Perioperative and functional outcomes of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: evidence-based on controlled studies.

To compare perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) using a single-port (SP) or multi-port (MP) robotic platform. We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases until June 2024. For a combined analysis of the data using random effects, Review Manager 5.4 was employed. To compare continuous and categorical variables, the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) were employed, respectively. Three original studies were included, comprising a total of 170 patients (SP-RARC: 73 versus MP-RARC: 93).Recovery of bowel function was faster in SP-RARC (WMD -1.02 days, 95% CI - 1.33 to - 0.17; p < 0.001), and lymph-node yield was lower than in MP-RARC patients (WMD - 6.32, 95% CI - 8.90 to - 3.75; p < 0.00001).There were no significant differences between the SP-RARC and MP-RARC groups in terms of other perioperative outcomes such as surgery duration, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, major complication rate, positive surgical margin rate, readmission rate, and recurrence rate. The SP robot offers a safe alternative surgical approach to RARC, providing similar postoperative outcomes compared to the MP robot. The SP system remains an attractive option that will require longer follow-up and cohort validation in the future.

A comprehensive evaluation and meta-analysis of the perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy using the DaVinci vs the Hugo RAS surgical platforms.

Because of the increasing popularity of Hugo RAS as a surgical platform, a comparison examination of intraoperative and oncological outcomes across DaVinci and Hugo RAS robotic surgery platforms is urgently needed. We carried out a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the literature of current research, comprehensively searching PubMed, Cochrane and Embase for eligible studies comparing the results between the DaVinci and Hugo RAS. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria were followed in the conduct of this study, with language restricted to English and a final search date of June 2024. We excluded articles composed solely of conference abstracts and irrelevant content. Composite outcomes were assessed using weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratios (ORs). The risk of bias in individual research was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and heterogeneity and bias risk were controlled for using a sensitivity analysis. Six studies in all were considered, comprising 1025 patients, including 626 DaVinci patients and 399 Hugo RAS patients. Review Manager V5.4.1 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was utilized to conduct the meta-analysis, including 6 trials, which demonstrated that compared to Hugo RAS, DaVinci was associated with statistically significant differences in several outcomes: a reduction in operative time (OT) (WMD - 8.46, 95% CI - 13.56 to 3.36; p = 0.001), an increase in estimated blood loss (EBL) (WMD 41.68, 95% CI 23.59 to 59.77; p < 0.00001), and an increased pelvic lymphadenectomy ratio (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.05-2.05; p = 0.01). On the contrary, there were no statistically noteworthy differences in the length of hospital stay (LOS) between the two teams (WMD - 0.05, 95% CI - 0.14 to 0.04; p = 0.25), nerve sparing (unilateral or bilateral) (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.68-1.35; p = 0.8), postoperative complications (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.50-2.64; p = 0.75), or positive surgical margins (PSM) (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.76-1.54; p = 0.68). Although DaVinci offers shorter operating times (OT) and increased pelvic lymph node dissection rates, Hugo RAS demonstrates lower estimated blood loss (EBL). Overall, Hugo RAS Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) results seem to be similar to those obtained with the DaVinci system. Further research and long-term follow-up are necessary to ascertain durable oncological and functional outcomes, allowing doctors to switch between robotic systems and use their skills. These findings are crucial for patients, surgeons, and healthcare policymakers and warrant future studies with extended follow-up.

First report of surgery for congenital biliary dilatation using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System (with video).

Robot-assisted surgery for congenital biliary dilatation has been evolving primarily with the da Vinci® Surgical System. The hinotori™ Surgical Robot System, developed in Japan, received approval for gastroenterological surgery in 2022. We present the inaugural case of congenital biliary dilatation surgery utilizing the hinotori™ system. A 57-year-old woman was referred to our institution for evaluation and treatment of common bile duct dilatation classified under Todani Type Ia congenital biliary dilatation. Robotic resection of the extrahepatic bile duct and hepaticojejunostomy with Roux-en-Y were performed. The operation lasted 292 min with minimal blood loss (10 mL). The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged 10 days after surgery. Robotic surgery using the hinotori™ system for congenital biliary dilatation can be safely performed.

Hybrid-3D robotic suite in spine and trauma surgery - experiences in 210 patients.

