Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 41
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(7): e2117816, 2021 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34309667

RESUMO

Importance: Identifying high priority pediatric conditions is important for setting a research agenda in hospital pediatrics that will benefit families, clinicians, and the health care system. However, the last such prioritization study was conducted more than a decade ago and used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Objectives: To identify conditions that should be prioritized for comparative effectiveness research based on prevalence, cost, and variation in cost of hospitalizations using contemporary data at US children's hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of children with hospital encounters used data from the Pediatric Health Information System database. Children younger than 18 years with inpatient hospital encounters at 45 tertiary care US children's hospitals between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, were included. Data were analyzed from March 2020 to April 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The condition-specific prevalence and total standardized cost, the corresponding prevalence and cost ranks, and the variation in standardized cost per encounter across hospitals were analyzed. The variation in cost was assessed using the number of outlier hospitals and intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: There were 2 882 490 inpatient hospital encounters (median [interquartile range] age, 4 [1-12] years; 1 554 024 [53.9%] boys) included. Among the 50 most prevalent and 50 most costly conditions (total, 74 conditions), 49 (66.2%) were medical, 15 (20.3%) were surgical, and 10 (13.5%) were medical/surgical. The top 10 conditions by cost accounted for $12.4 billion of $33.4 billion total costs (37.4%) and 592 815 encounters (33.8% of all encounters). Of 74 conditions, 4 conditions had an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.30 or higher (ie, major depressive disorder: ICC, 0.49; type 1 diabetes with complications: ICC, 0.36; diabetic ketoacidosis: ICC, 0.33; acute appendicitis without peritonitis: ICC, 0.30), and 9 conditions had an ICC higher than 0.20 (scoliosis: ICC, 0.27; hypertrophy of tonsils and adenoids: ICC, 0.26; supracondylar fracture of humerus: ICC, 0.25; cleft lip and palate: ICC, 0.24; acute appendicitis with peritonitis: ICC, 0.21). Examples of conditions high in prevalence, cost, and variation in cost included major depressive disorder (cost rank, 19; prevalence rank, 10; ICC, 0.49), scoliosis (cost rank, 6; prevalence rank, 38; ICC, 0.27), acute appendicitis with peritonitis (cost rank, 13; prevalence rank, 11; ICC, 0.21), asthma (cost rank, 10; prevalence rank, 2; ICC, 0.17), and dehydration (cost rank, 24; prevalence rank, 8; ICC, 0.18). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that major depressive disorder, scoliosis, acute appendicitis with peritonitis, asthma, and dehydration were high in prevalence, costs, and variation in cost. These results could help identify where future comparative effectiveness research in hospital pediatrics should be targeted to improve the care and outcomes of hospitalized children.


Assuntos
Criança Hospitalizada/estatística & dados numéricos , Prioridades em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Apendicite/economia , Apendicite/epidemiologia , Asma/economia , Asma/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Desidratação/economia , Desidratação/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/economia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Feminino , Prioridades em Saúde/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Peritonite/economia , Peritonite/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Pesquisa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escoliose/economia , Escoliose/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Z Gastroenterol ; 58(9): 855-867, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32947631

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The economic effects of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), nosocomial infections (nosInf) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) have so far been poorly studied. We analyzed the impact of these complications on treatment revenues in hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis. METHODS: 371 consecutive patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis, who received a paracentesis between 2012 and 2016, were included retrospectively. DRG (diagnosis-related group), "ZE/NUB" (additional charges/new examination/treatment methods), medication costs, length of hospital stay as well as different kinds of specific treatments (e. g., dialysis) were considered. Exclusion criteria included any kind of malignancy, a history of organ transplantation and/or missing accounting data. RESULTS: Total treatment costs (DRG + ZE/NUB) were higher in those with nosInf (€â€Š10,653 vs. €â€Š5,611, p < 0.0001) driven by a longer hospital stay (23 d vs. 12 d, p < 0.0001). Of note, revenues per day were not different (€â€Š473 vs. €â€Š488, p = 0.98) despite a far more complicated treatment with a more frequent need for dialysis (p < 0.0001) and high-complex care (p = 0.0002). Similarly, SBP was associated with higher total revenues (€â€Š10,307 vs. €â€Š6,659, p < 0.0001). However, the far higher effort for the care of SBP patients resulted in lower daily revenues compared to patients without SBP (€â€Š443 vs. €â€Š499, p = 0.18). ACLF increased treatment revenues to €â€Š10,593 vs. €6,369 without ACLF (p < 0.0001). While treatment of ACLF was more complicated, revenue per day was not different to no-ACLF patients (€â€Š483 vs. €â€Š480, p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: SBP, nosInf and/or ACLF lead to a significant increase in the effort, revenue and duration in the treatment of patients with cirrhosis. The lower daily revenue, despite a much more complex therapy, might indicate that these complications are not yet sufficiently considered in the German DRG system.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Hepática Crônica Agudizada/economia , Infecções Bacterianas/economia , Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Peritonite/economia , Insuficiência Hepática Crônica Agudizada/terapia , Infecções Bacterianas/terapia , Infecção Hospitalar/complicações , Infecção Hospitalar/terapia , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estatística & dados numéricos , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Peritonite/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Surg Res ; 246: 236-242, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31610351

