Digital Otoscopy Videos Versus Composite Images: A Reader Study to Compare the Accuracy of ENT Physicians.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: With the increasing emphasis on developing effective telemedicine approaches in Otolaryngology, this study explored whether a single composite image stitched from a digital otoscopy video provides acceptable diagnostic information to make an accurate diagnosis, as compared with that provided by the full video. STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic survey analysis. METHODS: Five Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) physicians reviewed the same set of 78 digital otoscope eardrum videos from four eardrum conditions: normal, effusion, retraction, and tympanosclerosis, along with the composite images generated by a SelectStitch method that selectively uses video frames with computer-assisted selection, as well as a Stitch method that incorporates all the video frames. Participants provided a diagnosis for each item along with a rating of diagnostic confidence. Diagnostic accuracy for each pathology of SelectStitch was compared with accuracy when reviewing the entire video clip and when reviewing the Stitch image. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy for physicians reviewing SelectStitch images and full video clips, but both provided better diagnostic accuracy than Stitch images. The inter-reader agreement was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Equal to using full video clips, composite images of eardrums generated by SelectStitch provided sufficient information for ENTs to make the correct diagnoses for most pathologies. These findings suggest that use of a composite eardrum image may be sufficient for telemedicine approaches to ear diagnosis, eliminating the need for storage and transmission of large video files, along with future applications for improved documentation in electronic medical record systems, patient/family counseling, and clinical training. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E1668-E1676, 2021.

Otoscopic diagnosis using computer vision: An automated machine learning approach.

OBJECTIVE: Access to otolaryngology is limited by lengthy wait lists and lack of specialists, especially in rural and remote areas. The objective of this study was to use an automated machine learning approach to build a computer vision algorithm for otoscopic diagnosis capable of greater accuracy than trained physicians. This algorithm could be used by primary care providers to facilitate timely referral, triage, and effective treatment. METHODS: Otoscopic images were obtained from Google Images (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA), from open access repositories, and within otolaryngology clinics associated with our institution. After preprocessing, 1,366 unique images were uploaded to the Google Cloud Vision AutoML platform (Google Inc.) and annotated with one or more of 14 otologic diagnoses. A consensus set of labels for each otoscopic image was attained, and a multilabel classifier architecture algorithm was trained. The performance of the algorithm on an 89-image test set was compared to the performance of physicians from pediatrics, emergency medicine, otolaryngology, and family medicine. RESULTS: For all diagnoses combined, the average precision (positive predictive value) of the algorithm was 90.9%, and the average recall (sensitivity) was 86.1%. The algorithm made 79 correct diagnoses with an accuracy of 88.7%. The average physician accuracy was 58.9%. CONCLUSION: We have created a computer vision algorithm using automated machine learning that on average rivals the accuracy of the physicians we tested. Fourteen different otologic diagnoses were analyzed. The field of medicine will be changed dramatically by artificial intelligence within the next few decades, and physicians of all specialties must be prepared to guide that process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:1408-1413, 2020.

Diagnostic methods for acute otitis media in 1 to 12 year old children: a cross sectional study in primary health care.

BACKGROUND: Otoscopy alone has low sensitivity and specificity for acute otitis media (AOM). Otomicroscopy and pneumatic methods are superior to otoscopy. However, these methods require clinical skills. The use of different diagnostic methods for AOM differs between countries and has not been evaluated in Sweden since new guidelines were introduced in 2010. This study aimed to describe the extent of which diagnostic methods and written advice were used for AOM in children 1 to 12 years old. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study all general practitioners (GPs) and specialist trainees in primary care (STs) at 27 primary health care centres in Sweden were asked to complete a self-administrated questionnaire including diagnostic approach and the management of AOM; 75% (111/148) responded to the questionnaire. OUTCOME MEASURES: GPs versus STs and their gender, the use of otoscopy, pneumatic otoscopy, otomicroscopy, tympanometry and written advice. Logistic regressions were used to evaluate the association between GPs versus STs and their gender and the use of diagnostic methods and written advice. RESULTS: To diagnose AOM, 98% of the GPs and STs often or always used otoscopy, in addition to this 17% often or always used otomicroscopy, 18% pneumatic otoscopy and 11% tympanometry. Written advice to parents was provided often or always by 19% of the GPs and STs. The GPs used otomicroscopy more often than STs, adjusted OR 4.9 (95% CI 1.5-17; p = 0.011). For the other diagnostic methods, no differences were found. Female GPs and STs provided written advice more often than male GPs and STs, OR 5.2 (95% CI, 1.6-17; p = 0.0061), adjusted for GP versus ST. CONCLUSIONS: Otoscopy was by far the most commonly used method for the diagnosis of AOM. Female GPs and STs provided written advice more frequently than did their male colleagues. GPs used the significantly better method otomicroscopy more often than STs, therefore, it is important to emphasise teaching of practical skills in otomicroscopy in the specialist training programme for general practice. A correct diagnosis is important for avoiding potentially harmful antibiotic treatments, antimicrobial resistance and possible delay of other diagnoses.