BACKGROUND: In modern Hybrid ORs, the synergies of navigation and robotics are assumed to contribute to the optimisation of the treatment in trauma, orthopaedic and spine surgery. Despite promising evidence in the area of navigation and robotics, previous publications have not definitively proven the potential benefits. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the potential benefit and clinical outcome of patients treated in a fully equipped 3D-Navigation Hybrid OR. METHODS: Prospective data was collected (March 2022- March 2024) after implementation of a fully equipped 3D-Navigation Hybrid OR ("Robotic Suite") in the authors level 1 trauma centre. The OR includes a navigation unit, a cone beam CT (CBCT), a robotic arm and mixed reality glasses. Surgeries with different indications of the spine, the pelvis (pelvic ring and acetabulum) and the extremities were performed. Spinal and non-spinal screws were inserted. The collected data was analysed retrospectively. Pedicle screw accuracy was graded according to the Gertzbein and Robbins (GR) classification. RESULTS: A total of n = 210 patients (118 m:92f) were treated in our 3D-Navigation Hybrid OR, with 1171 screws inserted. Among these patients, 23 patients (11.0%) arrived at the hospital via the trauma room with an average Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 25.7. There were 1035 (88.4%) spinal screws inserted at an accuracy rate of 98.7% (CI95%: 98.1-99.4%; 911 GR-A & 111 GR-B screws). The number of non-spinal screws were 136 (11.6%) with an accuracy rate of 99.3% (CI95%: 97.8-100.0%; 135 correctly placed screws). This resulted in an overall accuracy rate of 98.8% (CI95%: 98.2-99.4%). The robotic arm was used in 152 cases (72.4%), minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was performed in 139 cases (66.2%) and wound infection occurred in 4 cases (1,9%). Overall, no revisions were needed. CONCLUSION: By extending the scope of application, this study showed that interventions in a fully equipped 3D-Navigation Hybrid OR can be successfully performed not only on the spine, but also on the pelvis and extremities. In trauma, orthopaedics and spinal surgery, navigation and robotics can be used to perform operations with a high degree of precision, increased safety, reduced radiation exposure for the OR-team and a very low complication rate.

Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy using the GelPoint Platform with a focus on optimizing the port position and specimen retrieval.

INTRODUCTION: One of the factors that makes robot-assisted nephroureterectomy difficult is that the optimal port position differs between nephrectomy and bladder cuff excision. In addition, how best to retrieve the specimen after resection while minimizing the size of the wound is a challenge in robot-assisted surgery. To solve these problems, we designed a surgical technique for robot-assisted nephroureterectomy using the GelPoint Platform with a focus on port position optimization and specimen retrieval. This study describes the surgical technique of GelPoint robot-assisted nephroureterectomy and reports our initial experience with this technique. METHODS: Between January 2023 and May 2024, seven patients underwent robot-assisted nephroureterectomy using the GelPoint Platform and 11 underwent conventional robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. We compared the patients' characteristics and surgical outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the conventional robot-assisted nephroureterectomy group, the median operative time tended to be shorter in the GelPoint robot-assisted nephroureterectomy group (280 vs. 357 min, respectively; p = .135). The maximum incision length tended to be longer in the GelPoint robot-assisted nephroureterectomy group (7.0 vs. 6.0 cm, respectively; p = .078). The incidence of 30-day complications was similar between the two groups (28.5% vs. 18.2%, respectively; p = 1.000). No complications were associated with the use of the GelPoint Platform. CONCLUSION: The surgical outcomes of GelPoint robot-assisted nephroureterectomy are comparable to those of conventional robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, and it can be performed safely and effectively. GelPoint robot-assisted nephroureterectomy can be considered a feasible alternative for selected patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Flexible endoscope manipulating robot using quad-roller friction mechanism.

A robotic system for manipulating a flexible endoscope in surgery can provide enhanced accuracy and usability compared to manual operation. However, previous studies require large-scale, complex hardware systems to implement the rotational and translational motions of the soft endoscope cable. The conventional control of the endoscope by actuating the endoscope handle also leads to undesired slack between the endoscope tip and the handle, which becomes more problematic with long endoscopes such as a colonoscope. This study proposes a compact quad-roller friction mechanism that enables rotational and translational motions triggered not from the endoscope handle but at the endoscope tip. Controlling two pairs of tilted rollers achieves both types of motion within a small space. The proposed system also introduces an unsynchronized motion strategy between the handle and tip parts to minimize the robot's motion near the patient by employing the slack positively as a control index. Experiments indicate that the proposed system achieves accurate rotational and translational motions, and the unsynchronized control method reduces the total translational motion by up to 88% compared to the previous method.

