Current status of laparoscopy teaching in gynecology and obstetrics medical residency in Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize laparoscopy teaching in Medical Residency Programs in Gynecology and Obstetrics in Brazil, and to evaluate preceptors' characteristics in laparoscopy programs and map laparoscopic training practice scenarios. METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study evaluated questionnaire responses from coordinators of the Medical Residency Programs in Gynecology and Obstetrics from 2019 to 2021. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 175 programs, and 90 responses were received (51.4%). From the 85 valid responses, it was noted that 67 programs had laparoscopic training. Of the 64 responses received regarding location, 32 replies (50%) indicated the Southeast of Brazil, particularly some country's capitals. In 37.3% (n=25) of the cases, the program coordinator performed laparoscopy. The chief of the laparoscopy sector has advanced experience in most 52.5% (n=10) medical residency services; the preceptors also had advanced experience in 89.4% (n=59) of the services. Residents received laboratory training in 39.4% (n=26) of the services. In most cases, training was performed using a physical simulator. Of the 26 medical residency services with laparoscopy training outside the operating room, 80.8% (n=21) performed them as part of the curriculum, 61.5% (n=16) had a schedule for the same, and only 3.9% (n=1) were objectively evaluated. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy teaching in Brazil is heterogeneous, with only a few programs offering any training in laparoscopy. The preceptors had advanced experience and participated in laboratory and operating room training. Only a few programs have their own laboratories or training centers, and most teaching programs do not plan to set up training centers.

Obstetric care provider's knowledge about the use of low dose aspirin for preeclampsia prevention in low and middle income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Preeclampsia can elevate the likelihood of unfavorable consequences for a mother, such as severe morbidity and mortality. World Health Organization recommends low dose acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin, 75 mg per day) for the prevention of preeclampsia in women at moderate or high risk of developing the condition. The use of low dose aspirin is dependent on the knowledge of health care providers working in the antenatal care units. We found inconsistent figures regarding the knowledge level of health care providers on low dose aspirin for preeclampsia prevention around different low and middle income countries in the world. Thus, determining the pooled knowledge level of health care providers is very important. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) was conducted on the knowledge level of among obstetric care providers towards preeclampsia prevention in low and middle income countries. We identified relevant literature in the English language only. A comprehensive search was conducted on databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, HINARI, and Scopus. Subsequently, all datasets were exported to Mendeley reference manager and transferred to a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet to eliminate duplicate data during the review process. The extracted Microsoft Excel spreadsheet format data was imported to STATA software version 17 (STATA corporation, Texas, USA) for analysis. Then random effect model was used to estimate the pooled level of knowledge of health care providers on low dose aspirin for preeclampsia prevention in low income countries. Cochrane Q-test and I2 statistics were computed to assess heterogeneity among all the studies included in this SRMA. RESULT: A total of 1231 articles were identified through our search strategies, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Hinari and Scopus. Ultimately, six articles met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the final SRMA. The pooled knowledge level of healthcare providers regarding the use of low-dose aspirin for preeclampsia prevention in low-income countries was found to be 16.38% (95% CI: 4.36-28.40). The Cochrane heterogeneity index, with a substantial I2 value of 98.89% and a significant P-value of 0.01, indicated significant heterogeneity among the primary studies included. CONCLUSION: the knowledge level of obstetric care providers in low and middle income countries is found very low and all the governmental and non-governmental organizations should strive to enhance the knowledge of obstetric care providers on the use of low dose aspirin for preeclampsia prevention in low and middle income countries.

Segregation by Payer in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Ambulatory Care Sites.

