Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with pulmonary nocardiosis: A case report.

RATIONALE: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated motor sensory peripheral neuropathy that is rare in clinical practice. This treatment method aims to suppress potential immunopathology. Nocardiosis is a rare, destructive, opportunistic disease. We report a case of failed treatment of CIDP combined with pulmonary nocardiosis, and for the first time, we link these 2 diseases together. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 65-year-old man developed symmetrical limb weakness. Four months later, he was diagnosed with CIDP and started receiving glucocorticoid (GC) treatment. The disease progressed slowly and was treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination. He did not follow the doctor requirements for monthly follow-up visits, and the preventive medication for sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim was not strictly implemented. Two months after the combination therapy, the patient developed fever, coughing and sputum production, as well as fatigue and poor appetite. Based on imaging and etiological results, he was diagnosed with pulmonary nocardiosis. DIAGNOSES: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, pulmonary nocardiosis. INTERVENTIONS: After treatment with antibiotics, the patient lung infection temporarily improved. However, the patient CIDP condition progressed, limb weakness worsened, respiratory muscle involvement occurred, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was administered. However, there was no significant improvement in the condition, and the patient died. OUTCOMES: In this report, we present a case of a patient with CIDP and pulmonary nocardiosis. It is worth noting that in order to avoid the progression and recurrence of CIDP, we did not stop using related therapeutic drugs during the treatment process, the patient had repeatedly refused to use IVIG. Despite this, the patient condition worsened when lung inflammation improved, leading to persistent respiratory failure and ultimately death. Treatment contradictions, medication issues, and patient compliance issues reflected in this case are worth considering. LESSONS: For patients with CIDP receiving immunosuppressive therapy, attention should be paid to the occurrence and severity of Nocardia infection. Therefore, early detection and treatment are necessary. We need to pay attention to the compliance of patients with prophylactic use of antibiotics, strengthen the follow-up, and urge them to return to their appointments on time.

Leprosy Presenting as Distal Acquired Demyelinating Symmetric Variant of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: An Atypical Manifestation of Hansan's Disease.

Leprosy, caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae, is known to primarily affect the skin and peripheral nerves. We present a rare case of leprosy initially manifesting as demyelinating polyneuropathy. A 46-year-old female presented with progressive weakness, tingling, and numbness in her extremities. Nerve conduction studies revealed evidence of demyelination, prompting further investigations. Skin slit-skin smears confirmed the diagnosis of leprosy, with the presence of acid-fast bacilli. The patient was subsequently started on multidrug therapy, leading to significant clinical improvement. This case highlights the importance of considering leprosy as a differential diagnosis in patients presenting with demyelinating polyneuropathy, especially in endemic regions.

[Modern aspects of diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in children]. / Sovremennye aspekty diagnostiki i lecheniya khronicheskoi vospalitel'noi demieliniziruyushchei polineiropatii u detei.

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of demographic, clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological and neuroimaging data and pathogenetic therapy of pediatric patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients (n=30) were observed in a separate structural unit of the Russian Children's Clinical Hospital of the Russian National Research Medical University named after. N.I. Pirogova Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation in the period from 2006 to 2023. The examination was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Joint Task Force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society on the Management of CIDP (2021). All patients received immunotherapy, including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (n=1), IVIG and glucocorticosteroids (GCS) (n=17, 56.7%), IVIG+GCS+plasmapheresis (n=12, 40.0%). Alternative therapy included cyclophosphamide (n=1), cyclophosphamide followed by mycophenolate mofetil (n=1), rituximab (n=2, 6.6%), azathioprine (n=3), mycophenolate mofetil (n=2, 6.6%). RESULTS: In all patients, there was a significant difference between scores on the MRCss and INCAT functional scales before and after treatment. At the moment, 11/30 (36.6%) patients are in clinical remission and are not receiving pathogenetic therapy. The median duration of remission is 48 months (30-84). The longest remission (84 months) was observed in a patient with the onset of CIDP at the age of 1 year 7 months. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis of CIDP is important, since the disease is potentially curable; early administration of pathogenetic therapy provides a long-term favorable prognosis.

