Histopathologic changes in the middle ear mucosa after exposure to pepsin and unconjugated bile acid.

OBJECTIVE: An increasing number of studies indicate that pepsin and bile acid cause damage to the ear, nose, and throat structures as a result of extraesophageal reflux. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the damaging effect of bile acids and pepsin on the middle ear mucosa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-nine healthy rats were included in this study. The animals were divided into 5 groups. A single daily dose of 40 µmol/L chenodeoxycholic acid, 40 µg/mL pepsin, and saline were injected separately into the right middle ear of the rats. On day 30, all rats were decapitated, and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples of the middle ear both from the control and experimental rats were prepared. A semiquantitative analysis was performed. RESULTS: Inflammatory response was seen in all middle ear mucosa of rats except control group 1. The degree of inflammatory response was higher in the bile acid group when compared with the other groups. Epithelial metaplastic changes with varying number of goblet cells were observed in both the bile acid- and pepsin-injected groups. These metaplastic changes were also higher in the bile acid-induced group than in the pepsin-injected group. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study on the middle ear mucosal damage of both pepsin and bile acid. Our results demonstrate that bile acids were associated with more extensive mucosal injury at pH 7 in comparison to pepsin in a rat animal model. Inflammatory response and metaplastic changes may play an important role in the etiology of middle ear pathologies.

Identifying spinal sensory pathways activated by noxious esophageal acid.

BACKGROUND: The transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channel is critical for spinal afferent signaling of burning pain throughout the body. Such pain frequently originates from the esophagus, following acid reflux. The contribution of TRPV1 to spinal nociceptor signaling from the esophagus remains unclear. We aimed to identify the spinal afferent pathways that convey nociceptive signaling from the esophagus, specifically those sensitive to acid, and the extent to which TRPV1 contributes. METHODS: Acid/pepsin (150 mM HCl/1 mg mL(-1) pepsin) or saline/pepsin was perfused into the esophageal lumen of anesthetized wild-type and TRPV1 null mice over 20 min, followed by atraumatic perfuse fixation and removal of the cervical and thoracic spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia (DRG). To identify neurons responsive to esophageal perfusate, immunolabeling for neuronal activation marker phosphorylated extracellular receptor-regulated kinase (pERK) was used. Labeling for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and isolectin B4 (IB4) was then used to characterize responsive neurons. KEY RESULTS: Esophageal acid/pepsin perfusion significantly increased the number of pERK-immunoreactive (IR) neurons in the DRG and the cervical and thoracic spinal cord dorsal horn (DH) relative to saline/pepsin (DRG P < 0.01; cervical DH P < 0.05 and thoracic DH P < 0.005). The number of pERK-IR neurons following acid perfusion was significantly attenuated in TRPV1 -/- mice (DH P < 0.05 and DRG P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: This study has identified populations of spinal afferent DRG neurons and DH neurons involved in signaling of noxious acid from the esophagus. There is a major contribution of TRPV1 to signaling within these pathways.

[Occupational allergies against pepsin, chymosin and microbial rennet]. / Berufliche Allergien gegen Pepsin, Chymosin und mikrobielle Labersatzstoffe.

Rennet is a mixture of the proteolytic enzymes pepsin and chymosin (rennin), which is usually obtained from the fourth stomach of young ruminants. While pepsin is also used in the pharmaceutical industry, both enzymes (pepsin and chymosin) are used for the coagulation of milk protein in the manufacture of cheese. Additionally, microbial rennet, which is naturally produced by certain microorganisms, has been used as a substitute for natural rennet in the cheese production for decades. Exposure to enzyme dusts has long been known to cause occupational immediate hypersensitivities. The present paper reviews the results of an evaluation of the literature data concerning occupational airway sensitisation due to natural and microbial rennet. Cases of specific airway sensitisation caused by rennet could be shown clearly by several studies. Positive skin prick and challenge tests as well as specific IgE antibodies have been described, thus suggesting an immunological mechanism.

Oto-toxic effect of gastric reflux.

