Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 70.372
Filtrar
2.
Drugs Aging ; 41(7): 615-622, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980644

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgeons have come under increased scrutiny for postoperative pain management, particularly for opioid prescribing. To decrease opioid use but still provide pain control, nonopioid medications such as muscle relaxants are being used, which can be harmful in older adults. However, the prevalence of muscle relaxant prescribing, trends in use over time, and risk of prolonged use are unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Using a 20% representative Medicare sample, we conducted a retrospective analysis of muscle relaxant prescribing to patients ≥ 65 years of age. We merged patient data from Medicare Carrier, MedPAR, and Outpatient Files with Medicare Part D for the years 2013-2018. A total of 14 surgical procedures were included to represent a wide range of anatomic regions and specialties. RESULTS: The study cohort included 543,929 patients. Of the cohort, 8111 (1.5%) received a new muscle relaxant prescription at discharge. Spine procedures accounted for 12% of all procedures but 56% of postoperative prescribing. Overall, the rate of prescribing increased over the time period (1.4-2.0%, p < 0.001), with increases in prescribing primarily in the spine (7-9.6%, p < 0.0001) and orthopedic procedure groups (0.9-1.4%, p < 0.0001). Of patients discharged with a new muscle relaxant prescription, 10.7% had prolonged use. CONCLUSIONS: The use of muscle relaxants in the postoperative period for older adults is low, but increasing over time, especially in ortho and spine procedures. While pain control after surgery is crucial, surgeons should carefully consider the risks of muscle relaxant use, especially for older adults who are at higher risk for medication-related problems.


Assuntos
Medicare Part D , Dor Pós-Operatória , Humanos , Idoso , Medicare Part D/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Feminino , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
J Opioid Manag ; 20(3): 225-231, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39017614

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Electronic prescriptions are now the standard of practice for all discharge and outpatient prescriptions. The intention is to increase patient safety, provide a more complete medication record for patients, lessen the burden on prescribers, and shorten the time it takes for medication orders to reach the pharmacy. DESIGN: This cross-sectional questionnaire survey study was conducted between January and August 2022 in three areas of a large urban safety net hospital. SETTING: A large single academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency department, inpatient clinicians, and procedural areas. The subjects of the study were trainees, attending physicians, and advance practice providers (APPs) Interventions: Data were collected from the participants using a self-reported questionnaire, including sociodemographic characteristics, ease of use, reliability, and preference. Additionally, the perception of the strengths and limitations associated with electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the barriers to e-prescribing of opioids. RESULTS: A total of 121 prescribers completed the survey. The majority trusted that e-prescribing were transmitted successfully (62 percent), saved time (78 percent), and did not interrupt their workflow (78 percent). However, many prescribers indicated that additional improvements are needed, such as updating the patient's preferred pharmacy in the electronic medical record during each visit (52 percent) and having a 24-hour pharmacy readily available (66 percent). CONCLUSION: Prescribers value the ease of use of e-prescribing and how time efficient the process can be. Nevertheless, there is a need to improve the system's service, design, and usefulness.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Prescrição Eletrônica , Padrões de Prática Médica , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Feminino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Substâncias Controladas/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
4.
Clin Transl Sci ; 17(7): e13869, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946123

RESUMO

Insufficient labeling information regarding the appropriate age for prescribing drugs to the pediatric population is challenging. This study aimed to analyze the off-label prescription of age-related drugs for pediatric patients using claims data from South Korea and to assess the consistency of the approved age in South Korea, the United States, Europe, and Japan. In 2020, 1004 unique drugs were prescribed to the pediatric population in South Korea. We found that 641 drugs (63.8%, p < 0.0001) were related to off-label prescriptions for age-related use at least once, and the total number of off-label prescriptions was 2,236,669 (62.2%, p < 0.0001). Chlorpheniramine (28%) was the most frequently prescribed drug for pediatric patients with an age-related off-label, followed by budesonide (9%) and epinephrine (9%). The degree of agreement in the approved age range for 641 off-label drugs across countries was assessed using the overall kappa coefficient. We observed slight agreement in labeling across all countries (κ: 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14-0.18). The highest degree of agreement was observed between the United States and Europe (0.41, 0.37-0.45) due to pediatric-population-specific legislation. South Korea showed the lowest degree of agreement with the United States and Europe (0.10, 0.06-0.14). The United States, Europe, and Japan showed fair agreement (0.23, 0.21-0.26). However, the degree of agreement between South Korea, the United States, and Japan (0.09, 0.06-0.11) and South Korea, Europe, and Japan (0.08, 0.05-0.10) was low. This study highlights the need for South Korean regulatory agencies to consider introducing pediatric legislation to prescribe evidence-based drugs for safe and effective use.


