COVID-19: como informações baseadas em evidências auxiliaram um hospital terciário durante o primeiro ano pandêmico / COVID-19: how evidence-based information supported a tertiary hospital during the first pandemic year

Introdução: Durante a pandemia de COVID-19, a necessidade por uma informação confiável, rápida e precisa desafiou os profissionais de saúde de todo o mundo. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar e comparar as solicitações dos profissionais da saúde realizadas a um Centro de Informação Sobre Medicamentos (CIM) em um ano pré-pandêmico e durante o primeiro ano pandêmico. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo quantitativo e retrospectivo, que analisou as perguntas realizadas ao CIM do Instituto Central do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (ICHCFMUSP) quanto ao seu assunto, classificação ATC dos medicamentos envolvidos e profissionais solicitantes. Resultados: Os resultados demonstram que, de maneira geral, durante o primeiro ano pandêmico houve um aumento de 454 perguntas (66,13%; p < 0,01). As dúvidas se referiam principalmente a questões de administração, estabilidade/compatibilidade e padronização do medicamento na instituição, sendo o farmacêutico o profissional que realizou maior número de questionamentos. Ao seccionar as perguntas, verificou-se que a maioria das informações solicitadas se referiram a agentes infecciosos, agentes que atuam no sangue/órgãos hematopoiéticos e sistema nervoso. Conclusão: Considerando o cenário pandêmico, com sobrecarga dos serviços de saúde, contratação em massa de novos profissionais e pouca disponibilidade de informações com embasamento científico, as evidências fornecidas pelo CIM, aliadas ao entendimento do quadro clínico de cada paciente, com certeza auxiliaram em um melhor desfecho clínico, bem como foram essenciais no uso racional de medicamentos no combate a pandemia de COVID-19.

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic the need for reliable, fast and accurate information challenged healthcare professionals around the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the requests made by health professionals to a Drug Information Center (DIC) in a pre-pandemic year and during the first year of the pandemic. Methods: This is a quantitative and retrospective study that analyzed the solicitations made to the DIC of the Instituto Central do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (ICHCFMUSP) regarding its subject, ATC classification of drugs involved and requesting professionals. Results: The results show that, in general, during the first pandemic year there was an increase of 454 questions (66.13%; p < 0.01). The questions referred mainly to issues of administration, stability/compatibility and standardization of the medicines in the institution, being the pharmacist the professional who asked the most number of questions. When sectioning the questions, it was found that most of the information requested referred to infectious agents, agents that act on the blood/hematopoietic organs and the nervous system. Conclusion: Considering the pandemic scenario, with an overload of health services, large number of hires of new professionals and lack of availability of scientifically based information, the evidence provided by the DIC, combined with the understanding of clinical condition of each patient, certainly helped in a better outcome for each patient, as well as being essential in the rational use of medicines in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic.

Establishing A Global EBP Tool to Measure Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge: Translating and Testing the French Version of EKAN.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Government and professional organizations around the world have issued a call for evidence-based practice (EBP), affecting nursing globally. This study aimed to establish a baseline measure of EBP knowledge in French-speaking, baccalaureate nursing students and test the psychometric performance of a newly translated instrument. METHODS: For the cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational study, 103 baccalaureate nursing students from Haiti were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Rasch analysis showed strong evidence of validity (Weighted MS M = 984; Unweighted MS M = 1.01). Individual items showed item reliability (.94). The mean EBP knowledge score was 5.9 (SD = 1.93; Range = 2-10 points). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides initial psychometric evidence for an EBP knowledge measure that can be used as a catalyst for research in 29 French-speaking countries.

Awareness and usage of evidence-based learning strategies among health professions students and faculty.

Introduction: Learning is essential and life-long for faculty and students. Often students and teachers use ineffective learning strategies and are not aware of evidence-based strategies.Methods: A multicenter, international, cross-sectional, online survey-based assessment of awareness of evidence-based learning strategies among health professions students (n = 679) and faculty (n = 205).Results: Students endorsed many study habits which violate evidence-based principles, including studying whatever is due soonest (389/679, 57%), failing to return to course material once a course has ended (465/679, 68%), and re-reading underlined or highlighted notes (298.679, 44%). While the majority of faculty surveyed (125/157, 80%) reported recommending effective study strategies for their students, most students (558/679, 82%) said they did not study the way they do because of instruction from faculty. The majority of faculty (142/156, 91%) and students (347/661, 53%) believe students have different learning styles.Discussion: The results of this study demonstrate health professions students continue to use many ineffective study strategies, and both students and faculty hold misconceptions about evidence-based learning. While planning a curriculum, medical educators should focus on teaching students how to learn and use higher order thinking procedures in addition to teaching content.