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Peritonitis is an emergency which frequently requires surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to describe factors influencing seeking and reaching care for patients with peritonitis presenting to a tertiary referral hospital in Rwanda. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with peritonitis admitted to University Teaching Hospital of Kigali. Data were collected on demographics, prehospital course, and in-hospital management. Delays were classified according to the Three Delays Model as delays in seeking or reaching care. Chi square test and logistic regression were used to determine associations between delayed presentation and various factors. RESULTS: Over a 9-month period, 54 patients with peritonitis were admitted. Twenty (37%) patients attended only primary school and 15 (28%) never went to school. A large number (n = 26, 48%) of patients were unemployed and most (n = 45, 83%) used a community-based health insurance. For most patients (n = 44, 81%), the monthly income was less than 10,000 Rwandan francs (RWF) (11.90 U.S. Dollars [USD]). Most (n = 51, 94%) patients presented to the referral hospital with more than 24 h of symptoms. More than half (n = 31, 60%) of patients had more than 4 d of symptoms on presentation. Most (n = 37, 69%) patients consulted a traditional healer before presentation at the health care system. Consultation with a traditional healer was associated with delayed presentation at the referral hospital (P < 0.001). Most (n = 29, 53%) patients traveled more than 2 h to reach a health facility and this was associated with delayed presentation (P = 0.019). The cost of transportation ranged between 5000 and 1000 RWF (5.95-11.90 USD) for most patients and was not associated with delayed presentation (P = 0.449). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, most patients with peritonitis present in a delayed fashion to the referral hospital. Factors associated with seeking and reaching care included sociodemographic characteristics, health-seeking behaviors, cost of care, and travel time. These findings highlight factors associated with delays in seeking and reaching care for patients with peritonitis.


Assuntos
Medicinas Tradicionais Africanas/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Peritonite/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/economia , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicinas Tradicionais Africanas/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Peritonite/economia , Ruanda , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/psicologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/economia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 34(6): 1049-1055, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30603809

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although peritonitis causes significant morbidity and mortality in children receiving chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD), little is known about costs associated with treatment. METHODS: We analyzed 246 peritonitis-related hospitalizations in the USA, linked by the Standardized Care to Improve Outcomes in Pediatric End Stage Renal Disease (SCOPE) and Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) databases. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between high-cost hospitalizations (at or above the 75th percentile) and patient characteristics. Multivariable modeling was used to assess differences in the service-line specific geometric mean between (1) high- and low-cost (below the 75th percentile) hospitalizations and (2) fungal versus other types of peritonitis. Wage-adjusted hospitalization charges were converted to estimated costs using reported cost-to-charge ratios to estimate the cost of hospitalization. RESULTS: High-cost hospitalizations were associated with the following: age 3-12 years, Hispanic ethnicity, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of stay (LOS), and fungal peritonitis. Whereas absolute standardized cost by service line was significantly different when comparing high- and low-cost hospitalizations, the percentage of total cost by service line was similar in the two groups. Cost per case for fungal peritonitis was higher (p < 0.001) in every service line except pharmacy when compared to other peritonitis cases. The median (IQR) cost of hospitalization for the treatment of peritonitis was $13,655 ($7871, $28434) USD. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization-related costs for peritonitis treatment are substantial and arise from a variety of service lines. Fungal peritonitis is associated with high-cost hospitalization.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Peritonite/economia , Peritonite/etiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos
5.
World J Surg ; 42(6): 1603-1609, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29143091