The reflux of gastric content from the nasopharynx into the middle ear via the Eustachian tube may disrupt inner ear functions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of experimental gastric reflux on the cochlear function of rats. Twelve rats were included in this study. Acidified gastric pepsin was prepared by the addition of HCl and deionized water to pepsinogen from porcine stomach. The left ears were designated as the experimental ears, and the solution was delivered daily for 30 days. The control ears received an equal amount of a saline solution. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions were recorded at baseline (before the injection) and on days 3, 10, and 30. When the mean baseline distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements were compared with the final mean measurements on day 30, the acidified gastric pepsin caused statistically significant (P < 0.05) hearing loss in the experimental ears. There was no significant change in the hearing of the control ears. This is the first study on the ototoxicity of acidified gastric pepsin. Our results demonstrate that acidified gastric pepsin causes hearing loss due to inner ear ototoxicity in a rat animal model.

Experimental model of smoking and simulation of reflux with acid and pepsin in rats / Modelo experimental de tabagismo e simulação de refluxo com ácido e pepsina em ratos

PURPOSE: To develop experimental models to evaluate the effects of hydrochloric acid associated with the pepsin instilled in the mucosa of the upper esophagus and the esophagogastric junction of young male rats Wistar, simulating injury caused by gastroesophageal reflux on the mucosa of aero-digestive tract in humans as well as the action of the risk exposure of mucosa to cigarette smoke. METHODS: Fifty young male Wistar rats divided in 5 groups with 10 animals each one, respectively simulating pharyngo-laryngeal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux, pharyngo-laryngeal reflux and smoking, smoking only, gastroesophageal reflux and control group. RESULTS: The histopathologic studies no recorded neoplasias, only mild changes and no significant alterations. The hemo-oximetry (carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobim) and CO2 concentration confirm that the animals were submitted to high intensity of exposure to carcinogens in tobacco and its derivatives. CONCLUSION: The experimental models were highly efficient, practical, easy to use and economical and can be employed in other similar studies to determine the harmful effects by smoking and reflux.

OBJETIVO: Desenvolver modelos experimentais para avaliar os efeitos do ácido clorídrico associado a pepsina, instilados na mucosa da parte superior do esôfago e da junção esofagogástrica de jovens ratos Wistar, simulando lesão causada por refluxo gastroesofágico na mucosa do trato aero-digestivo em humanos, bem como a ação da exposição ao risco de mucosa, como a fumaça de cigarro. MÉTODOS: Cinqüenta jovens ratos Wistar divididos em cinco grupos com 10 animais cada um, respectivamente, simulando o refluxo faringo-laríngeo e refluxo gastroesofágico, refluxo faringo-laríngeo e tabagismo, tabagismo só, refluxo gastroesofágico e grupo controle. RESULTADOS: os estudos histopatológicos não registraram neoplasias, apenas leves alterações e não significativas. O hemo-oximetria (carboxiemoglobina e metemoglobina) e concentração de CO2 corroboram que os animais foram submetidos a alta intensidade de exposição a substâncias cancerígenas do tabaco e seus derivados. CONCLUSÃO: os modelos experimentais desenvolvidos foram altamente eficientes, práticos, fáceis de usar e econômicos podendo ser empregados em outros estudos semelhantes para determinar os efeitos prejudiciais causados pelo tabagismo e refluxo.

Experimental model of smoking and simulation of reflux with acid and pepsin in rats.

PURPOSE: To develop experimental models to evaluate the effects of hydrochloric acid associated with the pepsin instilled in the mucosa of the upper esophagus and the esophagogastric junction of young male rats Wistar, simulating injury caused by gastroesophageal reflux on the mucosa of aero-digestive tract in humans as well as the action of the risk exposure of mucosa to cigarette smoke. METHODS: Fifty young male Wistar rats divided in 5 groups with 10 animals each one, respectively simulating pharyngo-laryngeal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux, pharyngo-laryngeal reflux and smoking, smoking only, gastroesophageal reflux and control group. RESULTS: The histopathologic studies no recorded neoplasias, only mild changes and no significant alterations. The hemo-oximetry (carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobim) and CO2 concentration confirm that the animals were submitted to high intensity of exposure to carcinogens in tobacco and its derivatives. CONCLUSION: The experimental models were highly efficient, practical, easy to use and economical and can be employed in other similar studies to determine the harmful effects by smoking and reflux.

Ex vivo reconditioning of marginal donor lungs injured by acid aspiration.

