Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.690
Filtrar
1.
Dermatol Online J ; 30(2)2024 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959931

RESUMO

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) involves recurrent, pruritic wheals lasting more than 6 weeks in response to various etiologies, including unknown causality. Though most cutaneous reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine series are self-limited and of short duration, more complex presentations including chronic spontaneous urticaria have been described. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of chronic spontaneous urticaria following heterologous mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccination that includes vaccination with both forms of the mRNA vaccine. Our patient received Pfizer-BioNTech for the primary series and Moderna for the booster. After failing several therapies, our patient's urticaria was refractory even to omalizumab. The source for chronic spontaneous urticaria development in our patient may be related to the unique humoral response elicited by receipt of a different mRNA vaccine manufacturer.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Urticária Crônica , Imunização Secundária , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Imunização Secundária/efeitos adversos , Vacina BNT162/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Adulto
3.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 35(1): 2371545, 2024 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38972668

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The presence of wheals or hives has been viewed as a hallmark symptom of urticaria, a highly debilitating disease. This study explores our experience with omalizumab in patients with apparent mast-cell mediated pruritus in the absence of hives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case series examining all patients with mast cell-mediated pruritus in the absence of hives from April 2022 to May 2024 at a tertiary referral clinic at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York. Peak pruritus-numerical rating scale (PP-NRS) itch score changes over time were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Six patients (67% women; mean [SD] age, 47.67 [13.52] years) were included in the analysis. The median [IQR] pruritus PP-NRS itch score before omalizumab injection was 9 [6 - 10] and the final median [IQR] PP-NRS itch score was 2.5 [0 - 5]. The mean [SD] reduction in the PP-NRS itch score was 6 [3.16]. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that patients with evidence of mast cell-mediated pruritus can be identified based on clinical features and may benefit from omalizumab therapy.


Assuntos
Mastócitos , Omalizumab , Prurido , Humanos , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Omalizumab/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Prurido/tratamento farmacológico , Prurido/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Mastócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Mastócitos/imunologia , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Antialérgicos/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Urticária/tratamento farmacológico
4.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 45(4): 255-261, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982597

RESUMO

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common disease with complex pathogenesis. Patients' clinical characteristics and responses to treatment vary. Objective: We aimed to investigate the role of data obtained from routinely recommended tests in predicting the response to omalizumab, the only biologic agent approved for treatment, and in defining the clinical characteristics of the patients. Methods: A retrospective study of patients who started omalizumab treatment for CSU between 2015 and 2022 at the Department of Dermatology, Pamukkale University, was conducted. Response criteria were based on the urticaria control test, and patients with a urticaria control test score <12 at 6 months were considered treatment non-responders. Eosinophil and basophil counts, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels of the patients were evaluated before treatment and at the sixth month of treatment. Results: A total of 23.1% of the patients were unresponsive to omalizumab. The response rate to the omalizumab treatment of the patients with a total IgE level ≤ 30 IU/L (n = 4 [5.7%]) was significantly lower than patients with total IgE level > 30 IU/L (n = 66 [94.3%]) (p = 0.015). The mean ± standard deviation SIRI levels were significantly higher in non-responders versus responders (1.53 ± 1.03 versus 1.15 ± 7.76; p = 0.026). Eosinophil counts positively correlated with basophil counts (r = 587; p < 0.001) and IgE levels (r = 0.290; p = 0.005) but a negative correlation was found with levels of NLR (r = -0.475; p < 0.001), SIRI (r = -0.259; p = 0.013), and SII (r = -0.285; p = 0.006). NLR levels were lower in CSU patients with atopy, than in those without atopy (1.9 ± 0.9 vs 2.9 ± 2.1, p = 0.022). Conclusion: We suggest that eosinopenia and high NLR levels are linked to autoimmune CSU. Predicting a poor response to omalizumab seems possible with total IgE levels < 30 IU/L and high SIRI levels.