Assuntos
Rotulagem de Medicamentos , Uso Off-Label , Humanos , Uso Off-Label/estatística & dados numéricos , República da Coreia , Criança , Estados Unidos , Japão , Pré-Escolar , Rotulagem de Medicamentos/normas , Rotulagem de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Europa (Continente) , Lactente , Masculino , Adolescente , Feminino , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Fatores Etários , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Recém-Nascido
5.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 234, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951826

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTI) affect almost two-thirds of all women during their lives and many experience recurrent infections. There are evidence-based guidelines from multiple international societies for evaluation and treatment; however, recent claims-based analyses have demonstrated that adherence to these guidelines is poor. This study seeks to understand the barriers experienced by U.S. primary care providers (PCPs) to providing guideline-based care for UTI and recurrent UTI (rUTI). METHODS: Semi-structured interviews of 18 PCPs, recruited from the greater Los Angeles area, examined real-world clinical management of UTI/rUTI episodes, decisions to refer to subspecialty care, and resources guiding counseling and management. Grounded theory methodology served to analyze interview transcripts and identify preliminary and major themes. RESULTS: Participants expressed the desire to obtain urine cultures for each cystitis episode, but felt pressured to make compromises by patient demands or barriers to care. PCPs had lower thresholds to empirical treatment if patients had a history of rUTIs, were elderly, or declined evaluation. Laboratory data was minimally utilized in clinical decision-making: urinalyses were infrequently considered when interpreting culture data. PCPs treated a broad set of urologic and non-urologic symptoms as UTI, even with negative cultures. PCPs did not feel comfortable initiating UTI prophylaxis, instead seeking specialist evaluation for anatomic causes. They were unaware of management guidelines, typically utilizing UpToDate® as their primary resource. Few evidence-based UTI prevention interventions were recommended by providers. CONCLUSIONS: Low availability of succinct and clear professional guidelines are substantial barriers to appropriate UTI/rUTI care. Poor useability of clinical guidance documents results in substantial confusion about the role of preventative measures and additional diagnostic testing. Difficulties in patient access to care providers lead to expectations for presumptive treatment. Future studies are needed to determine if improved educational materials for providers and/or management algorithms can improve guideline concordance of UTI management.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Infecções Urinárias , Humanos , Infecções Urinárias/terapia , Médicos de Atenção Primária/psicologia , Feminino , Masculino , Recidiva , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Entrevistas como Assunto , Encaminhamento e Consulta
6.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(7): e5857, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38988208

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, preliminary results that later proved to be incorrect suggested the possible efficacy of anti-infective drugs such as azithromycin for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. These preliminary data may have influenced the prescription of azithromycin. However, no individual-level data linking the use of this antibiotic to acute SARS-CoV-2 infection are available. The present analysis aims to fill this gap. METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort design was used including patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the period ranging from February 2020 to February 2022. The data source for antibiotic consumption was the drug database of outpatient prescriptions of Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy). Antibiotics were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. Consumption rates and percentages of azithromycin DDDs (defined daily doses) during the acute phase of the infection were compared with a previous control period and with the post-acute phase. Analyses were stratified by four groups according to the prevalent virus variant at time of diagnosis. RESULTS: Comparing the previous control period with the acute phase of infections, the rates of azithromycin consumption (DDD per 1000 individuals per day) increased from 1.17 to 23.11, from 0.80 to 33.03, from 0.81 to 21.01, and from 1.02 to 9.76, in the pre-Alpha, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron periods, respectively. Similarly, the percentages of individuals receiving azithromycin, and the azithromycin DDDs percentages over total systemic antibiotics DDDs increased in acute phases of infection compared with control periods. The consumption rates and percentages returned to preinfection levels in the post-acute phase. In the study period, 12.9% of the use of azithromycin in the entire adult population of Emilia-Romagna was attributable to acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the low likelihood of bacterial coinfections, the increased azithromycin consumption in the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection suggests inappropriate prescribing of this antibiotic.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Azitromicina , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Itália/epidemiologia , Idoso , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Jovem , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adolescente , Doença Aguda , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes
8.
Am J Manag Care ; 30(7): e203-e209, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38995824