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical procedures are cost-effective compared with various medical and public health interventions. While peritonitis often requires surgery, little is known regarding the associated costs, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to determine in-hospital charges for patients with peritonitis and if patients are at risk of catastrophic health expenditure. METHODS: As part of a larger study examining the epidemiology and outcomes of patients with peritonitis at a referral hospital in Rwanda, patients undergoing operation for peritonitis were enrolled and hospital charges were examined. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients at risk for catastrophic health expenditure. Logistic regression was used to determine the association of various factors with risk for catastrophic health expenditure. RESULTS: Over a 6-month period, 280 patients underwent operation for peritonitis. In-hospital charges were available for 245 patients. A total of 240 (98%) patients had health insurance. Median total hospital charges were 308.1 USD, and the median amount paid by patients was 26.9 USD. Thirty-three (14%) patients were at risk of catastrophic health expenditure based on direct medical expenses. Estimating out-of-pocket non-medical expenses, 68 (28%) patients were at risk of catastrophic health expenditure. Unplanned reoperation was associated with increased risk of catastrophic health expenditure (p < 0.001), whereas patients with community-based health insurance had decreased risk of catastrophic health expenditure (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The median hospital charges paid out-of-pocket by patients with health insurance were small in relation to total charges. A significant number of patients with peritonitis are at risk of catastrophic health expenditure.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Peritonite/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Peritonite/economia , Peritonite/etiologia , Peritonite/cirurgia , Ruanda/epidemiologia , Centros de Cuidados de Saúde Secundários/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Br J Surg ; 104(1): 62-68, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28000941

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage is an alternative to sigmoid resection in selected patients presenting with purulent peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis. Although recent trials have lacked superiority for lavage in terms of morbidity, mortality was not compromised, and beneficial secondary outcomes were shown. These included shorter duration of surgery, less stoma formation and less surgical reintervention (including stoma reversal) for laparoscopic lavage versus sigmoid resection respectively. The cost analysis of laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis in the Ladies RCT was assessed in the present study. METHODS: This study involved an economic evaluation of the randomized LOLA (LaparOscopic LAvage) arm of the Ladies trial (comparing laparoscopic lavage with sigmoid resection in patients with purulent peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis). The actual resource use per individual patient was documented prospectively and analysed (according to intention-to-treat) for up to 1 year after randomization. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were randomized to either laparoscopic lavage (46) or sigmoid resection (42). The total medical costs for lavage were lower (mean difference € - 3512, 95 per cent bias-corrected and accelerated c.i. -16 020 to 8149). Surgical reintervention increased costs in the lavage group, whereas stoma reversal increased costs in the sigmoid resection group. Differences in favour of laparoscopy were robust when costs were varied by ±20 per cent in a sensitivity analysis (mean cost difference € - 2509 to -4438). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis is more cost-effective than sigmoid resection.


Assuntos
Doença Diverticular do Colo/terapia , Perfuração Intestinal/terapia , Laparoscopia/economia , Lavagem Peritoneal/economia , Peritonite/terapia , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Colo Sigmoide/cirurgia , Colostomia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Doença Diverticular do Colo/economia , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Perfuração Intestinal/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Peritonite/economia , Peritonite/etiologia , Reoperação/economia , Estomas Cirúrgicos/economia
7.
Perit Dial Int ; 37(2): 165-169, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27680762