BACKGROUND: Injured lungs due to gastric acid aspiration may be rejected for transplantation because of the possibility of early graft dysfunction. We hypothesized that diluted surfactant administration during ex vivo perfusion would recondition the lungs injured by acid aspiration and permit their use as suitable grafts for transplantation. METHODS: Using a pig model, lung injury was induced with 5-ml/kg administration of a betaine-HCl/pepsin mixture via a flexible bronchoscope. After injury, animals were randomly assigned to three study groups (n = 6/group): saline lavage during ex vivo perfusion (control); surfactant lavage ex vivo (SL-Exvivo); and surfactant lavage before harvest (SL-Pre); and a normal group (n = 4), with no lung injury. Cold storage time was 3 hours. A volume of 10 ml/kg (4 mg/ml, 40 mg/kg) surfactant (Curosurf) was used for lavage. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed before and after injury and at the end of the experiment. Protein and neutrophil percentage in BAL were assessed. Hemodynamic and aerodynamic parameters were measured every 30 minutes during a 2-hour observation period. RESULTS: An approximately 50% decrease in Pao(2) was observed in all animals after injury. Ex vivo surfactant lavage resulted in lower pulmonary vascular resistance, lower oxygenation index and higher Pao(2)/Fio(2) ratio compared with the control group (p = 0.001, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001, respectively, according to analysis of variance for repeated measures). Wet-to-dry weight ratio was lower in the SL-Exvivo group compared with the control group (p = 0.015). BAL neutrophil percent at the end of the experiment differed significantly between control and all other groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Diluted surfactant lavage during ex vivo perfusion improves graft function of lungs injured by gastric acid aspiration.

Experimental carcinogenesis on the oropharyngeal mucosa of rats with hydrochloric acid, sodium nitrate and pepsin / Carcinogênese experimental na mucosa orofaríngea de ratos com ácido clorídrico, nitrato de sódio e pepsina

PURPOSE: To investigate the carcinogenic action of hydrochloric acid, pepsin and sodium nitrate on the oropharyngeal mucosa of rats, simulating the reflux of gastric contents. METHODS: Eighty-two Wistar rats were divided in seven groups and submitted to 2 or 3 weekly applications of hydrochloric acid, pepsin and sodium nitrate on the pharyngeal mucosa during six months. Study groups comprised 12 animals each. Rats in groups I and II were submitted to 2 (GI) or 3 (GII) weekly applications of 0.1N hydrochloric acid. Groups III and IV were submitted to 2 (GIII) or 3 (GIV) weekly applications of 0.1N hydrochloric acid solution with pepsin. Groups V and VI were submitted to 2 (GV) or 3 (GVI) weekly applications of 0.1N hydrochloric acid and treated with daily nitrate diluted in water. Group VII consisted of 10 animals submitted to 2 weekly applications of filtered water. RESULTS: No dysplasia, intra-epithelial neoplasia or invasive carcinomas were detected. Inflammatory changes were observed in varying degrees and mast cells were more common in Groups V and VI (p=0.006). CONCLUSION: The data of the current study could not corroborate the hypothesis that gastroesophageal and pharyngolaryngeal refluxes are carcinogenic factors to the laryngopharyngeal mucosa, and more studies are necessary in the future.

OBJETIVO: Investigar a ação carcinogênica do ácido clorídrico, pepsina e nitrato de sódio na mucosa orofaríngea de ratos, simulando o refluxo do conteúdo gástrico à mucosa do faringo-laringea. MÉTODOS: Oitenta e dois ratos Wistar foram divididos em 7 grupos e submetidos a 2 ou 3 aplicações semanais de ácido clorídrico, pepsina e nitrato de sódio na mucosa orofaríngea durante 6 meses. Os grupos de estudo envolveram 12 animais cada. Os ratos nos grupos I e II foram submetidos à 2 (GI) ou 3 (GII) aplicações semanais de ácido clorídrico 0,1N. Nos grupos III e IV foram 2 (GIII) ou 3 (GIV) aplicações semanais de ácido clorídrico e pepsina. Nos grupos V e VI foram 2 (GV) ou 3 (GVI) aplicações semanais de ácido clorídrico além da oferta de nitrato diluído em água diariamente. Grupo VII era composto por 10 animais submetidos a 2 aplicações semanais de água filtrada. RESULTADOS: Não se observou displasia, neoplasia intra-epitelial ou neoplasia invasora. Alterações inflamatórias em graus variados foram observadas, com infiltrado mastocitário mais intenso nos grupos V e VI. (p=0,006). CONCLUSÃO: Os dados do presente estudo não confirmam a hipótese que o refluxo gastro-esofágico e faringo-laringeo são fatores carcinogênicos para a mucosa laringo-faringea e mais estudos são necessários no futuro.