Diagnostic accuracy and confidence for otoscopy: Are medical students receiving sufficient training?

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the confidence and abilities of medical students to diagnose specific types of otologic pathology, and to determine how different training experiences in medical school impact these outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Survey analysis. METHODS: Sixty third- and fourth-year medical students completed a computerized online survey. Participants answered questions about their otoscopic training experience and confidence, and provided diagnoses for 72 digital images taken with a high-definition video otoscope that showed common otologic pathologies of the tympanic membrane and middle ear space. RESULTS: Most participants (65%) had received less exposure to otoscopic training in medical school than they expected. Confidence in diagnostic ability was low. For diagnostic ability, the mean percent correct across pathologies was 54% ± 7.7%. Medical school year (P = .006), intended specialty (P = .022), and total number of otolaryngology rotations (P = .048) were predictive of diagnostic accuracy on univariable logistic regression analyses, but medical school year (P = .039) was the only significant independent predictor in multivariable analysis. Intended specialty (P = .047) and total number of otolaryngology rotations (P = .035) were predictive of prequiz diagnostic confidence on univariable logistic regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students were not satisfied with their exposure to otoscopic training. Intended specialty, total number of otolaryngology rotations, and year in medical school predicted diagnostic accuracy. Intended specialty and total number of otolaryngology rotations predicted diagnostic confidence. Additional studies are needed to investigate how training experiences can be improved to optimize otoscopy training during medical school. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 129:1891-1897, 2019.

Initial findings of shortwave infrared otoscopy in a pediatric population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of Shortwave infrared (SWIR) otoscopy in a pediatric population and establish differences with visible otoscopy. METHODS: Pediatric patients 3 years of age and older seen in the otolaryngology clinic with an audiogram and tympanogram obtained within a week of the visit were recruited for video otoscopy using visible light otoscopy and SWIR otoscopy. Videos were rated by two otolaryngologists based on ability to identify the promontory, ability to identify the ossicular chain and presence or absence of middle ear fluid. RESULTS: A total of 74 video recordings of ears were obtained in 20 patients. We obtained interpretable images in 63/74 (85.1%) ears. There was no statistical significance between ability to perform SWIR otoscopy versus white light video otoscopy as indicated by a p-value of 0.376. There was high inter-rater agreement for identification of both the promontory and the ossicular chain with Kappa values of 0.81 and 0.92 respectively. There was statistical significance between SWIR otoscopy and visible otoscopy in the ability to image the promontory (p = 0.012) and the ossicular chain (p = 0.010). Increased contrast of middle ear fluid was seen in SWIR otoscopy when compared to visible otoscopy. CONCLUSION: SWIR otoscopy is feasible in a pediatric population and could offer some advantages over visible light otoscopy such as better visualization of the middle ear structures through the tympanic membrane and increased contrast for middle ear effusions.

Use and teaching of pneumatic otoscopy in a family medicine residency program.