Importance: Many teaching hospitals in the US segregate patients by insurance status, with resident clinics primarily composed of publicly insured or uninsured patients and faculty practices seeing privately insured patients. The prevalence of this model in obstetrics and gynecology residencies is unknown. Objectives: To examine the prevalence of payer-based segregation in obstetrics and gynecology residency ambulatory care sites nationally and to compare residents' and program directors' perceptions of differences in quality of care between payer-segregated and integrated sites. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national survey study included all 6060 obstetrics and gynecology residents and 293 obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors in the US as of January 2023. The proportion of program directors reporting payer segregation was calculated to characterize the national prevalence of this model in obstetrics and gynecology. Perceived differences in care quality were compared between residents and program directors at payer-segregated sites. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary measure was prevalence of payer-based segregation in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in the US as reported by residency program directors. The secondary measure was resident and program director perceptions of care quality in these ambulatory care settings. Before study initiation, the study hypothesis was that residents and program directors at ambulatory sites with payer-based segregation would report more disparity in perceived health care quality between resident and faculty practices compared with those from integrated sites. Results: A total of 251 residency program directors (response rate, 85.7%) and 3471 residents (response rate, 57.3%) were included in the study. Resident respondent demographics reflected demographics of obstetrics and gynecology residents nationally in terms of racial and ethnic distribution (6 [0.2%] American Indian or Alaska Native; 425 [13.0%] Asian; 239 [7.3%] Black or African American; 290 [8.9%] Hispanic, Latinx, or Spanish; 7 [0.2%] Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander; 2052 [62.7%] non-Hispanic White; 49 [1.5%] multiracial; 56 [1.7%] other [any race not listed]; and 137 [4.2%] preferred not to say) and geographic distribution (regional prevalence of payer-based segregation: 36 of 53 [67.9%] in the Northeast, 35 of 44 [79.5%] in the Midwest, 43 of 67 [64.2%] in the South, and 13 of 22 [59.1%] in the West), with 2837 respondents (86.9%) identifying as female. Among program directors, 127 (68.3%) reported payer-based segregation in ambulatory care. University programs were more likely to report payer-based segregation compared with community, hybrid, and military programs (63 of 85 [74.1%] vs 31 of 46 [67.4%], 32 of 51 [62.7%], and 0, respectively; P = .04). Residents at payer-segregated programs were less likely than their counterparts at integrated programs to report equal or higher care quality from residents compared with faculty (1662 [68.7%] vs 692 [81.6%] at segregated and integrated programs, respectively; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of residents and residency program directors, payer-based segregation was prevalent in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs, particularly at university programs. These findings reveal an opportunity for structural reform to promote more equitable care in residency training programs.

Porcine stomach surgical simulation model for cesarean section and cervical laceration suturing.

BACKGROUND: Junior OB/GYN residents lack opportunities for fundamental surgical skills training of cesarean section, and most OB/GYN residents lack the experience of cervical laceration suturing due to its low incidence. METHODS: A porcine stomach simulation model was designed for obstetrics surgical training. The surface of the stomach simulated the uterus, and the pylorus and cardia simulated the cervical canal. EXPERIENCE: Materials are available from the nearby market. The total cost of the model isï¿¥41. This model can be used in the training in uterus incision and repair of cesarean section and training in cervical laceration suturing. CONCLUSION: The porcine stomach simulation model is pragmatic and realistic. They can be applied in the OB/GYN skill courses to introduce the fundamental obstetrics process to medical students and residents.

Obstetric Emergency Supply Chain Dynamics and Information Flow Among Obstetric Emergency Supply Chain Employees: Key Informant Interview Study.

