Role of transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype 2 in lower oesophageal sphincter in rat acid reflux oesophagitis.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal disorder. In the present study, we investigated TRP vanilloid subfamily member 2 (TRPV2) expression in lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) and its involvement in acid reflux oesophagitis in rats. Expression of TRPV2 and nerve growth factor mRNAs was significantly enhanced in LES of rats with reflux oesophagitis compared with normal rats. TRPV2 was mainly expressed in inhibitory motor neurons, and partly in intrinsic and extrinsic primary afferent neurons, and macrophages in LES of normal and reflux oesophagitis rats. Number of TRPV2-immunopositive nerve fibres was significantly increased, but that of nNOS-, CGRP-, and PGP9.5-nerve fibres was not changed in reflux oesophagitis compared with normal group. Probenecid produced nitric oxide production and relaxation in LES and this response was significantly enhanced in oesophagitis compared with normal group. Probenecid-induced relaxant effect was blocked by a TRPV2 inhibitor, tranilast, and a NOS inhibitor, NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester, in reflux oesophagitis rats. Oral administration of tranilast significantly improved body weight loss, oesophageal lesions, and epithelial thickness in oesophagitis model. These results suggest that up-regulation of TRPV2 in inhibitory motor neurons is involved in LES relaxation in oesophagitis model. TRPV2 inhibition might be beneficial for treatment of GERD.

Towards quantitation of the effects of renal impairment and probenecid inhibition on kidney uptake and efflux transporters, using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling and simulations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The kidney is a major drug-eliminating organ. Renal impairment or concomitant use of transporter inhibitors may decrease active secretion and increase exposure to a drug that is a substrate of kidney secretory transporters. However, prediction of the effects of patient factors on kidney transporters remains challenging because of the multiplicity of transporters and the lack of understanding of their abundance and specificity. The objective of this study was to use physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling to evaluate the effects of patient factors on kidney transporters. METHODS: Models for three renally cleared drugs (oseltamivir carboxylate, cidofovir and cefuroxime) were developed using a general PBPK platform, with the contributions of net basolateral uptake transport (T up,b) and apical efflux transport (T eff,a) being specifically defined. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the practical use of PBPK models to: (1) define transporter-mediated renal secretion, using plasma and urine data; (2) inform a change in the system-dependent parameter (≥10-fold reduction in the functional 'proximal tubule cells per gram kidney') in severe renal impairment that is responsible for the decreased secretory transport activities of test drugs; (3) derive an in vivo, plasma unbound inhibition constant of T up,b by probenecid (≤1 µM), based on observed drug interaction data; and (4) suggest a plausible mechanism of probenecid preferentially inhibiting T up,b in order to alleviate cidofovir-induced nephrotoxicity.

Pannexin1 drives multicellular aggregate compaction via a signaling cascade that remodels the actin cytoskeleton.

Pannexin 1 (Panx1) is a novel gap junction protein shown to have tumor-suppressive properties. To model its in vivo role in the intratumor biomechanical environment, we investigated whether Panx1 channels modulate the dynamic assembly of multicellular C6 glioma aggregates. Treatment with carbenoxolone and probenecid, which directly and specifically block Panx1 channels, respectively, showed that Panx1 is involved in accelerating aggregate assembly. Experiments further showed that exogenous ATP can reverse the inhibitive effects of carbenoxolone and that aggregate compaction is sensitive to the purinergic antagonist suramin. With a close examination of the F-actin microfilament network, these findings show that Panx1 channels act as conduits for ATP release that stimulate the P(2)X(7) purinergic receptor pathway, in turn up-regulating actomyosin function. Using a unique three-dimensional scaffold-free method to quantify multicellular interactions, this study shows that Panx1 is intimately involved in regulating intercellular biomechanical interactions pivotal in the progression of cancer.

Influence of multidrug resistance (MDR) proteins at the blood-brain barrier on the transport and brain distribution of enaminone anticonvulsants.

Previous in vitro studies evaluating the permeability of enaminones suggested that their blood-brain barrier (BBB) transport might be influenced by the presence of an efflux mechanism. Therefore, transport mechanisms responsible for these anticonvulsants across the BBB were examined. The transport of enaminones (1 x 10(-4) M) were evaluated over 120 min with verapamil (50 microM) and probenecid (100 microM) using bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells (BBMECs) to assess the role of multidrug resistant (MDR) transport proteins [i.e., P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and MDR protein 1 (MRP1)] on efflux, respectively. Uptake studies in the presence and absence of rhodamine 123 (R123; 3.2 and 5.0 microM) were also performed in a Pgp overexpressing cell line, MCF-7/Adr. Select enaminone esters (12.5 mg/kg) were administered intravenously to mdr 1 a/b (+/+), mdr 1 a/b (-/-) knockout and probenecid pretreated mice (20 +/- 5g). Enaminones and R123 were assayed with validated ultraviolet and fluorescence high-performance liquid chromatography methods, respectively. Verapamil and probenecid significantly ( p>0.05) inhibited the transport of select enaminone esters across BBMECs. Two enaminones caused a statistically significant increase in the uptake of R123 in MCF-7/Adr cells. Concentrations of select enaminones in mdr 1 a/b (-/-) mice brains were significantly higher ( p<0.05) compared with those in mdr 1 a/b (+/+) mice brains; however, no differences were observed in probenecid pretreated animals. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that Pgp may influence enaminone transport at the BBB and hence affect epilepsy treatment with these agents.