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with clinicians' likelihood and intensity of applying fluoride varnish (FV) overall and for visits paid by Medicaid and private insurers. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study using claims data. METHODS: Using the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database (2016-2018), we conducted a repeated cross-sectional study of 2911 clinicians (7277 clinician-year observations) providing well-child visits to children aged 1 to 5 years. Zero-inflated negative binomial models estimated the probability of a clinician applying FV and the number of visits with FV applications, overall and separately for visits paid by Medicaid and private insurers. RESULTS: A total of 30.9% of clinician-years applied FV at least once, and overall, an average of 8.4% of a clinician's well-child visits included FV annually. Controlling for all covariates, having a higher percentage of patients insured by Medicaid was associated with applying FV (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.23-1.45) and a higher expected number of applications (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09). Additionally, having a higher percentage of patients aged 1 to 5 years was associated with applying FV (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01-1.43), but not the number of applications. Similar associations were observed among visits paid by private insurers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite clinical recommendations and mandated insurance reimbursements, the likelihood and intensity of FV applications was low for most pediatric primary care clinicians. Clinician behavior was associated with patient-panel characteristics, suggesting the need for interventions that account for these differences.


Assuntos
Fluoretos Tópicos , Medicaid , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Estados Unidos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Masculino , Fluoretos Tópicos/uso terapêutico , Fluoretos Tópicos/administração & dosagem , Massachusetts , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
S D Med ; 77(3): 108-111, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38990794

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Millions of adult visits to emergency departments (EDs) each year are opioid-related, and those who visit with chronic pain are more likely to be super-utilizers (SUs) of the ED. Although SUs comprise 5% of the general population, they account for 50% of health care expenditure. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether brief provider opioid education results in decreased number of SUs and total ED visits by SUs. METHODS: The American Academy of Emergency Medicine's ED Opioid Prescribing Guidelines were presented to five EDs (estimated total 70,000 ED annual patient volume). ICD-10 codes from visits one year before and after the education were evaluated for painful diagnoses and identified patients who fit the definition of SU. Statistical analysis was performed on the data using McNemar's test and Z-scores. RESULTS: A statistically significant decrease (p=0.0006) in patients who visited the ED more than once after the education compared to prior to the education (n=304) was found. A statistically significant decrease (p=0.0017) in total number of visits after the education (n=268) by SU patients was found. No statistically significant change in visits made by non-SU patients (p=1.9983), nor average number of visits made by SUs (p=0.2320) was found. CONCLUSION: Providing opioid education to ED providers was associated with a significant reduction in number of SUs visiting the ED and number of visits made by SUs. Based on average costs of ED visits by SUs, this decrease in visits can be correlated to an estimated savings of over $1 million across five EDs.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Crônica/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0305619, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38990957