OBJECTIVE: To determine to what extent FPs teach and use pneumatic otoscopy and to identify the chief influences on this behaviour. DESIGN: Mixed-methods descriptive study conducted between March and May 2011. SETTING: The family medicine residency program at Laval University in Quebec city, Que. PARTICIPANTS: Directors of the family medicine teaching units (FMTUs), teachers, and residents. METHODS: We used questionnaires to assess the availability of pneumatic otoscopy equipment in 12 FMTUs, current behaviour and behavioural intention among physicians (residents and teachers) to use or teach pneumatic otoscopy, and facilitators and barriers to these practices. We also conducted 2 focus groups to further explore the facilitators of and barriers to using pneumatic otoscopy. We used descriptive statistics for quantitative data, transcribed the qualitative material, and performed content analysis. MAIN FINDINGS: Eight of the 12 FMTUs reported having pneumatic otoscopy equipment. Four had it in all of their consulting rooms, and 2 formally taught it. Nine (4%) of 211 physicians reported regular use of pneumatic otoscopy. Mean (SD) intention to teach or use pneumatic otoscopy during the next year was low (2.4 [1.0] out of 5). Teachers identified improved diagnostic accuracy as the main facilitator both for use and for teaching, while residents identified recommendation by practice guidelines as the main facilitator for use. All physicians reported lack of availability of equipment as the main barrier to use. The main barrier to teaching pneumatic otoscopy reported by teachers was that they did not use it themselves. In focus groups, themes of consequences, capabilities, and socioprofessional influences were most dominant. Residents clearly identified role modeling by teachers as facilitating the use of pneumatic otoscopy. CONCLUSION: Pneumatic otoscopy is minimally used and taught in the family medicine residency program studied. Interventions to increase its use should target identified underlying beliefs and facilitators of and barriers to its use and teaching.

Promoting diagnostic accuracy in general practitioner management of otitis media in children: findings from a multimodal, interactive workshop on tympanometry and pneumatic otoscopy.

AIM: Previous research has shown that general practitioners (GPs) rarely use pneumatic otoscopy or tympanometry as recommended by best practice guidelines for diagnosing otitis media. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a multimodal, interactive training workshop on the techniques of pneumatic otoscopy and tympanometry would improve the confidence of GPs for the diagnosis of otitis media with effusion (OME) and acute otitis media (AOM), and for using pneumatic otoscopy and tympanometry. Additionally, we sought to determine whether this training could change GPs' intentions for using pneumatic otoscopy and tympanometry in their practices. METHODS: Twenty-three GPs participated in a three-hour training workshop led by an ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgeon, a paediatrician and an audiologist. Prior to and following the workshop, GPs completed questionnaires indicating their previous use and beliefs about the usefulness of pneumatic otoscopy and tympanometry, confidence for diagnosing AOM and OME, confidence for using pneumatic otoscopy and tympanometry, and intention to use pneumatic otoscopy and tympanometry in the future. RESULTS: There were no differences (P > 0.05) from pre- to post-workshop in GP confidence for diagnosing AOM. There were increases in GP confidence for diagnosis of OME (pre: 4.5 ± 0.9, post: 4.9 ± 0.4, P < 0.01) and confidence for using pneumatic otoscopy (pre: 3.6 ± 1.6, post: 4.8 ± 1.0, P < 0.01) and tympanometry (pre: 3.3 ± 1.5, post: 5.0 ± 0.7, P < 0.01), but no change (P > 0.05) in intention to use pneumatic otoscopy or tympanometry in their practices in the future. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a multimodal, interactive workshop can significantly increase the confidence of GPs for diagnosis of OME and also for using pneumatic otoscopy and tympanometry. It is likely, however, that GPs will need follow-up and further practice with these techniques to implement them in their practices.

[Deafness in adults. Study of practices in general medicine]. / Les surdités de l'adulte. Etude de pratiques en médecine générale.

INTRODUCTION: Deafness is a sensory disability responsible for communication disorder, sometimes impairing social life. In children, the hearing is an important concern for all stakeholders in early childhood (systematic neonatal screening, etc.). On the other hand, in the adult, it is rarely tested, and patients do consult when their audiometric status is already badly impaired. But their care is all the better if the deafness diagnosis is made early, as for the audio-prosthetic rehabilitation for example. Today, the general practitioner is the first link of the diagnostic and therapeutic management chain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic practices of practitioners in front of deafness in adults. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 74 practitioners based in "Ile de France" interviewed using a multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) on otoscopic and audiometric diagnostics and a Script Concordance test (SC) on clinical adult deafness situations validated by a 5 experts panel. RESULTS: The obtained average score was 66.35% of correct answers to the MCQ and 47.76% to the SC. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the surveyed practitioners showed a good level of otoscopic and audiometric diagnosis in the MCQ. However, their answers were not concordant with those of the expert panel in the SC. They have been particularly poorly performing on issues related to functional signs and their use in a given clinical situation, often driving to establish an otoscopic misdiagnosis while their diagnostic recognition of a pathological eardrum in the MCQ was rather good. These results reflect a lack of confidence in their otoscopic diagnosis related to the lack of knowledge of the causes of deafness in adults and their symptoms.