RESUMO

♦ BACKGROUND: There is little information regarding the financial burden of peritonitis and the economic impact of continuous quality improvement (CQI) programs in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The objectives of this study were to measure the costs of peritonitis, and determine the net savings of a PD CQI program in Colombia. ♦ METHODS: The Renal Therapy Services (RTS) network in Colombia, along with Coomeva EPS, provided healthcare resource utilization data for PD patients with and without peritonitis between January 2012 and December 2013. Propensity score matching and regression analysis were performed to estimate the incremental cost of peritonitis. Patient months at risk, episodes of peritonitis pre- and post-CQI, and costs of CQI were obtained. Annual net savings of the CQI program were estimated based on the number of peritonitis events prevented. ♦ RESULTS: The incremental cost of a peritonitis episode was $250. In an 8-year period, peritonitis decreased from 1,837 episodes per 38,596 patient-months in 2006 to 841 episodes per 50,910 patient-months in 2014. Overall, the CQI program prevented an estimated 10,409 episodes of peritonitis. The cost of implementing the CQI program was $147,000 in the first year and $119,000 annually thereafter. Using a five percent discount rate, the net present value of the program was $1,346,431, with an average annual net savings of $207,027. The return on investment (i.e. total savings-program cost/program cost) of CQI was 169%. ♦ CONCLUSION: Continuous quality improvement initiatives designed to reduce rates of peritonitis have a strong potential to generate cost savings.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Peritoneal/economia , Peritonite/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Colômbia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Diálise Peritoneal Ambulatorial Contínua/efeitos adversos , Diálise Peritoneal Ambulatorial Contínua/economia , Diálise Peritoneal Ambulatorial Contínua/métodos , Peritonite/etiologia , Peritonite/prevenção & controle , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 32(8): 1331-1341, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27757588

RESUMO

Peritonitis is a leading cause of hospitalizations, morbidity, and modality change in pediatric chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) patients. Despite guidelines published by the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis aimed at reducing the risk of peritonitis, registry data have revealed significant variability in peritonitis rates among centers caring for children on CPD, which suggests variability in practice. Improvement science methods have been used to reduce a variety of healthcare-associated infections and are also being applied successfully to decrease rates of peritonitis in children. A successful quality improvement program with the goal of decreasing peritonitis will not only include primary drivers directly linked to the outcome of peritonitis, but will also direct attention to secondary drivers that are important for the achievement of primary drivers, such as health literacy and patient and family engagement strategies. In this review, we describe a comprehensive improvement science model for the reduction of peritonitis in pediatric patients on CPD.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Peritonite/prevenção & controle , Cateteres de Demora/microbiologia , Criança , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Diálise Peritoneal/instrumentação , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Diálise Peritoneal/normas , Peritonite/economia , Peritonite/epidemiologia , Peritonite/etiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Melhoria de Qualidade , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/economia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/etiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação
9.
J Pediatr Surg ; 51(11): 1896-1899, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27622589

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to explore the relationship between the degree of peritoneal contamination and postoperative resource utilization in children with complicated appendicitis. METHODS: Intraoperative findings were collected prospectively at a single children's hospital from 2012 to 2014. The degree of peritoneal contamination was categorized as either "localized" (confined to the right lower quadrant and pelvis) or "extensive" (extending to the liver). Imaging utilization, postoperative length of stay (pLOS), hospital cost, and readmission rates were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 88 patients with complicated appendicitis, 38% had extensive contamination. Preoperative characteristics were similar between groups. Patients with extensive contamination had higher rates of postoperative imaging (58.8% vs 27.7%, P<0.01), a 50% longer median pLOS (6days [IQR 4-9] vs 4days [IQR 2-5], P=0.003), a 30% higher median hospital cost ($17,663 [IQR $12,564-$23,697] vs $13,516 [IQR $10,546-$16,686], P=0.004), and a nearly four-fold higher readmission rate (20.6% vs 5.6%, P=0.04) compared to children with localized contamination. CONCLUSION: Extensive peritoneal contamination is associated with significantly higher resource utilization compared to localized contamination in children with complicated appendicitis. These findings may have important severity-adjustment implications for reimbursement and readmission rate reporting for hospitals that serve populations where late presentation is common.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/efeitos adversos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Peritonite/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Peritonite/diagnóstico , Peritonite/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia
10.
Br J Surg ; 103(11): 1539-47, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27548306