Assuntos
Antialérgicos , Urticária Crônica , Imunoglobulina E , Omalizumab , Humanos , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Eosinófilos/imunologia , Contagem de Leucócitos , Idoso , Adulto Jovem
6.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am ; 44(3): 453-467, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937009

RESUMO

This study focuses on quality of life (QoL) assessment in chronic urticaria, delving into tools, disease-specific measures, and its profound impact. With expanding therapeutic options, understanding QoL becomes crucial. QoL measures often involve comparisons of patient-reported outcomes in addition to quantitative measures of disease control. Emerging tools include the Urticaria Activity and Impact Measure, which may provide a balanced evaluation. In addition to discussions of the various QoL measures, the psychological impact of chronic urticaria are highlighted, covering emotional burden, stress, and psychiatric comorbidities. Finally, the economic impacts reveal escalating health care costs and cost-effectiveness considerations of therapies like omalizumab.


Assuntos
Urticária Crônica , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Urticária Crônica/economia , Urticária Crônica/psicologia , Urticária Crônica/diagnóstico , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Omalizumab/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente
7.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am ; 44(3): 503-515, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937012

RESUMO

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) affects 0.5% to 1% of the general population and is often managed by allergy and immunology specialists. Guidelines have evolved over the past several decades with an emphasis on decreasing extensive screening laboratory testing as they are of low-yield and cost-ineffective. The utility of biomarkers remains under investigation but total immunoglobulin E may be helpful in determining specific endotypes and response to omalizumab. Antihistamines and omalizumab remain the primary therapeutic options for CSU, but an expanding body of evidence supports the use of immunosuppressants and anti-inflammatory medications in refractory cases.


Assuntos
Urticária Crônica , Humanos , Urticária Crônica/diagnóstico , Urticária Crônica/terapia , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Gerenciamento Clínico , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapêutico , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico
8.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 35(5): e14132, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38727626

RESUMO

Tree nut allergy is a lifelong and potentially life-threatening condition. The standard of care is strictly avoiding the culprit nut and treating accidental reactions symptomatically. To evaluate potential therapeutic options for desensitizing patients with IgE-mediated tree nut allergy, we systematically searched three bibliographic databases for studies published until January 2024. We looked for active treatments of IgE-mediated allergy to tree nuts (walnut, hazelnut, pistachio, cashew, almond, pecan, macadamia nut, and brazil nut). We focused on allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) using oral (OIT), sublingual (SLIT), epicutaneous (EPIT), or subcutaneous (SCIT) delivery, or other disease-modifying treatments. We found 19 studies that met our criteria: 3 studies investigated sublingual immunotherapy, 5 studied oral immunotherapy to a single tree nut, and 6 used multi-food oral immunotherapy with or without omalizumab. The remaining studies investigated the effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies or IgE-immunoadsorption in multi-food allergic patients, including patients with tree nut allergy. The heterogeneity of the studies prevented pooling and meta-analysis. Oral immunotherapy, single or multi-nut, with or without omalizumab, was the most studied approach and appears effective in conferring protection from accidental exposures. Omalizumab monotherapy is the only approved alternative management for reducing allergic reactions that may occur with accidental exposure.


Assuntos
Dessensibilização Imunológica , Imunoglobulina E , Hipersensibilidade a Noz , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade a Noz/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Noz/terapia , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Nozes/imunologia , Criança , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico
9.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 24(4): 251-256, 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814736

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To acknowledge, the newly available treatments for food allergy described in the latest scientific literature, such as oral immunotherapy (OIT), biologics and the combination of them in managing patients with IgE-mediated food allergies. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies suggest that OIT and biologics, alone or together, can have a role as disease-modifying treatments for food allergies. The FDA has recently approved omalizumab as a treatment for food allergy. Other biologics are currently under evaluation and further studies are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of these therapies. SUMMARY: The allergology scenario is rapidly evolving, the recent introduction and approval of new therapeutic strategies such as biotechnological drugs and allergen immunotherapy is changing the therapeutic paradigm: we are witnessing a shift from a strategy based on avoiding the trigger and reversing an allergic reaction already in progress, to one that aims to modify the natural history of the disease by acting on the immunological mechanisms that determine it. This approach is consistent with the modern perspective of a personalized patient-tailored medicine. In this opinion review, we will provide a brief analysis of current and future therapeutic options for IgE-mediated food allergy, focusing on OIT, biologics and their combination.


