Effect of α-blockers on Handgrip Test Response of Diastolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive, Benign Hypertrophy of Prostate Patients in a Therapeutics Clinic, Kolkata: A Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The isometric handgrip (IHG) test is commonly used to detect sympathetic autonomic dysfunction. Tamsulosin, approved for the management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), acts as an antagonist for α1-adrenergic receptors (α1-AR), whereas prazosin, an α1 receptor blocker, being less selective than tamsulosin, is used as an antihypertensive agent clinically. Our objective was to investigate if there is a distinction in blood pressure (BP) increase during IHG exercise between individuals with essential hypertension taking tamsulosin compared to those taking prazosin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was performed on 50 subjects receiving tablet prazosin and 47 subjects receiving tamsulosin, who were asked to undergo an IHG test. Pre- and posttest BP was recorded for both the groups, and the difference in diastolic BP (DBP) (delta DBP) was compared between the groups and to their respective baseline values. RESULTS: Post-IHG test, mean DBP was found to be 93.98 ± 9.13 mm Hg in the prazosin group and 101.00 ± 12.05 mm Hg in the tamsulosin group, respectively. The change of delta DBP in the tamsulosin group was significant, but the prazosin group showed an insignificant rise in DBP. CONCLUSION: Prazosin, being less selective than tamsulosin in terms of α1 receptor antagonism, showed suppression of BP during IHG. Tamsulosin demonstrates high selectivity for prostatic receptors while showing minimal affinity for vascular receptors. As a result, its impact on BP is expected to be minimal.

Association of Terazosin, Doxazosin, or Alfuzosin Use and Risk of Dementia With Lewy Bodies in Men.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Terazosin, doxazosin, and alfuzosin (Tz/Dz/Az) are α-1 adrenergic receptor antagonists that also bind to and activate a key adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-producing enzyme in glycolysis. It is hypothesized that the increase in energy availability in the brain may slow or prevent neurodegeneration, potentially by reducing the accumulation of alpha-synuclein. Recent work has suggested a potentially neuroprotective effect of the use of Tz/Dz/Az in Parkinson disease in both animal and human studies. We investigated the neuroprotective effects of Tz/Dz/Az in a closely related disease, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). METHODS: We used a new-user active comparator design in the Merative Marketscan database to identify men with no history of DLB who were newly started on Tz/Dz/Az or 2 comparator medications. Our comparator medications were other drugs commonly used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia that do not increase ATP: the α-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist tamsulosin or 5α-reductase inhibitor (5ARI). We matched the cohorts on propensity scores and duration of follow-up. We followed up the matched cohorts forward to estimate the hazard of developing DLB using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Men who were newly started on Tz/Dz/Az had a lower hazard of developing DLB than matched men taking tamsulosin (n = 242,716, 728,256 person-years, hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.50-0.71) or 5ARI (n = 130,872, 399,316 person-years, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.93). while the hazard in men taking tamsulosin was similar to that of men taking 5ARI (n = 159,596, 482,280 person-years, HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96-1.42). These results were robust to several sensitivity analyses. DISCUSSION: We find an association in men who are taking Tz/Dz/Az and a lower hazard of DLB compared with similar men taking other medications. When combined with the literature of Tz/Dz/Az on Parkinson disease, our findings suggest that glycolysis-enhancing drugs may be broadly protective in neurodegenerative synucleinopathies. A future randomized trial is required to assess these associations for causality. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that Tz/Dz/Az use reduces the rate of developing DLB in adult men.

Pharmacotherapy for sleep disturbances in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances are an important symptom dimension of post-traumatic-stress-disorder (PTSD). There is no meta-analytic evidence examining the effects of all types of pharmacotherapy on sleep outcomes among patients with PTSD. METHODS: Medline/Embase/PsychInfo/CENTRAL/clinicaltrials.gov/ICTRP, reference lists of published reviews and all included studies were searched for Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) examining any pharmacotherapy vs. placebo or any other drug among patients with PTSD. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: total sleep time, nightmares, sleep quality. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: sleep onset latency, number of nocturnal awakenings, time spent awake following sleep onset, dropouts due to sleep-related adverse-effects, insomnia/somnolence/vivid-dreams as adverse-effects. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: 99 RCTs with 10,481 participants were included. Prazosin may be the most effective treatment for insomnia (SMD = -0.88, 95%CI = [-1.22;-0.54], nightmares (SMD = -0.44, 95%CI = [-0.84;-0.04]) and poor sleep quality (SMD = -0.55, 95%CI = [-1.01;-0.10]). Evidence is scarce and indicates lack of efficacy for SSRIs, Mirtazapine, z-drugs and benzodiazepines, which are widely used in daily practice. Risperidone and Quetiapine carry a high risk of causing somnolence without having a clear therapeutic benefit. Hydroxyzine, Trazodone, Nabilone, Paroxetine and MDMA-assisted psychotherapy may be promising options, but more research is needed. CONCLUSIONS: Underpowered individual comparisons and very-low to moderate confidence in effect estimates hinder the generalisability of the results. More RCTs, specifically reporting on sleep-related outcomes, are urgently needed.