Robotic sentinel lymph node dissection experiences in endometrial cancer at our tertiary cancer treatment institution.

OBJECTIVE: In endometrial cancer surgery, sentinel lymph node dissection is used instead of staging surgery, particularly in advanced disease that is limited to the uterus. The aim of this study is to evaluate our practice of robotic sentinel lymph node dissection, which is applied to endometrial cancer patients in our tertiary cancer treatment center, according to the current literature, and to share our own data. METHODS: Included in our analysis are patients who underwent robotic sentinel lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer utilizing indocyanine green in our center between January 2018 and January 2024. RESULTS: In all, of the 93 endometrial carcinoma patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, 63 were classified as low-risk, while 30 were high-risk according to the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We found sentinel lymph nodes in both low-risk and high-risk patients, with an overall sensitivity of 96.32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.12-99.71), specificity of 100% (95%CI, 92.20-99.8), negative predictive value of 96.72% (95%CI, 87.03-99.89), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.06 (95%CI, 0.01-0.36). CONCLUSION: After evaluating our data retrospectively, we determined that we were compatible with the current literature.

IMRA/SRS Delphi consensus on international standards for common core components of robotic surgical training design.

Robotic surgery has expanded internationally at pace. There are multiple local robotic training pathways but there is inconsistency in standardisation of core common components for curricula internationally. A framework is required to define key objectives that can be implemented across robotic training ecosystems. This Delphi consensus aimed to provide recommendations for core considerations in robotic training design across diverse training environments internationally. A literature search was performed and an international steering committee (AG, KL, JW, HM, TC) proposed key components for contemporary robotic training design and a modified Delphi approach was used to gather stakeholder opinion. The outcomes were then discussed at a face-to-face international expert consensus at the IMRA educational session at the Society of Robotic Surgery (SRS) meeting and final voting was conducted on outstanding items. Stakeholders included robotic surgeons, proctors, trainees and robotic surgical training providers. There was consensus achieved in 139 statements organised into 15 themes. There was 100% agreement that standardised themes in robotic curricula may improve patient safety. Key take-home messages include-training curricula should be multiplatform, non-technical skills are an important component of a robotic curriculum as well as console and bedside skills, clinically relevant performance metrics should be used for assessment where available, the reliance on cadaveric and live animal models should be reduced as high-fidelity synthetic models emerge, and stepwise component training is useful for advanced procedural training. These consensus recommendations are intended to guide design of fit for purpose contemporary robotic surgical curricula. Integration of these components into robotic training pathways internationally is recommended.

Exploring the safety and efficacy of robotic neurosurgery in the management of intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) carries a high mortality rate of around 50% annually, with management traditionally involving medical and surgical approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare robotic neurosurgery with conventional treatments for ICH. We adhered to PRISMA guidelines, analyzing data from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to October 2023, including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and cohort studies. We evaluated outcomes such as operation time, drainage time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization, mortality, and complications. Of the 10 studies with 1187 participants (609 in robotic neurosurgery and 578 in conventional management), robotic neurosurgery was associated with significantly reduced operation times, drainage times, and hospitalization needs, though intraoperative blood loss and mortality rates showed no significant difference. Robotic neurosurgery also demonstrated a lower risk of rebleeding but similar safety profiles for other complications. Despite these advantages, significant heterogeneity and limited RCTs highlight the need for further research. Robotic neurosurgery appears beneficial in improving ICH management outcomes, warranting additional multicenter trials to confirm long-term efficacy and safety.

Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score matching studies.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of robot distal gastrectomy (RDG) versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) for gastric cancer. Studies included only those that utilized propensity score matching (PSM). A systematic literature search was conducted in several major global databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, up to June 2024. Articles were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Baseline data and primary and secondary outcome measures (e.g., operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph-node yield dissection, length of hospital stay, and time to first flatus) were extracted. The quality of PSM studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I, and data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.1 software. A total of 12 propensity score-matched studies involving 3688 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Robot-assisted surgery resulted in a longer operative time (WMD 30.64 min, 95% CI 15.63 - 45.66; p < 0.0001), less estimated blood loss (WMD 29.54 mL, 95% CI - 47.14 - 11.94; p = 0.001), more lymph-node yield (WMD 5.14, 95% CI 2.39 - 7.88; p = 0.0002), and a shorter hospital stay (WMD - 0.36, 95% CI - 0.60 - 0.12; p = 0.004) compared with laparoscopic surgery. There were no significant differences between the two surgical methods in terms of time to first flatus, overall complications, and major complications. Robot distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer reduces intraoperative blood loss, increases lymph-node yield, and shortens hospital stay compared with laparoscopic surgery, despite a longer operative time. There are no significant differences in time to first flatus and complication rates between the two groups.

AB028. Precision neurosurgery for brain tumors using robotic navigation under exoscope.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) exoscope and navigation systems have recently become remarkably advanced in neurosurgery. Robotic navigation is being used in various facilities. Based on the created surgical plan, robotic navigation automatically determines the path to guide the instrument. It seamlessly integrates with continuous real-time navigation and robotic alignment functions to improve the efficiency of intraoperative workflow and support highly accurate positioning. We have achieved good results in surgeries utilizing robotic navigation at our institution, and we report on the results and prospects. METHODS: At our hospital, 15 patients underwent surgery using Stealth AutoguideTM (Medtronic) in conjunction with the StealthStation S8 (Medtronic). The mean age was 56.2 years; 10 were men, and five were women. We used the exoscopic systems with KINEVO 900 (Zeiss) or ORBEYE (Olympus). RESULTS: The cases comprised of 11 gliomas, two primary central nervous system lymphomas, one germ cell tumor, and one brain abscess. Seven biopsies (six burr holes, one craniotomy) and six fence posts were used for Stealth AutoguideTM, tubing in two cases. Biopsies were performed quickly and reliably. In the cases where fence posts were used, it was possible to position the post quickly on the target and place it accurately in the planned area to determine the extent of removal. In addition, using the 3D exoscope system allowed the surgeon to simultaneously view the operating field and navigation screen without moving the surgeon's line of sight, making the operation safer. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery using robotic navigation was performed safely and efficiently, and highly accurate positioning was achieved regardless of the surgical technique. This system is expected to continue improving the accuracy, safety, and reproducibility of surgery and reducing the burden on the patient.

Design and Modelling of Continuum Robot for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Surgery With Lifting Force Estimation.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early-stage gastrointestinal cancers. However, traditional surgical instruments lack accuracy and force-sensing. METHODS: A new type of continuum robot for ESD is designed. An accurate static model of the proposed continuum robot is established, considering cases where the robot bends into C-shapes and S-shapes. A force estimation method based on an accurate static model is proposed. Then, the accuracy of the static model and force estimation is verified through experiments. Finally, an ex-organ experiment is carried out. RESULTS: The average position error of the proposed static model is 0.72 mm, accounting for 2.57% of the total robot length. The average error of force estimation is 19.53 mN. By gripping and cutting ex-porcine gastric mucosa, the robot's functionality is validated. CONCLUSION: This paper contributes to precise control and safe interaction of continuum robots.

Safety and feasibility of "three arms settings" robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Hugo RAS system: surgical set-up in a double-center large case series.

PURPOSE: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the most common robotic procedures performed in urologic oncology. The Hugo Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System (Medtronic, USA©) has recently been launched on the market and is characterized by the modularity of four different independent arm carts. The aim of this study is to describe and evaluate safety and feasibility of three-arms setting for RARP using the Hugo RAS™ System in a large case series. METHODS: Between October 2022 and December 2023, a large case series of patients from two tertiary referral center who underwent RARP through HUGO™ RAS were prospectively enrolled. Informed written consent was obtained before the procedure and a three-arms setting was used in every case. Follow-up was scheduled according to EAU guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were included in this study and underwent RARP with Hugo™ RAS System. Median Console time time was 114 min (IQR, 75-150), median docking time 4 min (IQR, 3-5). Lymphadenectomy was successfully performed when indicated in 19 patients (22.1%). A vesicourethral anastomosis using the modified Van Velthoven technique was successfully achieved in all cases. No post-operative complications > Clavien II up to 30 post-operative days were reported. In all patients, catheter was removed on the 7th postoperative day. CONCLUSION: We conducted the first large case series of RARP through the novel Hugo™ RAS System using a three-arms configuration. This innovative robotic platform showed an easily accessible docking system, providing excellent perioperative outcomes.

Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians: an analysis of the US nationwide inpatient sample 2005-2018.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant health concern, particularly among older adults. Outcomes between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries for right-sided colon cancers in the oldest old population have yet to be evaluated despite increased use of these surgeries. AIM: This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes after robot-assisted right hemicolectomy (RARH) versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) in octogenarian and nonagenarian patients. METHODS: This population-based, retrospective and observational study analyzed the data of adults ≥ 80 years old diagnosed with right-side colon cancer who received RARH or LRH. All data were extracted from the US National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database 2005-2018. Associations between type of surgery and in-hospital outcomes were determined using univariate and multivariable logistic regression and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Data of 7,550 patients (representing 37,126 hospitalized patients in the U.S.) were analyzed. Mean age of the study population was 84.8 years, 61.4% were females, and 79.1% were non-smokers. After adjusting for relevant confounders, regression analysis showed that patients undergoing RARH had a significantly shorter LOS (adjusted Beta (aBeta), -0.24, 95% CI: -0.32, -0.15) but greater total hospital costs (aBeta, 26.54, 95% CI: 24.64, 28.44) than patients undergoing LRH. No significant differences in mortality, perioperative complications, and risk of unfavorable discharge were observed between the two procedures (p > 0.05). Stratified analyses by frailty status revealed consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: RARH is associated with a significantly shorter LOS but higher total hospital costs than LRH among octogenarians and nonagenarians. Other short-term outcomes for this population are similar between the two procedures, including in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, and unfavorable discharge. These findings also apply to frail patients.

Comparison of postoperative pain in robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Gynecologic surgery with minimally invasive method using robotic or laparoscopic techniques has gained popularity for reducing perioperative discomfort and length of hospital stay. However, the debate over postoperative pain superiority between traditional laparoscopy and robotic surgery persist. This study compared the postoperative pain of patients within 24 h of robotic (RM) and laparoscopic myomectomy (LM). This retrospective cohort study included 24 and 53 patients who underwent RM and LM, respectively, between January 2019 and July 2023. The primary outcomes were the postoperative pain levels of patients within 24 h and the use and dosage of postoperative analgesia. Additional perioperative analgesia, including long-acting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Dynastat) and abdominal nerve block, was also recorded. The secondary outcomes were blood loss and hospitalization duration. The patient characteristics were similar between the groups. Factors that could potentially increase pain, such as the number of ports (p < 0.0001), additional procedures (p = 0.0195), operative time (p < 0.0001), number of myomas (p = 0.0057), and the largest myoma size (p = 0.0086), were significantly higher in the RM group than in the LM group. However, there were no significantly different in the postoperative visual analog scale pain scores, use and dosage of ketorolac and opioid, and use of Dynastat and nerve block between the groups. Hospitalization duration and intraoperative blood loss were similar between the groups. RM and LM offer comparable postoperative pain outcomes, emphasizing the importance of patient-specific factors in decision-making regarding myomectomy techniques.

[Radiographic measurements of acetabular component orientation with Widmer´s method in total hip arthroplasty. Descriptive case series]. / Mediciones radiográficas de la orientación del componente acetabular con el método de Widmer en la artroplastía total de cadera. Serie de casos descriptiva.

INTRODUCTION: total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most performed surgeries worldwide, with high satisfaction rates. The orientation of the acetabular component has a direct impact on the risk of dislocation, recently with the support of robotic surgery the margin of error in implant placement has decreased; however, the conventional technique even without fluoroscopic support continues to have satisfactory results within the safety zone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive case series of patients treated with THA at Hospital General Xoco between 2022 and 2024. Degrees of anteversion and inclination were measured with Widmer's method on postoperative radiographs. RESULTS: the radiographs of 113 patients were studied, 80 female and 33 male, with a mean age of 63.2 ± 13.01 years (95% CI: 60.6-65.4), a mean inclination of 42.2° ± 8.1° (95% CI: 40.7-43.2) and anteversion of 14.3° ± 8.5° (95% CI: 12.5-15.4); 76% of the population was within Lewinnek safe zone; by etiology: osteoarthrosis 74%, sequelae of dysplasia 68% and intracapsular fracture 82%; difference between the values of the affected side: left 65%, right 83%, of 3.9° and 4.7°/6.4o and 9° in relation to the overall values of the population. CONCLUSION: in our population undergoing THA, without the use of robotic technique or support of imaging studies, anteversion and inclination figures were recorded within the Lewinnek safety parameters with a conventional method.