Experimental carcinogenesis on the oropharyngeal mucosa of rats with hydrochloric acid, sodium nitrate and pepsin.

PURPOSE: To investigate the carcinogenic action of hydrochloric acid, pepsin and sodium nitrate on the oropharyngeal mucosa of rats, simulating the reflux of gastric contents. METHODS: Eighty-two Wistar rats were divided in seven groups and submitted to 2 or 3 weekly applications of hydrochloric acid, pepsin and sodium nitrate on the pharyngeal mucosa during six months. Study groups comprised 12 animals each. Rats in groups I and II were submitted to 2 (GI) or 3 (GII) weekly applications of 0.1N hydrochloric acid. Groups III and IV were submitted to 2 (GIII) or 3 (GIV) weekly applications of 0.1N hydrochloric acid solution with pepsin. Groups V and VI were submitted to 2 (GV) or 3 (GVI) weekly applications of 0.1N hydrochloric acid and treated with daily nitrate diluted in water. Group VII consisted of 10 animals submitted to 2 weekly applications of filtered water. RESULTS: No dysplasia, intra-epithelial neoplasia or invasive carcinomas were detected. Inflammatory changes were observed in varying degrees and mast cells were more common in Groups V and VI (p=0.006). CONCLUSION: The data of the current study could not corroborate the hypothesis that gastroesophageal and pharyngolaryngeal refluxes are carcinogenic factors to the laryngopharyngeal mucosa, and more studies are necessary in the future.

Pathogenic importance of pepsin in ischemia/reperfusion-induced gastric injury.

We investigated the role of pepsin in the development of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)-induced gastric lesions in rats. Under urethane anesthesia, the pylorus was ligated, the celiac artery was clamped, and 1 ml of HCl (50-150 mM) was instilled in the stomach. Then, reperfusion was established 15 min later by removing the clamp, and 2 h later the stomach was assessed for gross mucosal damage. Pepstatin (a specific pepsin inhibitor) or pepsin was given i.g. after the pylorus was ligated while cimetidine, omeprazole, or atropine was given s.c. 30 min before the ligation. I/R produced hemorrhagic gastric injury, with a concomitant increase in the amount of pepsin secreted, and the degree of both these responses was dependent on the concentration of HCl. The formation of lesions by IR in the presence of 100 mM HCl was significantly prevented by atropine or bilateral vagotomy, but neither omeprazole nor cimetidine had any effect. Intragastric administration of pepstatin dose-dependently reduced the severity of the I/R-induced gastric lesions, the effect being significant even at 0.1 mg/kg, while that of pepsin markedly aggravated these lesions. The increased pepsin output during I/R was associated with luminal acid loss and significantly inhibited by bilateral vagotomy or pretreatment with atropine but not cimetidine or omeprazole, while pepstatin significantly inhibited the pepsin activity. In conclusion, we suggest that pepsin plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of I/R-induced gastric lesions, and pepsin secretion is increased during I/R, the process being associated with acid back-diffusion and mediated through a vagal-cholinergic pathway.

Effect of acid and pepsin on glottic wound healing: a simulated reflux model.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of acid and pepsin on the healing of traumatized vocal folds in a simulated reflux model. Gastroesophageal reflux is related to various laryngeal manifestations. However, there is a lack of established reflux animal models that would ensure longer observation periods. DESIGN: A prospective randomized animal study. INTERVENTIONS: Forty-two rabbits underwent a stripping procedure of the unilateral glottis and catheter insertion under transoral endoscopic guidance. The animals were randomly assigned to a control group (n = 21; isotonic sodium chloride was used) or a reflux group (n = 21, acid and pepsin were used). They received intrapharyngeal catheter irrigation with 3 mL of isotonic sodium chloride or a solution of acid with a pH of 3 and pepsin, 0.3 mg/mL, twice daily for 4 or 8 weeks after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gross and histologic findings of the preinjured glottides of the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: The catheter extrusion rate was significantly low (6%), and any catheter problems were immediately solved by reinsertion or reconnection. The extent of glottic scarring and frequency of granulation formation were higher in the reflux group compared with the control group (P<.05). Histologic inflammation scores and collagen deposition were significantly greater in the reflux group compared with the control group (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that glottic wound healing is significantly affected by acid and pepsin. Antireflux treatment can be advocated to minimize further injury caused by gastroesophageal reflux in patients who undergo laryngeal surgery.