Prazosin and cyproheptadine in combination in the treatment of alcohol use disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pre-clinical studies suggest that the simultaneous blockade of the α1b and 5HT2A receptors may be effective in reducing alcohol consumption. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of prazosin (α1b blocker) and cyproheptadine (5HT2A blocker) combination in decreasing total alcohol consumption (TAC) in alcohol use disorder (AUD). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, Phase 2, randomized clinical trial conducted in 32 addiction treatment centres in France. A total of 108 men and 46 women with severe AUD took part. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to one of the following 3-month treatments: (1) low-dose group (LDG) receiving 8 mg cyproheptadine and 5 mg prazosin extended-release (ER) formulation daily; (2) high-dose group (HDG) receiving 12 mg cyproheptadine and 10 mg prazosin ER daily; and (3) placebo group (PG) receiving placebo of cyproheptadine and prazosin ER. A total of 154 patients were randomized: 54 in the PG, 54 in the LDG and 46 in the HDG. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was TAC change from baseline to month 3. FINDINGS: A significant main treatment effect in the change in TAC was found in the intent-to-treat population (P = 0.039). The HDG and LDG showed a benefit in the change in TAC from baseline to month 3 compared with PG: -23.6 g/day, P = 0.016, Cohen's d = -0.44; -18.4 g/day, P = 0.048 (Bonferroni correction P < 0.025), Cohen's d = -0.36. In a subgroup of very high-risk drinking-level participants (> 100 g/day of pure alcohol for men and > 60 g/day for women), the difference between the HDG and the PG in the primary outcome was -29.8 g/day (P = 0.031, Cohen's d = -0.51). The high and low doses were well-tolerated with a similar safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: A randomized controlled trial of treatment of severe alcohol use disorder with a cyproheptadine-prazosin combination for 3 months reduced drinking by more than 23 g per day compared with placebo. A higher dose combination was associated with a larger magnitude of drinking reduction than a lower dose combination while showing similar safety profile.

The cytotoxic effects of prazosin, chlorpromazine, and haloperidol on hepatocellular carcinoma and immortalized non-tumor liver cells.

Liver cancer annually accounts for over 800,000 cases and 700,000 deaths worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma is responsible for over 80% of liver cancer cases. Due to ineffective treatment options and limited surgical interventions, hepatocellular carcinoma is notoriously difficult to treat. Nonetheless, drugs utilized for other medical conditions, such as the antihypertensive medication prazosin, the neuroleptic medication chlorpromazine, and the neuroleptic medication haloperidol, have gained attention for their potential anti-cancer effects. Therefore, this study used these medications for investigating toxicity to hepatocellular carcinoma while testing the adverse effects on a noncancerous liver cell line model THLE-2. After treatment, an XTT cell viability assay, cell apoptosis assay, reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay, apoptotic proteome profile, and western blot were performed. We calculated IC50 values for chlorpromazine and prazosin to have a molar range of 35-65 µM. Our main findings suggest the capability of both of these treatments to reduce cell viability and generate oxidative stress in HepG2 and THLE-2 cells (p value < 0.05). Haloperidol, however, failed to demonstrate any reduction in cell viability revealing no antitumor effect up to 100 µM. Based on our findings, a mechanism of cell death was not able to be established due to lack of cleaved caspase-3 expression. Capable of bypassing many aspects of the lengthy, costly, and difficult cancer drug approval process, chlorpromazine and prazosin deserve further investigation for use in conjunction with traditional chemotherapeutics.

