Differences in semicircular canal function in the video head impulse test in patients in the chronic stage of sudden sensorineural hearing loss with vertigo and vestibular neuritis.

BACKGROUND: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss with vertigo (SHLV) and vestibular neuritis (VN) can result in prolonged dizziness. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the video head impulse test (vHIT) of patients with SHLV and VN. METHODS: Fifteen patients with SHLV and 21 patients with VN who visited the Vertigo/Dizziness Center of our hospital between December 2016 and February 2023 were included. vHIT was performed at the time of admission, and the VOR gain and catch up saccade (CUS) in the three types of semicircular canals (SCCs) were analyzed. RESULTS: Pathologic vHIT results were observed most frequently in the posterior SCC (73%), followed by lateral (53%) and anterior (13%) SCCs in the SHLV group. In contrast, pathologic vHIT results were observed most frequently in the lateral SCC (100%), followed by the anterior (43%) and posterior SCC (24%) SCCs in the VN group. Pathological vHIT results in the lateral and posterior SCC showed significant differences between the two groups, but for anterior SCC, no significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Comparison of the two vHIT results revealed differences in the SCC dysfunction patterns. This may be due to the different pathophysiological mechanisms of the two vestibular disorders, which may result in prolonged vertigo.

The impairment of speech perception in noise following pure tone hearing recovery in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

To explore whether patients with unilateral idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (uISSNHL) have normal speech in noise (SIN) perception under different masking conditions after complete recovery of pure tone audiometry. Eight completely recovered uISSNHL patients were enrolled in ISSNHL group, while 8 normal-hearing adults matched with age, gender, and education experience were selected as the control group. Each group was tested SIN under four masking conditions, including noise and speech maskings with and without spatial separation cues. For both ISSNHL and control groups a two-way ANOVA showed a statistically significant effect of masking type (p = 0.007 vs p = 0.012). A significant effect of perceived spatial separation (p < 0.001 vs p < 0.001). A significant interaction between masking type and perceived spatial separation was found (p < 0.001 vs p < 0.001). A paired sample T-test showed that the SIN perception of the control group was statistically significant lower than that of ISSNHL patients only under speech masking without spatial separation cues (p = 0.011). There were still abnormalities in the auditory center shortly after complete recovery in the ISSNHL group (within 2 weeks). However, the auditory periphery and higher-level ability to use spatial cues was normal.

Comparison between postauricular steroid injection and intratympanic steroid perfusion for refractory severe and profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the clinical efficacy of intratympanic steroid perfusion (ISP) and postauricular steroid injection (PSI) for refractory severe and profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). METHODS: SSNHL patients who failed a conventional treatment with severe to profound hearing loss [pure tone average (PTA, 0.25-8 kHz) > 60 dB] were treated with ISP or PSI plus antioxidant and neurotrophin for 10 consecutive days. Antioxidant and neurotrophin were administrated either intravenously and/or orally. All patients were assigned into the ISP group or the PSI group and followed up for more than three months. The changes in PTA, effective rate and side effects were analyzed in the two groups. RESULTS: Similar hearing improvements and effective rates were observed in the two groups. However, a slightly better efficacy was observed in the PSI group compared to the ISP group. Patients with shorter intervals from onset to treatment had significantly more hearing improvements. The route of antioxidant and neurotrophin administration had no impact on treatment effects. CONCLUSION: Both ISP and PSI could be used as salvage treatments for refractory SSNHL. These salvage treatments should be started as soon as possible once SSNHL patients fail a conventional treatment.

Ear fullness characteristics and prognosis in patients with all-frequency sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the characteristics and prognosis of the feeling of ear fullness in patients with unilateral all-frequency sudden sensorineural hearing loss. METHODS: Our study included 56 patients with a diagnosis of unilateral all-frequency sudden sensorineural hearing loss accompanied by a feeling of ear fullness and 48 patients without a feeling of ear fullness. The condition of these patients was prospectively observed. RESULTS: Positive correlations were observed between grading of feeling of ear fullness and hearing loss in patients with a feeling of ear fullness (r = 0.599, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the total effective rate of hearing recovery between patients with and without a feeling of ear fullness after one month of treatment (Z = -0.641, p = 0.521). Eighty-six per cent of patients (48 out of 56) showed complete recovery from the feeling of ear fullness. There was no correlation between feeling of ear fullness recovery and hearing recovery (r = 0.040, p = 0.769). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of feeling of ear fullness is good. There was no correlation between feeling of ear fullness recovery and hearing recovery for all-frequency sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients.