Experimental esophagitis induced by acid and pepsin in rabbits mimicking human reflux esophagitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The lack of appropriate animal models might explain the paucity of information on the mechanisms of mucosal damage and defense in reflux esophagitis. The aim of this study was to develop a model of esophagitis in rabbits mimicking human reflux esophagitis. METHODS: New Zealand white rabbits underwent surgery for placement of a plastic tube into the cervical esophagus. Acidified pepsin (AP) was intermittently perfused for different periods. Esophageal injury was assessed by macroscopic and microscopic examination, including the cell proliferation immunohistochemical parameter mib1. RESULTS: Rabbit losses (20%) were attributable mostly to postsurgical mortality and tube displacement. Perfusion of AP for 60 min/12 h or 45 min/12 h induced high-grade esophagitis by days 3 and 5, respectively, characterized by diffuse erosion/ulceration, inflammation, bleeding, and reactive epithelial changes. Perfusion of acidified pepsin for 60 min/day, especially at 30 min/12 h, induced low-grade esophagitis characterized by superficial epithelial loss, mild/absent inflammation, and epithelial reactive changes including increased cell proliferation, basal hyperplasia, and papillomatosis, which reached maximal expression by day 7. This perfusion regimen induced mucosal adaptation to damage. CONCLUSIONS: Different and highly reproducible esophageal mucosal lesions mimicking human reflux esophagitis can be induced in rabbits with repetitive acid and pepsin exposure.

Effects of HCl-pepsin laryngeal instillations on upper airway patency-maintaining mechanisms.

Gastroesophageal reflux has been indicated as an etiopathological factor in disorders of the upper airway. Upper airway collapsing pressure stimulates pressure-responsive laryngeal receptors that reflexly increase the activity of upper airway abductor muscles. We studied, in anesthetized dogs, the effects of repeated laryngeal instillations of HCl-pepsin (HCl-P; pH = 2) on the response of laryngeal afferent endings and the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle (PCA) to negative pressure. The effect of negative pressure on receptor discharge or PCA activity was evaluated by comparing their response to upper airway (UAO) and tracheal occlusions (TO). It is only during UAO, but not during TO, that the larynx is subjected to negative transmural pressure. HCl-P instillation decreased the rate of discharge during UAO of the 10 laryngeal receptors studied from 56.4 +/- 10.9 (SE) to 38.2 +/- 9.2 impulses/s (P < 0.05). With UAO, the peak PCA moving time average, normalized by dividing it by the peak values of esophageal pressure, decreased after six HCl-P trials from 4.29 +/- 0.31 to 2.23 +/- 0.18 (n = 6; P < 0.05). The responses to TO of either receptors or PCA remained unaltered. We conclude that exposure of the laryngeal mucosa to HCl-P solutions, as it may occur with gastroesophageal reflux, impairs the patency-maintaining mechanisms provided by laryngeal sensory feedback. Inflammatory and necrotic alterations of the laryngeal mucosa are likely responsible for these effects.

Cytoprotective effect of epidermal growth factor on acid- and pepsin-induced damage to rat gastric epithelial cells: roles of Na+/H+ exchangers.