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Open surgery with resection and colostomy (Hartmann's procedure) has been the standard treatment for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis. In recent years laparoscopic lavage has emerged as an alternative, with potential benefits for patients with purulent peritonitis, Hinchey grade III. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic lavage and Hartmann's procedure with health economic evaluation within the framework of the DILALA (DIverticulitis - LAparoscopic LAvage versus resection (Hartmann's procedure) for acute diverticulitis with peritonitis) trial. METHODS: Clinical effectiveness and resource use were derived from the DILALA trial and unit costs from Swedish sources. Costs were analysed from the perspective of the healthcare sector. The study period was divided into short-term analysis (base-case A), within 12 months, and long-term analysis (base-case B), from inclusion in the trial throughout the patient's expected life. RESULTS: The study included 43 patients who underwent laparoscopic lavage and 40 who had Hartmann's procedure in Denmark and Sweden during 2010-2014. In base-case A, the difference in mean cost per patient between laparoscopic lavage and Hartmann's procedure was €-8983 (95 per cent c.i. -16 232 to -1735). The mean(s.d.) costs per patient in base-case B were €25 703(27 544) and €45 498(38 928) for laparoscopic lavage and Hartmann's procedure respectively, resulting in a difference of €-19 794 (95 per cent c.i. -34 657 to -4931). The results were robust as demonstrated in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: The significant cost reduction in this study, together with results of safety and efficacy from RCTs, support the routine use of laparoscopic lavage as treatment for complicated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis.


Assuntos
Doença Diverticular do Colo/cirurgia , Perfuração Intestinal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/economia , Irrigação Terapêutica/economia , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Colostomia/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Doença Diverticular do Colo/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peritonite/economia , Peritonite/etiologia , Peritonite/cirurgia , Reoperação/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 28(3): 297-304, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26735159

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The most common complication after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement is peristomal wound infection (up to 40% without antibiotic prophylaxis). Single-dose parenteral prophylactic antibiotics as advised by current guidelines decrease the infection rate to 9-15%. We assume a prolonged effect of local antibiotic treatment with antibacterial gauzes. This study is the first to describe the effect of antibacterial gauzes in preventing infections in PEG without the use of antibiotics. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis was carried out of all patients with PEG insertion between January 2009 and October 2014 in the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven. Data include placement and the period of the first 2 weeks after PEG placement, and long-term follow-up. All patients received a locally applied antibacterial gauze polyhexamethylene biguanide immediately following PEG insertion for 3 days. No other antibiotics were administered. The main outcomes were wound infection, peritonitis, and necrotizing fasciitis; secondary outcomes included other complications. RESULTS: A total of 331 patients with only antibacterial gauzes were analyzed. The total number of infections 2 weeks after PEG insertion was 9.4%, including 8.2% minor and 1.2% major infections (peritonitis). No wound infection-related mortality or bacterial resistance was found. Costs are five times lower than antibiotics, and gauzes are more practical and patient friendly for use. CONCLUSION: Retrospectively, antibacterial gauzes are at least comparable with literature data on parenteral antibiotics in preventing peristomal wound infection after PEG placement, with an infection rate of 9.4%. Rates of other complications found in this study were comparable with current literature data.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Fasciite Necrosante/prevenção & controle , Gastroscopia/efeitos adversos , Gastrostomia/efeitos adversos , Peritonite/prevenção & controle , Telas Cirúrgicas , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/economia , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/efeitos adversos , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/economia , Antibioticoprofilaxia/economia , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis/economia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos , Fasciite Necrosante/diagnóstico , Fasciite Necrosante/economia , Fasciite Necrosante/microbiologia , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Peritonite/diagnóstico , Peritonite/economia , Peritonite/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telas Cirúrgicas/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
12.
Avian Pathol ; 44(5): 370-8, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26083823

RESUMO

The incidence and economic impact of the Escherichia coli peritonitis syndrome (EPS), characterized by acute mortality, were estimated in chicken egg-producing farms in the Netherlands in 2013. The incidence was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the meat-sector (35% affected farms) compared to the layer-sector (7% affected farms). In consumption egg-producing farms EPS occurred on 12% of the free range and organic farms, while it was found on 1% and 4% of the cage and barn farms, respectively. Data from four layer and two broiler breeder flocks with EPS were used to estimate the overall economic impact of the disease. Mean numbers of eggs lost were 10 and 11 per hen housed (phh), while mean slaughter weight loss was 0.2 and 0.5 kg phh in the four layer and two broiler breeder flocks, respectively. Total losses including costs of destruction of dead hens, compensated for reduced feed intake due to a smaller flock size, ranged from €0.28 phh (cage farms) to €9.75 phh (grandparent farms) in the layer-sector and from €1.87 phh (parent farms) to €10.73 phh (grandparent farms) in the meat-sector. Antibiotics against EPS were given often and repeatedly especially in the meat-sector. Including the costs of antibiotics, total losses were estimated at €0.4 million, €3.3 million and €3.7 million for the layer-sector, the meat-sector and poultry farming as a whole, respectively. Research focusing on the prevention and treatment of EPS is justified by its severe clinical and economic impact.