Calculated versus measured pure tone bone conduction 3 kHz thresholds in sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the measured bone conduction threshold at 3 kHz with the calculated threshold in newly diagnosed sudden sensorineural hearing loss. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of pure tone audiograms in confirmed sudden sensorineural hearing loss cases. RESULTS: Of 157 patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss, 144 had idiopathic hearing loss, 8 had vestibular schwannoma and 5 had Ménière's disease. The r value for the correlation between the two methods of 3 kHz assessment for all patients was 0.887 (p < 0.001). The mean difference between the measured and calculated 3 kHz thresholds was 0.76 ± 7.96 dB, 0.4 ± 8.08 dB and 1.5 ± 1.8 dB in the sudden sensorineural hearing loss, idiopathic and Ménière's disease groups, respectively. The mean difference between the measured and calculated 3 kHz thresholds was significantly greater in the vestibular schwannoma group (6.86 ± 4.38 dB) than in the idiopathic group (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: The 3 kHz frequency may encompass important audiometric information. A discrepancy between the measured and calculated bone conduction 3 kHz thresholds raises suspicion of an underlying vestibular schwannoma as an aetiology for sudden sensorineural hearing loss, and these thresholds should therefore be measured independently and routinely.

Global and local brain connectivity changes associated with sudden unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

Recent studies suggest that even moderate sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) causes reduction of gray matter volume in the primary auditory cortex, diminishing its ability to react to sound stimulation, as well as reorganization of functional brain networks. We employed resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), in conjunction with graph-theoretical analysis and a newly developed functional "disruption index," to study whole-brain as well as local functional changes in patients with unilateral SSNHL. We also assessed the potential of graph-theoretical measures as biomarkers of disease, in terms of their relationship to clinically relevant audiological parameters. Eight patients with moderate or severe unilateral SSNHL and 15 healthy controls were included in this prospective pilot study. All patients underwent rs-fMRI to study potential changes in brain connectivity. From rs-fMRI data, global and local graph-theoretical measures, disruption index, and audiological examinations were estimated. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to study the differences between SSNHL patients and healthy controls. Associations between brain metrics and clinical variables were studied using multiple linear regressions, and the presence or absence of brain network hubs was assessed using Fisher's exact test. No statistically significant differences between SSNHL patients and healthy controls were found in global or local network measures. However, when analyzing brain networks through the disruption index, we found a brain-wide functional network reorganization (p < 0.001 as compared with controls), whose extent was associated with clinical impairment (p < 0.05). We also observed several functional hubs in SSNHL patients that were not present in healthy controls and vice versa. Our results demonstrate a brain involvement in SSNHL patients, not detectable using conventional graph-theoretical analysis, which may yield subtle disease clues and possibly aid in monitoring disease progression in clinical trials.

Comparison of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss with Tinnitus and Short-Term Tinnitus.

Objective: As one of the common symptoms of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSH), tinnitus seriously affects the life and work of SSH patients. The present study is aimed at exploring whether SSH can receive acoustic therapy and the factors that affect the efficacy of SSH acoustic therapy. Methods: A total of 162 patients were outpatients and inpatients, 86 were SSH, and 76 were short-term tinnitus (STT). Both groups received pure tone audiometry, tinnitus matching, and residual inhibition test (RI). The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), visual analog scale with respect to tinnitus loudness (VAS), and RI in each group were evaluated. The effects of age, degree of hearing loss, and tinnitus course on the efficacy of SSH acoustic therapy were also evaluated. Results: In the comparison of RI, THI, and VAS, there was no difference between SSH and STT (P > 0.05). SSH patients with mild hearing loss showed better acoustic therapy efficacy compared with SSH patients with severe hearing loss (P < 0.05), but there is no statistical difference in age and the course of tinnitus (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The present study showed that SSH may improve tinnitus symptom through receiving acoustic therapy and SSH patients with mild hearing loss can get better acoustic therapy effects.