Trauma Exposure in Migrant Children: Impact on Sleep and Acute Treatment Interventions.

Trauma exposure significantly impacts sleep in children. Nightmares are common. Evidence-based therapies are superior to medications but may not always be available in acute settings. No FDA-approved medications exist for the treatment of trauma-related sleep disturbances in youth. The evidence-base for the use of medications is largely based on case reports, retrospective chart reviews, clinical opinion, and adult studies. This evidence is reviewed for a number of medications, including prazosin, trazodone, alpha-2 agonists, quetiapine, and others.

Terazosin produces an antidepressant-like effect in mice exposed to chronic unpredictable mild stress behavioral alteration.

Terazosin is an α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist that can relax smooth muscle and is prescribed to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia and, rarely, hypertension. The present study investigated the antidepressant-like actions of terazosin (TZ) in mice. They were first subjected to chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) and then the effects of TZ were assessed using the forced swimming test (FST) and tail suspension test (TST), sucrose preference test (SPT), actophotometer test (APT). The changes in the PGK1 levels, neurotransmitters, and proinflammatory cytokines levels after chronic stress and TZ treatment were examined. It was found that TZ exhibited an antidepressant-like effect in the FST, TST, SPT, and APT. It was effective in the CUMS model of depression. It was also found that TZ treatment reduced the levels of proinflammatory cytokines and elevated the neurotransmitter levels in mice. Results of this study suggest that TZ has antidepressant-like actions in mice models of CUMS induced depression.

A case of prazosin in treatment of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder.

Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is characterized by dream-enactment behaviors that emerge during a loss of REM sleep atonia. Untreated RBD carries risks for physical injury from falls or other traumatic events during dream enactment as well as risk of injury to the bed partner. Currently, melatonin and clonazepam are the mainstay pharmacological therapies for RBD. However, therapeutic response to these medications is variable. While older adults are most vulnerable to RBD, they are also particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of benzodiazepines, including increased risk of falls, cognitive impairment, and increased risk of Alzheimer disease. Prazosin is a centrally active alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist often prescribed for trauma nightmares characterized by REM sleep without atonia in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. We report a case of successful RBD management with prazosin in a patient in whom high-dose melatonin was ineffective. Although there was no observable reduction in dream-enactment behaviors with high-dose melatonin, the possibility of a synergistic effect of prazosin combined with melatonin cannot be ruled out. This case report supports further evaluation of prazosin as a potential therapeutic for RBD. CITATION: Cho Y, Iliff JJ, Lim MM, Raskind M, Peskind E. A case of prazosin in treatment of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(2):319-321.

A non-randomized pilot trial of the use of prazosin in the prevention of transition from acute stress disorder to post-traumatic stress disorder.

BACKGROUND: Following a traumatic event, 40-80% of the patients with acute stress disorder (ASD) will develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 67% at 6 months. Alpha1-blockers are effective in treating some symptoms of PTSD but their usefulness in acute stress situations remains unclear. We hypothesized that reducing noradrenergic hyperactivity with an alpha1-blocker during the acute phase after a traumatic event could prevent the transition to PTSD in patients with ASD. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of a 1-month course of alpha1-blocker (prazosin) to prevent the transition to PTSD in patients with ASD at 6 months. METHOD: In a monocentric open-label prospective pilot study, 15 patients with ASD were included within 3-7 days of exposure to a traumatic event. After enrolment, they received prazosin LP at home at bedtime at 2.5 mg/day for 7 days and then 5 mg/day for 21 days. Incidence of PTSD was assessed at 6 months using the Clinician Administrated PTSD Scale (CAPS). RESULTS: At 6 months, 22% of patients who completed the study (2/9) met the diagnostic criteria for PTSD. This rate was significantly lower than that observed in previous studies (67%; p = .047). The treatment was well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings indicating the safety of prazosin and suggesting its potential to prevent the development of PTSD in ASD require to be replicated in large-scale randomized placebo-controlled studies.Trial registration: The study was pre-registered on a public database (www.clinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03045016).

Alpha1-blockers are safe and well tolerated in patients with acute stress disorder.The use of alpha1-blockers 3­7 days after traumatic exposure is worthy of study.Alpha1-blockers could prevent the transition to PTSD in ASD patients at 6 months.