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Investigating long-term trends in glaucoma medication. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with glaucoma and prescribed glaucoma eye drops between 2007 and 2020 in Korea's Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database participated in this study. A weight was assigned to each prescription using the reciprocal of the total number of prescriptions received by the individual in that year. The number of patients who received each type of glaucoma eye drop prescription was calculated by summing the weights for each year. RESULTS: During the study period, prostaglandin analog eye drop monotherapy was the most frequently given type of glaucoma eye drop prescription. Until 2008, the second most frequently given type of glaucoma eye drop prescription was beta blocker eye drop monotherapy; thereafter, it changed to carbonic anhydrase inhibitor/beta blocker fixed-combination eye drop monotherapy. The prescription proportion of single-ingredient glaucoma eye drops decreased (-1.290%/year, P < 0.001), whereas that of fixed-combination glaucoma eye drops increased (1.291%/year, P < 0.001). The number of glaucoma eye drops prescribed per patient remained constant (-0.00030/year, P = 0.167) with an average of 1.302, while the number of active ingredients prescribed per patient increased (0.01737/year, P < 0.001) from 1.659 in 2007 to 1.896 in 2020. CONCLUSION: Over 14 years, there was no change in the number of glaucoma eye drops prescribed to individual patients in Korea. However, the number of active ingredients prescribed increased owing to the increased prescription of fixed-combination eye drops. The current trends in glaucoma medication are expected to help establish future treatment strategies.


Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos , Glaucoma , Soluções Oftálmicas , Humanos , República da Coreia , Glaucoma/tratamento farmacológico , Soluções Oftálmicas/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Inibidores da Anidrase Carbônica/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais
11.
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 20(6): 334-340, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991827

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial lung disease is a leading cause of mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding screening, rescreening, diagnosis, and follow-up practices in interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD) in Colombia. METHODS: A structured survey focused on clinical practices in patients with SSc-ILD was conducted. Members of the Asociación Colombiana de Neumología y Cirugía de Tórax (Asoneumocito) and the Asociación Colombiana de Reumatología (Asoreuma) were invited to participate from March 2023 to May 2023. RESULTS: We surveyed 51 pulmonologists and 44 rheumatologists. Overall, 51.6% reported having access to multidisciplinary team discussion in ILD. Among the 95 participants, 78.9% would routinely perform a high-resolution computed tomography scan of the chest once a diagnosis of systemic sclerosis was established. This practice is more frequent among rheumatologists (84.1%) than among pulmonologists (74.5%). Approximately half of the participants would rescreen patients annually with computed tomography scan (56.8%) if baseline images were negative. Spirometry (81.1%), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (80.0%), and 6-min walk test (55.8%) were the most frequently performed tests upon diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. During follow-up, participants would consider repeating pulmonary function tests mostly every 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Screening of SSc-ILD is high among pulmonologists and rheumatologists. Decision-making on diagnosis and follow-up is similar between specialties, but there are variations in their frequency and indications. Further research is needed to evaluate how to adapt recommendations for assessing SSc-ILD in different settings.


Assuntos
Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Padrões de Prática Médica , Pneumologistas , Reumatologistas , Escleroderma Sistêmico , Escleroderma Sistêmico/complicações , Humanos , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/etiologia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/complicações , Colômbia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto
12.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 65(3): 195-204, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39007553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In contemporary clinical practice, carotid artery stenting (CAS) is increasingly becoming a multispecialty field, joining operators of various training backgrounds, which bring forth their unique expertise, patient management philosophies, and procedural preferences. The best practices and approaches, however, are still debated. Therefore, real-world insights on different operator preferences and related outcomes are of utmost value, yet still rather scarce in the available literature. METHODS: Using the data collected in the ROADSAVER observational, European multicenter CAS study, a prespecified comparative analysis evaluating the impact of the operator's specialization was performed. We used major adverse event (MAE) rate at 30-day follow-up, defined as the cumulative incidence of any death or stroke, and its components as outcome measures. RESULTS: A total of 1965 procedures were analyzed; almost half 878 (44.7%) were performed by radiologists (interventional/neuro), 717 (36.5%) by cardiologists or angiologists, and 370 (18.8%) by surgeons (vascular/neuro). Patients treated by surgeons were the oldest (72.9±8.5), while radiologists treated most symptomatic patients (58.1%) and more often used radial access (37.2%). The 30-day MAE incidence achieved by cardiologists/angiologists was 2.0%, radiologists 2.5%, and surgeons 1.9%; the observed differences in rates were statistically not-significant (P=0.7027), even when adjusted for baseline patient/lesion and procedural disparities across groups. The corresponding incidence rates for death from any cause were 1.0%, 0.8%, and 0.3%, P=0.4880, and for any stroke: 1.4%, 2.3%, and 1.9%, P=0.4477, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the disparities in patient selection and procedural preferences, the outcomes achieved by different specialties in real-world, contemporary CAS practice remain similar when using modern devices and techniques.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , Radiologistas , Stents , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Resultado do Tratamento , Europa (Continente) , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Fatores de Risco , Estenose das Carótidas/terapia , Estenose das Carótidas/mortalidade , Estenose das Carótidas/cirurgia , Cirurgiões , Padrões de Prática Médica , Cardiologistas , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Especialização , Competência Clínica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco
13.
Sex Health ; 212024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39008622