Growing body of evidence supports intrauterine insemination as first line treatment and rejects unfounded concerns about its efficacy, risks and cost effectiveness.

IUI has been practiced for five decades but only three unconvincing trials attempted to demonstrate the superiority of IUI over sexual intercourse (SI). In the absence of evidence of its effectiveness, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommended IVF over IUI after 2 years of unprotected SI. High-quality recent data in well-constructed studies suggest that biases against IUI procedures and in favour of IVF are invalid. It is unethical to continue to misinform patients and stakeholders. The well-constructed randomised controlled trials (RCT) show IUI procedure to be efficient, with minimal risk, and above all improved cost-effectiveness when compared to IVF for live birth. IUI as first-line treatment should be offered to most patients, while funding agencies and stakeholders need to be urgently informed of the cost-benefit in offering IUI. Fertility clinics, IVF interest groups, and regulatory bodies should amend their patient information and guidance to state that IUI should be the first line treatment and that IVF should be offered only when essential. Reappraising and promoting IUI based on evidence enhances patient autonomy, choices, and trust, while allowing the fertility industry to operate within an ethical and acceptable framework not seen as exploitative toward vulnerable patients.

[Access to information for evidence-based decision-making from the perspective of Municipal Health Secretaries in the State of Paraná, Brazil, 2014]. / Acesso à informação para tomada de decisão com base em evidências segundo a percepção de Secretários Municipais de Saúde do Estado do Paraná, no ano de 2014.

The study aimed to identify information sources for decision-making and barriers to access in the use of scientific journals by Municipal Health Secretaries in the State of Paraná, Brazil. Study participants included Secretaries of Health from 181 municipalities in the year 2014. Interviews focused on the frequency of consultation of resources for obtaining evidence, including from scientific journals. 40.9% of the participants were 18 to 39 years of age (mean age was 43±10.2 years; median 42 years). More than two-thirds (69.1%) had held the office of health secretary for less than five years. The majority were males (56.4%), and only one in three had a graduate degree in public health. The main sources of information were "non-scientific periodicals" (76.2%), "print/online journals" (71.4%), and "Ministry of Health guidelines" (71.3%). The main barriers to use of scientific journals were "lack of time for reading" (72.9%), "periodical's high cost" (69.1%), and "difficulty in identifying the best periodicals" (63.5%). The main information sources were non-scientific periodicals and Ministry of Health guidelines. The use of scientific journals is hindered by lack of time and limited familiarity with scientific language. Access to scientific information should be facilitated by the use of more accessible sources and training for municipal administrators in the use of open-access periodicals. Such measures can foster knowledge of current evidence among municipal health secretaries.

O objetivo foi identificar fontes de acesso a informações para a tomada de decisão e barreiras para o uso de periódicos científicos entre Secretários Municipais de saúde do Estado do Paraná, Brasil. Participaram do trabalho Secretários Municipais de Saúde de 181 municípios do Estado do Paraná, no ano de 2014. Foram realizadas entrevistas sobre a frequência e o uso de recursos, para obter informação sobre as evidências científicas relacionadas ao uso de periódicos científicos. Em geral, 40,9% dos participantes tinham entre 18 e 39 anos (média 43 ± 10,2; mediana 42 anos), ocupavam o cargo por um período menor de cinco anos (69,1%), eram do sexo masculino (56,4%) e apenas um a cada três possuía pós-graduação em saúde pública. As principais fontes de informação utilizadas foram "revistas não científicas" (76,2%), "jornais impressos/online" (71,4%)" e "diretrizes do Ministério da Saúde" (71,3%). As principais barreiras reportadas para o uso de periódicos científicos foram a "falta de tempo para leitura" (72,9%), o "custo elevado de periódico" (69,1%) e a "dificuldade de identificar os melhores periódicos" (63,5%). As principais fontes de acesso à informação utilizadas são veículos não científicos e as diretrizes do Ministério da Saúde. O emprego de periódicos científicos é dificultado pela falta de tempo e baixa familiaridade com a linguagem científica. O acesso a informações científicas deve ser facilitado com o emprego de fontes mais acessíveis, assim como o treinamento dos gestores para o uso de periódicos de livre acesso. Tais ações podem auxiliar no conhecimento de evidências atualizadas entre os secretários municipais de saúde.