BACKGROUND: For the past several decades, the Ethiopian Ministry of Health has worked to decrease the maternal mortality ratio (MMR)-the number of pregnant women dying per 100,000 live births. However, with the most recently reported MMR of 267, Ethiopia still ranks high in the MMR globally and needs additional interventions to lower the MMR to achieve the sustainable development goal of 70. One factor contributing to the current MMR is the frequent stockouts of critical medications and supplies needed to treat obstetric emergencies. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the obstetric emergency supply chain (OESC) dynamics and information flow in Amhara, Ethiopia, as a crucial first step in closing stockouts and gaps in supply availability. METHODS: Applying qualitative descriptive methodology, the research team performed 17 semistructured interviews with employees of the OESC at the federal, regional, and facility level to describe and gain an understanding of the system in the region, communication flow, and current barriers and facilitators to consistent emergency supply availability. The team performed inductive and deductive analysis and used the "Sociotechnical Model for Studying Health Information Technology in Complex Adaptive Healthcare Systems" to guide the deductive portion. RESULTS: The interviews identified several locations within the OESC where barriers could be addressed to improve overall facility-level readiness, such as gaps in communication about supply needs and availability in health care facilities and regional supply hubs and a lack of data transparency at the facility level. Ordering supplies through the integrated pharmaceutical logistics system was a well-established process and a frequently noted strength. Furthermore, having inventory data in one place was a benefit to pharmacists and supply managers who would need to use the data to determine their historic consumption. The greatest concern related to the workflow and communication of the OESC was an inability to accurately forecast future supply needs. This is a critical issue because inaccurate forecasting can lead to undersupplying and stockouts or oversupplying and waste of medication due to expiration. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of these interviews, we gained a nuanced understanding of the information needs for various levels of the health system to maintain a consistent supply of obstetric emergency resources and ultimately increase maternal survival. This study's findings will inform future work to create customized strategies that increase supply availability in facilities and the region overall, specifically the development of electronic dashboards to increase data availability at the regional and facility levels. Without comprehensive and timely data about the OESC, facilities will continue to remain in the dark about their true readiness to manage basic obstetric emergencies, and the central Ethiopian Pharmaceutical Supply Service and regional hubs will not have the necessary information to provide essential emergency supplies prospectively before stockouts and maternal deaths occur.

Assessing emergency room leadership of ObGyn residents in a public university teaching hospital of Sindh, Pakistan: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Leadership is a critical competency for medical professionals, yet it is often neglected in medical training. For ObGyn residents, leadership training is particularly crucial as it significantly impacts both maternal and newborn outcomes, as well as the operational efficiency of healthcare teams. The main objective of this study was to assess the perceptions of obstetrics and gynecology residents who served as group leaders in the emergency team at the Department of Gynecology, Ward 3, Dr. Ruth K.M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi. METHODS: A Cross-sectional survey was conducted with purposively sampled 28 year-4 residents who worked as group leaders during last 3 years (from 2018 to 2020) of their residency program at the emergency team in the department of Gynecology Ward 3 Dr Ruth KM Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi. The perceptions on leadership were assessed on 25 items scale sent through a questionnaire on email. Grading of responses was done using a 4-point ordinal scale where 1 meant little importance and 4 was regarded as having great importance. Data was summarized with relevant descriptive statistics and was analyzed on SPSS version 22. RESULTS: The mean age of residents was 30.36. The mean leadership scores of the group of residents were calculated to be 77.50 (SD ± 9.57) while 14(50%) residents showed good and 14 (50%) showed excellent leadership skills based on cumulative scores. Of the 25 traits examined in this study, the highest reported trait was humility 3.82 (± 0.39) followed by empowerment 3.68 (± 0.77) and effective communication 3.68 (± 0.77). While responding about learning experiences, 89.3% of participants felt that the experience enhanced their decision-making skills and boosted their confidence in dealing with emergencies. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the critical importance of leadership development in the training of ObGyn residents, particularly in high-pressure emergency settings. The findings reveal that residents value leadership traits such as humility, empowerment, and effective communication, which are essential for building teamwork and ensuring optimal patient outcomes and patient satisfaction.

The impact of specialty training and physician attitudes on fetal cardiac counseling.

