Evaluation of Surgical Treatment of Oroantral Fistulae in Smokers Versus Non-Smokers.

Background and Objectives: Smoking has been found to interfere with wound healing processes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare surgical treatment of oroantral fistulae (OAFs) in smokers and non-smokers. Materials and Methods: Medical records of all consecutive patients who underwent surgical closure of OAFs between 2003 and 2016 at the oral and maxillofacial surgery department, Rabin Medical Center, Israel were reviewed. Patients' demographic data, preoperative signs and symptoms, surgical method of repair, and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: The cohort consisted of 38 smokers and 59 non-smokers. Age and gender distributions were similar in both groups. The main etiology in both groups was tooth extraction, followed by pre-prosthetic surgery in smokers and odontogenic infection in non-smokers (p = 0.02). Preoperative conditions were not significantly different between smokers and non-smokers in terms of size of soft tissue fistula and bony defect, chronic sinusitis and foreign bodies inside the sinus. OAFs were repaired by local soft tissue flaps without consideration of smoking status. Smokers experienced more moderate-severe postoperative pain (p = 0.05) and requested more weak opioids (p = 0.06). Postoperative complications included infection, delayed wound healing, residual OAF, pain, sensory disturbances and sino nasal symptoms. These were mostly minor and tended to be more frequent in smokers (p = 0.35). Successful closure of OAFs was obtained in all patients except one smoker who required revision surgery. Conclusions: Smokers may be more susceptible to OAFs secondary to preprosthetic surgery. In this cohort, there was no statistically significant difference in outcome between smokers and non-smokers in terms of failure. However, smokers tended to have more severe postoperative pain and discomfort and to experience more postoperative complications. Further studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted to validate these results.

The mini dental implant in fixed and removable prosthetics: a review.

Dental implant treatment can restore oral function to edentulous patients. Recently, mini implants have been shown to be successful in minimally invasive treatment. There are initial reports of mini implants retaining removable prostheses and supporting fixed partial and complete dentures. This article reviews the treatment of edentulous patients with prostheses and mini implants and offers guidelines for successful outcomes.

[Implant-retained overdentures compared with complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. Satisfaction and subjective chewing capabilities]. / Overkappingsprothese op implantaten versus volledige prothese zonder en met mondbodemvestibulumplastiek. Tevredenheid en subjectief kauwvermogen.

The aim of this prospective randomized clinical trial was to evaluate and compare a set of clinical items and satisfaction of a group of edentulous patients during a 5-year follow-up. They were treated according to one of the following modalities: 61 patients with a mandibular overdenture on two implants (IMP-group), 60 patients with a conventional complete denture (VP-group) and 28 patients with a complete denture after preprosthetic surgery (MVP-group). It can be concluded that endosseous implants, serving as retention for a mandibular overdenture, have a high survival rate after 5 years of follow-up (93%). The mean satisfaction score of the VP-group was lower than of the IMP-group. The mean satisfaction score of the MVP-group is lower than of the IMP-group.

Importance of bone graft quality for implant integration after maxillary sinus reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether bone quality, as assessed by osteometry and histologic parameters, can be used to predict implant integration in conjunction with maxillary sinus reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Twelve patients with severely atrophied maxillary alveolar processes were treated through use of a two-stage surgical reconstructive strategy with implant placement 4 months after bone grafting. Bone biopsy specimens taken from the iliac crest peroperatively and from the sinus inlay sites 1, 2, 4, 6, or 12 months postoperatively were analyzed by light microscopy and osteomorphometry. Bone mineral content was measured by osteometry. RESULTS: Osteometric and osteomorphometric data (trabecular bone volume [%], assessment of chromatin staining, and an osteocyte index) registered for the biopsy specimens were not statistically correlated with implant failure. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic evaluation of implant survival is difficult. The tested methods did not contribute to the improvement of guidelines for the clinical handling of these patients.

Criterios clínicos y radiográficos para la toma de decisiones en el tratamiento quirúrgico de la atrofia alveolar mandibular / Clinical and radiographic criteria for decision making for surgical treatment of mandibular alveolar atrophy

La pérdida de hueso ocurre después de la extracción de los dientes (atrofia alveolar), es un problema que con frecuencia general la necesidad de procedimientos quirúrgicos preprotésicos para poder asegurar éxito en la rehabilitación protésica. El sindrome de atrofia alveolar (SAAM), es más severo y frecuente en la mandíbula que en el maxilar. En este artículo se exponen los criterios (clínicos, radiográficos y generales) empleados para la toma de deciciones quirúrgicas en el tratamiento de pacientes con atrofia alveolar mandibular