Assuntos
Infecções por Escherichia coli/veterinária , Escherichia coli/imunologia , Peritonite/veterinária , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/epidemiologia , Vacinação/veterinária , Criação de Animais Domésticos , Animais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Galinhas , Ovos , Infecções por Escherichia coli/economia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Feminino , Incidência , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Peritonite/economia , Peritonite/epidemiologia , Peritonite/microbiologia , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/economia , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/microbiologia
14.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(4): 412-6, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24679568

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gram-positive bacteria are the major causative pathogens of peritonitis and exit site infection in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). We investigated the cost-effectiveness of regular application of mupirocin at the exit site in PD recipients from the perspective of health care providers in Hong Kong. METHODS: A decision tree was designed to simulate outcomes of incident PD patients with and without regular application of mupirocin over a 1-year period. Outcome measures included total direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, and gram-positive infection-related mortality rate. Model inputs were derived from the literature. Sensitivity analyses evaluated the impact of uncertainty in all model variables. RESULTS: In a base case analysis, the mupirocin group had a higher expected QALY value (0.6496 vs 0.6456), a lower infection-related mortality rate (0.18% vs 1.64%), and a lower total cost per patient (US $258 vs $1661) compared with the control group. The rate of gram-positive peritonitis without mupirocin and the risk of gram-positive peritonitis with mupirocin were influential factors. In 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, the mupirocin group had significantly lower associated costs, higher QALYs, and a lower mortality rate 99.9% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Topical mupirocin appears to be a cost-effective preventive measure against gram-positive infection in incident patients undergoing PD. The cost-effectiveness of mupirocin is affected by the level of infection risk reduction and subject to resistance against mupirocin.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/economia , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Peritonite/prevenção & controle , Administração Tópica , Antibacterianos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hong Kong , Humanos , Mupirocina/economia , Peritonite/economia , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Sobrevida
15.
J Pediatr Surg ; 48(11): 2320-6, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24210206

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A primary determinant of value in treating appendicitis is inpatient cost. The purpose of this study was to identify hospital-level factors that drive costs associated with the treatment of appendicitis. METHODS: Cost-to-charge ratios from the 2009 Kids' Inpatient Database gave average all-payer costs by hospital for uncomplicated appendicitis (without peritonitis, ICD-9-CM 540.9) and complicated appendicitis (generalized peritonitis, 540.0; peritoneal abscess, 540.1). The 10% of hospitals with the lowest costs were defined as low cost; the remaining 90% were defined non-low cost. Bivariate and multivariate analyses compared hospital characteristics between the two groups. RESULTS: Threshold cost dividing low cost from non-low cost for uncomplicated appendicitis was $4626; for complicated appendicitis, it was $6,026. For both conditions teaching status, lower percentage of pediatric discharges, and fewer registered nurses (RN) per 1000 adjusted patient-days predicted a hospital to be low cost. A cost benefit for medium and large hospitals and higher inpatient volume was found only for uncomplicated appendicitis. Regional effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show the high-cost structure of hospitals that care for high volumes of children, emphasizing the need to constrain cost. There is some benefit of economies of scale, and careful attention to the numbers of nursing personnel.