A proposal to limit otoscopy to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics: a call for research.

Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most common bacterial infection in childhood, accounting for more than 10 million prescriptions written in the USA alone. Otoscopy is the only method to diagnose AOM, is difficult to perform in young children and has been found to be inaccurate. Otoscopy has certain risks, the most common of which are child discomfort, trauma to the external ear canal and parental anxiety. Current guidelines emphasize the importance of making an accurate diagnosis of AOM, which includes the presence of fever, otalgia or both. We propose a new strategy to limit the use of otoscopy to circumstances in which the pretest probability of AOM is high. We suggest indications for mandatory otoscopy and a flow chart outlining a proposal for limiting otoscopy in the management of AOM. Clinical research evaluating the rational use of otoscopy is encouraged to evaluate outcomes and acceptance of this proposal. Limiting otoscopy to clinical conditions in which the likelihood of AOM is high may reduce unnecessary pain and anxiety associated with the procedure, reduce rates of misdiagnosis and support the more judicious use of antibiotics.

Ear injuries sustained by British service personnel subjected to blast trauma.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the pattern of ear injuries sustained by all British servicemen serving in Iraq and Afghanistan between 2006 and 2009; to identify all servicemen evacuated to the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine following blast injury; to ascertain how many underwent otological assessment; and to calculate the incidence of hearing loss. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective analysis of data obtained from the Joint Theatre Trauma Registry and the Defence Analytical and Statistics Agency, together with audiometry records from the University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Trust. RESULTS: Ear damage was present in 5 per cent of all British servicemen sustaining battle injuries. Tympanic membrane rupture occurred in 8 per cent of personnel evacuated with blast injuries. In 2006, 1 per cent of servicemen sustaining blast injury underwent audiography; this figure rose to 13 per cent in 2009. Fifty-three per cent of these audiograms were abnormal. CONCLUSION: The incidence of tympanic membrane rupture was higher than that found in previous conflicts. Otological assessment prior to and following military deployment is required to determine the incidence of ear injury amongst British servicemen following blast trauma.

Avaliação da perda auditiva induzida por ruído em músicos de Tubarão-SC / Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss in musicians from Tubarão-SC

Introdução: A perda auditiva induzida por ruído (PAIR) é considerada como uma das doenças ocupacionaismais prevalentes no mundo. Ela atinge profissionais de diversas áreas da sociedade, inclusive os músicos, que acabam sendo submetidos a elevados níveis de pressão sonora em ambientes de apresentação ou mesmo em seus ensaios. Objetivo: É determinar a prevalência de perda auditivainduzida por ruído em músicos que atuam na cidade de Tubarão (SC), assim como, determinar os principais fatores de risco e os sintomas associados a essaperda auditiva. Material e Métodos: Estudo observacional, descritivo, com delineamento transversal com 21 músicos entre 18 a 59 anos de idade, de diversos estilos musicais, que atuam em bandas na cidade de Tubarão (SC). Assim, entre agosto e outubro de 2007, foram realizados contatos com os músicos e aplicado um questionário.Após, os profissionais foram encaminhados ao consultório com horário agendado sendo realizado otoscopia e audiometria. Resultados: A prevalência de PAIR foi de 42,9%.Com um predomínio quase absoluto do gênero masculino, 95,2% profissionais. A média de idade foi de 29 anos,variando de 21 a 47 anos. Os sintomas auditivos mais freqüentes foram o zumbido (52,4%), a plenitude auricular(38,1%), a dificuldade de compreensão da fala (28,6%) e a tontura (23,8%).Conclusões: A prevalência de PAIR foi de 42,9%. A perda auditiva foi predominante em fatores como idadee tempo de exposição a sons de alta pressão sonora. É necessário a implementação de programas de prevenção e conservação auditiva entre os músicos de Tubarão -SC.

