Hereditary Orotic Aciduria and the Excretion of Orotidine.

Objective Orotic aciduria and deficiency of uridine monophosphate synthetase have been observed in a patient, studied over 10 years, who had no megaloblastic anemia. Excretion of orotic acid and orotidine were 8.24 and 0.52 mmol/mol of creatinine. The ratio of 15.85 differed appreciably from that of 6 patients reported with no megaloblastic anemia. Methods The analysis of orotidine by gas chromotography mass spectrometry was conducted. Conclusion Patients with orotic aciduria with and without megaloblastic anemia cannot be distinguished by ratio of orotic acid to orotidine.

Effects of combined administration of DPD-inhibitory oral fluoropyrimidine, S-1, plus paclitaxel on gene expressions of fluoropyrimidine metabolism-related enzymes in human gastric xenografts.

BACKGROUND: S-1 is the most effective oral fluoropyrimidine derivative widely used for patients with gastric carcinoma in Japan. Although S-1 plus taxane has been a promising candidate as an effective chemotherapeutic regimen, the mechanisms of its additive or synergistic anticancer effects and changes in gene expression after the administration of these agents have not yet been fully elucidated. METHODS: Experimental chemotherapy was performed using human gastric carcinoma xenografts, MKN-45 and TMK-1, to examine anticancer effects and gene expressions of fluoropyrimidine metabolism-related enzymes including thymidine phosphorylase (TP), thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT), and uridine phosphorylase (UP). Nude mice were treated with S-1, paclitaxel, and their combination. After treatment, in vivo antitumor effects of S-1, paclitaxel alone, and their combination and the effects on gene expressions of enzymes involved in 5-fluorouracil metabolism were examined using the RT-PCR method. RESULTS: The combined use of S-1 and paclitaxel showed additive to synergistic antitumor effects on both gastric cancer xenografts. While consistent upregulation of dThPase and DPD gene expression was exhibited after administration of S-1, no further increase of dThPase gene expression after combined use of S-1 with paclitaxel was observed. There was no increase in TS gene expression after the administration of either S-1 alone or paclitaxel alone. CONCLUSION: These results provide some insight into the mechanism and/or rationale underlying the additive to synergistic effect of combined administration of S-1 and paclitaxel in gastric carcinoma.

Role of thymidine phosphorylase and orotate phosphoribosyltransferase mRNA expression and its ratio to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in the prognosis and clinicopathological features of patients with pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Thymidine phosphorylase (TP), orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT), and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are important enzymes related to the metabolism of 5-fluorouracil and its derivatives. In this study, we analyzed the expression of these enzymes and evaluated the association between the expression of these enzymes and clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: TP, OPRT, and DPD mRNA expressions were detected using a real-time reverse transcriptional-polymerase chain reaction method or by immunohistochemistry, using surgical specimens obtained from 25 patients with pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: TP mRNA expression was lower in cases with an alpha infiltration growth pattern than in cases with other infiltration growth patterns (P < 0.05). OPRT mRNA expression was higher in poorly differentiated-type cases than in differentiated type cases (P < 0.05). TP-, OPRT-, and DPD-positive stainings were found in 15 of 24 cases (63%), 10 of 19 cases (53%), and 14 of 21 cases (67%), respectively. There were significant correlations or trends between the mRNA and protein expressions of TP, OPRT, and DPD. Patients with a low TP/DPD ratio survived significantly longer than those with a high ratio (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significantly poorer outcome in patients with a high TP/DPD ratio compared with in patients with a low ratio (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The TP/DPD ratio might be useful as a prognostic factor in patients with pancreatic cancer.