Assuntos
Apendicite/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Apendicectomia/economia , Apendicectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Criança , Controle de Custos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Hospitais/classificação , Humanos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Tempo de Internação/economia , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/economia , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente , Peritonite/economia , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/economia , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
16.
Perit Dial Int ; 33(6): 679-86, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23547280

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We set out to estimate the direct medical costs (DMCs) of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and to compare the DMCs for continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) and automated PD (APD). In addition, DMCs according to age, sex, and the presence of peritonitis were evaluated. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort analysis considered patients initiating PD, calculating 2008 costs and, for comparison, updating the results for 2010. The analysis took the perspective of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, including outpatient clinic and emergency room visits, dialysis procedures, medications, laboratory tests, hospitalizations, and surgeries. RESULTS: No baseline differences were observed for the 41 patients evaluated (22 on CAPD, 19 on APD). Median annual DMCs per patient on PD were US$15 072 in 2008 and US$16 452 in 2010. When analyzing percentage distribution, no differences were found in the DMCs for the modality groups. In both APD and CAPD, the main costs pertained to the dialysis procedure (CAPD 41%, APD 47%) and hospitalizations (CAPD 37%, APD 32%). Dialysis procedures cost significantly more (p = 0.001) in APD (US$7 084) than in CAPD (US$6 071), but total costs (APD US$15 389 vs CAPD US$14 798) and other resources were not different. The presence of peritonitis increased the total costs (US$16 075 vs US$14 705 for patients without peritonitis, p = 0.05), but in the generalized linear model analysis, DMCs were not predicted by age, sex, dialysis modality, or peritonitis. A similar picture was observed for costs extrapolated to 2010, with a 10% - 20% increase for each component--except for laboratory tests, which increased 52%, and dialysis procedures, which decreased 3%, from 2008. CONCLUSIONS: The annual DMCs per patient on PD in this study were US$15 072 in 2008 and US$16 452 in 2010. Total DMCs for dialysis procedures were higher in APD than in CAPD, but the difference was not statistically significant. In both APD and CAPD, 90% of costs were attributable to the dialysis procedure, hospitalizations, and medications. In a multivariate analysis, no independent variable significantly predicted a higher DMC.


Assuntos
Diálise Peritoneal Ambulatorial Contínua/economia , Diálise Peritoneal/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , México , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Peritonite/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
Klin Khir ; (8): 39-45, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22013688

RESUMO

Clinic-economic analysis of antibacterial therapy of an acute peritonitis was conducted, using the method of modeling with "the tree of expanses" building. Economic advantages of ertapenem application as a start therapy of an acute peritonitis were proved.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/economia , Modelos Teóricos , Peritonite/tratamento farmacológico , Peritonite/economia , beta-Lactamas/economia , Doença Aguda , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ertapenem , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , beta-Lactamas/administração & dosagem , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico
18.
Value Health ; 12(2): 234-44, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20667059

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of community-acquired complicated intraabdominal infections accounting for development of antibiotic resistance in the Dutch setting. METHODS: A decision tree was developed to estimate cost-effectiveness of ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam at different time points after introduction of treatment. Development of resistance was incorporated using a compartment model. Resistance was a function of the eradication rate of pathogens and antibiotic prescription. Model outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), direct costs and cost per QALY saved. Microbiological eradication rate, clinical success, and costs were derived from literature. The analyses included pathogens with intrinsic or acquired resistance. RESULTS: The model suggested overall savings of euro355 (95% uncertainty interval euro480; euro1205) per patient when abdominal infections are treated with ertapenem instead of piperacillin/tazobactam. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found a 94% probability of the incremental cost per QALY saved being within the generally accepted threshold for cost-effectiveness (euro20,000). After 5 years, it is expected that antibiotic resistance with piperacillin/tazobactam has increased with a greater rate compared to ertapenem, and cost-savings with ertapenem are expected to increase to euro672 (euro-232; euro1617). Ertapenem will, in addition, result in greater success rates and in QALY savings (0.17; 0.07-0.30). Alternative scenarios, with lower levels of initial resistance confirm the cost savings with ertapenem. CONCLUSION: Given the underlying assumptions and data used, this evaluation demonstrated that ertapenem is a cost saving and possibly an economically dominant therapy over piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of community-acquired intraabdominal infections in The Netherlands.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Penicilânico/análogos & derivados , Piperacilina/uso terapêutico , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico , Abscesso Abdominal/tratamento farmacológico , Abscesso Abdominal/economia , Antibacterianos/economia , Infecções Bacterianas/economia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/economia , Simulação por Computador , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Custos de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ertapenem , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Países Baixos , Ácido Penicilânico/economia , Ácido Penicilânico/uso terapêutico , Peritonite/tratamento farmacológico , Peritonite/economia , Piperacilina/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Tazobactam , beta-Lactamas/economia
19.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 9(3): 335-47, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18570575