INTRODUCCIÓN: la artroplastía total de cadera (ATC) es una de las cirugías más realizadas a nivel mundial, con altos porcentajes de satisfacción. La orientación del componente acetabular tiene impacto directo en el riesgo de luxación; recientemente, con el apoyo de la cirugía robótica, el margen de error en la colocación de los implantes ha disminuido; sin embargo, la técnica convencional, incluso sin apoyo fluoroscópico, continúa teniendo resultados satisfactorios dentro de la zona de seguridad. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: serie de casos retrospectiva, transversal y descriptiva, de pacientes tratados con ATC en Hospital General Xoco entre 2022 y 2024. Se midieron los grados de anteversión e inclinación con el método de Widmer en las radiografías postoperatorias. RESULTADOS: se estudiaron las radiografías de 113 pacientes, 80 mujeres y 33 hombres, con edad media de 63.2 ± 13.01 años (IC95%: 60.6-65.4), se obtuvo una inclinación media de 42.2° ± 8.1° (IC95%: 40.7-43.2) y anteversión de 14.3° ± 8.5° (IC95% 12.5-15.4); 76% de la población se encontraba dentro de la zona segura de Lewinnek; por etiología: osteoartrosis 74%, secuelas de displasia 68% y fractura intracapsular 82%; diferencia entre los valores del lado afectado: izquierdo 65%, derecho 83%, de 3.9° y 4.7°/6.4° y 9° en relación con los valores globales de la población. CONCLUSIÓN: en nuestra población sometida a ATC, sin uso de técnica robótica o apoyo de estudios de imagen, se registraron cifras de anteversión e inclinación dentro de los parámetros de seguridad de Lewinnek con un método convencional.

Weeping womb (uretero-uterine fistula) after cesarean section managed with robotic surgery.

Since the last decade, iatrogenic injuries of ureter are increasingly common. We describe a case of 36-year-old young female, who underwent emergency cesarean section, presented to us after 3 weeks, with clear vaginal discharge. After evaluated with clinical examination and radiological investigations, she was found to have left uretero-uterine fistula and was successfully treated with robotic-assisted left uretero-uterine fistula repair by Lich-Gregoir technique.

Minimally Invasive Pancreas Surgery: Is There a Benefit?

Minimally invasive procedures minimize trauma to the human body while maintaining satisfactory therapeutic results. Minimally invasive pancreas surgery (MIPS) was introduced in 1994, but questions regarding its efficacy compared to an open approach were widespread. MIPS is associated with several perioperative advantages while maintaining oncological standards when performed by surgeons with a robust training regimen and frequent practice. Future research should focus on addressing learning curve discrepancies while identifying factors associated with shortening the time needed to attain technical proficiency.

Robotic surgery: bibliometric analysis, continental distribution, and co-words analysis from 2001 to 2023.

The project aimed to conduct an up-to-date and comprehensive bibliometric analysis of robotic surgery to provide a detailed and holistic understanding of the field. Three strategies were employed in the data analysis i.e. search terms were explored in (A) the title, abstract, and keywords and (B) only in the title of the documents. In 3rd part we analyzed the top 100 most cited papers. Vosviewer and R Studio were utilized for detailed bibliometric and network analyses. Strategy one identified 38,469 publications, and strategy two identified 6451 publications from 2001 to 2023. The top authors, universities, countries, sponsors, and sources based on the number of publications were identified for both strategies. The top 100 most cited papers were analyzed, providing the annual number of publications and various citation metrics. Top authors (by number of publications, total citations, h-index, g-index, and m-index), universities, and countries within these highly cited papers, along with their co-authorship networks and dynamics, were examined. Co-words analysis of the top 100 most cited papers revealed the primary focus of these documents across 25 categories. This comprehensive bibliometric analysis of robotic surgery highlighted significant contributions and collaborations in the field, emphasizing the importance of global and collaborative efforts in advancing robotic surgery research.