El objetivo fue identificar fuentes de acceso a la información para la toma de decisiones y las barreras existentes, para el uso de periódicos científicos entre Secretarios Municipales de Salud del estado de Paraná, Brasil. Participaron en el trabajo Secretarios Municipales de Salud de 181 municipios del estado de Paraná, durante el año 2014. Se realizaron entrevistas sobre la frecuencia y el uso de recursos, con el fin de obtener información sobre las evidencias científicas relacionadas con el uso de periódicos científicos. En general, un 40,9% de los participantes tenían entre 18 y 39 años (media 43 ± 10,2; mediana de 42 años), ocupaban el cargo por un período menor de cinco años (69,1%), eran de sexo masculino (56,4%), y solamente uno de cada tres contaba con posgrado en salud pública. Las principales fuentes de información utilizadas fueron "revistas no científicas" (76,2%), "periódicos impresos/online" (71,4%) y "directrices del Ministerio de Salud" (71,3%). Las principales barreras informadas para el uso de periódicos científicos fueron la "falta de tiempo para lectura" (72,9%), el "coste elevado del periódico" (69,1%) y la "dificultad de identificar los mejores periódicos" (63,5%). Las principales fuentes de acceso a la información utilizadas son vehículos no científicos y las directrices del Ministerio de Salud. El empleo de periódicos científicos está dificultado por falta de tiempo y baja familiaridad con el lenguaje científico. El acceso a información científica debe ser facilitado con el empleo de fuentes más accesibles, así como el entrenamiento de gestores para el uso de periódicos de libre acceso. Tales acciones pueden ayudar en el conocimiento de evidencias actualizadas entre los secretarios municipales de salud.

A scoping review and survey provides the rationale, perceptions, and preferences for the integration of randomized and nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses and GRADE assessments.

OBJECTIVES: To review the literature and obtain preferences and perceptions from experts regarding the role of randomized studies (RSs) and nonrandomized studies (NRSs) in systematic reviews of intervention effects. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Scoping review and survey of experts. Using levels of certainty developed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group, experts expressed their preferences about the use of RS and NRS in health syntheses. RESULTS: Of 189 respondents, 123 had the expertise required to answer the questionnaire; 116 provided their extent of agreement with approaches to use NRS with RS. Most respondents would include NRS when RS was unfeasible (83.6%) or unethical (71.5%) and a majority to maximize the body of evidence (66.3%), compare results in NRS and RS (53.5%) and to identify subgroups (51.7%). Sizable minorities would include NRS and RS to address the effect of randomization (29.5%) or because the question being addressed was a public-health intervention (36.5%). In summary of findings tables, most respondents would include both bodies of evidence-in two rows in the same table-when RS provided moderate, low, or very-low certainty evidence; even when RS provided high certainty evidence, a sizable minority (25%) would still present results from both bodies of evidence. Very few (3.6%) would, under realistic circumstances, pool RS and NRS results. CONCLUSIONS: Most experts would include both RS and NRS in the same review under a wide variety of circumstances, but almost all would present results of two bodies of evidence separately.

Acesso à informação para tomada de decisão com base em evidências segundo a percepção de Secretários Municipais de Saúde do Estado do Paraná, no ano de 2014 / Access to information for evidence-based decision-making from the perspective of Municipal Health Secretaries in the State of Paraná, Brazil, 2014 / Acceso a la información para la toma de decisiones en base a evidencias, según la percepción de Secretarios Municipales de Salud del estado de Paraná, Brasil, 2014