Assuntos
Dessensibilização Imunológica , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Imunoglobulina E , Omalizumab , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Alérgenos/imunologia , Alérgenos/administração & dosagem , Animais , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Medicina de Precisão/métodos
10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741391

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study examined the remission probability and duration in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients resistant to second-generation H1-antihistamines (sgAHs) undergoing omalizumab treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of 176 adult CSU patients exhibiting a significant pruritus component (≥ 8) of the weekly urticaria activity score (UAS7) despite four daily sgAH tablets and starting omalizumab treatment with 300 mg every 4 weeks. After excluding 13 nonresponders, we analyzed 163 omalizumab responders (mean age 51.8 years, 74.4% female). The intervals between applications were increased. Discontinuation was considered for patients that remained asymptomatic on a gradually reduced dosage (to 150 mg every 12 weeks) without sgAHs. RESULTS: Omalizumab discontinuation was possible in 25.8% (42/163). The duration of omalizumab treatment before remission ranged from 7 to 63 months. Twenty-one patients (50.0%) maintained complete remission until the end of the observation period (September 2021) for 8 to 68 months. Of the relapsed patients, 71.4% (15/21) effectively controlled CSU with sgAHs. Six patients (28.6%; 6/21) required omalizumab reintroduction after 6 to 40 months of remission, responding favorably. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that a quarter of severe CSU patients achieve long-term remission. In addition, sgAHs effectively manage symptoms in a majority of relapsed cases, and those requiring omalizumab reintroduction respond favorably.


Assuntos
Antialérgicos , Urticária Crônica , Omalizumab , Humanos , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Indução de Remissão , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso
11.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 261, 2024 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795119

RESUMO

While several studies have examined the role of T cells and related cytokines in the development of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), there is a limited amount of research focusing on the changes in cytokine levels during omalizumab treatment. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the inflammatory cytokine profile (including IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17, IL-31, IL-33, and TNFα) among CSU patients undergoing to omalizumab treatment. Plasma levels of cytokines were measured using ELISA. Measurements were taken before CSU treatment, at the 3rd and 6th months of omalizumab treatment, and once in the control group. The severity of the patients' disease was assessed using the weekly Urticaria Activity Score(UAS7), and disease control was evaluated using the Urticaria Control Test(UCT). Thirty-one CSU patients and 56 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were included. Plasma levels of IL-4 and IL-33 were significantly lower in patients with CSU compared to healthy controls (p = 0.001; p = 0.038, respectively). During omalizumab treatment, IL-4 levels showed a significant increase in the 3rd month compared to baseline (p = 0.01), and IL-5 levels significantly decreased in the 6th month compared to both the 3rd month and baseline (6th month vs. baseline; p = 0.006, 6th month vs. 3rd month; p = 0.001). One potential mechanism of action for omalizumab may involve its regulatory effects on type 2 inflammatory cytokines in CSU patients. This finding partially explains the efficacy of anti-IL-4/13 treatments in chronic spontaneous urticaria. Further investigations on drugs targeting type 2 inflammatory cytokines in CSU are warranted.


Assuntos
Antialérgicos , Urticária Crônica , Citocinas , Omalizumab , Humanos , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Omalizumab/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Urticária Crônica/sangue , Urticária Crônica/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Citocinas/sangue , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Antialérgicos/administração & dosagem , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Adulto Jovem
12.
Ter Arkh ; 95(12): 1112-1118, 2024 Jan 31.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785050

