Loosening and revision rates after total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid and three modern designs of metal-backed glenoid.

BACKGROUND: Several modern designs of metal-backed glenoids (MBG) have been devised to overcome flaws such as loosening and a high failure rate. This review aimed to compare rates of complications and revision surgeries between cemented polyethylene glenoid (PEG) and three examples of modern MBG designs. METHODS: Literature search was carried out using PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar using MeSH terms and natural keywords. A total of 1186 articles were screened. We descriptively analyzed numerical data between the groups and statistically analyzed the categorical data, such as the presence of radiolucent line, loosening, and revision surgery (failure). Articles were divided into three groups based on follow-up duration: < 36-month, 36-72-month, and > 72-month subgroups. RESULTS: This study included 35 articles (3769 shoulders); 25 on cemented PEG and ten on the modern MBG. Mean age was 66.4 (21-93) and 66.5 years (31-88). The mean duration of follow-up was 73.1 (12-211) and 56.1 months (24-100). Overall, the rate of the radiolucent line was 354/1302 (27%) and 47/282 (17%), the loosening rate was 465/3185 (15%) and 22/449 (5%), and the failure rate was 189/3316 (6%) and 11/457 (2%), for PEG and MBG, respectively. The results of < 36-month and 36-72-month subgroups showed lower rates of radiolucency and loosening in the cemented PEG group, but there was no significant difference in failure rate (P = 0.754 and 0.829, respectively). In the > 72-month subgroup, MBG was better in terms of loosening (P < 0.001) and failure rates (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The modern MBG component, especially TM glenoid, seems to be a promising alternative to cemented PEGs, based on subgroup revision rates according to the follow-up duration and overall results of ROM and clinical scores. All polyethylene glenoids tend to increase loosening and failure over time. Three modern MBG designs seem to have no difference in failure, at least in the < 36-month and 36-72-month subgroups compared to the cemented PEG. More long-term follow-up studies on modern MBG should be ultimately conducted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review.

Thirteen-year wear rate comparison of highly crosslinked and conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report the radiographic wear rates from a previous randomized controlled trial of first-generation highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a minimum of 13 years' follow-up. METHODS: Patients returned for radiographic imaging and radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Radiographs were reviewed for the presence of osteolysis or component loosening. Femoral head penetration (which includes both wear and creep) was measured using RSA. We compared Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) and Harris Hip Scores (HHS) with preoperative values. RESULTS: There was 1 revision in each group. There was no difference in WOMAC, SF-12, or HHS outcome scores between the highly crosslinked and conventional polyethylene groups (all p ≥ 0.13). Wear rate was lower with crosslinked polyethylene than conventional polyethylene (0.04 ± 0.02 mm/year v. 0.08 ± 0.03 mm/year, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: First-generation crosslinked polyethylene demonstrates greater wear resistance than conventional polyethylene after 13 years of implantation. Crosslinked polyethylene continues to outperform conventional polyethylene into the second decade of implantation.

CONTEXTE: Le but de cette étude était de faire rapport sur les taux d'usure à la radiographie dans la foulée d'un essai randomisé et contrôlé antérieur sur un polyéthylène hautement réticulé de première génération c. classique pour la prothèse totale de la hanche (PTH) après un minimum de 13 ans de suivi. MÉTHODES: Les patients se sont de nouveau présentés pour subir des radiographies et une analyse radiostéréométrique (ARS). On a vérifié à la radiographie la présence d'ostéolyse ou de descellement. La pénétration de la tête fémorale (qui inclut l'usure et le fluage) a été mesurée par ARS. Nous avons comparé l'indice WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index), le questionnaire SF-12 (questionnaire sur la qualité de vie en lien avec la santé en 12 points) et le score HHS (score de Harris pour la hanche) aux valeurs préopératoires. RÉSULTATS: Il y a eu 1 révision dans chaque groupe. On n'a noté aucune différence pour ce qui est des scores WOMAC, SF-12 ou HHS entre les groupes ayant reçu la prothèse de polyéthylène hautement réticulée c. classique (tous p ≥ 0,13). Le taux d'usure a été moindre avec le polyéthylène réticulé qu'avec le polyéthylène classique (0,04 ± 0,02 mm/an c. 0,08 ± 0,03 mm/an, p = 0,007). CONCLUSION: Le polyéthylène réticulé de première génération résiste mieux à l'usure que le polyéthylène classique 13 ans après l'implantation. Le polyéthylène réticulé continue de surclasser le polyéthylène classique au-delà des 10 premières années suivant l'implantation.