OBJECTIVE: Fetal cardiac anomalies are the most commonly diagnosed structural anomalies. In these cases, Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) specialists are tasked with counseling patients on a spectrum of diagnoses as well as their prognostic implications. A recent study of pediatric cardiologists demonstrated that personal beliefs regarding termination impact the counseling provided to patients. Our objective was to study whether the personal beliefs of MFMs impact counseling of patients with severe fetal cardiac anomalies and to compare these providers to their cardiology counterparts. METHODS: We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional survey of MFMs in New England that assessed personal beliefs and counseling practices when diagnosing hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). We subsequently compared these providers to the previously surveyed cardiologists. RESULTS: A total of 34 respondents representing a broad spectrum of age and experience across several states in New England were analyzed. When presented with the statement "some life is always better than no life at all," 79% (n = 27) of respondents disagreed and all respondents (n = 34) offered termination, palliative care, and treatment options when counseling patients with HLHS. Additionally, while 74% (n = 25) of providers would personally support a decision to terminate a pregnancy with HLHS, 94% (n = 32) would professionally support the decision to pursue termination.MFMs and cardiologists differed in their responses to "some life is better than no life" and the belief that termination should be offered, though differences did not reach statistical significance. However, with respect to the providers' personal and professional support of the decision to terminate the pregnancy, the groups of respondents varied significantly in their level of support, both professionally and personally with fewer cardiologists supporting this decision. CONCLUSION: When diagnosing a severe and potentially fatal congenital cardiac anomaly, counseling by MFMs was largely unaffected by personal beliefs regarding termination of pregnancy. While this is consistent with previously published data on counseling practices among pediatric cardiology specialists, some important differences between the specialties were seen.

Re-evaluating the Morse Fall Scale in obstetrics and gynecology wards and determining optimal cut-off scores for enhanced risk assessment: A retrospective survey.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the validity of the MFS by analyzing the electronic medical records on fall risk in obstetrics and gynecology wards and determine the optimal cut-off score of the Morse Fall Scale. DESIGN: A retrospective survey. METHODS: The research was conducted in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital and a general hospital. The sample included 136 fall inpatients and 120 no-fall inpatients recruited from January 1st, 2020, to July 10th, 2022. The Morse Fall Scale was analyzed using the gold standard of patients who fell while hospitalized, assessing the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Kappa. RESULTS: At cut-off scores of 40, 45,50, and 55, the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was 0.772, 0.761, 0.749, and 0.763, respectively. The Youden index was 0.543, 0.521, 0.498, and 0.525, while Kappa values were 0.540, 0.518, 0.490, and 0.515. Sensitivity was 0.735, 0.713, 0.640, and 0.625; specificity was 0.808, 0.808, 0.858, and 0.900. The positive predictive values were 0.813, 0.808, 0.837, and 0.876, and the negative predictive values were 0.729, 0.713, 0.678, and 0.679. Accuracy were 0.770, 0.758, 0.742, and 0.754. CONCLUSIONS: The Morse Fall Scale demonstrates good predictive performance for assessing fall risk in gynecology and obstetrics wards. The optimal cut-off score is 40.

Crisis Management by Obstetrics and Gynecologist Hospitalists: Lessons Learned in a Pandemic.

We discuss lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic through an obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) hospitalist lens, with a focus on clinical care considerations, workforce changes, communication and collaboration, and provider wellness. We end with a discussion on the role of OB/GYN hospitalists as leaders. Our goal is to share what worked well for hospital systems and OB/GYN hospitalist teams during COVID-19, along with recommendations to consider for future national emergencies.

Obstetrician-Gynecologist Hospitalists as Educators.

The progressive growth of the hospitalist model of practice over the past 20 years has solidified the role of the obstetrics and gynecology (ob/gyn) hospitalists as an essential component of quality inpatient care. The ob/gyn hospitalist as an educator is proving to be an important role in the future of hospitalist practice. The role as an educator has long-term benefits and implications for the standardization of education and evidence-based patient care both in community-based and academic practice settings.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Obstetrics and Gynecologist Hospitalists' Impact on Maternal Mortality.