RESUMO

This article presents the experience of successfully switching therapy from omalizumab 150 mg to benralizumab 30 mg/1 ml in a patient with a combined allergic and eosinophilic phenotype in the presence of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The effectiveness of biological therapy was evaluated when switching from omalizumab 150 mg subcutaneously at a dose of 600 mg for 36 weeks. Therapy for the drug benralizumab 30 mg/1 ml subcutaneously the first three injections monthly, the rest a month later for 52 weeks with bronchial asthma (BA), a severe uncontrolled course with a combined allergic and eosinophilic phenotype in the presence of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in a patient Ch., born in 2004. Switching therapy from omalizumab 150 mg to benralizumab 30 mg/1 ml allowed to achieve complete control of asthma symptoms (AST = 23 points), to achieve the absence of asthma exacerbations during 52 weeks, restore respiratory function to normal values, as well as improve the quality of life. The study reflects the good tolerability, high efficacy and safety of biological therapy when switching from one genetically engineered biological drug (GIBP) omalizumab 150 mg to another GIBP benralizumab 30 mg/1 ml in severe uncontrolled asthma with a combined allergic and eosinophilic phenotype in the presence of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Therapy with benralizumab 30 mg/1 ml in severe BA has demonstrated a more effective clinically significant improvement in the course of the disease, control of symptoms of the disease. Reduction of exacerbations, normalization of respiratory function indicators, complete control of the disease has been achieved. Consequently, the use of different biological molecules for the therapy of BA with a combined allergic and eosinophilic phenotype contributes to achieving disease control, improving the patient's quality of life and reducing the dose of oral glucocorticosteroids. The targeted biological drug benralizumab 30 mg/1 ml has a targeted effect on the key links in the pathogenesis of severe uncontrolled asthma with a combined allergic and eosinophilic phenotype in the presence of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and reduces the burden of severe disease.


Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Asma , Omalizumab , Humanos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Omalizumab/administração & dosagem , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Feminino , Substituição de Medicamentos/métodos , Qualidade de Vida
15.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(3): 1-7, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721949

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Many chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients have highly stressful life events and exhibit psychiatric comorbidities. Emotional stress can cause or exacerbate urticaria symptoms by causing mast cell degranulation via neuromediators. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency of stressful life events and compare psychiatric comorbidities and serum neuromediator levels in patients with CSU who responded to omalizumab with healthy controls. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included 42 patients with CSU who received at least 6 months of omalizumab treatment and a control group of 42 healthy controls. Stressful life events were evaluated with the Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-42 (DASS-42) was used to evaluate depression, anxiety and stress levels. Serum nerve growth factor (NGF), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (SP) levels were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. RESULTS: Twenty-six (62%) patients reported at least one stressful life event a median of 3.5 months before the onset of CSU. There were no significant differences in all three variables in the DASS subscales between the patient and control groups. Serum NGF levels were found to be significantly lower in patients with CSU (p <0.001), whereas CGRP levels were found to be significantly higher (p <0.001). There was no significant difference for SP. CONCLUSIONS: The psychological status of patients with CSU who benefited from omalizumab was similar to that of healthy controls. Omalizumab may affect stress-related neuromediator levels.


Assuntos
Antialérgicos , Urticária Crônica , Fator de Crescimento Neural , Omalizumab , Estresse Psicológico , Humanos , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Urticária Crônica/sangue , Estudos Transversais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estresse Psicológico/tratamento farmacológico , Estresse Psicológico/sangue , Fator de Crescimento Neural/sangue , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Substância P/sangue , Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina , Comorbidade , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Depressão/sangue , Depressão/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Mentais/sangue , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia
16.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e083112, 2024 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749694