Clinical features and prognostic factors of pediatric idiopathic sudden hearing loss from moderate to profound degree.

BACKGROUND: The pediatric idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (PISSNHL) is not rare in the clinics, however, the prognostic factors of PISSNHL are still unclear. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical and audiologic characteristics associated with prognosis in PISSNHL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical and audiological characteristics and possible prognostic factors were retrospectively evaluated in 76 PISSNHL patients aged less than 19 years. RESULTS: Hearing loss was moderate in nine patients, severe in 21 patients, profound in 46 patients. Among five types of audiogram, 3.9% were classified as ascending, 11.8% as descending, 25.0% as flat, 55.3% as profound, and 3.9% as concave. The recovery rate according to Siegel's criteria was 55.3%. There was no significant difference between the recovery group and the poor recovery group in terms of age, sex, laterality of hearing loss, the onset of treatment, and accompanying symptoms (p > 0.05). The initial hearing levels and the audiogram type were significantly different in the two groups (p < 0.001) according to univariate analysis, while only the initial hearing level was significantly different (p = 0.046) according to multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Prognosis of PISSNHL was mainly related to initial hearing at onset. An initial hearing level greater than 80 dB was a poor prognostic factor.

Sudden Sensorineural Hearing and Vestibular Loss in a Case of Relapsing Polychondritis.

OBJECTIVES: To report a case of profound bilateral sensorineural hearing and vestibular loss from relapsing polychondritis and hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation. METHODS: Case report and literature review. RESULTS: A 43 year-old woman developed sudden loss of hearing and balance that progressed over several weeks to bilateral, profound hearing and vestibular loss. Steroid treatments were ineffective. She underwent vestibular physical therapy and left cochlear implantation. About 10 months after her initial presentation, she developed erythema, warmth, swelling, and pain of the left auricle sparing the lobule, flattening of the bridge of her nose, and right ankle swelling, warmth, and skin erythema. A biopsy of the left auricle revealed histopathologic findings consistent with relapsing polychondritis. She was treated with high dose prednisolone. The ear inflammation resolved, however, despite excellent auditory response to pure tone thresholds, the patient reported no improvement in speech perception after cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Relapsing polychondritis can present with rapidly progressive, profound loss of hearing and vestibular function. Hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation can include poor speech discrimination despite good pure tone detection thresholds.

Association of the prognosis and severity of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss with cervical ultrasonographic findings.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association of the prognosis and severity of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) with cervical ultrasonographic findings suggestive of cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Seventy-four inpatients with ISSNHL were included in our study. Cervical ultrasonography was performed to evaluate the common carotid artery (CCA), internal carotid artery (ICA), and vertebral artery (VA). The peak systolic velocity, end diastolic velocity, intima-media thickness, pulsatility index (PI), and resistance index (RI) were evaluated. We investigated the relationship of these variables with the severity and prognosis of ISSNHL. RESULTS: ICA-PI, ICA-RI, and CCA-RI were significantly higher in patients with poor hearing prognosis than in those with good prognosis. The variables of VA were not related to the prognosis of ISSNHL. There were no statistically significant differences between ISSNHL severity and cervical ultrasonographic findings. CONCLUSIONS: We found that PI and RI might be prognostic factors for ISSNHL.

Evaluation and comparison of the efficacy of long-acting betamethasone and dexamethasone as injections in the treatment of idiopathic sudden hearing loss.

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine the efficacy of long-acting betamethasone, and its comparison with Dexamethasone as an intratympanic injection in the treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients who do not respond to systemic steroids and poor prognosis patients were enrolled in this study. The patients divided randomly into two groups: 1- Dexamethasone and 2- Long acting betamethasone. Dexamethasone (0.4 ml/mg) or long-acting betamethasone (0.1 ml/mg) was slowly injected (0.4 to 0.6 cc) into the superior-anterior area of the tympanic membrane as 6 injections twice a week for a total of 3 weeks. Right after the treatment and one, two and six months after completion of treatment, an audiometry was performed and compared with the pre-injection values. RESULTS: Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) showed improvements in both groups immediately after treatment and in the follow-up period, compared to baseline. Speech Discrimination Score (SDS) also improved in both groups directly after treatment and at one-month follow-up. The hearing improvement in the Dexamethasone group was clinically better than in the Beta group, but due to the non-parametric data, it was not possible to analyze the hearing improvement process in the variable group. CONCLUSION: According to the results obtained in this study, intratympanic corticosteroid injection in the treatment of patients with SSNHL has positive and promising results on improving hearing level.