Introduction: Noise-induced hearing loss is considered as a common sick in the world. It gets professionals of different areas, including the musicians, who areexposed to high sound pressure levels in shows or during their practice. Aim: To determine the prevalence of cases suggestive of noise-induced hearing loss in musicians from Tubarão (SC), South Brazil and to point out the main riskfactors and the symptoms of hearing loss. Materials and Methods: Observational, descriptive, and transversal study with 21 musicians between 18 and 47 years old, of different music style, that played inTubarão (SC). So, among August and October of 2007 it was done a questionnaire with the musicians. After,they were sent to clinical to do otoscopy and audiometry. Results: The prevalence of hearing loss was of 42,9%. During the study period, we had 21 musicians,being 20 men (95,2%). The mean age was 29 years old, ranging from 21 to 47 years old. The more frequent hearingsymptoms were tinnitus (52,4%), aural fullness (38,1%), difficulty in speech understanding (28,6%), and dizziness (23,8%). Conclusions: The hearing loss noise-induced was 42,9%. Hearing loss was higher in factors like age andexposition time to noise with high sound pressure. It is necessary to implement prevention and conservation hearing programs among the musicians from Tubarão - SC.

The incidence, prevalence and burden of OM in unselected children aged 1-8 years followed by weekly otoscopy through the "common cold" season.

BACKGROUND: There is a continuing interest in defining the incidence, prevalence and burden of otitis media (OM) in the individual and population for purposes of assigning "risk factors". Often overlooked in past studies are the contributions of cold-like illnesses (CLIs) and sampling interval to those estimates. OBJECTIVE: Describe the incidence of symptomatic (AOM) and asymptomatic (OME) OM, the prevalence of OM, the contribution of CLI incidence, burden and other OM "risk factors" to the incidence and burden of OM, and the effect of sampling interval on those measures in children. METHODS: 148 children (74 male; 131 white, aged 1.0-8.6 years) were followed from November 1 to April 30 by weekly pneumatic otoscopy to diagnose OM presence/absence and by daily parental diary to assign CLI episodes. Data for previously identified OM "risk factors" were collected on 127. Results were summarized using standard measures of incidence, prevalence and burden, and multiple regression techniques were used to identify OM "risk factors". RESULTS: The basal OM prevalence was 20% with peaks in December and March and the temporal pattern was correlated with CLI prevalence. The incidence of OME (per 27,232 child-days) was 317, AOM was 74 and CLI was 456. The seasonal pattern of AOM and OME incidences tracked and was correlated with that for CLIs. New OM episodes were usually of short duration (

How helpful is pneumatic otoscopy in improving diagnostic accuracy?

BACKGROUND: Pneumatic otoscopy is believed to be helpful in optimally assessing the presence or absence of middle ear effusion (MEE). Although expert clinicians teach the importance of this diagnostic skill to trainees, evidence exists that many pediatric providers do not typically perform pneumatic otoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the otoscopic accuracy within a group of clinicians improves with the pneumatic assessment when compared with the static assessment using videotaped otoendoscopic examinations (VOEs). METHODS: Residents and faculty from 2 pediatric training programs served as subjects. All viewed a set of 50 video otoscopic examinations of tympanic membranes (TMs) from a validated VOE developed previously for training purposes. The video displays each TM in a static presentation and then in a pneumatic (mobile) presentation, followed by a final static presentation. Each subject first viewed the initial static presentation of each TM and responded "yes/no" to the presence of MEE, and then viewed the pneumatic presentation of the same TM and again responded "yes/no" to the presence of MEE. We compared the accuracy of assessment for both the static and the pneumatic tests. RESULTS: Thirty-four pediatric residents and 6 clinical faculty participated. Accuracy (percent of total test items correct) on the pneumatic test was uniformly greater than accuracy on the static test. The mean absolute improvement in the accuracy from the static test (61%) to the pneumatic test (76%) was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12%-18%). The mean relative improvement in accuracy from the static test to the pneumatic test was 26% (95% CI = 19%-32%). Higher accuracy on the VOE was associated with greater absolute (r = 0.57) and greater relative (r = 0.47) improvement. The mean relative improvement in sensitivity and specificity from static viewing to pneumatic viewing was 24% (95% CI = 15%-33%) and 42% (95% CI = 27%-58%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using a video otoendoscopic test, we found that accurate identification of both the presence and the absence of MEE improved after pneumatic assessment of TM mobility. Providers who were more accurate at otoscopy, defined by higher video total test scores, benefited more from the pneumatic component than providers with lower scores.