All-polyethylene tibial components are not inferior to metal-backed tibial components in long-term follow-up of knee arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: All-polyethylene tibias (APT) are under-utilized in most of the Western countries, due to a shift from the original all-polyethylene design to metal-backed tibia (MBT) components. Only few total knee prostheses allow direct comparison between APT and MBT components, due to different geometric designs in many systems. The Depuy PFC Sigma prostheses have a similar geometric design in both the MBT and the APT, and with the same corresponding femoral component, thus allowing an assessment and comparison between APT and MBT components. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of osteoarthritic patients who underwent total knee arthroplasties with at least 10-year follow-up comparing a modern congruent APT component to a modular MBT component of the same design. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients (81 knees, mean age 73 years) were available for assessment. Among the cohort, three patients had revision surgery (one from the APT group). In total, 73 patients were available for follow-up (59 MBT prostheses and 22 APT prostheses). There were no differences in knee function (Knee Society score, range of motion, stability) or radiographic parameters between the groups. Of the three revisions due to tibial tray loosening, only one was performed in the APT group and two were performed in the MBT group; another revision in the MBT group was due to loosening of both components; none of the revisions were due to septic complications. Ten-year survivorship of both designs was 92 %. CONCLUSIONS: While function of both designs appears similar, the APT design shows a trend toward requiring fewer revisions and is more cost-effective.

The effect of an air knot on surgical knot integrity.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical trainees may tie air knots, which have a questionable tensile strength and rate of untying. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an air knot on knot integrity. METHODS: The 5 suture materials tested were 0-0 gauge coated polyethylene, polyglyconate, glycolide/lactide, polypropylene, and silk. The suture was tied between 2 hex screws 50 mm on center. The strands were tied using 5 square throws, and the knot tails were cut at 3-mm length. To create a standardized air knot, a round common nail measuring 3 mm in diameter was inserted between throws before tying square throw #3. The suture loop was positioned around the upper and lower hooks of the tensiometer so the location of the knot was roughly equidistant from the hooks. Ultimately, either the loop broke or the knot slipped. At that time, the peak tensile force as well as the outcome of the knot were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 480 knots were tied. The presence of an air knot significantly lowered the tension at knot failure in the glycolide/lactide (P = 0.0003), polypropylene (P = 0.0005), and silk (P = 0.0001) knot configurations. Air knots had the same integrity as surgical knots when coated polyethylene and polyglyconate suture were used. Linear regression was performed and identified both suture material (P < 0.0001) and presence of an air knot (P < 0.0001) to be independently associated with a lower tension at failure. CONCLUSIONS: Under laboratory conditions, an air knot may contribute to a lower tensile strength at failure for certain suture materials.

In vivo wear performance of highly cross-linked polyethylene vs. yttria stabilized zirconia and alumina stabilized zirconia at a mean seven-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Zirconia was introduced as an alternative to alumina for use in the femoral head. The yttria stabilized zirconia material was improved by adding alumina. We evaluated highly cross-linked polyethylene wear performance of zirconia in total hip arthroplasty. The hypothesis was that alumina stabilized zirconia could decrease highly cross-linked polyethylene wear. METHODS: Highly cross-linked polyethylene wear was measured with a computerized method (PolyWare) in 91 hips. The steady-state wear rates were measured based on the radiographs from the first year postoperatively to the final follow-up and were compared between hips with yttria stabilized zirconia and alumina stabilized zirconia. RESULTS: The steady-state wear rate of highly cross-linked polyethylene against zirconia was 0.02 mm/year at a mean follow-up of 7 years. No significant difference was observed between groups with yttria stabilized zirconia and alumina stabilized zirconia. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of alumina to the zirconia material failed to show further reduction of highly cross-linked polyethylene wear and our hypothesis was not verified.

Wear, bone density, functional outcome and survival in vitamin E-incorporated polyethylene cups in reversed hybrid total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasties is generally caused by periprosthetic bone resorption due to tissue reactions on polyethylene wear particles. In vitro testing of polyethylene cups incorporated with vitamin E shows increased wear resistance. The objective of this study is to compare vitamin E-stabilized highly cross-linked polyethylene with conventional cross-linked polyethylene in "reversed hybrid" total hip arthroplasties (cemented all-polyethylene cups combined with uncemented femoral stems). We hypothesize that the adjunction of vitamin E leads to a decrease in polyethylene wear in the long-term. We also expect changes in bone mineral density, less osteolysis, equal functional scores and increased implant survival in polyethylene cemented cups incorporated with vitamin E in the long-term. DESIGN: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Patients to be included are aged under 70, suffer from non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease of the hip and are scheduled for a primary total hip arthroplasty. The study group will receive a reversed hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a vitamin E-stabilized highly cross-linked polyethylene cemented cup. The control group will receive a reversed hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a conventional cross-linked polyethylene cemented cup. Radiological follow-up will be assessed at 6 weeks and at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years postoperatively, to determine polyethylene wear and osteolysis. Patient-reported functional status (HOOS), physician-reported functional status (Harris Hip Score) and patients' physical activity behavior (SQUASH) will also be assessed at these intervals. Acetabular bone mineral density will be assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at 6 weeks and at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. Implant survival will be determined at 10 years postoperatively. DISCUSSION: In vitro results of vitamin E-stabilized polyethylene are promising, showing increased wear resistance. However, controlled clinical follow-up data are not available at this moment.This randomized controlled trial has been designed to determine wear, bone mineral density, functional outcome and survival in reversed hybrid total hip arthroplasty comparing cemented vitamin E-stabilized highly cross-linked polyethylene cups with cemented conventional cross-linked polyethylene cups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Registry NTR3049.