RESUMO

Background Gonorrhoea notifications have increased substantially in Australia over the past decade. Neisseria gonorrhoeae is already highly resistant to several antibiotics and so, alternatives to first-line treatment are generally strongly discouraged. The penicillin allergy label (AL) on patient medical records has previously been shown to influence prescribing practices, to the detriment of best-practice management and antimicrobial stewardship. This study aimed to understand how the penicillin AL influences antibiotic selection for gonorrhoea treatment at Canberra Sexual Health Centre. Methods A retrospective chart audit of gonorrhoea cases treated at Canberra Sexual Health Centre between January 2020 and October 2023 (n =619 patients, n =728 cases). Antibiotic selection was assessed according to penicillin AL status. Ceftriaxone selection was assessed according to penicillin allergy severity reported in the medical records and as determined using a validated antibiotic allergy assessment tool. Results Cases with a penicillin AL were more likely to receive antibiotics other than ceftriaxone (n =7/41, 17.1%) than cases without the label (n =8/687, 1.2%, P n =28/41, 68.3%) to apply the assessment tool. Those reported as low-severity in the records were more likely to receive ceftriaxone (n =21/22, 95.5%) than those reported as moderate-high (n =7/11, 63.6%) or unreported (n =6/8, 0.75%). Conclusions Treatment of gonorrhoea in outpatient settings requires an understanding of penicillin allergy, and the ability to quickly and accurately identify penicillin-AL patients who can safely tolerate ceftriaxone. Institutionally endorsed penicillin allergy de-labelling protocols and access to easy-to-navigate prescribing advice within national sexually transmitted infection management guidelines would support this.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Ceftriaxona , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Gonorreia , Penicilinas , Humanos , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Austrália , Prontuários Médicos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rotulagem de Medicamentos
14.
CMAJ ; 196(25): E866-E874, 2024 Jul 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39009368

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Unused opioid prescriptions can be a driver of opioid misuse. Our objective was to determine the optimal quantity of opioids to prescribe to patients with acute pain at emergency department discharge, in order to meet their analgesic needs while limiting the amount of unused opioids. METHODS: In a prospective, multicentre cohort study, we included consecutive patients aged 18 years and older with an acute pain condition present for less than 2 weeks who were discharged from emergency department with an opioid prescription. Participants completed a pain medication diary for real-time recording of quantity, doses, and names of all analgesics consumed during a 14-day follow-up period. RESULTS: We included 2240 participants, who had a mean age of 51 years; 48% were female. Over 14 days, participants consumed a median of 5 (quartiles, 1-14) morphine 5 mg tablet equivalents, with significant variation across pain conditions (p < 0.001). Most opioid tablets prescribed (63%) were unused. To meet the opioid need of 80% of patients for 2 weeks, we found that those experiencing renal colic or abdominal pain required fewer opioid tablets (8 morphine 5 mg tablet equivalents) than patients who had fractures (24 tablets), back pain (21 tablets), neck pain (17 tablets), or other musculoskeletal pain (16 tablets). INTERPRETATION: Two-thirds of opioid tablets prescribed at emergency department discharge for acute pain were unused, whereas opioid requirements varied significantly based on the cause of acute pain. Smaller, cause-specific opioid prescriptions could provide adequate pain management while reducing the risk of opioid misuse. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT03953534.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda , Analgésicos Opioides , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , Idoso , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor Abdominal/tratamento farmacológico , Cólica Renal/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas Ósseas , Dor nas Costas/tratamento farmacológico , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro
16.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(14): e033463, 2024 Jul 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958132

