Not all Whipple procedures are equal: Proposal for a classification of pancreatoduodenectomies.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy is the standard treatment for pathologies of the pancreatic head and is performed routinely worldwide. The aim of the study was to analyze this procedure in terms of extent of surgery, technical difficulty, and clinical outcomes and thereby provide a standardized surgical categorization of pancreatoduodenectomies for future reference. METHODS: For this cohort study, all patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy at a single center within an 18-year period (October 2001 to December 2019) were identified in a prospectively maintained database. Based on technical difficulty and extent of surgery, 4 pancreatoduodenectomy types were proposed: (1) standard pancreatoduodenectomy; (2) pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein/superior mesenteric vein resection; (3) pancreatoduodenectomy with multivisceral resection; and (4) pancreatoduodenectomy with arterial resection. Patient characteristics, surgical parameters, and perioperative morbidity and mortality were analyzed. The 4 types were compared with regard to their surgical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3,953 pancreatoduodenectomies were performed in the study period. Standard pancreatoduodenectomy (type 1) was the most frequent procedure (n = 2,931, 74.1%), followed by pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein/superior mesenteric vein resection (type 2: n = 568, 14.4%), pancreatoduodenectomy with multivisceral resection (type 3: n = 415, 10.5%), and pancreatoduodenectomy with arterial resection (type 4: n = 39, 1.0%). Demographic baseline characteristics were clinically comparable among pancreatoduodenectomy types. Mortality within 90-days correlated with the type of pancreatoduodenectomy (type 1: 2.9%; type 2: 4.2%; type 3: 6.3%; type 4: 10.3%; P = .0007). Overall surgical morbidity was 41.7% (type 1), 40.8% (type 2), 52.5% (type 3), and 59.0% (type 4) (P < .0001), including postoperative pancreatic fistula type B/C (type 1: 11.9%; type 2: 7.7%; type 3: 14.7%; type 4: 15.4; P = .0031) and delayed gastric emptying (type 1: 19.4%; type 2: 22.5%; type 3: 22.0%; type 4: 25.6%; P = .187) as the most frequent complications. Relaparotomies were more frequent in type 4 (20.5%) and type 3 (20.6%) than in type 2 (12.0%) or type 1 (10.4%) pancreatoduodenectomy (P < .0001). Intensive care unit stay ≥2 days was more frequent in type 4 (48.7%) compared with type 3 (25.7%) or type 2 (27.1%) and type 1 (18.6%) (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The results show different clinical outcomes for the 4 types of pancreatoduodenectomy. Morbidity and mortality correlate with pancreatoduodenectomy type. The proposed pancreatoduodenectomy classification is useful for reporting pancreatoduodenectomy procedures, enhances the comparability of future studies, may be used for training purposes, and may guide intra and postoperative decision-making.

Standardizing terminology for minimally invasive pancreatic resection.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of literature pertaining to minimally invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR). Heterogeneity in MIPR terminology, leads to confusion and inconsistency. The Organizing Committee of the State of the Art Conference on MIPR collaborated to standardize MIPR terminology. METHODS: After formal literature review for "minimally invasive pancreatic surgery" term, key terminology elements were identified. A questionnaire was created assessing the type of resection, the approach, completion, and conversion. Delphi process was used to identify the level of agreement among the experts. RESULTS: A systematic terminology template was developed based on combining the approach and resection taking into account the completion. For a solitary approach the term should combine "approach + resection" (e.g. "laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy); for combined approaches the term must combine "first approach + resection" with "second approach + reconstruction" (e.g. "laparoscopic central pancreatectomy" with "open pancreaticojejunostomy") and where conversion has resulted the recommended term is "first approach" + "converted to" + "second approach" + "resection" (e.g. "robot-assisted" "converted to open" "pancreatoduodenectomy") CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines presented are geared towards standardizing terminology for MIPR, establishing a basis for comparative analyses and registries and allow incorporating future surgical and technological advances in MIPR.