Geriatric sudden deafness.

PURPOSE: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss, briefly sudden deafness (SD), in the elderly remains less investigated despite rapidly aging population in most countries around the world. This study investigated whether aging process affects the treatment outcome of SD in the elderly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with SD, comprising 40 geriatric patients aged >65 years and 40 non-geriatric patients aged 55-64 years, were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent an inner ear test battery including audiometry, and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), ocular VEMP (oVEMP), and caloric tests. RESULTS: Pre-treatment mean hearing level in the geriatric group (94 ± 16 dB) did not significantly differ from non-geriatric group (89 ± 20 dB). After treatment for 3 months, mean hearing gain in the geriatric group (22 ± 18 dB) with an improvement rate of 65%, did not significantly differ from non-geriatric group (21 ± 28 dB) with 58% improvement rate. Both inter-subject and intra-subject analyses revealed that the aging process greatly influenced the cVEMP and oVEMP responses, while less influenced the caloric responses. CONCLUSION: The treatment outcome of SD in geriatric patients aged >65 years did not significantly differ from that in non-geriatric patients aged 55-64 years, indicating that aging process did not affect treatment outcome of SD. Unlike treatment outcome for the presbycusis is unsatisfactory, treatment outcome for the elderly with SD could be favorable.

Clinical Profile of Patients With Unilateral Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Correlation With Hearing Prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize, with a standard systematic protocol, the clinical and audiometric profile of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and to correlate the findings with hearing recovery prognosis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort of patients with ISSNHL. SETTING: Outpatients of a tertiary referral center followed for 20 years. METHODS: We collected clinical information, including the presence of tinnitus, vertigo, and comorbidities, as well as initial pure tone averages, degree of hearing loss, audiogram curves, and time between hearing loss onset and treatment. These variables were statistically analyzed for their impact on hearing recovery prognosis. All patients were treated with oral corticosteroids, following a standard treatment protocol. Hearing recovery was defined according to the criteria of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, and hearing outcomes were reported via a standardized method (scattergrams). RESULTS: Our final study group comprised 186 patients. Most patients were between 41 and 60 years of age. Univariate analysis revealed that vertigo; presence of severe or profound initial hearing loss; flat, U-shaped, and descending audiogram curves; and initiating treatment ≥15 days were correlated with worse hearing recovery. However, the multivariate logistic model revealed that only the presence of severe or profound hearing loss (odds ratio, 6.634; 95% CI, 2.714-16.216; P < .001) and initiating treatment ≥15 days (odds ratio, 0.250; 95% CI, 0.102-0.610; P = .008) were independent risk factors for worse hearing recovery prognosis. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the presence of severe or profound hearing loss at the first audiogram and initiating treatment after 14 days from ISSNHL onset were independent risk factors associated with a worse hearing recovery prognosis.

Clinical characteristics and correlation between hearing outcomes after different episodes of recurrent idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES: Recurrent idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is a rare disease. In this study, we evaluated the correlations between hearing recovery after the first and recurrent episodes of ISSNHL and characterized the clinical features of different episodes of ISSNHL. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted by reviewing medical records pertaining to the period 2008-2018. A total of 30 patients (16 male, 14 female) who had experienced at least two episodes of ISSNHL were included. All patients were had received steroid therapy (including systemic and IT) and/or hyperbaric oxygen therapy within 2 weeks after the onset of disease. The SDRG's criteria was used for the grading of hearing recovery. RESULTS: The median age at the first and second episode of ISSNHL was 48 and 53.5 years, respectively; a total of 30% of patients presented with vertigo in the first episode and 40% presented with vertigo in the second episode. The hearing outcomes of both episodes showed significant improvement after treatment. The rate of complete recovery after the first and second episodes was 46.67% and 33.33%, respectively. A significant positive correlation was observed between the treatment outcomes of the first and second episodes (r = 0.721, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In ISSNHL, hearing recovery after a recurrent episode is significantly correlated with the hearing outcome after the initial episode (p = 0.042). The treatment outcome of the first episode is a prognostic factor for the outcomes of recurrent episodes.