Obstetrics and gynecology hospitalists play a vital role in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality by providing immediate access to obstetric care, especially in emergencies. Their presence in hospitals ensures timely interventions and expert management, contributing to better outcomes for mothers and babies. This proactive approach can extend beyond hospital walls through education, advocacy, and community outreach initiatives aimed at improving maternal health across diverse settings.

Obstetrics and Gynecologic Hospitalists and Their Focus: Impact on Safety and Quality Metrics.

Obstetrics and gynecologic hospitalists play a pivotal role in the evolution of perinatal care. Hospitalists improve patient safety by providing on-site, reliable, high-quality care. Hospitalists help to reduce the rates of unnecessary cesarean deliveries and increase the rates of vaginal deliveries.

The Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospitalist: Risk Management Implications.

The concept of a 24/7 in-house obstetrician, serving as an obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) hospitalist, provides a safety-net for obstetric and gynecologic events that may need immediate intervention for a successful outcome. The addition of an Ob/Gyn hospitalist role in the perinatal department mitigates loss prevention, a key precept of risk management. Inherent in the role of the Ob/Gyn hospitalist are the important patient safety and risk management principles of layers of back-up, enhanced teamwork and communications, and immediate availability.

Organizing and Operationalizing an Effective Obstetric and Gynecologic Hospitalist Program.

Creating and managing a successful obstetric and gynecologic (OB hospitalist) program requires careful attention to multiple aspects of the program. Appropriate policies and procedures need to be created. The clinical team needs to be selected and trained. Measurement of clinical and operational activity needs to be implemented and transparently shared with the team and the hospital partner. This all should be done with the hospital's goals for the program in mind and recognizing the type of clinical care that the hospital provides for obstetric patients in its community.

Triage Versus Obstetric Emergency Department and Main Emergency Department: Best Practices.

An obstetric emergency department (OBED) allows for timely, standardized and quality care by a clinician for pregnant patients presenting unscheduled to a hospital. Understanding the differences between a traditional labor and delivery triage model and an OBED are important in developing a successful, safe, and quality obstetric program that meets the needs of the community with appropriate resource allocation. The benefits in an OBED of every patient seen in a timely fashion by a clinician, and ultimately the impact on outcomes are noteworthy and should be considered when developing a labor and delivery unit.

The Role of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospitalist in the Changing Landscape of Obstetrics and Gynecology Practice.

As the field of obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) evolves, the role of the Ob/Gyn hospitalists has become increasingly integrated into the framework of the specialty. Ob/Gyn hospitalists take on essential responsibilities as competent clinicians in emergent situations and as hospital leaders: maintaining standard of care, collaborating with community practitioners and care teams, promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion practices, and contributing to educational initiatives. The impact of the Ob/Gyn hospitalists is positive for patients, fellow clinicians, and institutions. As the field continues to change and the Ob/Gyn hospitalist develops as an established subspecialty, further research evaluating its role remains essential.

Can Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospitalists Reduce Severe Maternal Morbidity?

Maternal mortality in the United States has risen steadily over the past 20 years. Several interventions including maternal mortality committees and safety bundles have been introduced to decrease the trend. Severe maternal morbidity is a more frequent occurrence related to maternal mortality and can be used to track interventions. Within safety bundles, the presence of well-trained on-site staff such as obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) hospitalists is key to correct implementation. In this article, the authors review the role of OB/GYN hospitalists in specific diagnoses and the evidence present to date on OB/GYN hospitalists' role in decreasing severe maternal morbidity.

OBGYN Hospitalist Fellowships: An Update on Fellowship Training in the United States.

Due to improved outcomes in clinical care, patient safety, and education, demand for OBGYN hospitalists is increasing. As a result, an OBGYN hospitalist fellowship was developed to train future leaders in OBGYN hospital medicine. This article is a discussion regarding the landscape of OBGYN hospitalist fellowships across the country. Utilizing information from program-specific Web sites, as well as discussions with past and present fellowship directors, this article summarizes key differences and similarities across programs, as well as reviews important considerations for those hoping to start a fellowship at their own institution.