Randomized controlled pilot trial of prazosin for prophylaxis of posttraumatic headaches in active-duty service members and veterans.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of prazosin for prophylaxis of headaches following mild traumatic brain injury in active-duty service members and military veterans. BACKGROUND: Prazosin is an alpha-1 adrenoreceptor antagonist that reduces noradrenergic signaling. An open-label trial in which prazosin reduced headache frequency in veterans following mild traumatic brain injury provided the rationale for this pilot study. METHODS: A 22-week parallel-group randomized controlled trial  which included 48 military veterans and active-duty service members with mild traumatic brain injury-related headaches was performed. The study design was based on International Headache Society consensus guidelines for randomized controlled trials for chronic migraine. Following a pre-treatment baseline phase, participants with at least eight qualifying headache days per 4 weeks were randomized 2:1 to prazosin or placebo. After a 5-week titration to a maximum possible dose of 5 mg (morning) and 20 mg (evening), participants were maintained on the achieved dose for 12 weeks. Outcome measures were evaluated in 4-week blocks during the maintenance dose phase. The primary outcome measure was change in 4-week frequency of qualifying headache days. Secondary outcome measures were percent participants achieving at least 50% reduction in qualifying headache days and change in Headache Impact Test-6 scores. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis of randomized study participants (prazosin N = 32; placebo N = 16) demonstrated greater benefit over time in the prazosin group for all three outcome measures. In prazosin versus placebo participants, reductions from baseline to the final rating period for 4-week headache frequency were -11.9 ± 1.0 (mean ± standard error) versus -6.7 ± 1.5, a prazosin minus placebo difference of -5.2 (-8.8, -1.6 [95% confidence interval]), p = 0.005 and for Headache Impact Test-6 scores were -6.0 ± 1.3 versus +0.6 ± 1.8, a difference of -6.6 (-11.0, -2.2), p = 0.004. The mean predicted percent of participants at 12 weeks with ≥50% reduction in headache days/4 weeks, baseline to final rating, was 70 ± 8% for prazosin (21/30) versus 29 ± 12% for placebo (4/14), odds ratio 5.8 (1.44, 23.6), p = 0.013. The trial completion rate of 94% in the prazosin group (30/32) and 88% in the placebo group (14/16) indicated that prazosin was generally well tolerated at the administered dose regimen. Morning drowsiness/lethargy was the only adverse effect that differed significantly between groups, affecting 69% of the prazosin group (22/32) versus 19% of the placebo group (3/16), p = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study provides a clinically meaningful efficacy signal for prazosin prophylaxis of posttraumatic headaches. A larger randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm and extend these promising results.

Psychosocial treatments for nightmares in adults and children: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: As nightmares may be a risk factor for, or symptom of, multiple psychological disorders, some researchers suggest that nightmares should be screened, diagnosed, and treated. Treatments for nightmares include trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Image Rehearsal Therapy, and pharmacological interventions such as prazosin and nitrazepam. As recent research has put into question our current understanding of treatment efficacy, there is a need to systematically review findings related to the effectiveness of nightmare treatments to inform best practice. The current review assessed the efficacy of psychosocial treatments of nightmare in all cohorts. METHODS: A systematic search of four databases for peer reviewed journal articles from 2000 onwards produced 69 (35 RCTs, 34 non-RCTs) eligible articles that underwent narrative synthesis. RESULTS: The results provide strong evidence for exposure and image rehearsal treatments for the reduction of nightmare frequency, severity, and distress, in civilian, military, idiopathic, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) cohorts. There is emerging evidence that self-guided and brief treatment modalities offer efficient and effective treatment options. There is an urgent need for clinical trials of treatment effectiveness in children. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that treatments for nightmares are most effective when they facilitate a sense of control or mastery by directly targeting the nightmare content and/or the client's emotional responses to the nightmare content. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020204861).

A randomized controlled clinical trial of prazosin for alcohol use disorder in active duty soldiers: Predictive effects of elevated cardiovascular parameters.