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Initial antibiotic therapy in hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) usually is empiric. We explored the economic consequences of failure of such therapy in this patient population. METHODS: Using a large U.S. multi-institutional database, we identified all hospitalized adults admitted between April 1, 2003, and March 31, 2004; who had any cIAI; underwent laparotomy, laparoscopy, or percutaneous drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess ("surgery"); and received intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Initial therapy was characterized in terms of all IV antibiotics received, on the day of or one day before initial surgery. Antibiotic failure was designated on the basis of the need for reoperation or receipt of other IV antibiotics postoperatively. Switches to narrower spectrum agents and changes in regimen prior to discharge with no other evidence of clinical failure were not counted as antibiotic failures. Using multivariable linear regression, duration of IV antibiotic therapy, hospital length of stay, and total inpatient charges were compared between patients who did and did not fail initial therapy. Mortality was compared using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 6,056 patients who met the study entrance criteria, 22.4% failed initial antibiotic therapy. Patients who failed received an additional 5.6 days of IV antibiotic therapy (10.4 total days [95% confidence interval 10.1, 10.8] days vs. 4.8 total days [4.8, 4.9] for those not failing), were hospitalized an additional 4.6 days (11.6 total days [11.3, 11.9] vs. 6.9 total days [6.8, 7.0], respectively), and incurred $6,368 in additional inpatient charges ($16,520 [$16,131, $16,919] vs. $10,152 [$10,027, $10,280]) (all, p < 0.01). They also were more likely to die in the hospital (9.5% vs. 1.3%; multivariable odds ratio 3.58 [95% confidence interval 2.53, 5.06]). CONCLUSIONS: Failure of initial IV antibiotic therapy in hospitalized adults with cIAIs is associated with longer hospitalization, higher hospital charges, and a higher mortality rate.


Assuntos
Abscesso Abdominal , Antibacterianos , Apendicite , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae , Hospitalização/economia , Peritonite , Abscesso Abdominal/complicações , Abscesso Abdominal/tratamento farmacológico , Abscesso Abdominal/microbiologia , Abscesso Abdominal/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Apendicite/complicações , Apendicite/tratamento farmacológico , Apendicite/economia , Apendicite/microbiologia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/economia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peritonite/complicações , Peritonite/tratamento farmacológico , Peritonite/economia , Peritonite/microbiologia , Falha de Tratamento
20.
Zentralbl Chir ; 132(6): 539-41, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18098082

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report how conservative treatment with interval appendectomy (IA) of ruptured appendicitis with localized abscess or phlegmon affects the outcome of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2001 to December 2005, 121 patients with ruptured appendicitis with localized abscess or phlegmon were treated in our hospital. 104 patients underwent appendectomy (Group A); 17 patients underwent antibiotic treatment with interval appendectomy (Group B). The clinical characteristics (age and sex), laboratory data, mean time to surgery, operative time, complications, hospital days and cost of hospitalization were recorded. RESULTS: The sex, age, white blood cell count (WBC), body temperature, operation time, length of stay after surgery, first flatus, oral feeding, passage of stools, cost and overall complications (including wound infection, wound disruption, intra-abdominal abscess and enterocutaneous fistula) were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the length of stay after diagnosis established of group B was significantly longer in group B than in group A. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment with IA is a safe and effective method to treat perforated appendicitis with localized abscess and phlegmon, but the recovery time may be longer and also the hospital stay (since diagnosis established). Thus this method is not cost-saving.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Emergências , Laparoscopia , Abscesso Abdominal/diagnóstico , Abscesso Abdominal/economia , Abscesso Abdominal/cirurgia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/economia , Apendicectomia/economia , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Apendicite/economia , Celulite (Flegmão)/diagnóstico , Celulite (Flegmão)/economia , Celulite (Flegmão)/cirurgia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Emergências/economia , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Peritonite/diagnóstico , Peritonite/economia , Peritonite/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taiwan
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...