O objetivo foi identificar fontes de acesso a informações para a tomada de decisão e barreiras para o uso de periódicos científicos entre Secretários Municipais de saúde do Estado do Paraná, Brasil. Participaram do trabalho Secretários Municipais de Saúde de 181 municípios do Estado do Paraná, no ano de 2014. Foram realizadas entrevistas sobre a frequência e o uso de recursos, para obter informação sobre as evidências científicas relacionadas ao uso de periódicos científicos. Em geral, 40,9% dos participantes tinham entre 18 e 39 anos (média 43 ± 10,2; mediana 42 anos), ocupavam o cargo por um período menor de cinco anos (69,1%), eram do sexo masculino (56,4%) e apenas um a cada três possuía pós-graduação em saúde pública. As principais fontes de informação utilizadas foram "revistas não científicas" (76,2%), "jornais impressos/online" (71,4%)" e "diretrizes do Ministério da Saúde" (71,3%). As principais barreiras reportadas para o uso de periódicos científicos foram a "falta de tempo para leitura" (72,9%), o "custo elevado de periódico" (69,1%) e a "dificuldade de identificar os melhores periódicos" (63,5%). As principais fontes de acesso à informação utilizadas são veículos não científicos e as diretrizes do Ministério da Saúde. O emprego de periódicos científicos é dificultado pela falta de tempo e baixa familiaridade com a linguagem científica. O acesso a informações científicas deve ser facilitado com o emprego de fontes mais acessíveis, assim como o treinamento dos gestores para o uso de periódicos de livre acesso. Tais ações podem auxiliar no conhecimento de evidências atualizadas entre os secretários municipais de saúde.

The study aimed to identify information sources for decision-making and barriers to access in the use of scientific journals by Municipal Health Secretaries in the State of Paraná, Brazil. Study participants included Secretaries of Health from 181 municipalities in the year 2014. Interviews focused on the frequency of consultation of resources for obtaining evidence, including from scientific journals. 40.9% of the participants were 18 to 39 years of age (mean age was 43±10.2 years; median 42 years). More than two-thirds (69.1%) had held the office of health secretary for less than five years. The majority were males (56.4%), and only one in three had a graduate degree in public health. The main sources of information were "non-scientific periodicals" (76.2%), "print/online journals" (71.4%), and "Ministry of Health guidelines" (71.3%). The main barriers to use of scientific journals were "lack of time for reading" (72.9%), "periodical's high cost" (69.1%), and "difficulty in identifying the best periodicals" (63.5%). The main information sources were non-scientific periodicals and Ministry of Health guidelines. The use of scientific journals is hindered by lack of time and limited familiarity with scientific language. Access to scientific information should be facilitated by the use of more accessible sources and training for municipal administrators in the use of open-access periodicals. Such measures can foster knowledge of current evidence among municipal health secretaries.

El objetivo fue identificar fuentes de acceso a la información para la toma de decisiones y las barreras existentes, para el uso de periódicos científicos entre Secretarios Municipales de Salud del estado de Paraná, Brasil. Participaron en el trabajo Secretarios Municipales de Salud de 181 municipios del estado de Paraná, durante el año 2014. Se realizaron entrevistas sobre la frecuencia y el uso de recursos, con el fin de obtener información sobre las evidencias científicas relacionadas con el uso de periódicos científicos. En general, un 40,9% de los participantes tenían entre 18 y 39 años (media 43 ± 10,2; mediana de 42 años), ocupaban el cargo por un período menor de cinco años (69,1%), eran de sexo masculino (56,4%), y solamente uno de cada tres contaba con posgrado en salud pública. Las principales fuentes de información utilizadas fueron "revistas no científicas" (76,2%), "periódicos impresos/online" (71,4%) y "directrices del Ministerio de Salud" (71,3%). Las principales barreras informadas para el uso de periódicos científicos fueron la "falta de tiempo para lectura" (72,9%), el "coste elevado del periódico" (69,1%) y la "dificultad de identificar los mejores periódicos" (63,5%). Las principales fuentes de acceso a la información utilizadas son vehículos no científicos y las directrices del Ministerio de Salud. El empleo de periódicos científicos está dificultado por falta de tiempo y baja familiaridad con el lenguaje científico. El acceso a información científica debe ser facilitado con el empleo de fuentes más accesibles, así como el entrenamiento de gestores para el uso de periódicos de libre acceso. Tales acciones pueden ayudar en el conocimiento de evidencias actualizadas entre los secretarios municipales de salud.