Outcome measures in pediatric chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Objective outcome measures in children undergoing treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) are lacking. The aim of the study was to record serial grip strength and motor nerve conduction studies to assess interval change. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 16 children (8 females and 8 males; median age, 9.7 years; interquartile range, 6-13 years) with CIDP followed at a tertiary children's hospital from 2013 to 2021. Subjects were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Right and left grip strength measurements were obtained at each clinic visit using a handheld dynamometer. Annual right median motor nerve conduction study data were recorded during the study period. RESULTS: Mean duration of follow-up was 2.9 years. Grip strength (right: 0.19 kg/month, p < 0.001; left 0.23 kg/month, p < 0.001) and median F-wave latencies (-0.23/month, p = 0.015) showed significant improvement over time. Akaike information criterion showed time + IVIG frequency <21 days as best fit for grip strength and distal compound muscle action potential amplitude. DISCUSSION: Our study results indicate serial grip strength measurements are a feasible and objective way to assess motor strength improvement in children with CIDP receiving immunotherapy.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) causes progressive or relapsing weakness and numbness of the limbs, which lasts for at least two months. Uncontrolled studies have suggested that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) could help to reduce symptoms. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and last updated in 2013. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin in people with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers on 8 March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that tested any dose of IVIg versus placebo, plasma exchange, or corticosteroids in people with definite or probable CIDP. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was significant improvement in disability within six weeks after the start of treatment, as determined and defined by the study authors. Our secondary outcomes were change in mean disability score within six weeks, change in muscle strength (Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score) within six weeks, change in mean disability score at 24 weeks or later, frequency of serious adverse events, and frequency of any adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for our main outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: We included nine RCTs with 372 participants (235 male) from Europe, North America, South America, and Israel. There was low statistical heterogeneity between the trial results, and the overall risk of bias was low for all trials that contributed data to the analysis. Five trials (235 participants) compared IVIg with placebo, one trial (20 participants) compared IVIg with plasma exchange, two trials (72 participants) compared IVIg with prednisolone, and one trial (45 participants) compared IVIg with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP). We included one new trial in this update, though it contributed no data to any meta-analyses. IVIg compared with placebo increases the probability of significant improvement in disability within six weeks of the start of treatment (risk ratio (RR) 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72 to 3.36; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 4, 95% CI 3 to 5; 5 trials, 269 participants; high-certainty evidence). Since each trial used a different disability scale and definition of significant improvement, we were unable to evaluate the clinical relevance of the pooled effect. IVIg compared with placebo improves disability measured on the Rankin scale (0 to 6, lower is better) two to six weeks after the start of treatment (mean difference (MD) -0.26 points, 95% CI -0.48 to -0.05; 3 trials, 90 participants; high-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with placebo probably improves disability measured on the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) scale (1 to 10, lower is better) after 24 weeks (MD 0.80 points, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.37; 1 trial, 117 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and placebo in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.87; 3 trials, 315 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The trial comparing IVIg with plasma exchange reported none of our main outcomes. IVIg compared with prednisolone probably has little or no effect on the probability of significant improvement in disability four weeks after the start of treatment (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.68; 1 trial, 29 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and little or no effect on change in mean disability measured on the Rankin scale (MD 0.21 points, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.61; 1 trial, 24 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and prednisolone in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.04 to 4.69; 1 cross-over trial, 32 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably increases the likelihood of significant improvement in disability two weeks after starting treatment (RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.40 to 5.38; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably has little or no effect on change in disability measured on the Rankin scale two weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.24 points, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.63; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or on change in mean disability measured with the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale (ONLS, 1 to 12, lower is better) 24 weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.03 points, 95% CI -0.91 to 0.97; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The frequency of serious adverse events may be higher with IVIg compared with IVMP (RR 4.40, 95% CI 0.22 to 86.78; 1 trial, 45 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from RCTs shows that IVIg improves disability for at least two to six weeks compared with placebo, with an NNTB of 4. During this period, IVIg probably has similar efficacy to oral prednisolone and IVMP. Further placebo-controlled trials are unlikely to change these conclusions. In one large trial, the benefit of IVIg compared with placebo in terms of improved disability score persisted for 24 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the long-term benefits and harms of IVIg relative to other treatments.

Association of the neonatal Fc receptor promoter variable number of tandem repeat polymorphism with immunoglobulin response in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune disease with humoral and cellular autoimmunity causing demyelination of peripheral nerves, commonly treated with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), encoded by the FCGRT gene, prevents the degradation of immunoglobulin G (IgG) by recycling circulating IgG. A variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism in the promoter region of the FCGRT gene is associated with different expression levels of mRNA and protein. Thus, patients with genotypes associated with relatively low FcRn expression may show a poorer treatment response to IVIg due to increased IVIg degradation. METHODS: VNTR genotypes were analyzed in 144 patients with CIDP. Patients' clinical data, including neurological scores and treatment data, were collected as part of the Immune-Mediated Neuropathies Biobank registry. RESULTS: Most patients (n = 124, 86%) were VNTR 3/3 homozygotes, and 20 patients (14%) were VNTR 2/3 heterozygotes. Both VNTR 3/3 and VNTR 2/3 genotype groups showed no difference in clinical disability and immunoglobulin dosage. However, patients with a VNTR 2 allele were more likely to receive subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIg) than patients homozygous for the VNTR 3 allele (25% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to receive second-line therapy (75% vs. 54%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The VNTR 2/3 genotype is associated with the administration of SCIg, possibly reflecting a greater benefit from SCIg due to more constant immunoglobulin levels without lower IVIg levels between the treatment circles. Also, the greater need for second-line treatment in VNTR 2/3 patients could be an indirect sign of a lower response to immunoglobulins.

