Evaluating speech perception of the MAXUM middle ear implant versus speech perception under inserts.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the speech perception of the Ototronix MAXUM middle ear implant relative to the cochlear potential for speech perception of patients. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical study chart review. METHODS: We performed an evaluation of data from a prospective clinical study of 10 MAXUM patients. Primary outcome measures included comparison of word recognition (WR) scores with MAXUM (WRMAXUM ) versus word recognition under inserts (WRinserts ), and the functional gain improvement for pure-tone average (PTA) (0.5, 1, and 2 kHz) and high-frequency pure-tone average (2, 3, and 4 kHz). RESULTS: Ten ears in 10 adult patients (six female; average age 68.7 years) were included. The average speech perception gap (difference between WRinserts and WRMAXUM ) with MAXUM was -9.2% (range, -26% to 4%). A negative number indicates that WRMAXUM was higher than the WRinserts . The average PTA with MAXUM was 23.1 dB (range, 18.7-30 dB), a 38.0-dB gain over the preoperative unaided condition (range, 20-53.3 dB). The average high-frequency pure-tone average with MAXUM was 34.4 dB (range, 26-43.3 dB), a 42.8-dB gain over the preoperative unaided condition (range, 32.3-58.7 dB). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that a significant, very strong correlation was observed between WRinserts and WRMAXUM scores (r = 0.86, P = .001), and a patient's WRinserts score may be used to reasonably predict the word recognition outcomes with MAXUM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:456-460, 2018.

Patient satisfaction after auditory implant surgery: ten-year experience from a single implanting unit center.

CONCLUSIONS: The satisfaction rate of the subjects with an auditory implant appears strictly related to the resulting auditory improvement, and the surgical variables would play a prevailing role in respect to the esthetic factors. OBJECTIVES: To assess the rate of satisfaction in subjects who underwent the surgical application of an auditory device at a single Implanting Center Unit. METHOD: A series of validated questionnaires has been administered to subjects who underwent the surgical application of different auditory devices. The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) have been used to compare the implanted situation with the hearing-aided one; a percutaneous bone conductive implant (pBCI) with an active middle ear implant (AMEI) on the round window in mixed hearing loss; and an invisible, fully-implantable device with a frankly and bulky semi-implantable device. RESULTS: The mean GBI scores were higher in Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB)® and Bonebridge® subjects, without significant differences among the various devices. The mean VAS score increased for all the devices in comparison with the conventional hearing aid. The mean APHAB score was similarly better in the implanted condition as total and partial scores.

A comparison of the user-friendliness of hydroxyapatite and titanium ossicular prostheses.

Both hydroxyapatite (Ha) and titanium (Ti) are well-accepted alloplastic materials for ossicular prostheses. Many different designs of Ha and Ti prostheses are presently available. Fourteen surgeons of different seniority and surgical experience were asked to 'test-drive' four different types of ossicular prostheses in cadaveric temporal bones to investigate the user-friendliness of these protheses. The Goldenberg design Ha incus prosthesis and the Dusseldorf design Bell Ti prosthesis were used as partial ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP). The Richards design Ha incus-stapes prosthesis and the Dusseldorf design Aerial Ti prosthesis were used as a total ossicular replacement prostheses (TORP). Nine out of 14 surgeons found the Ha PORP to be more user-friendly because of the notch design in the head. The Ti prosthesis was found to be more difficult to manipulate because it was too light. Half of the surgeons preferred the Ti TORP because of the open design of the top-plate. The Ha TORP was thought to be too top-heavy and to have a tendency to fall over.