Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Bioconjug Chem ; 31(1): 93-103, 2020 01 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31747250

RESUMO

Antibody-drug conjugates have elicited great interest recently as targeted chemotherapies for cancer. Recent preclinical and clinical data have continued to raise questions about optimizing the design of these complex therapeutics. Biochemical methods for site-specific antibody conjugation have been a design feature of recent clinical ADCs, and preclinical reports suggest that site-specifically conjugated ADCs generically offer improved therapeutic indices (i.e., the fold difference between efficacious and maximum tolerated doses). Here we present the results of a systematic preclinical comparison of ADCs embodying the DNA-alkylating linker-payload DGN549 generated with both heterogeneous lysine-directed and site-specific cysteine-directed conjugation chemistries. Importantly, the catabolites generated by each ADC are the same regardless of the conjugation format. In two different model systems evaluated, the site-specific ADC showed a therapeutic index benefit. However, the therapeutic index benefit is different in each case: both show evidence of improved tolerability, though with different magnitudes, and in one case significant efficacy improvement is also observed. These results support our contention that conjugation chemistry of ADCs is best evaluated in the context of a particular antibody, target, and linker-payload, and ideally across multiple disease models.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Imunoconjugados/uso terapêutico , Lisina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Oxindóis/uso terapêutico , Animais , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/química , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/química , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/farmacocinética , Benzodiazepinas/efeitos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/química , Benzodiazepinas/farmacocinética , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoconjugados/efeitos adversos , Imunoconjugados/química , Imunoconjugados/farmacocinética , Lisina/efeitos adversos , Lisina/química , Lisina/farmacocinética , Camundongos , Camundongos SCID , Oxindóis/efeitos adversos , Oxindóis/química , Oxindóis/farmacocinética , Índice Terapêutico
2.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 82(2): 211-219, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29802443

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A sequential approach, synchronizing cell-cycle specific chemotherapy during VEGFR-TKI treatment breaks, may improve the therapeutic index of this combination therapy. In this study we investigate the safety/tolerability and pharmacodynamic effects of docetaxel used in sequential combination with the novel VEGFR-TKI X-82. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies underwent 21-day treatment cycles with X-82 administered daily on days 1-14, a treatment break on days 15-20, and docetaxel administered on day 21. Randomization was 1:1 to either a low-dose X-82 (200 mg) or high-dose X-82 (400 mg) arm. Patients were scheduled to undergo four 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT scans to assess changes in tumor cell proliferation. PET standardized uptake values (SUV) were summarized for tumors and changes were assessed using mixed effects models. RESULTS: 14 patients were enrolled and treated with median 3.5 cycles (range 0-12). Three patients in the high-dose cohort (50%) and three patients in the low-dose cohort (38%) experienced at least one grade 3 adverse event during the study (infections, cytopenias, electrolyte abnormalities, and vascular complications). Four patients with 13 metastatic tumors underwent FLT PET/CT scanning. During the cycle 1 X-82 exposure period, tumor SUVmax decreased by - 11% (p = 0.04). After administration of docetaxel and the cycle 2 X-82 exposure period, tumor SUVmax decreased - 44% (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The sequential combination of X-82 and docetaxel was safe and led to diminished FLT uptake. Further, decrease in FLT uptake during cycle 2 (X-82 plus docetaxel) was greater than in cycle 1 (X-82 alone), suggesting sequential chemotherapy enhances the pharmacodynamic effect of therapy.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Didesoxinucleosídeos , Docetaxel/administração & dosagem , Docetaxel/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/sangue , Oxindóis/administração & dosagem , Oxindóis/efeitos adversos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...