BACKGROUND: Excessive noradrenergic signaling contributes to aversive symptoms of alcohol withdrawal that interfere with abstinence or reductions in harmful use. METHODS: To address this aspect of alcohol use disorder, 102 active-duty soldiers participating in command-mandated Army outpatient alcohol treatment were randomized to also receive the brain-penetrant alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist prazosin or placebo for 13 weeks. Primary outcomes were scores on the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS), standard drink units (SDUs) per day averaged over each week, % days of any drinking per week, and % days of heavy drinking per week. RESULTS: PACS declines did not differ significantly between the prazosin and placebo groups in the overall sample. In the subgroup with comorbid PTSD (n = 48), PACS declines were significantly greater in the prazosin than in the placebo condition (p < 0.05). Baseline alcohol consumption was markedly reduced by the pre-randomization outpatient alcohol treatment program, but the addition of prazosin treatment produced a greater slope of decline in SDUs per day compared to placebo (p = 0.01). Preplanned subgroup analyses were performed in soldiers with elevated baseline cardiovascular measures consistent with increased noradrenergic signaling. In soldiers with elevated standing heart rate (n = 15), prazosin reduced SDUs per day (p = 0.01), % days drinking (p = 0.03), and % days heavy drinking (p = 0.001) relative to placebo. In soldiers with elevated standing systolic blood pressure (n = 27), prazosin reduced SDUs per day (p = 0.04) and tended to reduce % days drinking (p = 0.056). Prazosin also reduced depressive symptoms and the incidence of emergent depressed mood more than placebo (p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively). During the final 4 weeks of prazosin vs. placebo treatment that followed completion of Army outpatient AUD treatment, alcohol consumption in soldiers with elevated baseline cardiovascular measures increased in those receiving placebo but remained suppressed in those receiving prazosin. CONCLUSIONS: These results extend reports that higher pretreatment cardiovascular measures predict beneficial effects of prazosin, which may be useful for relapse prevention in patients with AUD.

Prazosin for nightmares in serious illness.

Nightmares can be a distressing symptom in patients living with serious illness. Prazosin, a selective alpha-1 adrenergic antagonist, has been suggested to treat nightmares, with most data supporting its use in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We present the case of a 60-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer who experienced healthcare-associated nightmares following hospitalisation. She did not meet diagnostic criteria for PTSD. Atypical antipsychotics and benzodiazepines were ineffective in controlling her nightmares, resulting in referral to our outpatient palliative medicine clinic. Prazosin was initiated alongside interdisciplinary psychosocial support, resulting in rapid resolution of her nightmares. To our knowledge, this is the first case to report on use of prazosin to manage nightmares in the outpatient palliative medicine setting.

An evidence-based approach to psychopharmacology for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) - 2022 update.

Algorithms for posttraumatic stress disorder were published by this team in 1999 and 2011. Developments since then warrant revision. New studies and review articles from January 2011 to November 2021 were identified via PubMed and analyzed for evidence supporting changes. Following consideration of variations required by special patient populations, treatment of sleep impairments remains as the first recommended step. Nightmares and non-nightmare disturbed awakenings are best addressed with the anti-adrenergic agent prazosin, with doxazosin and clonidine as alternatives. First choices for difficulty initiating sleep include hydroxyzine and trazodone. If significant non-sleep PTSD symptoms remain, an SSRI should be tried, followed by a second SSRI or venlafaxine as a third step. Second generation antipsychotics can be considered, particularly for SSRI augmentation when PTSD-associated psychotic symptoms are present, with the caveat that positive evidence is limited and side effects are considerable. Anti-adrenergic agents can also be considered for general PTSD symptoms if not already tried, though evidence for daytime use lags that available for sleep. Regarding other pharmacological and procedural options, e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation, cannabinoids, ketamine, psychedelics, and stellate ganglion block, evidence does not yet support firm inclusion in the algorithm. An interactive version of this work can be found at www.psychopharm.mobi.

Prazosin improves neurogenic acute heart failure through downregulation of fibroblast growth factor 23 in rat hearts.