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous cross-sectional studies have identified wide practice pattern variations in the use of peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) for the treatment of claudication. However, there are limited data on longitudinal practice patterns. We aimed to describe the temporal trends and charges associated with PVI use for claudication over the past 12 years in the United States. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data to identify all patients who underwent a PVI for claudication between January 2011 and December 2022. We evaluated the trends in utilization and Medicare-allowed charges of PVI according to anatomic level, procedure type, and intervention settings using generalized linear models. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to evaluate factors associated with different levels and types of PVI. We identified 599 197 PVIs performed for claudication. The proportional use of tibial PVI increased 1.0% per year, and atherectomy increased by 1.6% per year over the study period. The proportion of PVIs performed in ambulatory surgical centers/office-based laboratories grew at 4% per year from 12.4% in 2011 to 55.7% in 2022. Total Medicare-allowed charges increased by $11 980 035 USD/year. Multinomial logistic regression identified significant associations between race and ethnicity and treatment setting with use of both atherectomy and tibial PVI. CONCLUSIONS: The use of tibial PVI and atherectomy for the treatment of claudication has increased dramatically in in ambulatory surgical center/office-based laboratory settings, non-White patients, and resulting in a significant increase in health care charges. There is a critical need to improve the delivery of value-based care for the treatment of claudication.


Assuntos
Claudicação Intermitente , Medicare , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Claudicação Intermitente/terapia , Claudicação Intermitente/epidemiologia , Claudicação Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicação Intermitente/economia , Medicare/tendências , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/economia , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fatores de Tempo
17.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1420032, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39011326

RESUMO

Objectives: The increased utilization of Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare changes practice and introduces ethical implications for AI adoption in medicine. We assess medical doctors' ethical stance in situations that arise in adopting an AI-enabled Clinical Decision Support System (AI-CDSS) for antibiotic prescribing decision support in a healthcare institution in Singapore. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with 30 doctors of varying medical specialties and designations between October 2022 and January 2023. Our interview guide was anchored on the four pillars of medical ethics. We used clinical vignettes with the following hypothetical scenarios: (1) Using an antibiotic AI-enabled CDSS's recommendations for a tourist, (2) Uncertainty about the AI-CDSS's recommendation of a narrow-spectrum antibiotic vs. concerns about antimicrobial resistance, (3) Patient refusing the "best treatment" recommended by the AI-CDSS, (4) Data breach. Results: More than half of the participants only realized that the AI-enabled CDSS could have misrepresented non-local populations after being probed to think about the AI-CDSS's data source. Regarding prescribing a broad- or narrow-spectrum antibiotic, most participants preferred to exercise their clinical judgment over the AI-enabled CDSS's recommendations in their patients' best interest. Two-thirds of participants prioritized beneficence over patient autonomy by convincing patients who refused the best practice treatment to accept it. Many were unaware of the implications of data breaches. Conclusion: The current position on the legal liability concerning the use of AI-enabled CDSS is unclear in relation to doctors, hospitals and CDSS providers. Having a comprehensive ethical legal and regulatory framework, perceived organizational support, and adequate knowledge of AI and ethics are essential for successfully implementing AI in healthcare.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Inteligência Artificial , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Médicos , Humanos , Singapura , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Feminino , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Entrevistas como Assunto , Pesquisa Qualitativa
18.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 215, 2024 Jul 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965460