Moving towards the New International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definitions in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison between the old and new.

BACKGROUND: The International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) has proposed several definitions for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH). We assessed the effects of implementing these definitions on predicting outcomes. METHODS: A database of 77 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2005 and December 2009 was analysed. Morbidities were defined and classified using the ISGPS definitions and recalculated based on the definitions adopted by our institution ('Old' definitions) prior to the implementation of ISGPS definitions. Data for the two groups were then compared. RESULTS: The morbidity rate rose to 70.1% from 27.2% when ISGPS rather than Old definitions were used to define morbidities (P < 0.001). Incidences of DGE, POPF and PPH were 20.7%, 39.0% and 10.4%, respectively. Rates of DGE and POPF were significantly higher according to ISGPS definitions than to Old definitions (20.7% vs. 5.2% [P= 0.001] and 39.0% vs. 15.6% [P= 0.004], respectively). According to the ISGPS definitions, all of the 12 additional patients with DGE and 12 of the 18 additional patients with POPF had grade A morbidities. Patients with ISGPS-defined morbidity had a longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay, longer postoperative stay and longer total stay (P= 0.030, P= 0.007 and P= 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The morbidity rate more than doubled when ISGPS definitions were applied (an additional 42.9% of patients demonstrated morbidities). The majority of patients with DGE and POPF had grade A morbidities. The ISGPS definitions correlate well with ICU stay, postoperative stay and total length of stay.

The role of pancreaticoduodenectomy in the treatment of severe chronic pancreatitis.

Chronic pancreatitis remains a debilitating disease with few definitive options for treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefit of pancreaticoduodenectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. The results were evaluated by standard descriptive statistics. In a retrospective study, we reviewed the patients at a single institution undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy between 1994 and 1997 for complications of chronic pancreatitis. Patients were evaluated for preoperative indication for surgery and perioperative morbidity and mortality, as well as long-term results. Thirty-two patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis; 56 per cent (18) underwent pylorus-preserving and 44 per cent (14) underwent classic pancreaticoduodenectomy. The mean age of these patients was 56+/-14.7 years (range, 23-79). All patients underwent preoperative CT scan and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The preoperative indication for surgery in 81 per cent (26) of these patients was intractable pain in the setting of a nondilated pancreatic duct. The other 19 per cent were treated for biliary/pancreatic duct stricture and pancreatic head fibrosis (mass suspicious of malignancy). Fifty-three per cent of the patients had a history of previous abdominal surgery. There were no perioperative deaths. The mean postoperative stay was 12.2+/-7.4 days. The postoperative morbidity rate was 31 per cent (10), consisting of 25 per cent with delayed gastric emptying, 3 per cent with pneumonia, and 3 per cent with wound infections. There was no occurrence of pancreatic fistulas. With a mean follow-up of 40 months (range, 10-52 months), 85 per cent reported a significant improvement in pain with 71 per cent being pain free and not requiring narcotics. Twenty per cent developed new-onset diabetes. The overall event survival rate at 5 years was 97 per cent. Thus, in a selected group of patients with severe chronic pancreatitis, resection of the head of the pancreas achieved relief of symptoms and was a safe and effective treatment for chronic pancreatitis.

[Primary and secondary interventions--a concept in surgical documentation]. / Haupt- und Untereingriffe--ein Konzept bei der Operationsdokumentation.

Nowadays systematic documentation of surgical procedures is absolutely necessary in all departments of surgery and will soon be required by law. Therefore code systems are essential. Amongst numerous systems the ICPM-GE classification has been chosen as basis. In the department for abdominal and transplantation surgery at Hanover Medical School the ICPM-GE classification has been extended by a concept of coding main and suboperations. This concept considers the fact that in an individual patient the surgical procedure may consist of different and standardized suboperations. This concept widens and simplifies the possibility of documentation considerably.