Assessment of active transport of HIV protease inhibitors in various cell lines and the in vitro blood--brain barrier.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the involvement of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) on the active transport of the HIV protease inhibitors amprenavir, ritonavir and indinavir. METHODS: The transport behaviour of ritonavir, indinavir and amprenavir in the presence and absence of Pgp modulators and probenecid was investigated in an in vitro blood--brain barrier (BBB) co-culture model and in monolayers of LLC-PK1, LLC-PK1:MDR1, LLC-PK1:MRP1 and Caco-2 cells. RESULTS: All three HIV protease inhibitors showed polarized transport in the BBB model, LLC-PK1:MDR1 and Caco-2 cell line. The Pgp modulators SDZ-PSC 833, verapamil and LY 335979 inhibited polarized transport, although their potency was dependent on both the cell model and the HIV protease inhibitor used. Ritonavir and indinavir also showed polarized transport in the LLC-PK1 and LLC-PK1:MRP1 cell line, which could be inhibited by probenecid. HIV protease inhibitors were not able to inhibit competitively polarized transport of other HIV protease inhibitors in the LLC-PK1:MDR1 cell line. CONCLUSIONS: Amprenavir, ritonavir and indinavir are mainly actively transported by Pgp, while MRP also plays a role in the transport of ritonavir and indinavir. This indicates that inhibition of Pgp could be useful therapeutically to increase HIV protease inhibitor concentrations in the brain and in other tissues and cells expressing Pgp. The HIV protease inhibitors were not able to inhibit Pgp-mediated efflux when given simultaneously, suggesting that simultaneous administration of these drugs will not increase the concentration of antiretroviral drugs in the brain.

AZT: farmacologia, benefícios e aplicaçÆes clínicas / AZT: pharmacology, general considerations and clinical effects

Este trabalho consiste numa revisåo dos principais tópicos referentes ao uso do AZT, como histórico, consideraçÆes gerais, mecanismo de açåo, farmacocinética, uso terapêutico e efeitos clínicos, reaçÆes adversas e interaçÆes medicamentosas. Pretender uma introduçåo para a descriçåo de nossa experiência com a droga, através de dois grupos de pacientes, 40 no total, a ser publicada num futuro próximo

Origins of the uricosuric response.

The acute effects of intravenous (i.v.) probenecid and chlorothiazide on renal urate handling were investigated in paired studies in normal men. Uricosuric responses to these agents were compared in the same subjects, both without and with pyrazinamide (PZA) pretreatment. Assuming that PZA selectively inhibits the tubular secretion of urate and that uricosuric agents act by increasing the excretion of filtered urate, then the uricosuric responses (the increment in urate excretion or clearance) should have been unaffected by PZA. Defined in this manner, however, uricosuric responses to probenecid and chlorothiazide were significantly decreased after PZA pretreatment. In order to determine whether PZA diminished other renal actions of chlorothiazide, changes in sodium and inorganic phosphorus excretion were examined. Chlorothiazide produced equivalent natriuretic and phosphaturic responses after PZA pretreatment, indicating that PZA does not interfere with at least some of the renal actions of chlorothiazide. In separate studies, PZA depressed urate excretion by at least 68% during the maintenance of chlorothiazide-induced natriuresis and phosphaturia, suggesting that chlorothiazide does not diminish the anti-secretory action of PZA. The results suggest that probenecid and chlorothiazide may derive their uricosuric properties by facilitating the excretion of both filtered and secreted urate. Possibly, increased excretion of secreted urate might occur through modulation of urate reabsorption at a site distal to tubular secretion, rather than by the direct acceleration of secretory transport. However, PZA-induced interference with the actions of probenecid and chlorothiazide on renal urate transport mechanisms cannot be excluded as a possible explanation for the present results.

Evidence for a postsecretory reabsorptive site for uric acid in man.

The effects of administration of drug combinations on uric acid excretion were studied in order to test the hypothesis that a portion of renal tubular reabsorption of uric acid occurs distal to the uric acid secretory site. Oral administration of pyrazinamide (3 g) during probenecid uricosuria (probenecid 500 mg every 6 h) decreased urate excretion from 463 mug/min following probenecid medication alone to 135 mug/min following probenecid plus pyrazinamide (P < 0.01). When a greater uricosuric effect was induced with a 2 g oral dose of probenecid, the decrement in urate excretion which followed pyrazinamide administration (3 g) was more pronounced (2,528 mug/min following probenecid alone, 574 mug/min following probenecid plus pyrazinamide). Results were similar when an 800 mg oral dose of sulfinpyrazone was given in place of probenecid (1,885 mug/min following sulfinpyrazone alone, 475 mug/min following sulfinpyrazone plus pyrazinamide). Thus, apparent urate secretion (measured as the decrease in excretion of urinary uric acid resulting from pyrazinamide administration) appeared to vary, depending upon the degree of inhibition of reabsorption produced by probenecid or sulfinpyrazone. When small doses of aspirin were administered in place of pyrazinamide to produce secretory inhibition, the results were similar. Neither probenecid nor pyrazinamide significantly altered urate excretion when administered to patients with serum salicylate levels above 14 mg/100 ml. These results are interpreted as suggesting that renal tubular reabsorption of uric acid occurs at least in part at a postsecretory site and that a portion of secreted urate is reabsorbed. During maximum probenecid- or sulfinpyrazone-induced uricosuria, inhibition of urate secretion with either pyrazinamide or low doses of aspirin resulted in a decrease in uric acid excretion which exceeded total urinary uric acid during control periods by two- to fourfold. This suggests that renal tubular secretion of urate may greatly exceed uric acid excretion and that a large fraction of secreted urate is reabsorbed. The pyrazinamide suppression test underestimates urate secretion. Uricosuria induced by some drugs, including probenecid, sulfinpyrazone, and iodinated radioopaque dyes, appears to represent, at least in part, inhibition of postsecretory urate reabsorption.