Upper and lower limb tremor in inflammatory neuropathies.

OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms underlying neuropathic tremor remain incompletely understood and a distinction has not been drawn between proximal and distal neuropathies. Lower limb tremor contributes to imbalance in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), but this is unexplored in other neuropathies. We characterized upper and lower limb tremor in chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy (CISP) and distal acquired demyelinating neuropathy with anti-MAG antibodies (DADS-MAG), contrasted to CIDP. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 38 patients (CIDP [n = 25], CISP [n = 7], DADS-MAG [n = 6]). Clinical assessment, tremor study recordings, nerve conduction studies, and somatosensory evoked potentials were performed. Balance was measured by force platform. RESULTS: Upper limb tremor was prevalent (CIDP 66%, CISP 70%, DADS-MAG 100%). Peak frequencies followed a gradient along the upper limb, unchanged by weight-loading. Lower limb tremor was also present (CIDP 32%, CISP 29%, DADS-MAG 66%) and associated with imbalance. Nerve conduction parameters correlated with upper limb tremor in DADS-MAG and CISP, and imbalance in CISP. CONCLUSIONS: Upper limb tremor is mediated by peripheral and central mechanisms regardless of distal or proximal pathology. Lower limb tremor correlates with peripheral nerve function and contributes to imbalance. SIGNIFICANCE: This study contributes to the understanding of neuropathic tremor. Addressing lower limb tremor may be of therapeutic importance for neuropathy-associated imbalance.

Serum Neurofilament and Free Light Chain Levels in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated disorder affecting the peripheral nervous system. Despite the established diagnostic criteria, monitoring disease activity and treatment remains challenging. To address this limitation, we investigated serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and serum free light chains (sFLCs) as potential biomarkers. A total of 32 CIDP patients undergoing immunoglobulin therapy and 32 healthy controls enrolled in the present study, and agreed to have their blood plasma sNfL and sFLCs analyzed, while CIDP severity was assessed through the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale (ONLS). In line with the immunoglobulin treatment aimed at limiting neuronal damage administered to the majority of patients, sNfL levels did not exhibit significant differences between the two groups. However, CIDP patients showed significantly elevated sFLC and sFLC ratios, while the marker levels did not correlate with the clinical scores. The study confirms the potential of sFLCs as a sensitive biomarker of inflammatory processes in CIDP. Additionally, the present study results regarding neurofilaments strengthen the role of sNfL in monitoring CIDP treatments, confirming the effectiveness of immunoglobulin therapy. Overall, our results demonstrate how combining these markers can lead to better patient characterization for improved treatment.

Anti-neurofascin 155 Antibody-positive Neuropathy in a Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected Patient.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated neuropathy is a common complication of HIV infection and has several clinical subtypes. HIV-associated chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a demyelinating neuropathy whose clinical features are known to differ from those of CIDP in the HIV-uninfected population. We herein report a case of CIDP in an HIV-infected patient who was finally diagnosed with anti-neurofascin 155 (NF155) antibody-positive neuropathy. The clinical features, including clinical findings and therapeutic responses, were typical of paranodal antibody-mediated neuropathy. To our knowledge, this is the first case of anti-NF155 antibody-associated neuropathy in an HIV-infected patient.

[Prospect of novel therapies in immune-mediated neuropathies].

The efficacy of immunotherapies such as steroids, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin have been proven in various immune-mediated neuropathies. However, these treatments sometimes lack the efficacy in a part of patients with the immune-mediated neuropathies. In addition, anti-myelin associated glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy is usually refractory to the treatments. Recently, novel therapies targeting a molecule which are associated with pathogenesis of immune-mediated diseases, have been developed. These molecularly targeted therapies are notable in immune-mediated neuropathies as novel drug candidates. In the present article, current treatments and future prospect of novel therapies in immune-mediated neuropathies will be reviewed.