Bilateral nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS) lesions, possibly caused by enterovirus 71 infection, cause severe neurogenic hypertension, leading to acute heart failure (HF), pulmonary edema, and death within hours. Alpha-adrenergic blockers attenuate blood pressure and ameliorate HF and pulmonary edema, thereby prolonging survival time. However, the molecular mechanisms of these blockers are not clear. In this study, we investigated these mechanisms in a rat model of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced HF. Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with prazosin 10 min after the microinjection of 6-OHDA into the NTS. Immunohistochemistry and dihydroethidium (DHE) staining were used for analysis. In the cardiac tissue of 6-OHDA-induced HF, in situ expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23), and FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1) increased, but in situ expression of Vitamin D receptor (VDR) decreased. DHE staining revealed several heart cells with high reactive oxygen species production. Prazosin treatment decreased TNF-α, FGF23, and FGFR1 expression in the heart of rats with 6-OHDA-induced HF. It also prevented cardiomyopathy caused by 6-OHDA-induced bilateral NTS lesions by inhibiting the FGF23-FGFR1 pathway and downregulating TNF-α expression. In situ, FGF23, FGFR1, VDR, superoxide, and TNF-α in the heart were found to be involved in acute HF in our rat model of 6-OHDA-induced bilateral NTS lesions. These findings are potentially useful for treating fatal enterovirus 71 infection-induced NTS lesions and HF.

Identification of Prazosin as a Potential Flagellum Attachment Zone 1(FAZ1) Inhibitor for the Treatment of Human African Trypanosomiasis.

Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) remains a health threat to sub-Saharan Africa. The current treatments suffer from drug resistance and life-threatening side effects, making drug discovery for HAT still important. A high-throughput screening of the library of pharmaceutically active compounds identified prazosin, an α-adrenoceptor antagonist, that showed selective activity toward Trypanosoma brucei brucei. Furthermore, a series of prazosin analogues were examined, and overall, the new analogues had improved activity and selectivity. To elucidate the binding partner, a biotin-conjugated probe was synthesized, and a protein pulldown assay combined with a proteomic analysis identified the flagellum attachment zone 1 (FAZ1) filament as an interacting partner. Additionally, prazosin treatment resulted in dysfunction of the flagellum of trypanosome cells, which is indicative of a FAZ1 irregularity. We also examined the drug distribution by utilizing immunofluorescence with a designed fluorescent analogue that showed partial colocalization with FAZ1. With the activity of the prazosin analogues, a structure-activity relationship (SAR) was summarized for future lead optimization. Our findings provide a new group of FAZ1 inhibitors as novel antitrypanosomal agents.

Pharmacological Management of Nightmares Associated with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can be a chronic and disabling condition. Post-traumatic nightmares (PTNs) form a core component of PTSD and are highly prevalent in this patient population. Nightmares in PTSD have been associated with significant distress, functional impairment, poor health outcomes, and decreased quality of life. Nightmares in PTSD are also an independent risk factor for suicide. Nightmare cessation can lead to improved quality of life, fewer hospital admissions, lower healthcare costs, and reduced all-cause mortality. Effective treatment of nightmares is critical and often leads to improvement of other PTSD symptomatology. However, approved pharmacological agents for the treatment of PTSD have modest effects on sleep and nightmares, and may cause adverse effects. No pharmacological agent has been approved specifically for the treatment of PTNs, but multiple agents have been studied. This current narrative review aimed to critically appraise proven as well as novel pharmacological agents used in the treatment of PTNs. Evidence of varying quality exists for the use of prazosin, doxazosin, clonidine, tricyclic antidepressants, trazodone, mirtazapine, atypical antipsychotics (especially risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine), gabapentin, topiramate, and cyproheptadine. Evidence does not support the use of venlafaxine, ß-blockers, benzodiazepines, or sedative hypnotics. Novel agents such as ramelteon, cannabinoids, ketamine, psychedelic agents, and trihexyphenidyl have shown promising results. Large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to evaluate the use of these novel agents. Future research directions are identified to optimize the treatment of nightmares in patients with PTSD.

Efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapeutic and pharmacological interventions for trauma-related nightmares: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

This network meta-analysis compares the efficacy and acceptability of all published psychotherapeutic and pharmacological interventions for trauma-related nightmares (TRN) in adults. The analysis included data from 29 randomized clinical trials involving 14 psychotherapeutic and pharmacological interventions and involved 2214 trauma survivors. Prazosin and image rehearsal therapy (IRT) were found to be the two effective interventions for TRN. Other interventions such as risperidone, paroxetine, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), CBT-I+IRT, prolonged exposure (PE), and IRT+PE, did not show significantly greater efficacy compared with control conditions. The rates of all-cause discontinuations were comparable among majority of the interventions and did not show significant differences compared with control conditions. Prazosin and IRT should be considered as the initial choice of pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions for TRN. The efficacy of other pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions remains to be demonstrated. Future guidelines and daily clinical decision making on the choice of interventions for TRN should consider these findings.