Diagnostic accuracy of otitis media and tympanocentesis skills assessment among pediatricians.

The comparative study presented here evaluated pediatricians from Italy, Greece, South Africa, and a reference group in the USA to determine (i) their ability to accurately diagnose acute otitis media (AOM) and otitis media with effusion (OME) using otoscopy, (ii) their knowledge of antibiotics, and (iii) their technical competence in performing tympanocentesis. The participants included 66 pediatricians from Italy, 115 from Greece, 36 from South Africa and 2,190 from the USA (reference group). Each pediatrician viewed nine video-recorded otoscopic examinations of tympanic membranes, after which their ability to differentiate AOM, OME and normal was ascertained. Questions were posed regarding appropriate, pathogen-directed antibiotic selection for AOM. A mannequin model was used to assess the technical proficiency of each pediatrician in performing tympanocentesis. Results were recorded for each group as the mean percentage +/- standard deviation. The correct diagnosis was made by each group of pediatricians in the following frequencies: Italy, 54+/-27% (range, 18-94%); Greece, 36+/-12% (range, 23-56%); South Africa, 53+/-21% (range, 22-88%); and the USA, 51+/-11% (range, 29-72%). The difference between results from Greece and the US reference group was statistically significant ( P=0.002). Pediatricians from each group over-diagnosed AOM with the following frequencies: Italy, 18+/-19% (range, 2-49%); Greece, 34+/-13% (8-50%); South Africa, 23+/-14% (7-44%); and the US reference group, 26+/-19% (7-51%). Pediatricians correctly selected an antibiotic recommended for treatment of AOM caused by drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae as follows: Italy, 89%; Greece, 77%; South Africa, 82%; and the USA, 80%. For treatment of beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae, the results were: Italy, 90%; Greece, 70%; South Africa, 81%; and the USA, 77%. Tympanocentesis was optimally performed by >/=86% of all pediatricians. The results indicate that pediatricians may often misdiagnose OME as AOM, but they select appropriate antibiotics about 80% of the time and can be trained to accurately perform tympanocentesis.

Otitis media in children: use of diagnostic tools by family practice residents.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although otitis media is a common problem in primary care, little is known about the use of diagnostic tools such as pneumatic otoscopy, tympanometry, acoustic reflectometry, or tympanocentesis by family physicians in training. METHODS: This was a self-reported observational study of family practice residents' use of otitis media diagnostic tools. Twenty-three family practice programs in Texas and Oklahoma were surveyed during November and December 2000. Residents were asked about their use of diagnostic tools, and, if tools were not used, they were asked the reason for not using them. Residents were also asked about the criteria they used to diagnose otitis media, and their responses were compared to criteria recommended by national guideline panels. RESULTS: The response rate was 61% (n = 316). The percentage of residents using pneumatic otoscopy was 66%, tympanometry 29%, acoustic reflectometry 2%, and tympanocentesis 0%. The most common reasons cited for not using tools were lack of training or unavailability of equipment. Fifty-five percent of family practice residents do not report pneumatic otoscopy for diagnosing otitis media and thus did not use recommended criteria. Faculty training of residents in the use of diagnostic tools was associated with a higher rate of using these tools. DISCUSSION: Few residents believed that diagnostic tools had no value in the diagnosis of otitis media, but lack of training or equipment problems were reported as contributing to their not using these tools. Half of family practice residents may be inadequately diagnosing middle ear problems since they did not report that pneumatic otoscopy was necessary for diagnosing otitis media. Because training was associated with higher rates of using appropriate diagnostic tools, family medicine faculty can play a significant role in improving the residents' diagnostic skills.