Usefulness of vertebrobasilar artery radiological finding as a predictive and prognostic factor for sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE: The association between sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and radiological findings of the vertebrobasilar artery is not well-known and little research has been done. We hypothesized that the radiological features of the vertebrobasilar artery contribute to the incidence and prognosis of SSNHL. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled patients diagnosed with unilateral SSNHL (SSNHL group) and those with acute vestibular neuritis (AVN; control group) in our hospital. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. We measured the following parameters on the radiological images: basilar artery diameter, direction and distance of basilar artery deviation, direction and distance of vertebral artery deviation, and incidence of vertebral artery obstruction. Pure tone audiometry (PTA) was performed in all patients. Follow up PTA between 1 week and 1 month after treatment was performed in the SSNHL group. RESULTS: A total of 244 SSNHL patients and 62 AVN patients were included in the analysis. Age, body mass index, and basilar artery diameter were found to be significantly associated with SSNHL. In the SSNHL group, patients were divided into three subgroups based on the consistency between the basilar artery deviation site and disease site. No significant difference was noted in initial PTA, final PTA, PTA recovery, and symptom improvement among the three groups. In case of the basilar artery, when the deviation and disease sites were in the opposite direction and the basilar artery diameter was >3.5 mm, diameter of basilar artery was positively correlated with PTA recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of this study is that radiological evaluation of the vertebrobasilar artery was performed. Further research on the association between SSNHL and radiological features of the vertebrobasilar artery should be conducted to emphasize the importance of vascular assessment in SSNHL.

Predicting hearing recovery following treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss with machine learning models.

PURPOSE: Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) is an emergency otological disease, and its definite prognostic factors remain unclear. This study applied machine learning methods to develop a new ISSHL prognosis prediction model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed the medical data of 244 patients who underwent combined intratympanic and systemic steroid treatment for ISSHL at a tertiary referral center between January 2015 and October 2019. We used 35 variables to predict hearing recovery based on Siegel's criteria. In addition to performing an analysis based on the conventional logistic regression model, we developed prediction models with five machine learning methods: least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, decision tree, random forest (RF), support vector machine, and boosting. To compare the predictive ability of each model, the accuracy, precision, recall, F-score, and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (ROC-AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: Former otological history, ear fullness, delay between symptom onset and treatment, delay between symptom onset and intratympanic steroid injection (ITSI), and initial hearing thresholds of the affected and unaffected ears differed significantly between the recovery and non-recovery groups. While the RF method (accuracy: 72.22%, ROC-AUC: 0.7445) achieved the highest predictive power, the other methods also featured relatively good predictive power. In the RF model, the following variables were identified to be important for hearing-recovery prediction: delay between symptom onset and ITSI or the initial treatment, initial hearing levels of the affected and non-affected ears, body mass index, and a previous history of hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: The machine learning models predictive of hearing recovery following treatment for ISSHL showed superior predictive power relative to the conventional logistic regression method, potentially allowing for better patient treatment outcomes.

Butylphthalide enhances recovery from sudden deafness.

OBJECTIVES: Cochlear microcirculation disturbance caused by vasculopathy is a common cause of sudden deafness (SD). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) plays an important role in cochlear injury during ischemia-reperfusion. Butylphthalide can improve microcirculation, reduce ROS formation and inhibit apoptosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of butylphthalide on patients with SD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The hearing gains from 32 ears treated with butylphthalide were compared with that of 32 ears treated with non-butylphthalide. Butylphthalide capsules was administrated orally on an empty stomach for 10 continuous days. There were no significant differences in audiological and clinical data between butylphthalide and non-butylphthalide groups. RESULTS: The hearing gain of butylphthalide group at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz was significantly higher than that of non-butylphthalide group correspondingly (P<0.01). And, the hearing gain at PTA (pure-tone average of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) in butylphthalide group was significantly higher than that of non-butylphthalide group (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The recovery of hearing in butylphthalide group was significantly better than that of non-butylphthalide group. It is confirmed that butylphthalide has a definite therapeutic effect on SD.