Synergistic effects of immune checkpoints and checkpoint inhibitors in inflammatory neuropathies: Implications and mechanisms.

Immune checkpoint molecules play pivotal roles in the regulation of immune homeostasis. Disruption of the immune checkpoints causes autoimmune/inflammatory as well as malignant disorders. Over the past few years, the immune checkpoint molecules with inhibitory function emerged as potential therapeutic targets in oncological conditions. The inhibition of the function of these molecules by using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has brought paradigmatic changes in cancer therapy due to their remarkable clinical benefits, not only in improving the quality of life but also in prolonging the survival time of cancer patients. Unfortunately, the ICIs soon turned out to be a "double-edged sword" as the use of ICIs caused multiple immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). The development of inflammatory neuropathies such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) as the secondary effects of immunotherapy appeared very challenging as these conditions result in significant and often permanent disability. The underlying mechanism(s) through which ICIs trigger inflammatory neuropathies are currently not known. Compelling evidence suggests autoimmune reaction and/or inflammation as the independent risk mechanism of inflammatory neuropathies. There is a lack of understanding as to whether prior exposure to the risk factors of inflammatory neuropathies, the presence of germline genetic variants in immune function-related genes, genetic variations within immune checkpoint molecules, the existence of autoantibodies, and activated/memory T cells act as determining factors for ICI-induced inflammatory neuropathies. Herein, we highlight the available pieces of evidence, discuss the mechanistic basis, and propose a few testable hypotheses on inflammatory neuropathies as irAEs of immunotherapy.

Serum neurofilament light chain does not detect self-reported treatment-related fluctuations in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is a marker for axonal degeneration. Patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) often report a fluctuation of symptoms throughout one treatment cycle with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG). The aim of this study was to determine whether sNfL is suitable to quantify patient-reported symptom fluctuations. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with the diagnosis of CIDP or a CIDP-variant under treatment with IVIG were recruited in this study and underwent examination before IVIG infusion, in the middle of the treatment interval, and before their next IVIG infusion. Patients were surveyed regarding symptom fluctuations at the last visit and divided into two groups: those with and without fluctuations of symptoms. At the first visit, sociodemographic and disease-specific data were collected. Clinical scores were assessed at every examination. sNfL values were compared between both groups at the different time points after conversion into Z-scores-adjusted for age and body mass index. RESULTS: Patients with CIDP show elevated sNfL Z-scores (median at baseline: 2.14, IQR: 1.0). There was no significant change in sNfL Z-scores or questionnaire scores within the treatment cycle in either group. There was no significant difference in sNfL levels between the patients with and without symptom fluctuations. CONCLUSIONS: CIDP patients show elevated sNfL levels. However, sNfL is not suitable to reflect patient-reported fluctuations of symptoms. This indicates that symptom fluctuations during treatment with IVIG in patients with CIDP are not caused by a neuroaxonal injury. Furthermore, repeated sNfL measurements within one treatment cycle with IVIG seem to have no benefit for symptom monitoring.

Immunomodulatory effects of intravenous and subcutaneous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: An observational study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is not known whether the route of administration affects the mechanisms of action of therapeutic immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). The aim of this study, therefore, was to compare the immunomodulatory effects of intravenous (IVIg) and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) in patients with CIDP and in IVIg-treated common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) patients. METHODS: Serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples were obtained from 30 CIDP patients receiving IVIg, 10 CIDP patients receiving SCIg, and 15 patients with CVID receiving IVIg. Samples and clinical data were obtained prior to IVIg/SCIg and at 3 days, 7 days, and, in CIDP patients receiving IVIg, 21 days post-administration. Serum cytokines were assessed by Luminex-based multiplex assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Immune cells were characterized by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Immune cell profiles of CIDP and CVID patients differed in frequencies of myeloid dendritic cells and cytotoxic natural killer cells. During treatment with IVIg or SCIg in CIDP patients, cellular immunomarkers were largely similar. CIDP patients receiving IVIg had higher macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α (p = 0.01), interleukin (IL)-4 (p = 0.04), and IL-33 (p = 0.04) levels than SCIg recipients. IVIg treatment more broadly modulated cytokines in CIDP than SCIg treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the modulation of cellular immunomarkers in CIDP is independent of the application route of therapeutic immunoglobulin. Minor differences were observed between CIDP and CVID patients. In contrast, cytokines were differentially modulated by IVIg and SCIg in CIDP.

Extensive arm skin necrosis following administration of unfractionated heparin.