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a frequent condition affecting approximately 2% of the population. Medical treatment consists long-term use of intranasal corticosteroids and short-term use of oral corticosteroids, in adjunct with saline solution rinses. Surgical management is proposed in patients who failed after medical treatment. In France, two biologics are reimbursed in case of severe uncontrolled CRSwNP despite medical treatment and endoscopic sinus surgery. Waiting for head-to-head biologics comparison, studies should report the efficacy and safety of biologics in large real-life cohorts. This study protocol describes the aims and methods of a prospective, observational, national, multicentric cohort of patients with CRSwNP treated with biologics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The BIOlogics in severe nasal POlyposis SurvEy is a French multicentre prospective observational cohort study. The main aim is to assess the efficacy and tolerance of biologics in patients with CRSwNP, with or without association with other type 2 diseases, and to determine the strategies in case of uncontrolled disease under biologics. Patients over 18 years old requiring biologics for CRSwNP in accordance with its marketing approval in France (ie, severe nasal polyposis, with lack of control under nasal corticosteroid, systemic corticosteroids and surgery) are invited to participate. Collected data include topical history of surgical procedures and biologics, medication and use of systemic corticosteroids, visual analogical scales for specific symptoms, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 questionnaire, nasal polyp score, asthma control test, Lund-Mackay score on CT scan and IgE concentration and eosinophilic count on blood sample. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05228041/DRI_2021/0030.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Pólipos Nasais , Rinite , Sinusite , Humanos , Pólipos Nasais/tratamento farmacológico , Pólipos Nasais/complicações , Sinusite/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Crônica , Rinite/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , França , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Rinossinusite
17.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(5)2024 Apr 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38792886

RESUMO

Background and Objectives: The guidelines for chronic urticaria in children contain recommendations that are often based on adult studies. The diagnostic pathway has not been standardized and the effectiveness of anti-H1, omalizumab, montelukast, and systemic glucocorticoids is rarely reported in the pediatric population. There is a wide variation in the rate of remission of chronic urticaria between studies. The aim of this study is to enhance our understanding of pediatric chronic urticaria. Materials and Methods: This study enrolled 37 children with chronic urticaria aged from 0 to 18 years. Demographic parameters, medical history, clinical features, laboratory data and treatment information were collected. Children were treated with the recommended dosage of second-generation H1-antihistamines, which was increased by up to twofold. Omalizumab was added for refractory anti-H1 patients. A three-day course with systemic glucocorticoids was administered for severe exacerbations. Montelukast was administered to some children. Results: Wheals without angioedema were common. Chronic urticaria was spontaneous in 32 children (86.48%), inducible in 2 (5.41%), induced by a parasite in 1 and vasculitic in 2. Treatment of the potential causes of chronic urticaria was of no benefit, except for eradication of Dientamoeba fragilis. Chronic urticaria was resolved within three years in 45.9% of cases. Allergic diseases were present in nine children (24.32%) and autoimmune diseases were present in three (8.11%). All children were treated with anti-H1 at the licensed dose or at a higher dose. A partial or complete response to anti-H1 was observed in 29 (78.38%) patients. Montelukast showed no benefit. All children treated with omalizumab responded. Systemic glucocorticoids were successfully used to treat exacerbations. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that laboratory tests should not be routinely performed in children with chronic urticaria without clinical suspicion. However, comorbidities such as thyroid autoimmune disease and coeliac disease are suggested to be monitored over the chronic urticaria course. These clinical conditions could be diagnosed from the diagnostic framework of chronic urticaria. Increasing the dosage of anti-H1 and omalizumab was effective in children resistant to standard treatment but we still need further studies to generate a standard patient-centered treatment.


Assuntos
Acetatos , Urticária Crônica , Ciclopropanos , Omalizumab , Quinolinas , Sulfetos , Humanos , Criança , Feminino , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Lactente , Ciclopropanos/uso terapêutico , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , Quinolinas/administração & dosagem , Acetatos/uso terapêutico , Acetatos/administração & dosagem , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos H1/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos H1/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Antialérgicos/administração & dosagem , Recém-Nascido , Doença Crônica , Urticária/tratamento farmacológico
18.
Skin Res Technol ; 30(5): e13749, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776128