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders are common in clinical settings, but physicians still lack sufficient understanding and effective management of these conditions. METHODS: This research assessed Egyptian physicians' knowledge, practices, and attitudes towards GI motility disorders. A cross-sectional survey employing a self-administered questionnaire was carried out among physicians in Egypt. The questionnaire addressed various aspects of physicians' understanding, practices, and attitudes regarding GI motility disorders. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and presented as frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 462 physicians took part in the study. Although nearly two-thirds of them knew about GI motility studies, a notable proportion lacked adequate knowledge about GI motility disorders. Notably, 84.2% correctly identified dysphagia as a critical symptom suggestive of an upper GI motility disorder. However, 13.4% incorrectly linked hematemesis with an upper GI motility disorder, and 16.7% expressed uncertainty. In terms of practice, around half of the participants encountered a small number of patients with GI motility disorders (less than 5 per week or even fewer). Only 29.7% felt confident in managing patients with motility disorders. Most participating physicians expressed a willingness to participate in training programs focused on motility disorders. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores a knowledge gap among Egyptian physicians concerning GI motility disorders. It suggests the necessity of tailored education and training programs to improve their competency and practice in this domain.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Gastroenteropatias , Motilidade Gastrointestinal , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Egito , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/psicologia , Gastroenteropatias/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Competência Clínica , Adulto , Médicos/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica
19.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 15190, 2024 07 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956390

RESUMO

Benralizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-5 receptors, reduces exacerbations and oral corticosteroid requirements for severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. In Japan, geographic disparities in asthma outcomes suggest differential prescribing and access. This study aimed to quantify regional prescribing variations for benralizumab nationwide. Using Japan's National Database (NDB) of insurance claims (2009-2019), benralizumab standardized claim ratios (SCRs) were calculated for 47 prefectures. Correlations between SCRs and other biologics' SCRs, economic variables like average income, and physician densities were evaluated through univariate analysis and multivariate regressions. Income-related barriers to optimal prescribing were examined. Wide variation emerged in benralizumab SCRs, from 40.1 to 184.2 across prefectures. SCRs strongly correlated with omalizumab (r = 0.61, p < 0.00001) and mepolizumab (r = 0.43, p = 0.0024). Average monthly income also positively correlated with benralizumab SCRs (r = 0.45, p = 0.0016), whereas lifestyle factors were insignificant. Respiratory specialist density modestly correlated with SCRs (r = 0.29, p = 0.047). In multivariate regressions, average income remained the most robust predictor (B = 0.74, p = 0.022). Benralizumab SCRs strongly associate with income metrics more than healthcare infrastructure/population factors. Many regions show low SCRs, constituting apparent prescribing gaps. Access barriers for advanced asthma therapies remain inequitable among Japan's income strata. Addressing affordability alongside specialist allocation can achieve better prescribing quality and asthma outcomes.


Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Asma , Humanos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/economia , Japão , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/economia , Masculino , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Antiasmáticos/economia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Padrões de Prática Médica
20.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 655, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956481

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) program of Vancouver General Hospital (VGH) was supervised by emergency physicians (EPs) until 2017 when infectious disease (ID) physicians began assisting in management. We designed a retrospective study to determine whether ID involvement led to improved outcomes. METHODS: This study analyzes the impact of ID involvement by comparing the mean days patients spent on OPAT with ID involvement versus EPs alone through a retrospective chart review. Secondary research objectives were to compare patient care decisions, e.g., antibiotic choice, tests ordered, and final diagnosis. RESULTS: There was no difference between the mean number of days on OPAT between physician types. Compared to historic patterns, patients seen in OPAT after increased ID consultation spent an average of 0.5 fewer days in the program. However, when grouped by the first day of ID assessment, the average total days in OPAT was closely aligned with the day of first ID assessment, implying that ID frequently discharged patients close to initial assessment. Patients seen by ID were less likely to return within one month of discharge compared to those not seen by ID. Secondary findings include ID physicians prescribing a greater range of antibiotics, providing more varied final diagnoses, prescribing antibiotics less frequently, as well as ordering more cultures, diagnostic imaging and specialist consults. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study support the hypothesis that ID involvement in OPAT programs leads to changes in care that may have beneficial outcomes for patients and the healthcare system.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Médicos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Doenças Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...