to pancytopenia and pneumonia. Otherwise, the drug was reasonably well tolerated. At this dosage and schedule, menogaril has no substantial anti-tumor activity for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

A phase II study of menogaril in low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. An NCI Canada Clinical Trials Group study.

The NCI Canada Clinical Trials Group conducted a phase II study of menogaril given intravenously every 4 weeks in low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Fifteen of 26 eligible patients had had no prior therapy. Partial responses were seen in 9 patients (35%). Toxicity was moderate including myelosuppression, nausea, phlebitis, alopecia, and lethargy. This drug has only modest activity in this potentially responsive group of patients.

New anthracycline antitumor antibiotics.

Doxorubicin is an essential component of the treatment of aggressive lymphoma, childhood solid tumors, bone and soft tissue sarcomas, and breast cancer and additional indications are emerging. On the other hand, daunorubicin has occupied the central position of interest in the treatment of acute leukemia. Epirubicin has a spectrum very similar to doxorubicin but lesser toxicity. The ability to protect against cardiotoxicity with ICRF-187 further enhances clinical interest in exploiting modifications in doze intensity to therapeutic advantage. Idarubicin has at least equivalent activity to daunorubicin and doxorubicin in leukemia. New areas of research in relation to anthracycline antibiotics include introduction of new the analogs, insight into mechanisms of resistance, the reversal of multidrug resistance in vitro, the protection of cardiac toxicity, and the study of other important biochemical reactions relevant to cytotoxicity. Orally active anthracyclines such as idarubicin and compounds which lack cross-resistance with the parent drugs or have other mechanisms for cytotoxicity are being developed. It is likely that these modifications will lead to an expanding therapeutic spectrum for these already widely useful drugs.

The biochemical pharmacology of nogalamycin and its derivatives.

This review assimilates up-to-date information on the biochemical pharmacology of nogalamycin and selected derivatives that have shown good biological activities and/or received a relatively detailed investigation. The structure and chemical preparation of these derivatives from nogalamycin is described and the nomenclature which has been rather perplexing in the literature is clarified. The interaction of this class of compounds, particularly nogalamycin, with DNA is extensively reviewed. The biochemical mechanism of action of nogalamycin and its structurally closely-related derivatives is described. Among nogalamycin derivatives, menogaril showed distinct biochemical effects as well as superior cytotoxicity and antitumor activity and also proved to be effective against breast cancer clinically.

Phase II trial of menogaril as initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Eighteen women with metastatic breast cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy were entered on a phase II trial of intravenous menogaril, a new anthracycline derivative. Treatment was given at 140 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each 28 day cycle. The most common toxicities were leukopenia in all patients and burning and phlebitis at infusion sites in 72%. Serial assessment of cardiac function by resting and stress gated blood pool scans showed temporary decrements in ejection fraction in only 2 patients (11%). The response rate to the therapy was 19% [95% CI 0-38%] including 1 complete and 2 partial responses. The median time to relapse among responders was 6.5 months. Mean survival in all patients entered was 15.8 months from date of entry. Menogaril at this dose and schedule has modest activity as first line therapy for metastatic breast cancer but also has significant marrow and local toxicity.

A phase II study of menogaril (NSC-269148) in colorectal carcinoma. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

In this phase II trial, menogaril was administered to patients with metastatic colon cancer at a dose of 200 mg/m2 IV over one hour with cycles repeated every 28 days provided the absolute granulocyte count was greater than or equal to 2000 cells/microliters. Dose adjustments up or down were made depending upon nadir counts. Twenty-four patients were entered on this study with 21 eligible and evaluable for response. There was 1 CR lasting four and one-half months and 1 PR lasting three months for an overall CR + PR rate of 10% with a 95% confidence interval of 1% to 30%. Six patients (29%) had stable disease and 13 (62%) progressed. Median survival is 13.1 months. Toxicity was primarily hematologic with two cases of life-threatening leukopenia (less than 1000 cells/microliters) and one case of life-threatening granulocytopenia (less than 250 cells/microliters) among the 21 eligible patients, and one case of life-threatening leukopenia and granulocytopenia in one ineligible patient. There were no deaths due to treatment.

Activity of intravenous menogaril in patients with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer. A National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study.

We have carried out a phase II study of intravenous menogaril given every four weeks in a group of patients with breast cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting and local reactions were seen frequently. Six partial responses (median duration 154 days) were seen in 24 eligible patients. We conclude menogaril is active in breast cancer and recommend that because it can be delivered in high doses orally, future trials in this disease should focus on intense oral schedule.

[Antitumor activities of orally administered 7-con-0-methylnogarol (TUT-7)].

We estimated antitumor activity of TUT-7 following p.o. administration using animal tumor models and human tumor xenografts. In mouse L 1210 leukemia system, antitumor activity of TUT-7 administered orally was as good as that by i.v. administration. Treatment involving schedules of every 4-days or daily administration was much more effective than single treatment. Therapiotic indices of this compound administered both p.o. or i.v. routes, were better than that of adriamycin administered i.v.. TUT-7 showed antitumor activities against various mouse tumors (L 1210 leukemia, P 388 leukemia, colon 38 adenocarcinoma, B 16 melanoma), LX-1 human tumor xenografts, and Yoshida sarcoma in rat. Base on above results, we concluded that oral administration is one of the useful route of TUT-7 administration.

[Antitumor spectrum of TUT-7 on rat ascitic hepatoma].

The antitumor activity of TUT-7, a new anthracycline compound, was compared to that of adriamycin in the screening system with rat ascites hepatomas. A marked antitumor effect was observed in most tumor lines, and the activity was assumed to be better than adriamycin.

Phase I study of oral menogaril administered on a once weekly schedule.

Forty-seven patients with solid tumors were treated on a phase I study of menogaril administered by mouth once per week. Nausea and vomiting were excessive at weekly doses of 350 and 450 mg/m2/week but were tolerable and controlled reasonably well by antiemetics at lower doses. There appeared to be a relatively shallow dose-vs-granulocytopenia curve above a menogaril dose of 180 mg/m2/week. No patient receiving chronic dexamethasone for cerebral edema developed granulocytopenia, even at menogaril doses of 350-450 mg/m2/week. Two patients developed neutropenic infection. No patient developed thrombocytopenia. Mild arrhythmias were seen in 3 patients. Two patients suffered possible myocardial infarcts that may not have been related to treatment. Asymptomatic blood pressure fluctuations were common and were probably not related to treatment. Diarrhea was dose-related but was generally not severe. Alopecia and stomatitis occurred occasionally. Minor responses were seen in two patients with gliomas, and three of five evaluable prostate cancer patients experienced marked pain relief. The dose recommended for phase II studies is 250-300 mg/m2/week with antiemetic pretreatment. This schedule appears to allow an oral menogaril dose-intensity that is approximately double that attainable with other oral schedules that have been studied.

Evaluation of menogaril in renal cell carcinoma. A Southwest Oncology Group phase II study (8504).

The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) studied the response rate and toxicity of menogaril (200 mg/m2 i.v. q 28 days) in patients with advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma. During the early stage of the trial two partial responses were seen in the first 20 treated patients, and an additional 36 evaluable patients were studied. Three of 56 (5%) evaluable patients achieved partial responses. Significant white cell toxicity was observed. Mild or moderate degrees of thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal side effects, alopecia and phlebitis occurred. No cardiac toxicity was noted. The low response rate suggests that menogaril in this dose schedule has no role in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic renal cancer.