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab is the only licensed drug that serves as a third-line treatment for chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). The optimum doses of omalizumab remain controversial. Therefore, this study aims to estimate the efficacy and safety of different doses of omalizumab in the treatment of CIU patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four databases were searched from the database's creation to April 8, 2023. Several keywords such as omalizumab and urticarias were used to retrieve related studies. The meta-analytical outcomes were analyzed in R 4.2.1 software and Stata 15.1 software. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool Ver. 2 was used to evaluate the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS: In total, 2331 patients were included. Five indexes were employed to assess, including weekly Itch Severity Score (ISS7), weekly Hive Severity Score (HSS7), weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and adverse events (AE). A 300 mg dose of omalizumab was the optimum dose to treat CIU, followed by the 150 mg dose. Furthermore, 600 mg of omalizumab only showed a significant difference from the placebo in HSS7. No significant statistical difference was observed in AE. Meta-regression analysis revealed that time, as a covariate, was statistically significant in the comparison of omalizumab 150 mg with placebo. CONCLUSION: 300 mg of omalizumab was the optimum dosage to treat CIU patients, with a 150 mg dose also exhibiting good efficacy. Further studies are required to explore the efficacy and safety of different doses of omalizumab in the treatment of CIU patients.


Assuntos
Antialérgicos , Urticária Crônica , Omalizumab , Omalizumab/efeitos adversos , Omalizumab/administração & dosagem , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Antialérgicos/administração & dosagem , Antialérgicos/efeitos adversos , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Metanálise em Rede , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga
19.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10404, 2024 05 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710930

RESUMO

To date, most studies to identify biomarkers associated with response to the anti-interleukin 5 agent, mepolizumab, and to the anti-immunoglobulin E agent, omalizumab have focused on clinically available biomarkers, such as the peripheral blood eosinophil counts (BEC) and total immunoglobulin E (IgE). However, these biomarkers often have low predictive accuracy, with many patients with eosinophilic or allergic asthma failing to demonstrate clinical response to mepolizumab or omalizumab respectively. In this study, we evaluated the association of baseline pre-biologic plasma levels of 26 cytokines and chemokines, including T-helper 1 (Th1)-, Th2-, Th17-related cytokines, and their ratios with subsequent clinical response to mepolizumab or omalizumab. We defined clinical response as a reduction in the baseline annual exacerbation rate by half or more over the one-year period following initiation of the biologic. Baseline levels of plasma IL-13 were differentially elevated in responders versus non-responders to mepolizumab and plasma CXCL10 levels were differentially elevated in responders to omalizumab. The ratio of IL-13/TNF-α had the best sensitivity and specificity in predicting response to mepolizumab and CXCL10/CCL17 to omalizumab, and these performed better as predictive biomarkers of response than BEC and IgE. Cytokines and chemokines associated with airway eosinophilia, allergic inflammation, or Th2 inflammation, such as IL-13 and CXCL10, may be better predictors of clinical response to mepolizumab and omalizumab, than IL-5 or IgE, the targets of mepolizumab and omalizumab.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Asma , Quimiocina CCL17 , Quimiocina CXCL10 , Eosinófilos , Imunoglobulina E , Interleucina-13 , Omalizumab , Humanos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/sangue , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Feminino , Masculino , Quimiocina CCL17/sangue , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Quimiocina CXCL10/sangue , Interleucina-13/sangue , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Contagem de Leucócitos , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Rev Mal Respir ; 41(5): 372-381, 2024 May.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653607

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is a pathology that remains severe and is inadequately controlled in 4% of patients. Identification of multiple pathophysiological mechanisms has led to the development of biomedicines, of which there are currently five available in France, with a safety profile that appears favorable but remains uncertain due to a lack of real-life experience with these new molecules. STATE OF KNOWLEDGE: Although relatively benign, the adverse effects of biologics are diverse. Headache, joint pain, skin reactions at the injection site, fever and asthenia are commonly observed during the different treatments. Ophthalmological complications seem restricted to dupilumab, with numerous cases of keratitis and conjunctivitis in patients with atopic dermatitis. Several respiratory complications have also been observed, essentially consisting in pharyngitis and other upper respiratory infections. Hypereosinophilia may occur, mainly with dupilumab, requiring investigation of systemic repercussions or vasculitis. Allergic reactions are uncommon but require careful monitoring during initial injections. CONCLUSION: Biologics for severe asthma are recent drugs with a favorable safety profile, but with little real-life experience, justifying increased vigilance by prescribing physicians.


Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Produtos Biológicos , Humanos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiologia , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Antiasmáticos/efeitos adversos , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Omalizumab/efeitos adversos , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , França/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...