Comparison of Therapeutic Results with/without Additional Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Randomized Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of the combination of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and pharmacological treatment in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and define patients amenable for HBO therapy. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, trial involving 136 cases with unilateral ISSNHL that were randomly divided into 2 groups: the pharmacological treatment (P) group and HBO + pharmacological treatment (HBO+P) group, which received additional HBO for 14 days besides the pharmacological treatments. Pure tone audiometry gain larger than 15 dBHL was defined as success, and the success rate of each group was calculated. RESULTS: The overall success rate of the HBO+P group and the P group is 60.6% (40/66) and 42.9% (30/70), respectively (p < 0.05). Furthermore, patients with mild-moderate baseline hearing loss, aged ≤50 years, receiving treatment in ≤14 days, or without accompanied dizziness/vertigo in the HBO+P group had higher success rate than the P group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HBO combined with pharmacological treatments leads to better hearing recovery than pharmacological treatments alone.

Lesion-specific prognosis by magnetic resonance imaging in sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

BACKGROUND: High signals in the inner ear of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been reported, but no quantitative evaluation has yet been done. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate hearing outcomes and cochlear signal intensities on 3-T heavily T2-weighted three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging (hT2W-3D-FLAIR) in patients with ISSNHL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with ISSNHL were included. Patients underwent hT2W-3D-FLAIR with intravenous gadolinium injection and pure tone audiometry (PTA) at initial visits and 3 months later. Signal intensity ratios (SIRs) were measured in the basal or apical-middle turns of the affected cochlea. A statistical analysis of relationships between SIRs and the average hearing levels (HLs) at low (125, 250, and 500 Hz) and high (2, 4, and 8 kHz) tone frequencies was performed. RESULTS: Hearing improvements at high-tone frequencies in ears with HLs ≥60 dB were significantly worse in those with high SIRs at the basal turns on pre-contrast images. Similarly, hearing improvements at low-tone frequencies in ears with HLs ≥60 dB were significantly worse in those with high SIRs at the apical-middle turns on post-contrast images. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: High SIRs on hT2W-3D-FLAIR indicate cochlear disturbances with severe ISSNHL and could provide lesion-specific prognostic information.

Physician decision support system for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is an emergency disease, and its pathogenesis is still largely unknown, making it difficult to diagnose and develop a therapeutic strategy. To predict the treatment outcomes and further customize the treatment strategy, we used a physician decision support system that incorporates complex information from electronic health records. We first developed the infrastructure of the physician decision support system, including an integrated data warehouse and an automatic data de-identification workflow. METHODS: We next conducted a cohort study to evaluate the treatment outcomes of 757 ISSNHL patients using the modified Siegel's criteria. The complete recovery (<25 dB) as a hearing outcome for ISSNHL patients was compared based on pretreatment hearing grades and disease onset with adjusted for age and sex after treatment initiation. RESULTS: The results showed that a complete recovery hearing outcome based on pretreatment hearing grades and disease onset in consideration of age and sex was associated with a low risk of pretreatment hearing Grade 2 (26-45 dB) (adjusted odds ratio 12.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.8-31.3) and disease onset ≤7 days (adjusted odds ratio 13.9, 95% CI: 4.2-45.8), respectively. Hearing recovery outcomes among complete recovery and noncomplete recovery (>25 dB) subjects according to pretreatment hearing grades were 32.9% (Grade 2 or 26-45 dB HL), 25.4% (Grade 3 or 46-75 dB HL), 31.1% (Grade 4 or 76-90 dB), and 4.5% (Grade 5, or >90 dB HL) (p < 0.0001). Patients with pretreatment hearing Grade 2 who received treatment within ≤7 days of disease onset had the highest rate of complete recovery (32.9%, 23/70). CONCLUSION: In summary, using the physician decision support system, we successfully identified two predictors, the pretreatment hearing Grade 2 (26-45 dB) and treatment within ≤7 days of disease onset, associated with the highest odds of achieving complete recovery (<25 dB) of hearing in patients with ISSNHL.