Compreendendo os Estudos de Meta-Epidemiologia / Understanding Meta-Epidemiological Studies

O conceito de meta-epidemiologia foi introduzido devido às limitações metodológicas da revisão sistemática em rever os ensaios clínicos de intervenção. A meta-epidemiologia passou de um método estatístico para uma nova metodologia com o objetivo de fechar as lacunas entre a evidência e a prática, controlando os potenciais vieses em revisões sistemáticas quantitativas, e desenhar evidências adequadas para o estabelecimento de diretrizes baseadas em evidência. A meta-epidemiologia de rede foi sugerida a fim de superar algumas limitações da meta-epidemiologia. Esta revisão tem o objetivo de esclarecer o conceito e os principais métodos para realização de um estudo de meta-epidemiologia

Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude and Utilization Survey.

OBJECTIVE: Most health professions recognize the value of evidence-based practice (EBP), yet the uptake of EBP across most health disciplines has been suboptimal. To improve EBP uptake, it is important to first understand the many dimensions that affect EBP use. The Evidence-Based practice Attitude and utilization SurvEy (EBASE) was designed to measure the attitudes, skills, and use of EBP among practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM); however, the dimensionality of the instrument is not well understood. The aim of the current research was to examine the psychometric properties of the attitudes, skills, and use subscales of EBASE. DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of data obtained from the administration of EBASE. Data were examined using principal components analyses and confirmatory methods. Internal consistency reliabilities of resultant subscales were also computed. PARTICIPANTS: 1314 U.S. chiropractors and 554 Canadian chiropractors. RESULTS: A unidimensional structure best fit the attitudes and use subscales. Skills subscale items were best represented by subscales with a multidimensional structure. Specifically, the skills construct was best modeled with three dimensions (identification of the research question, locating research, and application of EBP). All subscales had acceptable internal consistency reliability estimates. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the modification of the scoring guidelines for the original EBASE. These changes are likely to result in a more accurate measure of EBP attitudes, skills, and use among chiropractors, and possibly CAM providers more generally.

Endovascular thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke / Tratamento endovascular do acidente vascular isquêmico agudo

ABSTRACT Few patients benefit from the current standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), encouraging the development of new treatments. Objective To systematically review the literature on the efficacy and/or safety of endovascular thrombectomy in AIS compared to standard treatment and to identify ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Method Searches for RCTs were performed in Medline/Embase, and for ongoing trials: International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, Clinicaltrials.gov and ISRCTN registry (to June 15th, 2015). Results From the eight published RCTs, five showed the superiority of treatment that includes thrombectomy compared to standard care alone. From the 13 ongoing RCTs, 3 have been halted, one has not started, one has unknown status and eight will end between 2016 - 2020. Conclusion Evidence favours a combination of the standard therapy with endovascular thrombectomy. The selection criteria however limit the number of people who can benefit. Further studies are needed to prove its cost-effectiveness.

RESUMO Poucos pacientes se beneficiam do atual tratamento para o acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico agudo (AVCIA), incentivando o desenvolvimento de novos tratamentos. Objetivo Revisão sistemática da literatura sobre a eficácia e/ou segurança da trombectomia endovascular (TE) em AVCIA comparado com tratamento padrão (TP) e identificar ensaios clínicos randomizados controlados (ECR) atualmente em andamento. Método Buscas por ECRs foram conduzidas no Medline,Embase, International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, Clinicaltrials.gov e no ISRCTN registry (to June 15th, 2015). Resultados Oito ECRs publicados foram identificados, dos quais cinco mostraram superioridade do tratamento com trombectomia comparado ao TP. Dos 13 ERCs registrados, 3 foram suspensos, um não iniciou, um temstatus desconhecido e oito encerrarão recrutamento entre 2016 e 2020. Conclusão A evidência favorece a combinação do TP com a TE em relação ao TP somente. Os critérios de inclusão limitam o número daqueles que poderiam se beneficiar. Mais estudos são necessários para demonstrar o custo-efetividade desta intervenção.

Endovascular thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

UNLABELLED: Few patients benefit from the current standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), encouraging the development of new treatments. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on the efficacy and/or safety of endovascular thrombectomy in AIS compared to standard treatment and to identify ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHOD: Searches for RCTs were performed in Medline/Embase, and for ongoing trials: International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, Clinicaltrials.gov and ISRCTN registry (to June 15th, 2015). RESULTS: From the eight published RCTs, five showed the superiority of treatment that includes thrombectomy compared to standard care alone. From the 13 ongoing RCTs, 3 have been halted, one has not started, one has unknown status and eight will end between 2016 - 2020. CONCLUSION: Evidence favours a combination of the standard therapy with endovascular thrombectomy. The selection criteria however limit the number of people who can benefit. Further studies are needed to prove its cost-effectiveness.