Polyethylene thickness in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Inadequate polyethylene thickness is a risk factor in the development of polyethylene wear in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The labelled thickness of polyethylene inserts often refers to the combined thickness of the insert and its metal backing. However specific information regarding the actual minimum thickness of the polyethylene is seldom available. We sought to determine the actual minimum thickness of polyethylene inserts used in five contemporary metal-backed UKA designs. The thinnest available insert from each of these designs was identified and measured at the lowest point of its concave articulating surface with a Kincrome electronic digital micrometer. The minimum thickness of the inserts ranged from 3.702 mm to 7.859 mm (mean values). In two of the inserts, the minimum thickness was found to be less than the recommended minimum thickness of 6mm. Implant manufacturers should clearly indicate the actual minimum thickness of polyethylene inserts on their product labels.

Highly crosslinked polyethylene is safe for use in total knee arthroplasty.

UNLABELLED: Highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) has been used with good initial success in hip arthroplasty to reduce wear. However, the process of crosslinking reduces fracture toughness, raising concerns as to whether it can be safely used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We therefore asked whether XLPE can be used safely in TKA. We performed a retrospective review of 100 subjects receiving XLPE and compared them to 100 subjects who received standard polyethylene in the setting of TKA. The standard polyethylene group had a mean age of 70 with a minimum follow up of 82 months. The highly cross-linked polyethylene group had a mean age of 67 and a minimum follow up of 69 months (mean, 75 months; range, 69-82 months). On radiographic review, the standard group demonstrated 20 TKAs with radiolucencies; 4 of these had evidence of a loose tibial component. The standard group required three revisions related to loose tibial components. The XLPE group had 2 subjects that demonstrated radiolucencies on radiograph and no subjects with evidence of tibial loosening. There were no reoperations related to osteolysis. The data suggest XLPE in TKA can be used safely at least short- to midterm. Our study provides an impetus for further long-term investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: a three-year randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis.

The creep and wear behaviour of highly cross-linked polyethylene and standard polyethylene liners were examined in a prospective, double-blind randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. We randomised 54 patients to receive hip replacements with either highly cross-linked polyethylene or standard liners and determined the three-dimensional penetration of the liners over three years. After three years the mean total penetration was 0.35 mm (SD 0.14) for the highly cross-linked polyethylene group and 0.45 mm (SD 0.19) for the standard group. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0184). From the pattern of penetration it was possible to discriminate creep from wear. Most (95%) of the creep occurred within six months of implantation and nearly all within the first year. There was no difference in the mean degree of creep between the two types of polyethylene (highly cross-linked polyethylene 0.26 mm, SD 0.17; standard 0.27 mm, SD 0.2; p = 0.83). There was, however, a significant difference (p = 0.012) in the mean wear rate (highly cross-linked polyethylene 0.03 mm/yr, SD 0.06; standard 0.07 mm/yr, SD 0.05). Creep and wear occurred in significantly different directions (p = 0.01); creep was predominantly proximal whereas wear was anterior, proximal and medial. We conclude that penetration in the first six months is creep-dominated, but after one year virtually all penetration is due to wear. Highly cross-linked polyethylene has a 60% lower rate of wear than standard polyethylene and therefore will probably perform better in the long term.

Simulation of polyethylene wear in ankle joint prostheses.

The performance of total ankle replacements (TARs) have not been comparable to those of the other major joints of the lower extremity. The aim of this work was to develop a new simulator test to compare the wear of a new mobile bearing TAR (Mobility) with one with a good clinical history, the Buechel Pappas, using kinematic inputs derived from the literature. The wear rate for the Mobility components was lower than that for the Buechel-Pappas ankle joints at all time points. The wear rate for both sets of components increased with the inclusion of an anterior/posterior displacement in the kinematic inputs. This was expected as the components are subjected to higher kinematic demands and reproduces similar effects found in knee prostheses. This study has demonstrated that it is possible to study wear of TARs in a modified simulator originally designed for total knee replacements. It was also shown that the new Mobility ankle compares favorably with the Buechel Pappas ankle, which has a successful clinical history, under the simulator test conditions described.