We have previously established a cell damage model, with damage induced by either acid or pepsin treatment for 30 min, involving a rat gastric epithelial cell line (RGM1). In the present study, pretreatment of cells with epidermal growth factor (EGF; 0.1-10 ng/mL) or sucralfate (0.1-3 mg/mL) for 4 h prevented such cell damage in a concentration-dependent manner. Protection of cells by these drugs was not affected by pretreatment with indomethacin (10(-5) mol/L) for 4 h. Removal of Na+, but not Ca2+, from the acidified medium totally abolished the inhibitory effect of EGF, but not that of sucralfate. Genistein (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) apparently reduced the inhibitory effect of EGF. DNA synthesis by RGM1 cells did not increase when cells were incubated with EGF for 4 h. We conclude that both EGF and sucralfate protect RGM1 cells from acid- and pepsin-induced damage and that the mechanism of protection by EGF against acid-induced damage seems to be via activation of Na+/H+ exchangers.

Role of acid and duodenogastric reflux in esophageal mucosal injury: a review of animal and human studies.

The role of acid and duodenogastric reflux (DGR) in the development of esophageal mucosal injury has been extensively investigated using both animal and human models. In this report, clinical and experimental data are reviewed. The mechanisms by which gastric and duodenal contents produce esophageal mucosal injury are also discussed. Acid and pepsin are unquestionably important in causing mucosal damage at low pH values in both animal and human models. Animal models suggest synergistic damaging potential for conjugated bile acids and HCI as well as that of unconjugated bile acids and trypsin in more neutral pH values. Human evidence for the involvement of bile and its constituents has been controversial; however, the advent of better technology to detect DGR is beginning to clarify the role of these constituents. The contribution of each methodology in clarifying the extent of involvement of DGR in esophageal mucosal injury is reviewed. Despite some conflicting results, preliminary human studies support the results from the animal data suggesting synergistic damaging effects for both bile and acid in esophageal mucosal injury. The implication of these studies in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease are discussed.

Role of arachidonic acid metabolites in acid-pepsin injury to rabbit esophagus.

The role of cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase metabolites of arachidonic acid in experimental esophageal were lumenally perfused for 1 h with acidified saline (pH 2.0) with or without pepsin followed by a second hour with acidified saline. Separate groups of pepsin-perfused animals were pretreated with indomethacin, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, or BW755C, a lipoxygenase-cyclooxygenase inhibitor. Esophageal injury was graded grossly. H+ and hemoglobin fluxes were determined. Acidified saline caused no significant damage. Pepsin induced moderate injury. Indomethacin decreased pepsin-induced H+ flux by 55% without affecting the other indices. BW755C, by all measurements, dramatically increased pepsin-induced injury. In separate experiments, cyclooxygenase activity was decreased by indomethacin and BW755C by 62% and 49%, respectively. Lipoxygenase activity was decreased 74% by BW755C and was not significantly affected by indomethacin. These results suggest that esophageal cytoprotection is mediated by endogenous lipoxygenase metabolites.

Sucralfate prevents experimental peptic esophagitis in rabbits.

Sucralfate was tested in a rabbit model for its ability to prevent experimental esophagitis. Esophagitis was assessed by gross appearance and microscopic examination by an uninformed observer. In addition, the permeability of the esophagus to a number of probe molecules was measured to assess barrier function. Animals were exposed for 1 h to either acid alone (HCl at pH 2), acid plus pepsin (0.8 mg/ml), or acid plus taurocholic acid (5 mM), as well as to the same injurious agents with the addition of 1 g of sucralfate. At the completion of this hour, the perfusate was removed and all animals were again perfused for 1 h with HCl at pH 2 while mucosal permeability was assessed by measuring erythritol, glucose, potassium, and sodium fluxes. The animals were then killed. Sucralfate significantly diminished esophagitis and the attendant mucosal permeability changes induced by pepsin. The viscous sucralfate gel was shown to adhere tenaciously to the esophageal mucosa, but this characteristic of sucralfate was found not to be critical for its protective action because a clear sucrose sulfate solution with no gel present was also protective. Hence, it was not necessary for the gel to be present for the drug to be effective. Several in vitro tests suggested that the clear sucrose sulfate solution, like the sucralfate gel, probably acts through a topical protectant effect, rather than through pepsin inactivation. Although the degree of esophagitis induced by the bile acid was significantly less than that observed with pepsin, the mucosal permeability changes were comparable. Sucralfate did not significantly reduce the flux rates of glucose, potassium, and sodium nor did it affect the morphology of the mucosa after exposure to taurocholic acid. In conclusion, the binding of sucralfate to pepsin substrates in tissue results in this agent being very effective in preventing experimental peptic esophagitis.