Usage evaluation of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) among Brazilian physical therapists.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) is widely and equally used by physical therapists in Brazil. As PEDro is considered a key resource to support evidence-based physical therapy, analyses of PEDro usage could reflect the extent of dissemination of evidence-based practice. OBJECTIVE: To describe the usage of PEDro among the five regions of the World Confederation for Physical Therapy (WCPT) and, in more detail, in the South American region and Brazil over a 5-year period. METHOD: PEDro home-page sessions and the number of searches performed were logged for a 5-year period (2010-2014). Absolute usage and relative usage were calculated for each region of the WCPT, each country in the South American region of WCPT, and each Regional Council (CREFITO) in Brazil. RESULTS: Europe had the highest absolute and relative usage among the five regions of the WCPT (971 searches per million-population per year), with the South American region ranked 4th in absolute terms and 3rd in relative terms (486). Within the South American region, Brazil accounted for nearly 60% of searches (755). Analysis at a national level revealed that usage per physical therapist in Brazil is very low across all CREFITOs. The highest usage occurred in CREFITO 6 with 1.3 searches per physical therapist per year. CONCLUSIONS: PEDro is not widely and equally used throughout Brazil. Strategies to promote PEDro and to make PEDro more accessible to physical therapists speaking Portuguese are needed.

Usage evaluation of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) among Brazilian physical therapists

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) is widely and equally used by physical therapists in Brazil. As PEDro is considered a key resource to support evidence-based physical therapy, analyses of PEDro usage could reflect the extent of dissemination of evidence-based practice.OBJECTIVE: To describe the usage of PEDro among the five regions of the World Confederation for Physical Therapy (WCPT) and, in more detail, in the South American region and Brazil over a 5-year period.METHOD: PEDro home-page sessions and the number of searches performed were logged for a 5-year period (2010-2014). Absolute usage and relative usage were calculated for each region of the WCPT, each country in the South American region of WCPT, and each Regional Council (CREFITO) in Brazil.RESULTS: Europe had the highest absolute and relative usage among the five regions of the WCPT (971 searches per million-population per year), with the South American region ranked 4th in absolute terms and 3rd in relative terms (486). Within the South American region, Brazil accounted for nearly 60% of searches (755). Analysis at a national level revealed that usage per physical therapist in Brazil is very low across all CREFITOs. The highest usage occurred in CREFITO 6 with 1.3 searches per physical therapist per year.CONCLUSIONS: PEDro is not widely and equally used throughout Brazil. Strategies to promote PEDro and to make PEDro more accessible to physical therapists speaking Portuguese are needed.

Knowledge, Attitude and Use of Evidence-Based Practice among nurses active on the Internet.

OBJECTIVE: to determine the evidence-based practice (EBP) competence of Spanish and Latin-American nurses participating in professional forums on the Internet and estimate the influence of socio-demographic and professional factors on their competence, which was defined as knowledge of, attitude towards, and implementation of EBP. METHODOLOGY: An online survey was administered to a convenience sample of nurses active in Internet forums, comprising validated Spanish versions of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ) and Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) and socio-demographics and professional variables. RESULTS: 314 questionnaires were obtained (76.96%). The mean EBPQ score was 5.02 out of 7 (95%CI, 4.89-5.14). The variables associated with a higher competence in EBP were academic level, (p<03001), professional category (p=0.001), country of work (p<0.001), perception of practice environment (p=0,018) and research activities (p<0,036). CONCLUSIONS: These nurses showed a moderate level of EBP competence. They revealed a positive attitude towards EBP and achieved intermediate scores in both EBP-related skills and knowledge and their implementation. Higher academic levels and professional categories were associated with greater EBP competence. A practice environment perceived to be unfavorable has a negative influence on EBP implementation.