Unfractionated heparin (UH), a commonly used anticoagulant, can rarely cause skin necrosis following heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). A 38-year-old female, a case of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) admitted to the neurology ward, developed extensive skin necrosis following a change in UH dose at the exact site of UH injection. A sudden fall in the platelet count was observed within 48 h of increasing the UH dose. Necrosis of the outer layer of the skin along with clot formation and inflammation in the inner layers was detected after histopathological evaluation. UH was discontinued, and rivaroxaban was started for the patient as soon as the complication was detected. The patient was discharged in good condition after completing treatment for CIDP without any need for surgical removal of the necrotic tissue. Extensive skin necrosis, as a result of HIT, requires immediate discontinuation of UH and substitution of a nonheparin-based anticoagulation treatment.

Aggressive Acquired Demyelinating Neuropathy Caused by NF-155: Initially Treatment-Resistant.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-neurofascin-155 IgG4 (NF-155) antibody disease has previously been associated with a subset of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. We report a case of NF-155 positive polyneuropathy that initially presented as an acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. The patient responded appropriately to treatment but subsequently progressed over a 3-month period, resulting in quadriplegia, areflexia, and oculobulbar paralysis. METHODS: Case report and literature review. RESULTS: A 40-year-old male presented with acute bilateral arm and thigh weakness, areflexia, and distal sensory loss. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for acute acquired demyelinating neuropathy resulted in initial improvement but subsequent decline. Lack of response to additional IVIg and plasmapheresis (PLEX) prompted testing for NF-155. Treatment with rituximab and steroids resulted in virtually complete recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Early testing for nodal and paranodal proteins is indicated in patients who present with acute acquired demyelinating neuropathy but fail to respond to conventional treatments, such as IVIg or PLEX. Identification of nodal and paranodal antibodies should prompt treatment with rituximab and steroids to increase likelihood of recovery.

In persons with CIDP, auto-HSCT can be conducted fully on an outpatient basis and induces significant clinical responses: A prospective study in a single center.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is one of the world's most common treatable neuropathy which usually responds to immunosuppressive treatment. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is an intense way of inducing immunosuppression. OBJECTIVE: We analyze the evolution of CIDP patients treated with aHSCT in our center. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2023, persons with CIDP were prospectively autografted employing the "Mexican method" to conduct grafts on an outpatient basis, employing cyclophosphamide 200 mg/Kg and rituximab 1000 mg. The protocol is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02674217. RESULTS: In our center 21 autologous transplant cases were completed in 2018-2023. Seven patients provided data to assess the efficacy of the procedure. Positive responses (stabilization and/or improvement) were observed in all seven patients: Five reported improvements in the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) score and one reported stabilization. In the Inflammatory Rasch-Built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS) score. Median INCAT score was 5 (range 1-9), whereas median I-RODS score was 24 (range 11-29). Five patients (71%) reported improvement in the INCAT score, one reported stabilization and one informed worsening; concerning the I-RODS score 5 (71%) informed improvement, whereas two reported stabilization. CONCLUSION: aHSCT conducted fully in an outpatient basis, employing the conditioning regimen of the "Mexican method" appears to be a feasible therapeutic option for persons with CIDP. Additional studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Clinical relevance of distinguishing autoimmune nodopathies from CIDP: longitudinal assessment in a large cohort.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine treatment response and whether it is associated with antibody titre change in patients with autoimmune nodopathy (AN) previously diagnosed as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and to compare clinical features and treatment response between AN and CIDP. METHODS: Serum IgG antibodies to neurofascin-155 (NF155), contactin-1 (CNTN1) and contactin-associated protein 1 (CASPR1) were detected with cell-based assays in patients diagnosed with CIDP. Clinical improvement was determined using the modified Rankin scale, need for alternative and/or additional treatments and assessment of the treating neurologist. RESULTS: We studied 401 patients diagnosed with CIDP and identified 21 patients with AN (10 anti-NF155, 6 anti-CNTN1, 4 anti-CASPR1 and 1 anti-NF155/anti-CASPR1 double positive). In patients with AN ataxia (68% vs 28%, p=0.001), cranial nerve involvement (34% vs 11%, p=0.012) and autonomic symptoms (47% vs 22%, p=0.025) were more frequently reported; patients with AN improved less often after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (39% vs 80%, p=0.002) and required additional/alternative treatments more frequently (84% vs 34%, p<0.001), compared with patients with CIDP. Antibody titres decreased or became negative in patients improving on treatment. Treatment withdrawal was associated with a titre increase and clinical deterioration in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: Distinguishing CIDP from AN is important, as patients with AN need a different treatment approach. Improvement and relapses were associated with changes in antibody titres, supporting the pathogenicity of these antibodies.