Experiência da inserção do Lian Gong na Estratégia Saúde da Família de Samambaia – Distrito Federal / The Experience of Lian Gong’s Insertion at Family Health Strategy of Samambaia– Federal District

O Lian Gong é uma Prática Integrativa de Saúde que visa à integralidadeda assistência e promoção de qualidade de vida (QV). Por meio do Programa de Educação pelo Trabalho para a Saúde (PET-Saúde), objetivou-se contribuir para sua implantação e avaliar a QV de seus praticantes. Estudo qualiquantitativo, prospectivo, tipo antes/depois, realizado de 04/2010 a 03/2012, por amostragem de conveniência, com três etapas: avaliação sociodemográfica; aplicação do questionário SF-36 antes e após seis meses de prática; e realização de grupo focal, com análise descritiva do conteúdo transcrito. Análise quantitativa por meio do programa SPSS. A amostra consta de onze usuárias, com média de 58 anos, que demonstraram melhora em todos os domínios do SF-36, destacando-se o domínio Aspectos Físicos. A análise descritiva evidenciou melhora em limitação física, qualidade do sono e socialização das usuárias. A Medicina Complementar/Integrativa consiste emuma via alternativa e eficaz no alcance da integralidade da assistência,emergindo como ponto inovador e pouco oneroso de investimento.

The Lian Gong, an Integrative Health Practice, aims to promote integrativecare and quality of life (QOL). Through the Education Program of Work for Health (Health-PET), the goals of this work were to contribute to its implementation and evaluate the QOL of its practitioners. Study qualitative and quantitative prospective, type before / after, made between 04/2010 and 03/2012, with a convenience sample, with three steps: socio-demographic evaluation, application of the SF-36 questionnaire before and after six months of practice; and conducting focus groups with descriptive analysis of the transcribed recording. Quantitative analysis using SPSS. The sample consists of eleven users, with an average of 58 years, which showed improvement in all domains of the SF-36, highlighting the domain Physical Aspects. The descriptive analysis showed improvement in physical limitation, quality of sleep and socialization of users. The Complementary/ Integrative Medicine consist of an alternative and effective way to achieve comprehensivecare, emerging as an innovative point of investment.

Effect of a multifaceted intervention on use of evidence-based therapies in patients with acute coronary syndromes in Brazil: the BRIDGE-ACS randomized trial.

CONTEXT: Studies have found that patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) often do not receive evidence-based therapies in community practice. This is particularly true in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a multifaceted quality improvement (QI) intervention can improve the use of evidence-based therapies and reduce the incidence of major cardiovascular events among patients with ACS in a middle-income country. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The BRIDGE-ACS (Brazilian Intervention to Increase Evidence Usage in Acute Coronary Syndromes) trial, a cluster-randomized (concealed allocation) trial conducted among 34 clusters (public hospitals) in Brazil and enrolling a total of 1150 patients with ACS from March 15, 2011, through November 2, 2011, with follow-up through January 27, 2012. INTERVENTION: Multifaceted QI intervention including educational materials for clinicians, reminders, algorithms, and case manager training, vs routine practice (control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point was the percentage of eligible patients who received all evidence-based therapies (aspirin, clopidogrel, anticoagulants, and statins) during the first 24 hours in patients without contraindications. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients enrolled was 62 (SD, 13) years; 68.6% were men, and 40% presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 35.6% with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and 23.6% with unstable angina. The randomized clusters included 79.5% teaching hospitals, all from major urban areas and 41.2% with 24-hour percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities. Among eligible patients (923/1150 [80.3%]), 67.9% in the intervention vs 49.5% in the control group received all eligible acute therapies (population average odds ratio [OR(PA)], 2.64 [95% CI, 1.28-5.45]). Similarly, among eligible patients (801/1150 [69.7%]), those in the intervention group were more likely to receive all eligible acute and discharge medications (50.9% vs 31.9%; OR(PA),, 2.49 [95% CI, 1.08-5.74]). Overall composite adherence scores were higher in the intervention clusters (89% vs 81.4%; mean difference, 8.6% [95% CI, 2.2%-15.0%]). In-hospital cardiovascular event rates were 5.5% in the intervention group vs 7.0% in the control group (OR(PA), 0.72 [95% CI, 0.36-1.43]); 30-day all-cause mortality was 7.0% vs 8.4% (ORPA, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.46-1.34]). CONCLUSION: Among patients with ACS treated in Brazil, a multifaceted educational intervention resulted in significant improvement in the use of evidence-based therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00958958.